You are on page 1of 8

Operations Practice

Resilience in transport
and logistics
The transportation-and-logistics sector is especially susceptible
to economic shocks. Here’s how to prepare your operations for a
smoother ride.

by Sal Arora, Wigbert Böhm, Kevin Dolan, Rebecca Gould, and Scott McConnell

© Getty Images

February 2020
The transportation-and-logistics (T&L) But it hasn’t all been smooth sailing. Economic
sector has benefitted from many of the most downturns tend to hit the sector particularly hard.
important business trends of the past half century. Our analysis of the past five US recessions shows
Globalization, the evolution of sophisticated just-in- that T&L companies suffer more on average than
time supply chains, and the rise of e-commerce have the economy as a whole (Exhibit 1). And in recent
all helped the sector grow at a rate broadly similar to cycles, the problem may have worsened. Truck
Transportation
the overall and logistics activities are hit
economy. hard in downturns.
transportation, for example, experienced little

Change in gross output by recession period, from peak to trough,¹ %

Exhibit 1
Transportation Transportation Benchmarks
and logistics activities are hit hard in downturns.
1980 1982 1991 2001 2008–09 1980 1982 1991 2001 2008–09
Rail Motor vehicle manufacturing
7
–6 –5
–2 –8 –10
Average –8
–19
–24
–28
Average –25
Truck
3
–2 –4
–6
Average –5
–18

–70

Water Professional services

4 0

–1 –8
Average –3 –3 –4 –1
Average –9 –16 –15
–18
Hospitals

Average 4 2 2 –1 5 10

Total transportation² Real GDP


–1
–7 –8 –8 –10 Average –2 –2 –3 0 –1 –4
Average –7
1980 1982 1991 2001 2008–09 1980 1982 1991 2001 2008–09
1

²Includes rail, water, truck, air, pipeline, warehousing, support activities

2 Resilience in transport and logistics


Web 2019
Enabling a digital and analytics transformation in heavy-industry manufacturing
Exhibit 3 of 4

Resilient
Exhibit 2 T&L players outperformed competitors throughout the last
Resilient
economic T&L players outperformed competitors throughout the last economic cycle.
cycle.

TRS¹ performance, indexed to 100 Resilient Non-resilient S&P500

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50
Downturn Recovery Growth
0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

¹Total return to shareholders


Source: CPAnalytics; McKinsey analysis

contraction in the recessions of 1980, 1982 and recovery. By 2017, resilient companies had delivered
1991. In 2001, by contrast, the industry shrank by 6 a cumulative total return to shareholders (TRS)
percent, and the 2008 recession triggered an 18 that was more than 150 percent higher than their
percent contraction. non-resilient counterparts. Among the logistics
and transportation players in the study, the gap was
As in all industries, sector averages don’t tell even starker, at 267 percent (Exhibit 2).
the whole story. Some companies ride out
downturns much more successfully than others.
When McKinsey analyzed the performance of A playbook for resilience
around 1000 large, publicly traded companies What made the difference? Part of the formula is
through the 2007-2008 global recession, we fast decision making, enabled by a well-prepared
identified a subgroup of “resilient” organizations organization. Our analysis also identified a
that outperformed their peers by a significant playbook of specific interventions applied by
margin over the cycle. The performance of these resilient companies (Exhibit 3). In the lead-up to
companies dipped less overall during the recession the recession, these companies took steps to
and improved faster during the ensuing economic achieve extra financial flexibility. They reduced

Resilience in transport and logistics 3


Exhibit 3
A new resilience playbook
A new resilience isisemerging.
playbook emerging.

Band of Unlock
leaders balance sheet

Organization Sharp digital


simplification program

B U
O S
Resilience “nerve Through-cycle
center” Accelerated Resilience interventions
decisions interventions
R T

balance-sheet debt while competitors were of traditional performance-improvement


piling it on. And when the downturn hit, resilient methodologies oriented around head count and
companies moved faster and further than others, cost will require fresh thinking about boosting
selling off businesses and cutting costs through productivity.
improvements to operational effectiveness.
That’s especially true in the area of operating-
That focus on cost and value helped resilient cost reduction. In the decade since the 2008
companies maintain their margins—and, even recession, digital technologies have transformed
more important, their key customer relationships— the pressures and opportunities that logistics
through the crisis. It also put them in the best companies face, driving a significant rise in
possible position to take advantage of the customer expectations, for example. Used to
recovery. As the economy began to pick up, the speed, flexibility, and transparency offered
resilient organizations were ready to ramp up in by the best e-commerce operations, customers
response to growing demand, while also taking increasingly expect similar service levels across
the opportunity to acquire new assets from the full spectrum of transportation activities.
distressed competitors.
On the other side of the coin, companies now
Next time will be different have new levers to pull in addressing operational
Business cycles are inherently unpredictable. costs and efficiencies, thanks to the availability
Transport and logistics companies don’t yet know of the Internet of Things (IoT), digital workforce
if today’s political and economic uncertainties will tools, advanced analytics, and machine learning.
be enough to stall the economy, or how deep and Today’s leading T&L companies are adopting these
how long any resulting slowdown will be. approaches to achieve dramatic performance
improvements.
What is clear, however, is that responding
effectively to the next downturn will require a The new generation of digital tools can be applied
different approach. Getting past the limitations across four broad areas of companies’ operations:

4 Resilience in transport and logistics


their people, their processes, their supply bases, Using this data, the company built multiple models
and their networks (Exhibit 4). Let’s look at each to analyze the factors that had the biggest impact
in turn. on driver attrition. That work identified five specific
clusters of drivers who were much more likely to
Manage your people digitally leave, providing the basis for a number of targeted
Improved workforce management is a significant initiatives designed to address important pain
opportunity for T&L companies. The labor- points in the driver experience.
intensive nature of many activities, combined with
significant variability in labor demand and skills Moreover, models indicated that if the company
shortages in key roles, makes recruiting, managing, achieved its attrition-reduction target, overall
and retaining staff particularly challenging. EBITDA would rise by about 4 percent. More
broadly, our analysis suggests that an integrated
Leading players are now applying data and digital workforce-management transformation—
advanced analytic methods—such as machine applying a range of different tools and techniques—
learning and artificial intelligence—to a broad can unlock 10 to 20 percent of additional value for
range of workforce-management tasks: demand T&L companies.
forecasting, capacity planning, recruitment, daily
scheduling, and task allocation and performance Automate and streamline your processes
management. One road-transport company, New digital approaches can transform the
for example, used a data-driven approach to performance of core operations as well. The right
understand and address the most significant digital tools boost efficiency by revealing the root
factors that led to high rates of driver attrition. The causes for transportation-asset failures, thereby
company started with more than five million data reducing the need for high-cost overhauls—and
points extracted from employee sentiment surveys, by automating routine activities such as report
HR, payroll and finance systems, dispatching generation. They improve quality, eliminating
systems, and on-vehicle computers. the errors that can creep in when managers and
Web 2019
Growing your own agility coaches to adopt new ways of working
Exhibit 2 of 4

Exhibit 4
For T&L companies, digital can improve cost and performance in four
For T&L companies, digital can improve cost and performance in four broad areas.
broad areas.

Manage your people digitally Automate and streamline your


Advanced forecasting processes

Demand and supply simulations Always-on digital dashboard

Behavioral clustering and root-cause analysis Process automation


to reduce absenteeism and attrition Digital task allocation
Automated scheduling Advanced analytics (e.g. Monte Carlo
simulation) to optimize scheduling

Engage your supply base Reimagine your network


Automated analytics to understand Scenario simulation
demand and market dynamics
Complex route optimization
Automation of routine transactional activities
across the source-to-pay process

Resilience in transport and logistics 5


frontline personnel rely on email, spreadsheets, around an hour of planning work a day, while
or paper documents. And they transform increasing maintenance efficiency by more than 15
effectiveness, enabling decisions to be made percent and reducing service-level misses by more
faster, with more relevant, timely, and accurate than one-quarter.
data.
The opportunities offered by technology extend
At one large rail company for example, the beyond the optimization of individual processes.
reliability of its thousands of locomotives had Some leading transportation and logistics
fallen sharply for years. Managers thought that a companies are now using digital approaches to
more robust, time-based maintenance program link their operations from end-to-end, providing
and additional overhauls would be an effective significant improvements to visibility, performance
answer. and responsiveness.

But when the company systematically analyzed Engage your supply base
seven years of locomotive-failure data, a different In recent years, logistics and transportation
picture emerged. The root cause turned out not companies have become much smarter about
to be a lack of maintenance, but poor scoping what they buy—and how. Most have developed
and targeting. Managers fine-tuned more than sophisticated procurement capabilities, such as
80 percent of the required maintenance tasks, comprehensive category-management strategies,
saving more than 30,000 hours of maintenance improved negotiation tactics, and careful spend
per year thanks to more accurate, time-based monitoring.
maintenance rationalization. Overhaul costs
fell by a quarter, generating savings that the Building on those fundamental good practices,
company reinvested in new condition-monitoring leading players are now using digital tools to
technology that let it further improve maintenance further improve the efficiency and effectiveness
and asset-replacement decisions. of their purchasing activities. They’re applying
advanced analytics to understand the dynamics
For a different logistics provider, the problem was of their demand and the characteristics of the
a large backlog of maintenance tasks. Pressure market, automating routine transactional activities
on technicians to increase their work rate only across the source-to-pay process, and building
compounded the problem by reducing the quality integrated procurement platforms to enhance
of the repair work that was completed. spend transparency.

The company found that the main root cause was One global logistics company recently used
its cumbersome planning process. The task list e-procurement tools to carry out two large tenders.
allocated to technicians was updated only once One, for rail, covered 50 providers and roughly
a week, and they were instructed to complete 5,000 origin and destination pairs for different
tasks in the order presented to them. Since that container types and directions. The second, for
order did not account for the issue’s criticality or truck services, covered 750 vendors and 12,000
the location of the asset, technicians often had to lanes. Using a digital approach allowed the
travel significant distances to work on relatively company to address more than a million data points
minor jobs, while more important ones waited across the two tenders, eventually unlocking
nearby. additional price reductions of 5 percent for rail and
roughly 10 percent for trucking.
The response was to build a new digital tool that
allowed planners to cluster jobs by location, and Another large transportation company used a
prioritize tasks according to their likely impact on range of digital spend-management tools to
commercially important service-level agreements. capture savings of 20 to 30 percent in one of its
The new approach saved maintenance managers most significant send categories: tires. For more

6 Resilience in transport and logistics


30,000
One large rail company saved more than

hours of maintenance per year thanks to more


accurate, time-based maintenance rationalization.

than a decade, the company had sourced new Today, the development of powerful modeling,
and retread tires from a single supplier, while simulation, and analytics approaches is
leaving procurement of services such as tire repair changing the way companies tackle complex
and installation to the discretion of individual network-optimization problems. The latest
field locations. That approach meant no price tools deliver deeper insights into not only the
competition for tire purchases, and no scale or current performance of a network, but also its
consistency in tire services. future performance—allowing organizations
to identify bottlenecks, evaluate multiple
The company started from a clean sheet, defining alternative configurations, and rapidly stress-
a standard set of tire specifications depending test their designs against a wide range of
on asset type, operating conditions, and tier scenarios.
positions. It then used advanced e-sourcing
tools to generate request-for-proposals from A shipping line looked at three potential
numerous manufacturers. On the services side, the changes to its network: adjustment of feeder
company applied digital mapping tools to analyze connections, review of port calls with low yield,
the networks of potential dealers, with the aim of and replacement of expensive transshipment
identifying opportunities consolidate purchasing cargo with more attractive alternative cargo.
from a smaller number of providers. Leveraging advanced analytics, it simulated
the expected revenue loss, cost savings, and
Reimagine your network potential revenue-recovery probabilities for
Network optimization is fundamentally difficult. As each possible intervention across all ship
they develop their networks, T&L companies face systems and cargo flows.
a multitude of complex, interdependent decisions,
which must be made with incomplete data and for The project revealed opportunities to simplify
uncertain future demand. the shipping line’s network and capture several

Resilience in transport and logistics 7


million dollars in annual savings. To identify Transformation, not intervention
inefficient repositioning of empty containers, the The approaches described in this article are
line applied an algorithm that examined patterns already being applied at transportation and
in several million container movements. That logistics companies around the world. On their own,
project improved the steering of tens of thousands however, advanced digital tools are not enough to
of containers across all geographies. Inspired by deliver real impact. Translating opportunities into
the results, managers throughout the company value requires companies to make coordinated
now use the tools developed for these analyses changes across their people, technology,
in regular reviews, driving continuous savings and processes, and culture—the type of systematic,
performance improvements. large-scale transformation that involves a major
commitment from leaders.
Another company, this time in the rail sector,
used a simulation-based approach to optimize It won’t be easy. But when is the right time to take
the long-term planning of its maintenance the first steps? Right now. Nobody knows when
network. The company modeled the changing the next downcycle will hit, how long it will last, or
characteristics of its fleet over a ten-year time how deep it will go. As history has shown, however,
frame to understand future demand for critical the companies that prepare best for difficult times
maintenance resources. In only two months, that emerge strongest from them.
effort allowed the company to reduce its planned
capital expenditure on maintenance facilities by
about $100 million.

Sal Arora is a senior partner in McKinsey’s Atlanta office; Wigbert Böhm is a partner in the Munich office; Kevin Dolan is a
senior partner in the Chicago office, where Scott McConnell is a partner; and Rebecca Gould is an engagement manager in
the Washington, DC office.

Copyright © 2020 McKinsey & Company. All rights reserved.

8 Resilience in transport and logistics

You might also like