Professional Documents
Culture Documents
So What!
In the social sciences, the research problem establishes the means by which you must answer
the "So What?" question. The "So What?" question refers to a research problem surviving the
relevancy test [the quality of a measurement procedure that provides repeatability and
accuracy]. Note that answering the "So What" question requires a commitment on your part to
not only show that you have researched the material, but that you have thought about its
significance.
To survive the "So What" question, problem statements should possess the following
attributes:
Clarity and precision [a well-written statement does not make sweeping generalizations
and irresponsible statements],
Identification of what would be studied, while avoiding the use of value-laden words and
terms,
Identification of an overarching question and key factors or variables,
Identification of key concepts and terms,
Articulation of the study's boundaries or parameters,
Some generalizability in regards to applicability and bringing results into general use,
Conveyance of the study's importance, benefits, and justification [regardless of the type
of research, it is important to address the “so what” question by demonstrating that the
research is not trivial],
Does not have unnecessary jargon; and,
Conveyance of more than the mere gathering of descriptive data providing only a
snapshot of the issue or phenomenon under investigation.
Castellanos, Susie. Critical Writing and Thinking. The Writing Center. Dean of the College.
Brown University; Ellis, Timothy J. and Yair Levy Nova Framework of Problem-Based Research:
A Guide for Novice Researchers on the Development of a Research-Worthy Problem. Informing
Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 11 (2008); Thesis and
Purpose Statements. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin,
Madison; Thesis Statements. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Tips and
Examples for Writing Thesis Statements. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University.
Structure and Writing Style
I. Types and Content
There are four general conceptualizations of a research problem in the social sciences:
1. Casuist Research Problem -- this type of problem relates to the determination of right
and wrong in questions of conduct or conscience by analyzing moral dilemmas through
the application of general rules and the careful distinction of special cases.
2. Difference Research Problem -- typically asks the question, “Is there a difference
between two or more groups or treatments?” This type of problem statement is used
when the researcher compares or contrasts two or more phenomena.
3. Descriptive Research Problem -- typically asks the question, "what is...?" with the
underlying purpose to describe a situation, state, or existence of a specific phenomenon.
4. Relational Research Problem -- suggests a relationship of some sort between two or
more variables to be investigated. The underlying purpose is to investigate
qualities/characteristics that are connected in some way.
A lead-in that helps ensure the reader will maintain interest over the study
A declaration of originality [e.g., mentioning a knowledge void, which would be supported
by the literature review]
An indication of the central focus of the study, and
An explanation of the study's significance or the benefits to be derived from an
investigating the problem.
Researchable
It seems a bit obvious, but you don't want to find yourself in the midst of investigating a
complex research project and realize that you don't have much to draw on for your research.
Choose research problems that can be supported by the resources available to you. Not sure?
Seek out help from a librarian!
NOTE: Do not confuse a research problem with a research topic. A topic is something to read
and obtain information about whereas a problem is something to solve or framed as a question
that must be answered.
This is an example of a research problem that fails the "so what?" test because it does not
reveal the relevance of why you are investigating the problem of having no hospital in the
community [e.g., there's a hospital in the community ten miles away] and because the research
problem does not elucidate the significance of why one should study the fact that no hospital
exists in the community [e.g., that hospital in the community ten miles away has no emergency
room].
Types of Relationships
A relationship refers to the correspondence between two variables. When we talk about types
of relationships, we can mean that in at least two ways: the nature of the relationship or
the pattern of it.
While all relationships tell about the correspondence between two variables, there is a special
type of relationship that holds that the two variables are not only in correspondence, but that
one causes the other. This is the key distinction between a simple correlational relationship and
a causal relationship. A correlational relationship simply says that two things perform in a
synchronized manner. For instance, there has often been talk of a relationship between ability in
math and proficiency in music. In general people who are good in one may have a greater
tendency to be good in the other; those who are poor in one may also tend to be poor in the
other. If this relationship is true, then we can say that the two variables are correlated. But
knowing that two variables are correlated does not tell us whether one causes the other. We
know, for instance, that there is a correlation between the number of roads built in Europe and
the number of children born in the United States. Does that mean that if we want fewer children
in the U.S., we should stop building so many roads in Europe? Or, does it mean that if we don’t
have enough roads in Europe, we should encourage U.S. citizens to have more babies? Of
course not. (At least, I hope not). While there is a relationship between the number of roads built
and the number of babies, we don’t believe that the relationship is a causal one. This leads to
consideration of what is often termed the third variable problem. In this example, it may be that
there is a third variable that is causing both the building of roads and the birthrate, that is
causing the correlation we observe. For instance, perhaps the general world economy is
responsible for both. When the economy is good more roads are built in Europe and more
children are born in the U.S. The key lesson here is that you have to be careful when you
interpret correlations.
If you observe a correlation between the number of hours students use the computer to study
and their grade point averages (with high computer users getting higher grades),
you cannot assume that the relationship is causal: that computer use improves grades. In this
case, the third variable might be socioeconomic status – richer students who have greater
resources at their disposal tend to both use computers and do better in their grades. It’s the
resources that drives both use and grades, not computer use that causes the change in the
grade point average.
Patterns of Relationships
We have several terms to describe the major different types of patterns one might find in a
relationship. First, there is the case of no relationship at all. If you know the values on one
variable, you don’t know anything about the values on the other. For instance, I suspect that
there is no relationship between the length of the lifeline on your hand and your grade point
average. If I know your GPA, I don’t have any idea how long your lifeline is.
Then, we have the positive relationship. In a positive relationship, high values on one variable
are associated with high values on the other and low values on one are associated with low
values on the other. In this example, we assume an idealized positive relationship between
years of education and the salary one might expect to be making.
On the other hand a negative relationship implies that high values on one variable are
associated with low values on the other. This is also sometimes termed an inverse relationship.
Here, we show an idealized negative relationship between a measure of self esteem and a
measure of paranoia in psychiatric patients.
These are the simplest types of relationships we might typically estimate in research. But the
pattern of a relationship can be more complex than this. For instance, the figure on the left
shows a relationship that changes over the range of both variables, a curvilinear relationship. In
this example, the horizontal axis represents dosage of a drug for an illness and the vertical axis
represents a severity of illness measure. As dosage rises, severity of illness goes down. But at
some point, the patient begins to experience negative side effects associated with too high a
dosage, and the severity of illness begins to increase again.
Before beginning your paper, you need to decide how you plan to design the study .
The research design refers to the overall strategy that you choose to integrate the different
components of the study in a coherent and logical way, thereby, ensuring you will
effectively address the research problem; it constitutes the blueprint for the collection,
measurement, and analysis of data. Note that the research problem determines the type of
design you should use, not the other way around!
Types of Research Designs - Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper - Research
Guides at University of Southern California (usc.edu)