Professional Documents
Culture Documents
!
!
!
! I!
!
!
4%
6% 2%
26%
9%
! II!
The Relationship Between Different Indicators Of Reading
Fluency And Fourth Grade Students’ Reading
Comprehension
Summary
This study aimed to explore the relationship between four different indicators of
reading fluency (rapid naming, sight word fluency, fluency of connected texts, and
The participants were 156 fourth graders drawn from two elementary schools in
Pingtung City. The students took the Chinese Character Recognition Test and The
completed The Rapid Naming Test, The Sight Words Fluency Test, Fluency Test of
Connected Texts, and Fluency Test of Disconnected Texts individually. The reading
rates were calculated for the four fluency tests. A series of multiple regression
sight words fluency explained 12% of the variance, connected texts reading speed
recognition were accounted for, only connected texts reading speed and
! III!
with 6% and 2% of total variance were explained.
2. When entered into the equation altogether, the four indices of fluency predicted
variance of Chinese character recognition were accounted for, the four indices still
explained. Only connected reading speed and rapid naming explained reading
comprehension significantly.
3. After the other three indices of fluency were accounted for, only connected
texts reading speed and disconnected texts reading speed had unique contribution
and the other three indices of fluency were accounted for, only connected texts
comprehension. !
! IV!
! V!
! VI!
!
! VII!
!
!!!
!
Trelease
! 1!
!
Gunning, 2003;
Reading First
Torgesen, 2002
theory
White 1995
Shaywitz 2003
! 2!
Kuhn & Stahl, 2000 White, 1995
Chard,
Vaughn, & Tyler, 2002; Kuhn & Stahl, 2003; National Reading Panel, 2000
Chall 1966
reconstruction
learning to read
reading to learn
Chall fourth-grade-slump
! 3!
National Assessment of
2007
Fuchs,
van
Georgiou,
Parrila Liao
! 4!
Catts 2001 sight-word reading
McCormick, 1995
Kim Petscher, 2010; Klauda Guthrie, 2008; Van den Broek, Espin,
Deno, 2003
! 5!
!
!
!
! 6!
!
!
reading fluency
! 7!
reading comprehension
A3
! 8!
Chinese character recognition !
increment
! 9!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! 10!
!
Stahl, 2004
2003
rate Perfetti
2002 sight
words
accuracy
! 11!
speed Mckenna Stahl 2003
Progress NAEP
decoding
2003
music
accuracy
! 12!
Klauda
Guthrie 2008
comprehension monitoring
! 13!
matching recoding
lexical access
parsing
mental dictionaries
integration summarization
elaboration
macro
goal-setting strategy
! 14!
selection goal checking remediation
Gagne
Kuhn
Stahl 2000 National Reading Panel, 2000; Rasinski & Hoffman, 2003
! 15!
Samuels, 1994
Adams, 1990;
Stanovich, 1984
1994
orientation of
sensory receptors
Samuels 1994
alertness
selectivity
limit capacity
! 16!
Samuels, 1994
Samuels
1979
Mayer, 2008,
p. 63
! 17!
LaBerge Samuels 1974
1980
! 18!
Chall Ehri
Carnine, et al., 2004; Indrisano & Chall, 1995; Kuhn & Stahl, 2003
prereading stage
spoken lauguage
pretend reading
! 19!
conventional literacy stage / beginning
comfort
! 20!
reading for learning the new information
! 21!
Chall
Pressley,
2006
Schreiber, 1991
Ehri
! 22!
Ehri, 2005 Ehri
Ehri 2005
Ehri
Beech, 2005; Ehri, 2005; Kuhn & Stahl, 2003 Chall 1983
Chall
! 23!
full alphabetic phases
Chall
Chall
Ehri 2005
Perfetti 1992
415
Chall
Ehri
! 24!
Mckenna Stahl 2003
Geschwind
! 25!
Blachman 1994 Torgesen Wagner Rashotte 1994
Wolf
double-deficit hypothesis
Wolf 1999
! 26!
characters
rapid
Geschwind Geschwind
Wolf
! 27!
Korhonen 1995
9 18
Swanson 1989
2008 Wolf
1998
! 28!
200mm×130mm
Wolf 1999
1998
Wolf 1986
! 29!
Katzir
1999
! 30!
sight word
McCormick, 1995
Stoodt 1989
good reader
poor reader
occipitotmeporal OT
OT Carr, Brown,
! 31!
1990 Slosson Oral Reading Test SORT
SORT
2007a
OT
!!!!
! 32!
Van den Broek, Espin, Deno 2003
! 33!
WPM WCPM
Ashcraft, 2002
! 34!
Jenkins, Fuchs, Van Den Broek, Espin, Deno 2003
Bie- miller, 1977–1978; Doehring, 1976; Perfetti, Finger, & Hoga- boam, 1978;
Stanovich, 1980
! 35!
Posner and Snyder , 1975
! 36!
Klauda Guthrie 2008
! 37!
nonsense words
24.5%
! 38!
! !
!
!!!!
!
!
1,1 !
1,2 !
1,3 !
1,4 !
1,5
1,6
1,7
1,8
! 39!
!
2,1
2,2
3,1
3,2
3,3
3,4
3,5
3,6
3,7
! 40!
3,8
!
!!!!
85 71 156 !
!!!!
!!!!
(A3)
A3
! 41!
!
!!! 2008
30 200
.36~.76
.48~.67
!!!!
! 42!
/ !
14
A4
! 43!
14
A4
14 A4
79
1200 3,1
!!!!!
3,1 !
! ! ! ! !
! 44!
!
!!!!
!!!!
!!!! 1
2 !
!!!! !
!!!
30 !
! 45!
!!!!! !
40 !
!!!!
!!!!
! 46!
!
!!!! !
! ;!
!!!! !
! ;!
!!! !
! 47!
!
!!
! 48!
!
! 49!
! 50!
! !
!!!!
! !
!!!! 4,1
23.16 7.59
2008
18.65
4,1! !
! ! ! ! !
! 51!
!
!!!!
!!!! 4,2
!!!!
p<.01
.41 .70
.21 .49
r=.49 r=.48
r=.40 r=.35
4,2 n=156 !
! 1! 2! 3! 4! 5! 6!
1. ! 1! ! ! ! ! !
2. ! 0.488**! 1! ! ! ! !
3. ! ,0.208**! ,0.413**! 1! ! ! !
**p<.01!
! 52!
!
!!!! 4,3
F p<.01 24%
4%
12% 23%
16% !
4,3! !
! Beta! t! R2 ! F !
**p<.01! ! ***p<.001!
VIF 10
6% 2%
! 53!
4,4! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
! ! ,.01! ,.10!
***p<.001!
4,5! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
! .09! 1.00! ! ! !
***p<.001!
4,6! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
! .29! 3.51**! ! ! !
**p<.01! ! ***p<.001!
! 54!
4,7! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
! .18! 2.12*! ! ! !
*p<.05! ! ***p<.001!
!!!! 4,8
VIF 10
p<.001
26%
4,8! !!!!!!!!!!
! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
*p<.05! ! ***p<.001!
! 55!
!!!! 4,9
VIF
10
24%
F p<.01
9%
!!!
4,9! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
! !
!!!! 4,10
! 56!
VIF 10
1 24%
F p<.05 R2
.03 !
4,10! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
!!!! 4,11
VIF 10
26%
! 57!
.01 !!!!
4,11! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
*p<.05! ! ***p<.001!
!!!!!!!!!
!!!! 4,12
VIF
10
18%
p<.001 9%
! 58!
4,12! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
!!!! 4,13
VIF 10
24%
p<.01 3%
! 59!
4,13! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
!!!! 4,14
VIF 10
31%
F p<.05
2% !
! 60!
4,14! !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
!!!! 4,15
VIF 10
32%
.00 !
! 61!
4,15 !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
!!!! 4,16
VIF 10
27%
F p<.01
5% !
! 62!
4,16 !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
!! 4,17
VIF 10
31%
.01 !
! 63!
4,17 !
! ! Beta! t! R2 ! R2 ! F ! VIF!
!!!! 4,1
! 4,1! !
!!!!
! 64!
!!!! !
!!!!
!!!!!
! 65!
!
!!!!
!!!!
Chall 1996
White 1995
!!!!
9%
9%
! 66!
26%
2005
!!!! 2008
2011
2003
2013
2011
! 67!
Van!den!Broek,!Espin,!
!!!!!
! 68!
! !
!!!!
4%
6% 2%
26%
9%
!
! 69!
!
!!!!
!!!!
! !
! 70!
!
!! !
!!!!
!!!!
9%
! 71!
!
! 72!
!
! 73!
! 74!
! 75!
! 76!
! 77!
! 78!
! 79!
! 80!
! 81!
! 82!
! !
! 83!
! !
!!!! 23!
47!
71!
94!
119!
143!
168!
192!
217!
240!
265!
283!
!
!
!
!
=__________ =__________
!
=__________
! 84!
! !
25!
! !
50!
!
75!
!
100!
!
125!
!
150!
!
175!
!
200!
!
225!
!
250!
!
275!
!
283!
! 85!