Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Weeks 1 and 2
Tim Besley
January 2021
That you follow the lectures and “attend” all of the classes
I will aim to make the two speak to each other
But that means that you need to prepare for the classes
you will get much less out of them if you do not.
Week 3/4: Lectures 5-7: Who gets what from the market system?
The market system does not guarantee equity. We will discuss di¤erent ways of thinking about
inequality and its measurement. Some simple ethical theories will also be discussed as will some
government interventions which change distribution.
Week 6: Lectures 11 & 12: How does the market work when people
do not know their own best interests?
Our study of behavioural economics has already allowed us to explore frailty in human decision
making. Here, we will discuss how the case for the market system change when individuals lack
the capacity to understand what is good for them. We will also discuss principles of government
intervention in this world.
Something boring
M people labelled by i
N goods labelled by j
Each person has “talents” which can be deployed to generate income
see below
People have preferences
U i xi , Li
where xi = x1i , ...xNi is consumption and Li is labour supply.
Conventional assumption: people like goods and dislike work.
Throughout the course, we will focus on the case of just two goods
and also two people
will su¢ ce to illustrate the main ideas.
where we are using the convention that aij = 0 when individual i has
not talent for producing good j.
Demand for a good is just the sum of the demands by all individuals:
M
Xj (p1 , ..., pN , a) = ∑ f i (p1 , ..., pN , aij )
i =1
Suppose that there are more people who are able to produce a
particular good
then excess demand will fall for any given price
we would then expect the market clearing price to fall
but will also a¤ect markets for complements and substitutes for that
good
If a good becomes more popular
then excess demand for that good increases
we would expect the market clearing price to rise
will a¤ect other markets which are complements or substitutes.
Price normalization
A general equilibrium can be expressed entirely in terms of a numeraire
good since only relative prices matter
But the choice of numeraire is arbitrary: we can set pk = 1 for any k.
Walras Law
If all but one market is in equilibrium, then so is the last one
To see this, set p1 = 1 and then note that
N N
X1 + ∑ pj Xj = Z1 + ∑ pj Zj
j =2 j =2
so if ∑N N
j =2 pj Xj = ∑j =2 pj Zj , then X1 = Z1 .
Four steps
1 Make life easy by using the fact that we can set p1 = 1
2 Solve for demand functions
3 Set supply equal to demand
4 Solve for prices (using Walras law)
Set p1 = 1
Then use the budget constraint p1 x1A + p2 x2A p1 Z1 to derive
x1A = Z1 x2A p2
x1B
x2B = Z2
p2
q
x1B
x1B = arg max 2 x1B + Z2
p2
1 1
First Order Condition : (x1B ) 2 =0
p2
x1B = ( p2 ) 2
! x2B = Z2 p2
or
4
Z1 + (p2 )2 = Z1
p2
or
1
p2 = 4 3 > 1 = p1 .
(Note that it would not have mattered had we instead set supply for
good 2 equal to supply of good 2
2
1
Z2 p2 + 4 = Z2 )
p2
Consistency
is there a set of prices at which supply and demand are balanced in all
markets?
E¢ ciency
In what sense, if at all, is the market system e¢ cient?
Distribution
Who gets what from the market system?
Over the next few weeks, we will study each of these.
Key features:
High enough price discourages demand and encourages supply
Low enough price encourages demand and discourages supply
No jumps in supply and demand
importance of “convexity assumptions” to make demand and supply
continuous
averaging over people also helps too
Cannot be drawn but the basic idea is the same as a single market
except that all prices are moving to achieve equilibrium across all
markets
However, continuity and what happens in a market as prices become
high and low still play a key role
A set of prices that set all excess demand functions equal to zero
simultaneously is known as a “…xed point”.
A market system in this very stylized world is a set of market-clearing
prices
A few years ago, the World Bank started trying to track this through
their "Doing Business
Project"
Two parts:
where you start
depends on the amount of food and books that each individual owns.
as fσA1 , σA2 , σB 1 , σB 2 g vary then we move around inside the box.
where you end up
consumption after trade.
endowments
Now ask what level of utility does each consumer obtain in a general
equilibrium?
this is a crucial idea when it comes to thinking about e¢ ciency and
equity.
We allow for the possibility of redistribution between the two
individuals.
imagine a redistribution of property rights to output
Relative prices will change to re‡ect the scarcity of the goods to
achieve a general equilibrium outcome
and each will be associated with a particular level of utility for each
individual.
Is this surprising?
Interest goes back to Smith’s famous quote
the only thing “regulating” interactions between economic actors is the
price vector at which they can trade.
there is nobody directly coordinating economic activity and people are
acting independently and sel…shly
So perhaps it is remarkable that this does not yield chaos?
So why is it true?
The proof is rather trivial
We know that everyone is maximizing given the prices that they face.
Then
n ifothere is a bundle of consumption and labour supply
0 0
xi , Li that a consumer i prefers, it must be “una¤ordable”
0
Equally if there is xi0 , Li such that
0
U xi0 , Li > U f i p , aij , g i p , aij
Amartya Sen —
’A society can be Pareto optimal and still perfectly disgusting.’
Income is given by
mi = ∑ pj σij Zj .
j
mA = Z1
and
mB = p2 Z2 = 41/3 Z2
so even if Z1 = Z2 , the income of B will be higher than A.
mi = pj aij g i (p, a) .
and
q
B x1B
U = 2 x1B + Z2
p2
= Z2 + 41/3
U i f i (p , a) , g i (p , a)