Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Introduction to robust control 2019/2020
Here, Δ(s) represents plant parameter uncertainty, P(s) represents the plant
nominal transfer function and K(s) represents feedback control
One of the objectives is to make the system insensitive to external disturbances.
This is equivalent to make z as independent of w as possible
If the plant perturbation Δ(s) is ignored, then the model simplifies to
To minimize the error z due to the external inputs w, the function Fl(P, K) must be
minimized
The aim is to find the lowest value of for which the above equation has a solution
One possibility is to start with the LQG solution and then to reduce it using a binary
search
The plant equations in state-space form is
‒ D11=0 and D22=0 simplifies the equations and implies that the transfer functions
from u to y and from w to z rolls off at high frequency.
So, the problem simplifies to
Solution to H∞ problem
This requires the solving of two Ricatti equation, one for the controller and the
other for the observer
The control law is given by
Where,
The controller gain is Kc as for the LQG case, and the estimator gain is Z∞ke instead
of Ke as for the LQG case, with
And
The terms X∞ and Y∞ are solutions to the controller and estimator Ricatti equations
Note: These calculations are not carried out by hand-MATLAB robust control
toolbox is used instead.
Properties of H∞ controller
The stabilizing feedback law u(s)=Ky2 minimizes the norm of the closed-loop transfer
function
Example
Consider the case of the double integrator
This plant violates the rules for a solution (poles on imaginary axis)
The equation set, in state space form, with the addition of a ”disturbance” term
representing uncertainty d, is
Dr.-Ing. Jackson G. Njiri EMT 3104 L-5: Introduction to robust control 19
Sem. 2
Introduction to robust control 2019/2020