Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EHR Interoperability
Teryn Green
Karen Wagamon
October 3, 2021
EHR INTEROPERABILITY Green 2
Electronic health records (EHR) allow clinicians to access patient information at the click
of a button. Anything from past medical histories to current treatment and interventions being
conducted can be accessed by all members of the care team. EHRs have established a concise
location for all types of patient data including scans, procedures, and med administration times
(Hoover, 2017). The implementation of EHRs in practice has resulted in a 60% reduction in
medication administration errors and a 52% drop in adverse reactions (Hoover, 2017). The
documents have been alleviated by the application of EHRs. The growth of computer charting
within the medical field has created an increased need for interoperable data systems. An
interoperable system can accurately communicate data through an exchange within the system or
With every great thing, there are bound to be some drawbacks and EHRs are no
exception to that rule. One major issue with the previous method of documenting through paper
charts was a possible exposure of patient information. Paper forms can easily be misplaced, lost,
or picked up by the wrong person which in the end, results in a violation of the patient’s rights.
Some patients are unable to advocate for themselves or act as active members in their care due to
their illness acuity or cognitive deficits. This inability for patients to advocate for themselves
instills a stronger sense of privacy that nurses must maintain as one of their clinicians.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a very widely
known act within the medical field. HIPAA ensures the protection of patient privacy concerning
their medical information (CDC, 2019). Despite EHR's elimination of some of the possible
EHR INTEROPERABILITY Green 3
offenses to this act, they have created avenues for misutilizations in other ways. Violations of
HIPAA are taken very seriously, and all members of the care team must ensure the
confidentiality of their patients is maintained at all times (CDC, 2019). Provision 2 of the nursing
code of ethics states that as the nurse, the primary commitment is to the patient, provision 4
addresses the need for nurses to hold themselves accountable as the authority of a patient’s care
(American Nurses Association, 2015). With the nursing code of ethics in mind and an
understanding of a patient’s rights and the laws and acts to uphold them, nurses must address
Although EHR interoperability can enhance the healthcare delivery process, there will
still be downfalls to these revolutionary systems. EHRs allow clinicians to easily access patient
information, but that ease of retrieval could be detrimental when the wrong person is granted
access to the chart (Hoover, 2017). EHRs risk the exposure of sensitive patient information when
clinicians do not take the proper steps to protect the individuals under their care. For instance,
leaving a computer logged on with an EHR of a patient pulled up, sharing personal passwords
with others, and members of the facility not directly involved in care accessing a patient’s
information, are all ways in which clinicians risk violating HIPAA. In the nursing code of ethics,
provision 3 states that the nurse must protect the rights of the patient (American Nurses
Association, 2015). Ensuring medical staff does not abuse the simplicity at which they can
access a patient’s information is something every nurse must hold themselves and their peers
accountable for (CDC, 2019). Protecting passwords, closing out of EHRs when leaving a
workstation, and reporting any staff that is attempting to access information to a patient that is
not under their care are all steps that must be taken to ensure confidentiality.
EHR INTEROPERABILITY Green 4
An EHR houses all patient information for nurses, providers, and all other medical staff
to utilize. These systems are important when reviewing patient demographics, provider notes,
vital signs, lab results, scans, procedure findings, medication administrations, and much more
(Hoover, 2017). Within Beebe Hospital, there are currently two EHR systems being utilized to
document information or interventions for patients. The first and more widely used EHR is
Cerner which is used by every floor of the hospital except the emergency department (ED). In
the ED, the EHR in use is IBEX, no other floors have access to this system or the information
within it.
When a patient presents to the ED they are registered and triaged and eventually brought
into one of the ED rooms. At that point, the patient is seen by the ED nurse and providers,
assessments are conducted, and orders are placed and then completed. If needed the patient will
receive various scans, lab tests, or medications for the treatment of their chief complaint. All of
the information collected, assessments completed, orders placed, and medications passed are
charted within IBEX. Lab results and radiology tests are the only pieces of data charted within
Cerner at this time. Once it has been decided that the patient is to be admitted to one of the
hospital's floors the data collected and documented in IBEX is transcribed in an ED note which
is accessible in Cerner. Once the patient is brought to the floor all charting from this point
forward is completed in Cerner. The major issue with having two systems in use within one
The ED note that populates can be up to 30 pages long and is very unorganized making it
hard to understand which medications were given in the ED or what the baseline assessments
EHR INTEROPERABILITY Green 5
were before admission to the floor. These ED notes are not available to nurses on the floor before
the patient's admission therefore when a nurse is preparing to receive a handoff report from an
ED nurse, they are unable to simultaneously look up the patient's information and ask questions
to clarify something they may see within the ED nurse's charting. This chaotic process results in
a great deal of confusion for floor nurses and can result in many issues about missed or duplicate
medication administrations or overlooked lab results or scans. Having one system hospital-wide
or two systems that can effectively cross over information from one database to the other would
not only result in better patient care but also increased faculty satisfaction, and reduced costs.
The best outcome for patients and medical staff at Beebe Healthcare would be moving all
of the floors to one EHR system. More places holding information about a patient result in a
greater risk for missed data. Patients will have an improved level of care as their nurses will be
able to provide a smoother continuity of treatment as they transition from the ED to their floor of
screenings, and medication administrations would all be readily available for nurses on the floor
reducing possible duplicate med passes or improper dosing (Payne et al., 2012). Within the EHR
any ordered tests, scans, or medication administrations only result as completed within the
system they were ordered (Payne et al., 2012). Although lab results can populate in Cerner when
ordered through IBEX, it does not mark the task as completed which can cause duplicate blood
draws, costing the hospital money and the patient unnecessary distress. The less time a nurse
must spend searching within a 20-30 page note to understand if a lab was already collected or if a
medication was already administered increases that nurse’s ability to perform the tasks they need
The optimal outcome for Beebe healthcare would be for the administration to purchase
Cerner for the ED to utilize as well. With one EHR in use, after the initial process of registration
and triage, the patient would be brought back into an ED room where the nurse would complete
all charting within Cerner. All orders and interventions would be input to the Cerner database,
allowing for the floor nurses to pick up where the ED staff left off in terms of med passes, blood
draws, and assessments. This unified system may be an adjustment for the nursing staff at first
but overall will establish an improvement in workflow. Beebe administration may be reluctant to
make the transition to one system due to time consumption and expenses related to training the
current staff on the new system and the purchasing of the system altogether (Payne et al., 2012).
Another option to mitigate the risk of missed information could be to install a banner system
within Cerner to notify nurses that there is additional information that has not been charted
within Cerner present in the ED note (Payne et al., 2012). The implementation of these banners
will not change the inconvenience for floor nurses that must pillage through pages of ED notes,
but it will at least provide them a reminder that it exists. Lastly, if one selected system is
unrealistic at this time, one way around this option would be to allow nurses on other floors
access to IBEX. This option would face much criticism from the other units as they are as
equally unfamiliar with IBEX as the ED is with Cerner, leaving the implementation of Cerner
hospital-wide as the more sensible option. When observing data on cost-effectiveness, benefits of
one system, and overall patient and staff satisfaction, switching to one vendor would result in the
Below are two workflow maps that analyze the current and proposed EHR usage within
Beebe Healthcare. The first map demonstrates the current process of having more than one EMR
EHR INTEROPERABILITY Green 7
at Beebe, IBEX, and Cerner. Within the first map, a lack of interoperability is displayed,
revealing opportunities for missing data and additional work for the floor nurses. The second
workflow map demonstrates what this exchange of data looks at over the admission process after
a change has been implemented to one EHR system, Cerner. The use of workflow maps to
compare the effectiveness of each process provides a visualization that supports the claim that a
Workflow Map 1: Current Beebe Hospital EHR Process with Cerner and IBEX
EHR INTEROPERABILITY Green 9
Workflow Map 2: Proposed Beebe Hospital EHR Process using only Cerner
EHR INTEROPERABILITY Green 10
Conclusion
While technology continues to grow nurses must grow with it to ensure they are
maintaining the standard of practice that they vowed to by receiving their license. Remaining
diligent in including accurate documentation in the correct EHR and maintaining patient
confidentiality while using the selected systems is vital at every level of care. The evidence-
based practice supports not only the continued use of EHRs to improve patient care but also has
proven the necessity of an EHR that can effectively communicate throughout every area of the
hospital. Beebe Healthcare would greatly benefit from adopting an EHR system that allows for a
more cohesive collection of data and execution of interventions. The current systems in place
that consist of two incompatible EHRs pose a risk to patient care and hospital growth. It is
heavily recommended that the administration at Beebe analyze the current processes and select
interoperability within the hospital setting continues to grow and evolve. Only time will tell how
future systems will be altered to establish more cohesive communication. As for now, Beebe
Healthcare can counteract the incompatibilities in the current EHR systems by limiting their
References
American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics with interpretative statements. Silver
http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/CodeofEthicsforNur
ses/Code-of-Ethics-For-Nurses.htm
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) | CDC. (2019, February
21). https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/hipaa.html
Hoover, R. (2017). Benefits of using an electronic health record. Nursing2020 Critical Care,
Iroju, O., Soriyan, A., Gambo, I., & Olaleke, J. (2013). Interoperability in healthcare: Benefits,
challenges and resolutions. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(1),
262-270. https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00493
Payne, T., Fellner, J., Dugowson, C., Liebovitz, D., & Fletcher, G. (2012). Use of more than one