Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This work presents and discusses the results of an experimental investigation of heat transfer between the different plates of
impinged jets. An unconfined jet of water is impinged on the mild steel copper and aluminium plate and the position of the plate
to nozzle distance of 20mm for each plate.The experiment is focused on the verification of the jet effect on the distribution of
local heat transfer coefficient on the impinged target surface. The effect of flow in jet to test plate distance are also examined at
fixed intersect spacing. As the result obtained the heat transfer rate experienced by a aluminium plate was more followed by mild
steel plate and copper plate, when direct jet of fluid is impinged on it. Also compare the nozzle to plate distance 10 mm from
each plate.
Keywords: Jet impingement, Jet to test plate, unconfined jet, Aluminum plate, Mild steel plate, Copper plate
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
I. INTRODUCTION
Jet impingement involves a jet flow of fluid from a nozzle of a given configuration to a target surface. It is a common method for
heating or cooling solid surfaces. Heat transfer for impinging jet is generally higher than that achieving with conventional
methods. Heat transfer rates in case of impinging jets are affected by various parameters like Reynolds number, nozzle plate
spacing, radial distance from stagnation point, pradntl number, and target plate inclination confinement of the jet, nozzle
geometry, and roughness of the target plate. Nikuradse[1] investigated of the effect of surface roughness on the fluid flow who
measured pressure drop and velocity profile for water flowing on pipes roughened by Sand grains Gardon and cobonoque[2]have
reported the heat transfer distribution between circular jet and flat plate for the nozzle plate spacings greater than two times the
diameter of jet, both for single jet and array of jets. They have used specially designed heat flux gauge for the measurement of
local heat transfer rates from a constant wall temperature plate. Livingood [3] presented a survey of literature on Impingement
heat transfer from turbulent air jets to flat plates, A comparison in tabular form was made to analyze the heat transfer coefficient
variation. Turbold and Obot [4] investigated the effect of heat transfer on cross flow multi air jet impingement to rough surface
composed of repeated ribs. Z. H. Lin, Y. J. Chou [5] experimentally investigated the heat transfer behaviors of a confined slot jet
impingement has been systematically performed.. As for the investigation of heat transfer behaviors on stagnation, local and
average Nusselt number, it is evident that the effect of jet separation distance is not significant; while the heat transfer
performance increases with increasing jet Reynolds number. . Hani A. El-Sheikh and Suresh V. Garimella [6] investigated the
enhancement of heat transfer from pin-fin heat sink using multiple air jets impingement. The use of multiple jets is expected to
provide greater options for trade-offs between air flow rate, pumping power and cooling rates, in addition to allowing greater
temperature uniformity in the heat sink. Abdlmonem et al.[7] examined and compared the effect of surface roughness on the
average heat transfer coefficient for a smooth surface. Surface roughness disrupts the boundary layer and promotes turbulence of
the wall jet which results in an increase in heat transfer. For the present experiments the average Nusselt number increased by up
to 6% over the whole surface area. Mangesh Chaudhary et al. [8] investigated the heat transfer characteristics of synthetic jet
impingement cooling. In this experimental work, average heat transfer coefficient as a function of various geometric parameters
has been measured and presented in this work. An experimental setup has been carefully designed, fabricated and validated
towards this end. It is noticed that the average heat transfer coefficient is affected by the orifice diameter, and increases with a
decrease in the thickness of the orifice plate. In this study an experimental work was done analyzing for both rough and smooth
plate and compares the result each of them.
plate and finding the heat transfer characteristics in plate. When jet is impinged on a plate because the aim of the study is to
determine the heat transfer characteristics on water jet impinged on a flat plate. The jet is impinged on a plate by using a water
pump. A simple water pump is used in the experiment. It takes the water from water tank .The round nozzle is attached to the
pump. Then the unconfined flow strikes test plate at different heights.
The heating unit assembled to test plate is mainly a coil type heater of 10 mm daimeter. The power input to the heater is
controlled by Variac to obtain a steady state condition along the test piece. The steady state temperature of the flat plate was
measured by J-type thermocouples inserted into different positions in test plate.. This J-type thermocouple is made of
homogeneous material which provides accuracy in measurement. Therefore, three readings are obtained from aluminum plate,
mild steel plate and copper plate at a distance from nozzle10 mm. Similarly ,readings can be taken from this three plates at
distance of 20 mm. The reading of thermocouple is recorded by using digital temperature controller and the average of these
readings is taken to steady state temperature of the test surface.
Fig. 2: Variation of Nusselt number w.r.t Reynold number for mild steel plate at nozzle distance 10mm and 20 mm
Fig. 3: Variation of Nusselt number w.r.t Reynold number for copper plate at nozzle distance 10 mm and 20 mm
Fig. 4: Variation of Nusselt number w.r.t Reynold number for aluminium plate at nozzle distance 10mm and 20 mm
Fig.5 & 6 shows the combined result of mild steel ,copper and aluminium plate at a distance of plate to nozzle is 10 and 20
mm.As graph shows aluminum has more heat transfer coefficient followed by mild steel and copper at a distance of 10 mm.
Fig. 5: Variation of Nusselt number w.r.t Reynold number for different plates at nozzle distance 10mm
Fig. 6: Variation of Nusselt number w.r.t Reynold number for different plates at nozzle distance 20mm
IV. CONCLUSION
The Experimental analysis was made to gain a fundamental understanding and comparing the heat transfer rate for a rough and
smooth plate, when an unconfined jet of water is impinged on it. The following conclusions were made throughout the
experimentation:
1) It was observed that the rate of heat transfer was more for a aluminium plate followed by mild steel and copper plate.
2) The effect of distance of the plate and nozzle play an important role w.r.t. heat transfer.
3) As the plate is closely placed near to the nozzle, better is the heat transfer rate. An optimum selection of position of the
plate w.r.t nozzle is to make depending upon the industrial application.
REFERENCES
[1] Nikuradse J, (1933), “Laws of flow in rough pipes” VDI Forschungsheft, No.361, Series B, Vol.4, NACA TM 1292.
[2] Robert Gardon & J. Cahit Akfirat, (1965), “The role of turbulence in determining the heat-transfer characteristics of impinging jets,” International Journal
of Heat and Mass Transfer Vol. 8, pp. 1261-1272.
[3] J.B. Livingood, P. Hrycak, (1973), “Impingement heat transfer from turbulent air jets to flat plates – a literature survey,” NASA TM X-2778.
[4] Trabold T.A. and Obot N.T, (1987), “Impingement heat transfer with in arrays of circular jets: Part II-Effect of cross flow in the presence of roughness
elements” Journal of Turbo machinery, Vol.109, pp.594-601.
[5] Z. H. Lin, Y. J. Chou, Y. H. Hung, (1997), “Heat transfer behaviors of a confined slot jet impingement International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer”,
Vol. 40, pp. 1095-1107.
[6] Hani A. El-Sheikh and Suresh V. Garimella, (2000), “Heat Transfer from Pin-Fin Heat Sinks under multiple impinging Jets”, IEEE transactions on
advanced packaging, Vol. 23, pp.113-119.
[7] Abdlmonem H. Beitelmal and Michel A.Saad, (2000), “Effects of surface roughness on the average heat transfer of an impinging air jet,” Int. Comm. Heat
Mass Transfer, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
[8] Mangesh Chaudhari, Bhalchandra Puranik and Amit Agrawal, (2010), “Heat transfer characteristics of synthetic jet impingement cooling, International
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 53, pp.1057–1069.
[10] Harry W. Townes, Rolf H. Sarersky, (1966), “Experiments on the flow over a rough surface,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 9,
pp.729-738.
[11] M. Hudina, (1979), “Evaluation of heat transfer performances of rough Surfaces from experimental investigation in annular Channels,” Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer, Vol. 22 pp.1381-1392.
[12] X. Liu, J. H. Lienhard V, J. S. Lombara1 Connective, (1991), “Heat Transfer by Impingement of Circular Liquid jets,” Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 113,
pp.571-582.
[13] Gau, C.C. Lee, (1992), “Impingement cooling flow structure and heat Transfer along rib-roughened walls,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol.35, pp.3009–
3020.
[14] K. Jambunathan, E. Lai, M. A. Moss and B. L. Button, (1992), “A review of heat transfer data for single circular jet impingement,” Int. J. Heat and Fluid
Flow, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp-106-115.
[15] Luis A. Brignoni and Suresh V. Garimella, (1999), “Experimental Optimization of Confined Air Jet Impingement on a Pin Fin Heat Sink,” IEEE
transactions on components and packaging technology, Vol. 22, pp 399-404.
[16] Mansoo, Han Seoung Yoo, Geunyoung Yang, Joon Sik Lee and Dong Kee Sohn, (2000), “Measurements of impinging jet flow and heat transfer on a semi-
circular concave surface,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 43,pp.1811-1822.
[17] A.B. Turner, S.E. Hubbe-Walker, F.J. Bayley, (2000), “Fluid Flow and heat transfer over straight and curved rough surfaces,” International Journal of Heat
and Mass Transfer, Vol.43,pp. 251-262.
[18] Frank P. Incropera and David P. Dewitt, (2002), “Heat and mass transfer”, 5th ed., John Willy and sons, Newyork.
[19] Yunus A. Cengel, (2004), “Heat Tranfer”, Tata McGrraw-hill, Publication Company.
[20] Nag P.K., (2004), “Heat and mass Transfer”, McGraw-Hill, Newyork.
[21] Holman JP, (2002), “Experimental Methods for engineers”, Tata McGraw Hill Publication Company.