Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BYRD
CUYAHOGA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
vs.
Judge: EMILY HAGAN
STEPHANIE ANN GRISHAM
Pages Filed: 12
Electronically Filed 10/05/2021 13:55/ /CV21 953971 / Confirmation Nbr. 2368391 /CLJSZ
Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Defendant
Is this case related to any new cases now pending or previously filed? Yes No H
Case #: Judge:
I certify that to the best of my knowledge the within case is not related to any now pending or previously filed, expect as noted above.
Zukerman, Lear & Murray Co., LPA LarryW.ZukermamEsq.
Firm Name (Print or type) Attorney of Record (Print or Type)
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Address Supreme Court #
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Address Email Address
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Phone Signature
2
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
3 CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
4
MAX LEONARD MILLER CASE NO.:
5 12 Chippenham Court
Rocky River, Ohio 44116, JUDGE:
6
7 Plaintiff,
8 -vs-
VERIFIED
9
STEPHANIE ANN GRISHAM COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY,
10 502 S. Madison Street PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT
Plainville, KS 67663, INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF
11
Defendant. (JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HEREON)
12
13
Now comes Plaintiff MAX LEONARD MILLER, by and through undersigned counsel Larry
14
W. Zukerman, Esq,, S. Michael Lear, Esq., Brian A. Murray, Esq., and Adam Brown, Esq., an^for
15
_l
o
16 his Complaint for Temporary, Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive and Other Relief against
CO
co
17 co
co
Defendant STEPHANIE ANN GRISHAM, hereby states and avers as follows: CM
18 _Q
THE PARTIES O
19 4—•
E
1. Plaintiff MAX LEONARD MILLER (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff") is a resident
20 o
O
Cxi
23 >
O
Grisham") is, on information and belief, an out-of-state resident, currently residing in Plainville,
24 LO
LO
CO
25 Kansas.
C\l
o
C\l
26 PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND OUT-OF-STATE SERVICE LO
o
o
27
3. This Court can exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendant Grisham pursuant to
iZ
28 _>v
one or more subsections set forth in R.C. 2307.382, entitled Personal jurisdiction, including but
'c
o
■q
(D
ZU KERMAN 3912 PROSPECT AVE. 216.696.0900 ZUKERMAN LEAR & MURRAY CQ>A
CLEVELAND, OHIO 44115 216.696.8800
L lLv.-V.CC 1
not limited to, R.C. 2307.382(A)(6), as the causes of action set forth herein arose from Defendant
Grisham "[c]ausing tortious injury in this state to any person [Plaintiff] by an act outside this state
committed with the purpose of injuring persons, when the person [Defendant Grisham] might
reasonably have expected that some person would be injured thereby in this state”.
4. Service of process may be made upon Defendant Grisham outside of this state
pursuant to one or more subsections set forth in Civ.R. 4.3, including, but not limited to, Civ.R.
4.3(A)(9), as Defendant Grisham caused "tortious injury in this state to any person [Plaintiff] by
an act outside this state committed with the purpose of injuring persons, when the person to be
served [Defendant Grisham] might reasonably have expected that some person would be injured
VENUE
5. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to one or more subsections set forth in
Civ.R. 3, including, but not limited to, Civ.R. 3(C)(7), as the within action constitutes an action
FACTS
6. Plaintiff was a former aide for the 45th President of the United States, Donald John
Trump.
7. Plaintiff is currently a candidate for the Republican nomination for a seat in the
United States House of Representatives for Ohio's 16th Congressional District, in the 2022
election.
Press Secretary, Communications Director and Chief of Staff and Press Secretary for the first lady
9. Defendant Grisham is the author of a book entitled "I'll Take Your Questions Now:
What I Saw at the Trump White House”, which was released on October 5, 2021.
10. Defendant Grisham is currently promoting her book by sitting for interviews that
11. As part of her book promotion, on October 5, 2021, Defendant Grisham authored
a written article that was published online by the Washington Post entitled "Opinion: Stephanie
Grisham: I told the Trumps my relationship with a White House staffer had turned abusive. They
12. The article is replete with libelous and defamatory false statements about Plaintiff.
fellow White House staffer”. It is widely publicly known that the person referred to in the article,
i.e., Defendant Grisham's previous "boyfriend” and "fellow White House staffer” is Plaintiff. In
fact, Defendant Grisham highlights this by stating in her article that "Trump has endorsed my ex's
14. Within the article, Defendant Grisham writes numerous false and defamatory
statements about Plaintiff, including, but not limited to, "the relationship turned abusive”; "the
end of our relationship had become violent”; "he got physical with me”; "I confided the same
story about the physical abuse”; and "this 'great guy' had anger issues and a violent streak”.
article was committed with the purpose of injuring Plaintiff, under circumstances whereby
Defendant Grisham might reasonably have expected that Plaintiff would be injured thereby in
COUNT ONE
Defamation Per Se (Libel)
16. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms, reiterates, and incorporates by reference each and every
allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 15 of this Complaint as if fully restated herein.
17. Defendant's written statements about the Plaintiff in the article in which she falsely
alleged that Plaintiff assaulted and/or abused the Defendant, at any time or in any way, were
false and constitute defamation per se, as the false statements accuse Plaintiff of a crimes of
moral turpitude (domestic violence/ domestic abuse), and caused special harm to the Plaintiff.
18. These false and defamatory statements made by Defendant about Plaintiff were
published to third parties, including, but not limited to, The Washington Post and its millions of
19. Defendant published, without privilege these false and defamatory statements about
Plaintiff to third parties, The Washington Post and its millions of readers, with actual malice
against Plaintiff, in retaliation for her failed relationship with Plaintiff, in retaliation against those
associated with the Trump Administration for her failed stint as White House Press Secretary, in
a malicious attempt to secure personal financial gain by selling more books, and/or for other
parties, knowing that the statements were false, with actual malice, and with the purpose of
21. Actual malice and damages are presumed in an action for defamation per se and
therefore the Plaintiff need not prove actual damages. See JP v. TH, 2020 Ohio 320 at 10 - Ohio:
Court of Appeals, 9th Appellate Dist. 2020. Nevertheless, Plaintiff submits that Defendant's
malicious and tortious conduct has caused him damages, to be further established, at trial.
COUNT TWO
Punitive Damages
22. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms, reiterates, and incorporates by reference each and every
allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 21 of this Complaint as if fully restated herein.
23. As noted above, actual malice and damages are presumed in an action for defamation
per se and therefore the Plaintiff need not prove actual damages. See JP v. TH, 2020 Ohio 320 at
24. In publishing these false and defamatory statements about Plaintiff, without privilege,
to third parties, including The Washington Post and its millions of readers, Defendant acted with
malice, as Defendant acted with a state of mind under which a person's conduct is characterized
by hatred, ill will or a spirit of revenge or Defendant acted with a conscious disregard for the
rights and safety of Plaintiff that had a great probability of causing substantial harm to Plaintiff.
26. Plaintiff prays for an award of punitive or exemplary damages against the Defendant
because the Defendant has acted with malice as set forth herein and/or as Defendant has acted
COUNT THREE
Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief
27. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms, reiterates, and incorporates by reference each and every
allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 26 of this Complaint as if fully restated herein.
28. As a result of Defendant's actions as set forth herein, Plaintiff has suffered, and
29. Plaintiff is likely to prevail on the merits of the within action and has made a strong
30. Plaintiff has established that without injunctive relief, Plaintiff will continue to suffer
immediate and irreparable harm, for which he has no adequate remedy at law, as without
injunctive relief, Defendant will continue to publish false and defamatory statements about
Plaintiff, without privilege, to third parties, as she has done previously, thus causing Plaintiff
31. Issuance of injunctive relief will not substantially harm Defendant herein and/or will
32. This action for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief has, accordingly, been
and Preliminary Injunction, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure and the
provisions of Chapter 2727 of the Ohio Revised Code and the common law of Ohio.
33. Plaintiff seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, and thus requests this
Honorable Court to issue an Order compelling, restraining, and/or enjoining Defendant from
statements to third parties that Plaintiff engaged in any assault, abuse, violence and/or any other
criminal act against her, including but not limited to, telling others that Plaintiff assaulted, hit,
34. Furthermore, Plaintiff seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, and thus
requests this Honorable Court to issue an Order compelling, restraining, and/or enjoining
Defendant from posting on the internet, including any and all social media websites, and/or
sending any electronic communications, including but not limited to text messages and/or
emails, any further and additional false and defamatory statements about the Plaintiff that could
be viewed by any other individual, including but not limited to any statements suggesting that
Plaintiff engaged in criminal conduct against her, specifically including but not limited to,
publishing to third parties, without privilege, that Plaintiff assaulted, hit, smacked, pushed,
5, 2021 at 4:00p.m. by Jake Tapper on CNN and, subsequently by Chris Cuomo, also on CNN,
wherein she intends to further defame and slander Plaintiff by making additional false allegations
of criminal conduct (such as assault and/or domestic abuse) against Plaintiff, to bolster the false
allegations of criminal conduct against Plaintiff set forth in her Washington Post article. The
Defendant's interviews with Tapper and Cuomo on CNN, will be broadcast to millions of viewers
worldwide.
any non-privileged third party including, but not limited to, making any statements
to said non-privileged third parties that Plaintiff engaged in any assault, abuse,
violence and/or any other criminal act against her, including but not limited to,
telling others that Plaintiff assaulted, hit, smacked, pushed, and/or otherwise
any non-privileged third party including, but not limited to, orally stating, writing,
and/or concerning Plaintiff on the internet, including any news media outlets'
websites, any “social media” internet sites including, but not limited to, twitter,
“application” or “app” including, but not limited to, posting any content on any
such internet site and/or application and/or app that Plaintiff engaged in any
assault, abuse, violence and/or any other criminal act against her, including but
not limited to, telling others that Plaintiff assaulted, hit, smacked, pushed, and/or
any non-privileged third party including, but not limited to, writing and/or
any information relating to Plaintiff that Plaintiff engaged in any assault, abuse,
violence and/or any other criminal act against her, including but not limited to,
telling others that Plaintiff assaulted, hit, smacked, pushed, and/or otherwise
Plaintiff further demands an award including costs of this action, attorneys fees, and/or
any and all other relief which this Honorable Court deems just and equitable.
B. OTHER CAUSES OF ACTION: With respect to Counts One, and/or Two, Plaintiff
statutory maximum;
o
<u
E
3) Interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment;
o
O
4) Costs of this action, including attorney's fees;
h
O)
co
5) And any and all other relief which this Honorable Court deems just and equitable.
CM
>
o
9
ADAM M. BROWN, Esq. (#0092209)
ZUKERMAN, LEAR & MURRAY CO., L.P.A.
3912 Prospect Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
(216) 696-0900 phone
(216) 696-8800 fax
lwz@zukerman-law.com
sml@zukerman-law.com
bam@zukerman-law.com
amb@zukerman-law.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
JURY DEMAND
Now comes the Plaintiff, by and through counsel, and respectfully requests a trial of the
within matter by a jury composed of the maximum number of jurors permitted by law.
ElectronicallyFiled10/05/2021 13:55/ /
10
VERIFICATION
I, MAX MILLER declare that I am the named Plaintiff herein, and that I have read the
Complaint and know the contents thereof, and that the same are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
Sworn to before me and subscribed in my presence of this Sth day of October 2021.
0/03/2021 13:55/ /
. ADAM BROWN
Attorney At Law
,= NOTARY PUBLIC
d1
f STATE OF OHIO
e
/ My Commission Has
yFil
/ No Expiration Date
ll
11