JournalofCareerAssessment 2015 Morgan 493 511

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/265124983
Constructing Holland’s Hexagon in South Africa
Article in Journal of Career Assessment · August 2015

DOI: 10.1177/1069072714547615
CITATIONS
12
3 authors:
Brandon Morgan Gideon P. De Bruin

University of Johannesburg Stellenbosch University
20 PUBLICATIONS 124 CITATIONS 124 PUBLICATIONS 1,395 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE
Karina de Bruin
University of the Free State
13 PUBLICATIONS 183 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Adolescents and youth wellbeing across cultures View project
Swiss South African Joint Research Program Found grant View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Gideon P. De Bruin on 03 December 2015.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Article
Journal of Career Assessment
2015, Vol. 23(3) 493-511
ª The Author(s) 2014
Constructing Holland’s Hexagon Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
in South Africa: Development DOI: 10.1177/1069072714547615
jca.sagepub.com
and Initial Validation of the
South African Career
Interest Inventory
Brandon Morgan1, Gideon P. de Bruin1, and Karina de Bruin2
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to document the development of the South African Career Interest
Inventory and to examine the structural validity of Holland’s circular/hexagonal model in the South
African context. The validity of Holland’s model was investigated in a sample of 985 university
students in Study 1 and 175 university students and adults in Study 2. The randomization test of
hypothesized order relations and covariance structure modeling were used to investigate the fit of a
tight circular ordering and four circumplex models. The randomization test found good fit for the
tight circular ordering in both the studies. Covariance structure modeling demonstrated unsa-
tisfactory fit across the four circumplex models in Study 1 but satisfactory fit in Study 2. The results
suggest that the structural validity of Holland’s circular ordering model in South Africa is tenable.
Recommendations for research and practice are presented.
Keywords
Holland, South Africa, RIASEC, circular ordering, circumplex, validity
John Holland’s (1973, 1985, 1997) circular/hexagonal theory of vocational personality types is
recognized as one of the most influential vocational counseling theories (Gottfredson, 1999; Nauta,
2010) with numerous interest inventories based on the model (e.g., Self-Directed Search and
Vocational Preference Inventories). In South Africa, the measurement of vocational interests using
his theory is a common practice (de Bruin & de Bruin, 2009; de Bruin & Nel, 1996; Foxcroft,
Paterson, le Roux, & Herbst, 2004). Two frequently used interest inventories in the South African
1
Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, Centre for Work Performance, University of Johannesburg,
Auckland Park, South Africa
2
Department of Psychology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Corresponding Author:
Brandon Morgan, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park
Kingsway Campus, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa.
Email: bmorgan@uj.ac.za
Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

494 Journal of Career Assessment 23(3)
context are the Self-Directed Search Inventory (Gevers, du Toit, & Harilall, 1997) and the South
African Vocational Interest Inventory (du Toit, Prinsloo, Gevers, & Harilall, 1993). However,
despite their popularity, these inventories are outdated in content, have limited evidence of reliabil-
ity and validity across diverse demographic groups, and have yielded limited evidence in support of
the structural validity of Holland’s circular/hexagonal model (du Toit & de Bruin, 2002; Foxcroft
et al., 2004; Watson, Foxcroft, & Allen, 2007).
It is necessary to examine the structural validity of Holland’s circular model in the South African
context because research has shown that the validity of his model outside the United States is con-
tentious (Rounds & Tracey, 1996). Indeed previous work has suggested that the circular/hexagonal
model of vocational personality types may not be valid for Black South Africans (du Toit & de
Bruin, 2002). Vocational assessment and counseling based on Holland’s model is moot if the valid-
ity of the model is not established in the cultural context where it is used (Darcy & Tracey, 2007; du
Toit & de Bruin, 2002; Rounds & Tracey, 1996). Accordingly, the purpose of this article is to report
two studies that document the operationalization of Holland’s vocational personality theory using a
constrained emic approach through the development of the South African Career Interest Inventory
(SACII) and to examine the structural validity of Holland’s circular/hexagonal model in the South
African context.
Theoretical Background
Holland (1973, 1985, 1997) proposed six vocational personality types and six corresponding voca-
tional environment types: Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional
(RIASEC). According to Holland (1985, 1997) people seek out environments that allow them to
enact their personality type. Furthermore, behavior is thought to be a product of people’s personality
types and the environment types in which they operate (Holland, 1997). Research suggests that con-
gruence between a person’s personality type and the environment leads to favorable outcomes such
as job stability and job satisfaction (Holland, 1985, 1997; Nauta, 2010; Tranberg, Slane, & Ekeberg,
1993). In the context of career counseling, potential career choices can be provided to people based
on their personality types and the characteristic environments of particular jobs (Holland, 1997;
McDaniel & Snell, 1999; Reardon & Lenz, 1998). However, this is only possible if the structural
validity of Holland’s circular/hexagonal model is established (Darcy & Tracey, 2007).
The Circumplex Model of Holland’s Personality Types

Holland (1985, 1997; Holland, Whitney, Cole, & Richards, 1969) posited that the six vocational per-
sonality types have a circular ordering, which yields a circular or equilateral hexagonal RIASEC
shape (Tracey & Rounds, 1993). The circular ordering reflects the calculus assumption, which states
that ‘‘the distances among the types or environments are inversely proportional to the theoretical
relationship between them’’ (Holland, 1997, p. 5). Thus, adjacent types (such as Realistic and Inves-
tigative) are posited to be more similar than alternate types (such as Realistic and Artistic), which in
turn are more similar than opposite types (such as Realistic and Social;Darcy & Tracey, 2007;
Holland, 1997). The equal distances constraint of the six types implies a circumplex model (Hogan,
1983; Tracey & Rounds, 1993). It is also possible to view the model as a misshapen polygon
(Holland, 1997; Holland & Gottfredson, 1992) because research suggests that the six types are not
necessarily equidistant (Darcy & Tracey, 2007; Liu & Rounds, 2003; Tracey & Rounds, 1995).
The psychometric circumplex model was first proposed by Guttman (1954) as a model with a
circular arrangement of relations between variables (Tracey, 2000). That is, the intercorrelations
show a pattern of decreasing and increasing consistency with a cosine pattern of relations (Grassi,
Luccio, & di Blas, 2010; Yik & Russell, 2004). Guttman (1954) distinguished between a quasi-

Morgan et al. 495
circumplex model and a circulant model. The quasi-circumplex model refers to a loose circular
ordering of the types where no equality constraints with respect to the distances between variables
are imposed. In contrast, Guttman (1954) proposed that the circulant model has an equal spacing
constraint, such that the distances between the types in the circular shape are equal (Tracey,
2000). Browne (1992, 1995; Fabrigar, Visser, & Browne, 1997) extended the circumplex model
by differentiating between equal spacing and equal communality (radii) constraints. More specifi-
cally, Browne (1992, 1995) describes four types of circumplex models (three quasi-circumplex mod-
els and one circumplex model). These are the unconstrained or loose circular ordering quasi-
circumplex, the equal spacing quasi-circumplex, the equal communality quasi-circumplex, and the
circulant model (equal spacing and equal communality).
There are many analytic techniques that are used to investigate the validity of Holland’s postu-
lated circular/hexagonal model, of which the most popular appear to be multidimensional scaling
(MDS), the randomization test of hypothesized order relations (RTHOR; Hubert & Arabie,
1987), and covariance structure modeling1 (CSM; cf. Fabrigar et al., 1997). While MDS was the
most popular technique in the 1980s and 1990s, contemporary researchers mostly employ the
RTHOR and CSM (cf. Darcy & Tracey, 2007). The latter two techniques are used in this study. The
RTHOR is a nonparametric technique that is used to examine the fit of a tight circular ordering
model to a correlation matrix (Hubert & Arabie, 1987; Rounds, Tracey, & Hubert, 1992). A tight
circular ordering model is similar to a circumplex model except that the relative relations between
variables are compared to each other rather than having actual equality constraints placed on the
model (Darcy & Tracey, 2007; Tracey, 2000). The RTHOR is used as both a descriptive and an
inferential technique of model fit. The correspondence index (CI) is a descriptive measure that indi-
cates the extent to which the order predictions of a set of variables are met in a correlation matrix
(Hubert & Arabie, 1987). The CI value ranges from 1, indicating no fit, to 1, indicating perfect fit
(Hubert & Arabie, 1987; Rounds et al., 1992). It also produces an exact probability of observing the
obtained CI value under the null hypothesis of random ordering. In the vocational psychology liter-
ature, a p value < .05 is usually taken as evidence that the correlation matrix is consistent with a
circular ordering model (Hubert & Arabie, 1987).
Browne’s (1992) parametric CSM approach is used to evaluate the fit of a correlation matrix to
increasingly stringent tests of circular ordering (Browne, 1992; Fabrigar et al., 1997). Within
Browne’s framework three constraints define a circumplex model. First, the variables are circularly
ordered; second, the distances between the variables are equal (equidistant or equal spacing con-
straint); and third, the communalities (i.e., the radii) of the variables are equal (equal communalities
constraint). A model that satisfies these constraints is also referred to as a circulant model (Browne,
1992; Fabrigar et al., 1997; Tracey, 2000). By relaxing one or both of the equal spacing or equal
communalities constraints, different variants of a so-called quasi-circumplex is obtained, namely
(a) equal communalities but unequal spacing, (b) equal spacing but unequal communalities, and
(c) unequal communalities and unequal spacing (this is also referred to as a loose circular structure).
Applied to Holland’s model, a circumplex model would be characterized by a hexagonal RIASEC
shape, where the six sides of the hexagon are equidistant and where the types have equal
communalities.
Cross-Cultural Applicability of Holland’s Model

The circular/hexagonal model has been studied in many different countries. For the most part these
studies tended to use adolescent and young adult samples (cf. Armstrong, Hubert, & Rounds, 2003;
Darcy & Tracey, 2007; Soh & Leong, 2001; Tracey & Rounds, 1996). The focus on these age-groups
may impact negatively on the cross-cultural generalizability of Holland’s model because interests in
adolescence are generally less stable than that in adulthood (Iliescu, Ispas, Ilie, & Ion, 2013; Strong,

1955; Swanson, 1999). In addition, an adult is likely to have had more interaction with the work
environment, which in turn may lead to a better self-understanding of his or her vocational interests
(Holland, 1997).
Broadly, cross-cultural studies can adopt an emic or an etic approach (Cheung, van de Vijver, &
Leong, 2011). The former focuses on using locally derived concepts and constructs, whereas the lat-
ter imports concepts and constructs from one context and applies them to another context without
modification (Cheung et al., 2011; Einarsdóttir, Rounds, & Su, 2010). Cross-cultural studies of
vocational interests have typically employed an etic approach, where Holland’s theory and the
instruments used to measure the RIASEC types are imported from the United States. Such imported
instruments may contain content that does not adequately represent a specific country’s work con-
text (Day, Rounds, & Swaney, 1998; Einarsdóttir et al., 2010; Rounds & Day, 1999).
It is therefore unsurprising that mixed results for the structural validity of Holland’s model have
been found with some studies providing evidence for cultural invariance (Nagy, Trautwein, &
Lüdtke, 2010; Šverko & Babarović, 2006; Thorsteinsson, 2009) and others for cultural variance
(Long & Tracey, 2006; Rounds & Tracey, 1996; Tang, 2009). Indeed, a large-scale structural
meta-analysis conducted by Rounds and Tracey (1996) found limited support for the cross-
cultural applicability of Holland’s tight circular ordering model (using the RTHOR) outside of the
United States, with a mean CI value in of .48 in non-U.S. samples and .78 in the U.S. sample group
(Rounds & Tracey, 1996).
In contrast to the aforementioned meta-analysis, recent research demonstrates that the appli-
cation of his model across diverse contexts may not be as problematic as originally thought. For
example, Tak (2004) investigated the fit of the tight circular order model in Korean university
students and found that the model held (i.e., all p values were significant) with CI values of .82
for both men and women. Soh and Leong (2001) reported a CI value of .61 with Chinese stu-
dents in Singapore, and Šverko and Babarović (2006) found that a tight circular ordering model
held in Croatian adolescents with CI values of .31, .57, and .72 depending on the age of the
participants. Iliescu et al. (2013) similarly found support for the tight circular ordering model
in Romania, with CI values of .68 in university students and .82 in working adults. However,
the fit of the tight circular ordering model with a high school students sample was marginal (p
¼ .05, CI ¼ .42). For the most part, these CI values exceed the international benchmark of .48
obtained by Rounds and Tracey (1996).
Investigation of the circumplex model of interests using covariance structure modeling has pro-
duced mixed results. Techniques such as the RTHOR and constrained MDS tend to produce better fit
to a circumplex (i.e., tight circular ordering and circulant model) because they are nonparametric
techniques and focus on relative fit rather than perfect fit (Darcy & Tracey, 2007; Tracey, 2000).
Darcy and Tracey (2007) used Browne’s CSM approach in a U.S. sample and found that the model
fit was generally poor across the different circumplex models and age-groups (Grades 8, 10, and 12).
However, the RTHOR, constrained MDS, and circular unidimensional scaling indicated good fit
across the different samples (Darcy & Tracey, 2007).
Iliescu et al. (2013) tested an equality constrained and inequality constrained model using
confirmatory factor analysis from a structural equation modeling framework in three Romanian
sample groups (high school students, university students, and working adults). The model fit for
both the equality constrained and inequality constrained models with the high school students
sample was marginally acceptable, while the fit of the university student and working adult
sample groups was acceptable. Nagy et al. (2010) tested a circulant model using a variation
in Browne’s (1992) CSM approach in German high school and university students. The fit
of the unconstrained circumplex and equal scaling constants circumplex was acceptable with
the high school students, and the fit of the equal spacing constants circumplex was reasonable
with the university students.

Morgan et al. 497
The only study to investigate the circular order model in South Africa was conducted by du Toit
and de Bruin (2002) among rural men and women of the Eastern Cape and North–West provinces.
The results of an RTHOR analysis indicated poor fit with the Eastern Cape sample (CI ¼ .49 for men
and .48 for women, p > .05,) and the North West sample (CI ¼ .35 for men and .32 for women, p <
.05). MDS plots also showed disordering of the personality types. Potential reasons provided for the
poor fit included cultural differences between the Western context and the South African context
(individualism vs. collectivism), poverty, and language barriers between the test administration lan-
guage and the participants’ spoken home language (du Toit & de Bruin, 2002).
Development of the SACII

The purpose for the development of the SACII was to operationalize Holland’s vocational person-
ality theory in South Africa. The underlying construct domain of the SACII is Holland’s (1973,
1985, 1997) vocational personality theory, which postulates the existence of six vocational person-
ality or interest types. The development of the SACII adopted a constrained emic approach (Einars-
dóttir et al., 2010; Einarsdóttir, Eyjólfsdóttir, & Rounds, 2013). This approach consists of importing
Holland’s circular/hexagonal model into a particular context while developing items with content
that are unique to the context in which it is used. Thus, a theoretical framework (such as Holland’s
vocational personality theory) that has strong empirical support and practical utility in one context is
tailored to another context through the development of indigenous content (Einarsdóttir et al., 2010,
2013; Rounds & Day, 1999; van de Vijver & Tanzer, 2004). It was deemed necessary to adopt this
approach because the South African labor market is an emerging market and is therefore not directly
comparable to the U.S. labor market.
Initially, items were written for 12 scales in order to provide a more fine-grained analysis of the
interest domain (Rounds & Tracey, 1993; Tracey & Rounds, 1995), where there were 6 primary
RIASEC scales and 6 secondary scales. The secondary scales were defined as the interpoint dis-
tances between the primary scales. For example, the secondary scale between the primary scales
of Realistic and Investigative is the Realistic–Investigative scale. The slicing of the underlying inter-
est domain is arbitrary, and it is therefore possible to create any number of types at different levels of
measurement abstraction (Tracey & Rounds, 1995).
Items were written by the first author that reflect Holland’s RIASEC typology and that were rel-
evant to South Africa, taking into consideration the South African labor context, language barriers,
and access to different occupations (such as the emergence of new occupations due to technological
developments). Job profiles and descriptions obtained from various online databases (such as the
O*Net database, which classifies occupations according to Holland’s RIASEC types) and that were
relevant to the South African context were used as a point of departure. Items are presented as state-
ments to which respondents indicate their agreement or disagreement on a 5-point Likert-type scale
ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). The initial item pool consisted of 425 items.
The items were subjected to review by psychologists who had expert knowledge of Holland’s
theory.
The reviewers were provided with definitions of each of the 12 types and then asked to sort each
item into the type that it best represented. For each review, items were scored from zero to six
depending on how close the reviewer’s placement of the item was to the a priori specified type
of the item. For example, if the item was intended for the Realistic type and a reviewer correctly
placed the item in the Realistic type, a score of six was given to the item. Placement of the Realistic
item in the Realistic–Conventional or Realistic–Investigative categories received a score of 5, pla-
cement in the Conventional or Investigative categories received a score of 4, and so on. The scores
obtained for each item were then averaged across the reviewers to obtain a value out of a maximum
of 6 (where 6 was equal to perfect agreement between the item and its theoretical type). The decision

to eliminate an item was based on whether the type it came from had a sufficient number of items to
warrant deletion of items and whether the item obtained a particularly low score in comparison to
other items from the same type.
The review identified 71 unsatisfactory items, which were removed from the item pool, leaving a
total of 354 items. A pilot study with 404 students indicated that the 12 scales failed to demonstrate
discriminant validity. More specifically, MDS and CSM indicated that it was difficult to separate the
secondary types from the primary types. Scale intercorrelations also revealed that some of the pri-
mary types and secondary types were too highly correlated. For example, the correlation between the
Enterprising and Enterprising–Conventional scales was .91. Because of these findings it was decided
to collapse the 12 scales into the six standard RIASEC scales.
The angular placement of the items in two-dimensional space (Tracey, 1997a, 2002; Tracey &
Rounds, 1996) was used to select approximately 40 items for each of the RIASEC scales using the
same data on which the 12 scales were investigated (i.e., 404 students). This process consists of
obtaining the angular location of each item and plotting them on the circumference of a circle. Here-
after items are selected that fall into an arbitrarily prespecified angular range and that have content
theoretically consistent with their respective type. After the item selection, a total of 237 items
remained across the six scales.
Aim of the Present Study

In summary, questions remain about the validity of Holland’s theory and measures of the vocational
personality types in non-Western contexts in general (Rounds & Tracey, 1996), and the South Afri-
can context in particular (du Toit & de Bruin, 2002). Against this background, the aims of this study
are to document the operationalization of Holland’s vocational personality theory through the devel-
opment of the SACII using a constrained emic approach and to examine the structural validity of the
SACII for South African adolescents, young adults, and adults. In particular, we report on two stud-
ies where we test variations in the hypothesis that the SACII scales have a circular RIASEC structure
using Hubert and Arabie’s (1987) RTHOR and Browne’s (1992) CSM approach.
Study 1
Method
Participants
Participants were 985 adolescents and young adults (students) from three higher education institu-
tions in the Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal Provinces (men ¼ 435, 44.30%; women ¼ 547, 55.70%).
The mean age was 21.31 years (SD ¼ 3.69 years, median ¼ 20 years) with a range of 17–60 years.
The majority of the participants were Black (n ¼ 787, 80.06%). The remaining participants were
composed of mixed ethnicity (n ¼ 57, 5.80%), Indian/Asian (n ¼ 85, 8.65%), and White (n ¼
54, 5.50%) ethnic groups. The spoken home languages of the participants included an indigenous
South African language (n ¼ 767, 78.75%), English (n ¼ 175, 17.97%), and Afrikaans (n ¼ 32,
3.29%). The majority of the participants were registered in a faculty of engineering (n ¼ 443,
46%). The remainder were registered in faculties of humanities (n ¼ 131, 14%), art, design and
architecture (n ¼ 20, 2%), economic and financial sciences (n ¼ 37, 4%), education (n ¼ 110,
11%), health sciences (n ¼ 22, 2%), law (n ¼ 17, 2%), natural science (n ¼ 32, 3%), and manage-
ment (n ¼ 152, 16%).

Morgan et al. 499
Table 1. Cronbach’s a Coefficients of the Six SACII Scales.
Scale No. of Items Total Sample Black Mixed Ethnicity Indian/Asian White
R 40 .98 .97 .97 .98 .98

I 38 .96 .97 .96 .96 .96
A 40 .97 .97 .96 .97 .97
S 39 .96 .96 .97 .97 .96
E 40 .96 .97 .94 .97 .95
C 40 .97 .97 .96 .97 .96
Note. R ¼ Realistic; I ¼ Investigative; A ¼ Artistic; S ¼ Social; E ¼ Enterprising; C ¼ Conventional; SACII ¼ South African
Career Interest Inventory. Total, N ¼ 985; Black, n ¼ 787; mixed ethnicity, n ¼ 57; Indian/Asian, n ¼ 85; White, n ¼ 54.
Analysis
The validity of the circular/hexagonal model was investigated using Hubert and Arabie’s (1987)
RTHOR and Browne’s (1992) CSM approach. The RTHOR was also used to determine whether the
fit of the tight circular ordering model in one group was better than that in another group (cf. Hubert
& Arabie, 1987; Ryan, Tracey, & Rounds, 1996). The RANDALL software (Tracey, 1997b) was
used to calculate the RTHOR, and the RANDMF software (Tracey, 1997b) was used to compare
the fit of the tight circular ordering structure across the different ethnic groups.
The CircE (version 1) package (Grassi et al., 2010) in R (R Core Team, 2013) was employed to
compare the fit of the four competing models of the circumplex structure: (a) a loose ordering cir-
cular model (no constraints), (b) a quasi-circumplex model with equal communality constraints, (c) a
quasi-circumplex with equal spacing constraints, and (d) a circulant model with equal communality
and equal spacing constraints (Browne, 1992, 1995; Fabrigar et al., 1997). The CircE package is
equivalent to the CIRCUM software (Browne, 1995), which has commonly been used in studies
of circumplex structure. In addition to testing the fit of the model, the CircE (and CIRCUM) soft-
ware provides the angular locations and communalities (radii) of the scales on a circular arrange-
ment (Browne, 1992; Grassi et al., 2010; Tracey, 2000). CircE provides various fit statistics:
likelihood w2, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; Steiger & Lind, 1980), standar-
dized root mean square residual (SRMR), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI; Tucker & Lewis, 1973), com-
parative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990), the goodness-of-fit index (GFI; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1989),
and the expected cross-validation index (ECVI; Browne & Cudek, 1992). Acceptable fit is indicated
by RMSEA and SRMR values .08 (Browne & Cudek, 1992; Hu & Bentler, 1999) and TLI, CFI,
and GFI values .90 (Bentler, 1990; Brown, 2006; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1989). The ECVI is used to
identify models that are most likely to successfully replicate in future samples, with smaller values
indicating better fit (Browne & Cudeck, 1992).
Results
Reliability
The Cronbach’s a coefficients of the six scales for the total sample ranged from .96 to .98 (see
Table 1). The reliabilities were .94 across all four ethnic groups.
Table 2 presents descriptive statistics and intercorrelations of the six scales. The correlations
show a pattern of rising and falling as expected in a circular ordering model (Guttman, 1954). The
correlations between the Social and Artistic (0.81) and Enterprising and Conventional (0.86) scales
were large, indicating that there may be more similarity between the respective types than expected
in the model.

Table 2. Descriptive Statistics and Correlations of the SACII Scales (Study 1).
R I A S E C
R 1.00 .69 .19 .12 .34 .63

I .68 1.00 .51 .44 .39 .56
A .19 .49 1.00 .81 .47 .37
S .10 .41 .81 1.00 .55 .41
E .33 .36 .46 .53 1.00 .87
C .62 .54 .36 .38 .86 1.00
Mean 98.45 94.92 104.73 115.28 116.33 101.66
SD 40.06 33.86 34.95 35.13 34.30 36.07
Skewness .19 .32 .28 .14 .01 .21
Kurtosis 1.09 .60 .53 .69 .73 .68
Career Interest Inventory. Correlations below the diagonal are Spearman’s rank order correlations. Correlations above the
diagonal are Pearson’s product-moment correlations.
Table 3. Randomization Test of Hypothesized Order Relations (Study 1).
Predictions
Group Met Tied Correspondence Index p
Total 66 0 .83 .017

Black 63 4 .81 .017
Mixed ethnicity 68 0 .89 .017
Indian/Asian 62 1 .74 .017
White 66 0 .83 .017
Note. A total of 72 order predictions are made in a Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional
(RIASEC) correlation matrix.
Good fit was found for the total sample and across the four ethnic groups using the RTHOR (see
Table 3). In the total sample, 66 of the 72 order predictions were met (CI ¼ .83, p ¼ .017). The
Indian/Asian sample had the lowest CI (.74, p ¼ .017), but this value still indicated statistically sig-
nificant and good fit (62 of the 72 order predictions were met). The randomization test of differences
found that there were no statistically significant (p < .05) differences in the fit of the tight circular
order model across the four ethnic groups. However, the differences in sample sizes of the four
groups necessitate caution in interpretation of the results.
The fit of the data to four circumplex models (unconstrained, equal communality, equal
spacing, and circulant) to the total sample group was investigated with the CircE package using
a two-parameter specification (m ¼ 2; see Table 4). The RMSEA of each of the four models
was unsatisfactory (RMSEA > .20). However, the RMSEA is positively biased in models with
small degrees of freedom, which may lead to the rejection of models that fit the data well
(Kenny, Kaniskan, & McCoach, 2011; Kenny & McCoach, 2003). The degrees of freedom
of the four circumplex models ranged from 2 (for the unconstrained model) to 12 (for the cir-
culant model) and therefore the fit of the RMSEA must be interpreted with caution. By con-
trast, the fit of the unconstrained model (loose circular ordering) was acceptable based on
the SRMR (.05), CFI (.98), and GFI (.97). The other three models (equal spacing, equal com-
munality, and circulant) had unsatisfactory overall fit. The ECVI value (0.13) indicated that the
unconstrained model was the most likely model to be replicated in future samples.

Morgan et al. 501
Table 4. Fit Statistics of Four Circumplex RIASEC Models (Study 1).
Model w2 df RMSEA SRMR TFI CFI GFI ECVI
Unconstrained 88.49 2 .21 [.17, .24] .05 .86 .98 .97 .13
Eq. Com 413.51 7 .24 [.22, .26] .08 .81 .91 .88 .45
Eq. Spacing 631.71 7 .30 [.28, .32] .10 .70 .86 .83 .67
Circulant 940.44 12 .28 [.27, .30] .10 .74 .79 .76 .97
Note. RMSEA ¼ root mean square error of approximation; SRMR ¼ standardized root mean square residual; CFI ¼ com-
parative fit index; GFI ¼ goodness-of-fit index; ECVI ¼ expected cross validation index; Eq. Spacing ¼ equal spacing con-
straint; Eq. Com ¼ equal communality constraint. All w2 values were significant at the .001 level. 90% Confidence interval
of the RMSEA in brackets.
Table 5. Angular Locations and Communalities of the RIASEC Scales (Study 1).
Model R I A S E C
Expected 0 60 120 180 240 300

Unconstrained model 0 52 149 164 262 301
Lower bound 0 43 134 151 252 292
Upper bound 0 61 161 178 271 310
Arc-tan 0 40 133 149 244 286
h2 of Model 1 0.82 1.00 0.89 0.92 0.97 1.00
Note. RIASEC ¼ Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional. Lower bound and upper bound are
the 95% confidence intervals of the estimated angles.
The angular placements of the RIASEC scales obtained in the CircE unconstrained model are
presented in Table 5 (the angle of Realistic was set to 0 to serve as a reference point). These
angles were contrasted to the equal spacing target of 60 as expected in a hexagonal model. There
was a relatively large angular distance between the Investigative and Artistic scales (94 ) and the
Social and Enterprising Scales (103 ), respectively. In contrast, the distance between the Social
and Artistic scales was small (12 ), indicating that the participants may have made little differen-
tiation between the two types (Figure 1).
Reduction of Items
The 237 items of the SACII were further reduced after investigating their psychometric properties in
the above-mentioned sample group. The interest space was divided into six slices and the angular
locations of items within these slices inspected. Items with unexpected angular placements were
flagged for removal (Tracey, 1997a, 2002; Tracey & Rounds, 1996). An item had an unexpected
angular location if its location deviated from other items that were of the same type. For example,
if the Realistic items had angles that ranged from 60 to 90 , a Realistic item with an angle of 140
would be unexpected.
Hereafter, item analysis from a classical test theory and item response theory approach
(Rasch analysis) was employed to identify items that did not fit the data well. Both theoretical
considerations and statistical information (i.e., item fit and item parameters) were taken into
account before removing any particular item. Sixty-eight items were removed leaving 169
items across the six scales. After the removal of these items the Artistic scale consisted of
30 items, the Realistic, Social, and Enterprising scales of 28 items each, the Investigate scale
of 26 items, and the Conventional scale of 29 items. Sample items of each domain are avail-
able in the Appendix.

Figure 1. Angular and communality placement of the Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and
Conventional (RIASEC) scales from the unconstrained CIRCUM model for the total sample of Study 1 (n ¼ 985).
Study 2
Method
Participants
Participants were 175 adolescents, young adults (students), and adults. There were 98 (66.67%)
women and 49 (33.33%) men. The mean age was 31.73 years (SD ¼ 9.12 years, median ¼ 29 years)
with a range of 16–63 years. The majority of the participants were White (n ¼ 144, 83.24%). The
remaining participants were mixed ethnicity (n ¼ 4, 2.31%), Indian/Asian (n ¼ 16, 9.25%), and
Black (n ¼ 9, 5.20%). The spoken home languages of the participants included an indigenous
South African language (n ¼ 10, 5.92%), English (n ¼ 116, 68.64%), and Afrikaans (n ¼ 43,
25.44%). Sixty-three (36.41%) of the participants were registered as university students. The
majority of the students were registered in the faculty of humanities (n ¼ 24) and management
(n ¼ 24).
Results
Reliability
The Cronbach’s a coefficients of the six scales for the total sample were all >.90. Table 6 presents
the descriptive statistics, intercorrelations, and a coefficients (on the diagonal of the correlation
matrix) of the six scales. As was seen in Study 1, the correlations show a pattern of rising and falling
expected in a circular ordering model (Guttman, 1954).

Morgan et al. 503
Table 6. Descriptive Statistics and Correlations of the SACII Scales (Study 2).
R I A S E C
R .97 .60 .31 .21 .34 .54

I .62 .93 .49 .19 .00 .19
A .32 .48 .96 0.55 .20 .08
S .20 .16 .50 .94 .53 .26
E .34 .00 .18 .51 .94 .66
C .54 .15 .05 .25 .67 .96
Mean 47.73 63.86 82.43 79.21 74.64 56.11
SD 20.93 20.58 28.16 22.40 21.47 21.83
Skewness 1.27 .21 .17 .10 .10 .94
Kurtosis 1.19 .26 .70 .52 .44 .65
Career Interest Inventory. Correlations below the diagonal are Spearman’s rank order correlations. Correlations above the
diagonal are Pearson’s product–moment correlations. a on the diagonal.
Table 7. Fit Statistics of Four Circumplex RIASEC Models (Study 2).
Model w2 df RMSEA SRMR TFI CFI GFI ECVI
Unconstrained 6.73 2 .12 [.03, .22] .04 .92 .99 .99 .27
Eq. Com 16.98 7 .09 [.04, .15] .05 .95 .98 .98 .27
Eq. Spacing 14.29 7 .08 [.01, .14] .05 .96 .98 .99 .25
Circulant 24.88 12 .08 [.03, .12] .06 .96 .97 .98 .25
Note. Eq. Spacing ¼ equal spacing constraint; Eq. Com ¼ equal communality constraint; RMSEA ¼ root mean square error of
approximation; SRMR ¼ standardized root mean square residual; CFI ¼ comparative fit index; GFI ¼ goodness-of-fit index;
ECVI ¼ expected cross validation index; RIASEC ¼ Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional. All
w2 values were significant at the .001 level. 90% Confidence interval of the RMSEA in brackets.
Good fit was found for the total sample using the RTHOR with 69 of the 72 order predictions met
(CI ¼ .92, p ¼ .017). The fit of the data to four circumplex models (unconstrained, equal commun-
ality, equal spacing and circulant) for the total sample group was investigated with the CircE soft-
ware using a two-parameter specification (m ¼ 2; see Table 7). The RMSEA of the unconstrained
model was the most unsatisfactory of all the models. However, the 90% confidence intervals indi-
cate that the unconstrained model does not necessarily have unsatisfactory fit. As a whole the equal
spacing model demonstrated the lowest ECVI value (.25) and the best overall fit (RMSEA ¼ .08,
SRMR ¼ .05, TFI ¼ .96, CFI ¼ .98, GFI ¼ .99).
The angular placements of the RIASEC scales obtained in the CircE unconstrained model are
presented in Table 8 (the angle of Realistic was set to 0 to serve as a reference point). These angles
were contrasted to the equal spacing target of 60 as expected in a hexagonal model. For the
most part, the angular distances approximated a roughly 60 separation between each of the types
(Figure 2).
Discussion
This article outlines the development of the SACII using a constrained-emic approach and reports on
the structural validity of Holland’s (1973, 1985, 1997) circular/hexagonal model of vocational per-
sonality types in the South African context. While previous work has cast doubt on the validity of
Holland’s hexagon for Black South Africans (du Toit & de Bruin, 2002), the results of the two

Table 8. Angular Locations and Communalities of the RIASEC Scales (Study 2).
Model R I A S E C
Expected 0 60 120 180 240 300

Unconstrained model 0 49 118 177 246 294
Lower bound 0 33 103 156 232 278
Upper bound 0 64 134 198 261 310
h2 of Model 2 0.99 0.77 0.90 0.73 0.98 0.79
Note. Lower bound and upper bound are the 95% confidence intervals of the estimated angles. R ¼ Realistic; I ¼ Investigative;
A ¼ Artistic; S ¼ Social; E ¼ Enterprising; C ¼ Conventional.
Figure 2. Angular and communality placement of the Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and
Conventional (RIASEC) scales from the unconstrained CIRCUM model for the total sample of Study 2 (n ¼ 175).
studies reported here support the proposed circular/hexagonal structure and demonstrate that the six
vocational personality types can be measured with high reliability.
Determining the fit of a tight circular ordering model was the a starting point in investigating the
circular/hexagonal model. The RTHOR supported the hypothesis of a tight circular ordering RIASEC
model in the total sample and in each of the four ethnic groups for Study 1, and for the total sample in
Study 2. In addition, there were no significant differences in the fit of the model across the four dif-
ferent ethnic groups in Study 1. The CI values were high and comfortably exceed the average U.S. and
non-U.S. sample CI values of .78 and .48 reported by Rounds and Tracey (1996) and compared favor-
ably to other cross-cultural studies on the applicability of the tight circular ordering model (Iliescu
et al., 2013; Soh & Leong, 2001; Šverko and Babarović, 2006; Tak, 2004). More importantly, the
results contradict the negative results reported by du Toit and de Bruin (2002). Hence, it appears that
Holland’s circular RIASEC model may indeed be valid in the South African context.

Morgan et al. 505
The covariance structure modeling tests of circumplex structure in Study 1 revealed satisfactory
fit for the unconstrained (loose circular ordering) model but unsatisfactory fit for the remaining mod-
els (equal communality, equal spacing, and circulant). The fit of the four models must be seen
against the background of previous studies, which have also found unsatisfactory fit for covariance
structure modeling tests of circumplex structure (Darcy & Tracey, 2007; Gupta, 2008). It must also
be kept in mind that covariance structure modeling examines perfect fit rather than relative fit and is
therefore more likely to produce worse fitting solutions (Darcy & Tracey, 2007). Alternatively,
because the fit was good with the RTHOR, it may be possible—as suggested by Darcy and Tracey
(2007)—that the data are best explained by a misshapen polygon (Holland, 1997; Holland & Gott-
fredson, 1992) rather than by an equilateral hexagon. However, in Study 2, the fit of all four models
was mostly satisfactory. This result implies that the RIASEC ordering may be consistent with a cir-
culant model in the South African context, within the boundaries of the sample group used for the
second study.
We offer three potential reasons for the better fit obtained in Study 2. First, Study 2 used a
more refined set of items than Study 1 in that they were selected to reproduce the hexagon.
Second, Study 2 examined the vocational interests of working adults, whose interests are likely
more stable and clearly defined than those of the university students examined in Study 1
(Strong, 1955; Swanson, 1999). It is to be expected that adults will have better self-
understanding of their interests and a clearer picture of what types of job activities they would
prefer (Holland, 1997), which in turn should lead to more reliable and valid responses to the
items. Third, given that the sample consisted primarily of White participants, and that previous
research has shown that Holland’s model generally fits better in Western contexts (Rounds &
Tracey, 1996), we cannot exclude the possibility that the improved fit observed in Study 2 was
due to the composition of the sample.
Although the RIASEC ordering was observed in the data in Study 1, the angular locations of
the six RIASEC interests show that the Artistic scale was spaced relatively closely to the Social
scale and too far from the Investigative scale. The Enterprising and Conventional scales were
also more closely distanced than would be expected. These results mirror those of Darcy and
Tracey (2007; in their Grade 8 sample) and Nagy et al. (2010) who found that the Social and
Artistic interests are relatively closely spaced to each other. However, in Study 2, the angular
locations of the six RIASEC scales approximated a roughly 60 separation with the relatively
close distance between the Social and Artistic and Enterprising and Conventional scales in
Study 1 disappearing.
Although previous research has tended to find poor cross-cultural applicability of Holland’s
model, it is possible that these poor results can be attributed to the adoption of a pure etic
approach, where Holland’s theoretical model and the test items are imported to a particular cul-
tural group. In the development of the SACII, a constrained emic (Einarsdóttir et al., 2010)
approach was used to develop items that reflect Holland’s six types and the South African labor
context (Day et al., 1998). It is therefore possible that the results of the Study 2 were particularly
promising because the items were developed for the South African context taking the South Afri-
can work context into account.
Implications for Theory and Practice

Holland’s structural model, often used as a starting point in career counseling, is often assumed to
be invariant across individuals and cultures (du Toit & de Bruin, 2002) without any such evidence.
Erroneously making such an assumption can lead to improper career counseling because the pri-
mary and secondary assumptions of Holland’s theory are dependent on the structural model
(Darcy & Tracey, 2007). The results of the two studies presented in this article suggest that,

contrary to prior research (du Toit & de Bruin, 2002), Holland’s circular/hexagonal model may be
applicable to the South African context and that career assessment and counseling based on the
model may proceed if valid interest inventories are used. With the development of the SACII,
an initial step has been taken to produce a psychometric instrument developed for South Africans,
hereby attempting to address the call for the development of high-quality and psychometrically
sound instruments in the South African context (Foxcroft et al., 2004; Paterson & Uys, 2005; Pre-
torius, 2008).
The results further show the value of using a constrained emic approach to the develop-
ment of interest inventories that reflect a particular country’s world of work (Day et al.,
1998). It is therefore possible that cross-cultural research that fails to establish the validity
of Holland’s structural model can benefit from having items developed that are particular
to that country rather than importing inventories and standardizing them (Einarsdóttir et al.,
2010). Such an approach may assist in extending Holland’s theory into Africa and addresses the
need for current and cross culturally valid measures of career interests that are based on solid
theory.
Limitations and Recommendations

The development and initial validation of the SACII is subject to several limitations. The charac-
teristics of the participants are considered a limitation because in Study 1 they mainly consisted of
higher education students, unequal ethnic group sizes, unequal representations of different univer-
sity or college faculties and because they were only obtained from two different provinces and
three higher education institutions. In Study 2, the composition of the participants was limited
in ethnicity, language group, age, and sample size, and therefore caution must be used in general-
izing the results. Future research should address these limitations by exploring the psychometric
properties of the SACII with larger and more diverse sample groups in terms of ethnic background,
age, socioeconomic status, home language, and job/field of study across South Africa. Further-
more, it needs to be demonstrated that the improved fit obtained in Study 2 also occurs across
non-White ethnic groups.
At present, the SACII scales are populated with a fair number of good quality items. Future
research on the SACII should continue to conduct item analyses on the scale items to further reduce
the scale lengths and ensure that the validity of Holland’s structural model holds across different
sample groups. In addition, differences in the structural model must be investigated across gender,
ethnicity, and language to investigate whether there are any differences in model fit. Finally, the
angular locations of the types should be examined using circular unidimensional scaling in addition
to CSM because this technique is well suited to investigate spacing of the types on a circular distri-
bution (Armstrong et al., 2003; Darcy & Tracey, 2007).
Conclusion
The purpose of this article was to describe the development of the SACII and provide evidence
of the structural validity of Holland’s circular/hexagonal model in the South African context.
The results showed, contrary to previous findings, that Holland’s structural model may be valid
in the South African context, which implies that career counseling using his model is tenable.
Although the initial evidence is promising, it is recognized that much research is still required
to make the SACII a viable instrument for the measurement of vocational interests in South
Africa.

Morgan et al. 507
Appendix
Table A1. Sample SACII Items.
Realistic
Build kitchen cupboards
Repair broken gates
Operate heavy machinery
Investigative
Study diseases
Set up equipment for a scientific experiment
Do blood tests in a laboratory
Artistic
Compose music
Paint a picture
Write a book
Social
Put makeup on people
Run a feeding program
Help people to get a social grant
Enterprising
Start a business
Network with clients
Sell products
Conventional
Order office supplies
Prepare income tax returns
Monitor the budget of a project
Note. SACII ¼ South African Career Interest Inventory.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Professors T. J. G. Tracey and J. Rounds for their assistance with analyzing circumplex
models and suggestions on analytic techniques to do so.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or
publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Note
1. Other techniques that are used to investigate the model not covered in this article are confirmatory factor
analysis from a structural equation modeling approach (Jöreskog, 1974) and circular unidimensional scaling
(Armstrong et al., 2003).
References
Armstrong, P. I., Hubert, L., & Rounds, J. (2003). Circular unidimensional scaling: A new look at group
differences in interest structure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 297–308. doi:10.1037/0022-
0167.50.3.297

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:
10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
Browne, M. W. (1992). Circumplex models for correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 57, 469–497. doi:10.1007/
BF02294416
Browne, M. W. (1995). CIRCUM: Satellite program to AUFIT for circumplex models. Columbus: Ohio State
University, Psychology Department.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and
Research, 21, 230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of per-
sonality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603. doi:10.1037/a0022389
Darcy, M. U. A., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2007). Circumplex structures of Holland’s RIASEC interests across gender
and time. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 17–31. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.17
Day, S. X, Rounds, J., & Swaney, K. (1998). The structure of vocational interests for diverse racial-ethnic
groups. Psychological Science, 9, 40–44. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00007
de Bruin, G. P., & de Bruin, K. (2009). Career counselling assessment. In C. Foxcroft & G. Roodt. (Eds.),
Introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context (3rd ed., pp. 175–184). Cape
Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.
de Bruin, G. P., & Nel, Z. J. (1996). ‘n Geı̈ntegreerde oorsig van empiriese navorsing oor loopbaanvoorligting
in Suid-Afrika, 1980–1990 [An integrated overview of empirical research about career counselling in South
Africa, 1980–1990]. South African Journal of Psychology, 26, 248–252. doi:10.1177/008124639602600408
du Toit, R., & de Bruin, G. P. (2002). The structural validity of Holland’s R-I-A-S-E-C model of vocational
personality types for young black South African men and women. Journal of Career Assessment, 10,
62–77. doi:10.1177/1069072702010001004
du Toit, R., Prinsloo, W. B. J., Gevers, J., & Harilall, R. (1993). Manual for the South African Vocational
Interest Inventory (SAVII). Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.
Einarsdóttir, S., Eyjólfsdóttir, K. O., & Rounds, J. (2013). Development of indigenous basic interest scales:
Re-structuring the Icelandic interest space. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 105–115. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.001
Einarsdóttir, S., Rounds, J., & Su, R. (2010). Holland in Iceland revisited: An emic approach to evaluating
U.S. vocational interest models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 361–367. doi:10.1037/
a0019685
Fabrigar, L. R., Visser, P. S., & Browne, M. B. (1997). Conceptual and methodological issues in testing the
circumplex structure of data in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology
Review, 1, 184–203. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0103_1
Foxcroft, C., Paterson, H., le Roux, N., & Herbst, D. (2004). Psychological assessment in South Africa: A needs
analysis. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Science Research Council.
Gevers, J., du Toit, R., & Harilall, R. (1997). SDS manual. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research
Council.
Gottfredson, G. D. (1999). John L. Holland’s contributions to vocational psychology: A review and eva-
luation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 15–40. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.
1999.1695
Grassi, M., Luccio, R., & Di Blas, L. (2010). CircE: An R implementation of Browne’s circular stochastic pro-
cess model. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 55–73. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.55
Gupta, S. (2008). Structural analysis and cross-racial/-cultural validity of Holland’s theory of vocational inter-
ests as measured by the UNICAT (published doctoral dissertation). Arizona, USA: Arizona State University.
Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radix. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.). Mathematical
thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Morgan et al. 509
Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on

motivation 1982. Personality: Current theory and research (pp. 55–89). Lincoln: University of
Nebraska Press.
Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments
(2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments
(3rd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Holland, J. L., & Gottfredson, G. D. (1992). Studies of the hexagonal model: An evaluation (or, the perils of
stalking the perfect hexagon). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 159–170. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/0001-8791(92)90063-6
Holland, J. L., Whitney, D. R., Cole, N. S., & Richards, J. M. (1969). An empirical occupational classification
derived from a theory of personality and intended for practice and research (ACT Research Report No. 29).
Iowa, IA: American College Testing Program.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional
criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:
10.1080/10705519909540118
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological
Bulletin, 102, 172–178. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.172
Iliescu, D., Ispas, D., Ilie, A., & Ion, A. (2013). The structure of vocational interests in Romania. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 60, 294–302. doi:10.1037/a0032199
Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices. In D. H.
Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psy-
chology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–56). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software
International, Inc.
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equa-
tion modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 333–351. doi:10.1207/
S15328007SEM1003_1
Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2011). The performance of RMSEA in models with small
degrees of freedom (Unpublished paper). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
Liu, C., & Rounds, J. (2003). Evaluating the structure of vocational interests in China. Acta Psychologica
Sinica, 35, 411–418.
Long, L., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2006). Structure of RIASEC scores in China: A structural meta-analysis. Journal
of Vocational Behavior, 68, 39–51. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.002
McDaniel, M. A., & Snell, A. F. (1999). Holland’s theory and occupational information. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 55, 74–85. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1698
Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2010). The structure of vocational interests in Germany: Different
methodologies, different conclusions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 153–169. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.07.002
Nauta, M. M. (2010). The development, evolution, and status of Holland’s theory of vocational personalities:
Reflections and future directions for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 11–22.
doi:10.1037/a0018213
Paterson, H., & Uys, K. (2005). Critical issues in psychological test use in the South African workplace. South
African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31, 12–22.
Pretorius, H. G. (2008). Race, sex and class in psychology: A vision of hope for a fair and just South Africa.
Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18, 349–354.

R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation
for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
Reardon, R. C., & Lenz, J. G. (1998). The self-directed search and related Holland career materials: A practi-
tioner’s guide. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Rounds, J., & Day, S. X. (1999). Describing, evaluating, and creating vocational interest structures. In M. L.
Savickas & A. R. Spokane (Eds.), Vocational interests: Their meaning, measurement and use in counseling
(pp. 103–133). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. G. (1993). Prediger’s dimensional representation of Holland’s RIASEC circumplex.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 875–890. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.875
Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. G. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 310–329. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.43.3.310
Rounds, J., Tracey, T. J. G., & Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypoth-
eses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239–259. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-
8791(92)90073-9
Ryan, J. M., Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1996). Generalizability of Holland’s structure of vocational interests
across ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 330–337. doi:10.
1037/0022-0167.43.3.330
Soh, S., & Leong, F. T. L. (2001). Cross-cultural validation of Holland’s theory in Singapore: Beyond structural
validity of RIASEC. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 115–133. doi:10.1177/106907270100900202
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. M. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper
presented at the meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
Strong, E. K. (1955). Vocational interests 18 years after college. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Šverko, I., & Babarović, T. (2006). The validity of Holland’s theory in Croatia. Journal of Career Assessment,
14, 490–507. doi:10.1177/1069072706288940
Swanson, J. L. (1999). Stability and change in vocational interest. In M. L. Savickas & A. R. Spokane (Eds.),
Vocational interests: Meaning, measurement, and counseling use (pp. 135–158). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-
Black.
Tang, M. (2009). Examining the application of Holland’s theory to vocational interests and choices of Chinese
college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 17, 86–98. doi:10.1177/1069072708325743
Tak, J. (2004). Structure of vocational interests for Korean college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 12,
298–311. doi:10.1177/1069072703261555
Thorsteinsson, B. S. (2009). Í leit að starfi: ı́slensk staðfærsla og stöðlun á SDS [Self-Directed Search (SDS):
Icelandic adaptation and standardization]. Sálfræðiritið, 14, 39–58.
Tracey, T. J. G. (1997a). The structure of interests and self-efficacy estimations: An expanded examination of
the spherical model of interests. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 32–43. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.44.
1.32
Tracey, T. J. G. (1997b). RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for a randomization test of hypothe-
sized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164–168. doi:10.1177/
0013164497057001012
Tracey, T. J. G. (2000). Analysis of circumplex models. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of
applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 641–664). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Tracey, T. J. G. (2002). Personal globe inventory: Measurement of the spherical model of interests and com-
petence beliefs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 113–172. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/
jvbe.2001.1817
Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland’s and Gati’s vocational-interest models: A structural
meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.229
Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1995). The arbitrary nature of Holland’s RIASEC types: A concentric-circles
structure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 431–439. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.42.4.431

Morgan et al. 511
Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1996). Contributions of the spherical representation of vocational interests.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 85–95. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0009
Tranberg, M., Slane, S., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1993). The relation between interest congruence and satisfaction: A
metaanalysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 253–264. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.
1993.1018
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis.
Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
Van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview.
European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119–135. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.
2003.12.004
Watson, M. B., Foxcroft, C. D., & Allen, L. J. (2007). Tracking Holland interest codes: The case of South
African field guides. Australian Journal of Career Development, 16, 51–59. doi:10.1177/10384162070
1600208
Yik, M. S. M., & Russell, J. A. (2004). On the relationship between circumplexes: Affect and Wiggins’ IAS.
Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 203–230. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_4

View publication stats

JournalofCareerAssessment 2015 Morgan 493 511

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

JournalofCareerAssessment 2015 Morgan 493 511

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Constructing Holland’s Hexagon in South Africa

Article in Journal of Career Assessment · August 2015

Brandon Morgan Gideon P. De Bruin

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Adolescents and youth wellbeing across cultures View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Brandon Morgan1, Gideon P. de Bruin1, and Karina de Bruin2

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

The Circumplex Model of Holland’s Personality Types

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Cross-Cultural Applicability of Holland’s Model

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Development of the SACII

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Aim of the Present Study

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Table 1. Cronbach’s a Coefficients of the Six SACII Scales.

R 40 .98 .97 .97 .98 .98

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

R 1.00 .69 .19 .12 .34 .63

Table 3. Randomization Test of Hypothesized Order Relations (Study 1).

Group Met Tied Correspondence Index p

Total 66 0 .83 .017

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Table 4. Fit Statistics of Four Circumplex RIASEC Models (Study 1).

Model w2 df RMSEA SRMR TFI CFI GFI ECVI

Expected 0 60 120 180 240 300

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

R .97 .60 .31 .21 .34 .54

Table 7. Fit Statistics of Four Circumplex RIASEC Models (Study 2).

Model w2 df RMSEA SRMR TFI CFI GFI ECVI

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Expected 0 60 120 180 240 300

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Implications for Theory and Practice

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Limitations and Recommendations

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Table A1. Sample SACII Items.

Note. SACII ¼ South African Career Interest Inventory.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

Downloaded from jca.sagepub.com at University of Johannesburg on December 3, 2015

You might also like