Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To fully complete the proof, you should also refer to the case of
degenerate eigenfunction and use the previous knowledge that the
eigenfunctions of any Hermitian operator is a complete set.
You should also show specifically that it doesn't work in the case
̂, 𝑩
[𝑨 ̂] ≠ 𝟎
o Given [𝑨 ̂ ] ≠ 𝟎, assume 𝜓 is an e.f of both 𝐴̂, 𝐵̂
̂, 𝑩
o Therefore: 𝐵̂𝐴̂𝜓 = 𝑎𝐵̂𝜓 = 𝑎𝑏𝜓
o And: 𝐴̂𝐵̂𝜓 = 𝑏𝐴̂𝜓 = 𝑏𝑎𝜓 = 𝑎𝑏𝜓 = 𝐵̂𝐴̂𝜓
o If this is true for any 𝜓 then 𝐴𝐵 = 𝐵𝐴
o Which is in contradiction with [𝑨 ̂, 𝑩
̂] ≠ 𝟎
o so the assumption that 𝜓 is an e.f of both 𝐴̂, 𝐵̂ is wrong.
Which means:
𝛼 ∫ 𝜓 ∗ 𝜙𝑑𝑥
=−
𝛽 ∫ 𝜓 ∗ 𝜓𝑑𝑥
1. Add an explicit example ( 𝑒 𝑖𝑘𝑥 ) and maybe vectors
̂ ):
2. The Hamiltonian (ℋ
The operator representing the total energy
ℋ̂ = 𝑇̂ + 𝑉̂ (𝑥)
A system is specified by its potential and its boundary conditions.
E.g. a Quantum harmonic oscillator: 𝓗 ̂=𝑻 ̂ +𝒌𝒙 ̂𝟐
𝟐
ℏ2 𝑑2 𝑘
− 2
𝜓0 (𝑥) + 𝑥 2 𝜓0 (𝑥) = 𝐸0 𝜓0 (𝑥)
2𝑚 𝑑𝑥 2
2
𝜓0 (𝑥) = 𝑒 −𝛼𝑥
ℏ2 𝑘
− [−2𝛼𝜓0 (𝑥) + 4𝛼 2 𝑥 2 𝜓0 (𝑥)] + 𝑥 2 𝜓0 (𝑥) = 𝐸0 𝜓0 (𝑥)
2𝑚 2
ℏ2 ℏ2 𝑘
( 2𝛼) 𝜓0 (𝑥) + (− 4𝛼 2 + ) 𝑥 2 𝜓0 (𝑥) = 𝐸0 𝜓0 (𝑥)
2𝑚 2𝑚 2
ℏ2 𝑘
− 4𝛼 2 + = 0
2𝑚 2
√𝑘𝑚
𝛼=
2ℏ
ℏ2 ℏ2 √𝑘𝑚 ℏ 𝑘 ℏ𝜔
𝐸0 = 2𝛼 = 2 = √ =
2𝑚 2𝑚 2ℏ 2 𝑚 2
ℏ2 𝑘
− 4𝛼 2 + = 0
2𝑚 2
√𝑘𝑚
𝛼=
2ℏ
ℏ2 ℏ2 √𝑘𝑚 3 𝑘 3
𝐸1 = 6𝛼 = 6 = ℏ√ = ℏ𝜔
2𝑚 2𝑚 2ℏ 2 𝑚 2
ℏ2 ℏ2 𝑘
𝐸2 = ( 10𝛼 − 4𝛼 2 𝛽 + 𝛽)
2𝑚 2𝑚 2
ℏ2 ℏ2 𝑘
= 10𝛼 + 𝛽 (− 4𝛼 2 + )
2𝑚 2𝑚 2
ℏ2 ℏ2 √𝑘𝑚 5 𝑘
= 10𝛼 = 10 = ℏ√
2𝑚 2𝑚 2ℏ 2 𝑚
𝟓
𝑬𝟐 = ℏ𝝎
𝟐
To find 𝛽:
ℏ2
− 2(1 + 𝛽𝛼) = −𝛽𝐸2
2𝑚
ℏ2 ℏ2
− = ( 𝛼 − 𝐸2 ) 𝛽
𝑚 𝑚
1 1 ℏ
𝛽= = =
𝐸2 𝑚
− 𝛼 5 √𝑘𝑚 − √𝑘𝑚 2√𝑘𝑚
ℏ2 2 ℏ 2ℏ
We can verify that 𝛽 has units of area, as required by the definition of 𝜓2 (𝑥).
ℏ2 ℏ2 𝑘 ℏ2 𝑘
− 6(1 + 𝛼𝛾)𝑥𝜓 + [− (−14𝛼 − 4𝛼𝛾) − 𝛾] 𝑥 3 𝜓 + (− (4𝛼 2 ) + ) 𝑥 5 𝜓0 (𝑥)
2𝑚 2𝑚 2 2𝑚 2
3
= 𝐸3 (𝑥 − 𝛾𝑥)𝜓0 (𝑥)
Again:
ℏ2 𝑘
− (4𝛼 2 ) + = 0
2𝑚 2
√𝑘𝑚
𝛼=
2ℏ
ℏ2 ℏ2 𝑘
𝐸3 = 14𝛼 + ( 4𝛼 − ) 𝛾
2𝑚 2𝑚 2
ℏ2 ℏ2 √𝑘𝑚 7 𝑘
= 14𝛼 = 14 = ℏ√
2𝑚 2𝑚 2ℏ 2 𝑚
𝟕
𝑬𝟑 = ℏ𝝎
𝟐
And to find 𝛾:
ℏ2
−6(1 + 𝛼𝛾) = −𝛾𝐸3
2𝑚
ℏ2 ℏ2
− 6=( 6𝛼 − 𝐸3 ) 𝛾
2𝑚 2𝑚
1 1 3ℏ
𝛾= = =
𝑚𝐸3 𝑚 7 √ 𝑘 √𝑘𝑚 2√𝑘𝑚
−𝛼 ℏ −
3ℏ2 3ℏ2 2 𝑚 2ℏ
And again we can verify that 𝛾 has units of area, as required by the definition of
𝜓3 (𝑥).
iv. The overlap between any two normalized states 𝜙𝑛 and 𝜓 is their inner product
𝐶𝑛 = ∫ 𝜙𝑛 (𝑥, 𝑡)∗ 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑡)𝑑𝑥 and the probability to measure 𝜙𝑛 (𝑥, 𝑡) given the case
we are at the state 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑡) is |𝑐𝑛 |2
a) If 𝝍(𝒙, 𝒕) = ∑𝒏 𝒄𝒏 𝝓𝒏 (𝒙, 𝒕) is a non-normalized function, where 𝝓𝒏 (𝒙, 𝒕) are a
set of orthogonal eigenfunctions. Prove that the Normalization factor
𝟏
𝑵 = √∑ 𝟐
𝒏|𝒄𝒏 |
𝑛 𝑚 𝑛 𝑚
2
=𝑁 ∑ 𝑐𝑛∗ 𝑐𝑛 2
= 𝑁 ∑|𝑐𝑛 |2 =1
𝑛 𝑛
So:
𝟏
𝑵=√
∑𝒏|𝒄𝒏 |𝟐
b) For a Hermitian operator 𝑨 ̂ , with normalized eigenfunctions 𝝋𝒏 and
eigenvalues 𝒂𝒏 ,
prove:
〈𝐴̂〉 = ∫ 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑡)∗ 𝐴̂𝜓(𝑥, 𝑡)𝑑𝑥 = ∑|𝑐𝑛 |2 𝑎𝑛
𝑛
𝐴̂ is Hermitian so its eigenfunctions, 𝜑𝑛 , (such that 𝐴𝜑𝑛 = 𝑎𝑛 𝜑𝑛 ) can span
the entire space. Therefore we can write:
𝜓(𝑥, 𝑡) = ∑ 𝑐𝑛 𝜑𝑛 (𝑥, 𝑡)
𝑛
Substituting into the above relation. We choose 𝑐𝑛 such that 𝜓(𝑥) is a
normalized eigenfunction.
∗
𝑛 𝑚
using the linearity of 𝐴̂ and working out the conjugation: