You are on page 1of 2

Q&A

Instantaneous Array Performance


S ome customers expect that a 4 kW
PV system will produce 4 kW of
power on a sunny day. I know it is not that
for a PV system requires taking three
readings: inverter output power, cell
temperature and irradiance in the
A digital infrared thermometer is
the easiest way to obtain a cell temper-
ature reading. This is a great device to
simple, but how can I show my customers plane of the array. These measure- have in your toolbox and can be used
that their PV system is operating properly? ments should be taken under the for other purposes in the field. Expect
same ambient conditions, ideally to spend $100–$150 for a quality
Every installer has been there. You just at the same time. If the weather is meter, regardless of the manufacturer.
wrapped up another fine installation, changing rapidly, this may be a two- Due to the reflective nature of glass,
closed your disconnects and everything person job. the device works best when measuring
fired up as expected. Then your custom- Field measurements are required the temperature on the underside of
ers come along. They read the display because PV module nameplate rat- the module, not the glass surface.
on the inverter and say: “So, if we just ings are based upon tests performed Measuring irradiance at the array
bought a 4 kW system, why is it produc- under standard test conditions. In is easy with the Daystar digital solar
ing only 2,953 watts? This is a perfectly the factory, a module is flash tested at meter (daystarpv.com). This irradiance
sunny day. Something’s wrong!” an irradiance of 1,000 watts/m2 and meter is accurate within 3% and costs
This is a common concern, and— a cell temperature of 25°C. But in the less than $150. It is a must-have for
given the large capital investment field, temperature and irradiance are your toolbox. When measuring irradi-
most customers make—a legitimate dynamic and highly variable. ance, make sure that the sensor for the
one. If your customers do not have Tools for the job. Instantaneous meter is in the same plane as the array.
confidence that their system is per- output power is typically displayed at Either set the bottom of the Daystar
forming properly, they will convey the inverter. If the inverter happens to meter on a module or hold the side of
that message, intentionally or not, to not have a display—or if you have rea- the device flush with a module frame.
friends and neighbors. son to distrust the inverter’s display— In this case, the three field mea-
With that in mind, in response to you can use a clamp-style multi-meter surements gathered are:
this query I recommend running a to quantify inverter output power.  rPVUQVUQPXFS 8
short series of tests and providing the Simply capture the inverter ac output  rDFMMUFNQFSBUVSFž$
results to your client. The quick pro- current and multiply this by the grid  rJSSBEJBODF8N2
cedure that I illustrate here will instill voltage. In general, however, the only System deratings. In addition to
confidence in your technical abilities, tools required for this exercise are a these three field measurements, it is
your company’s customer support and digital infrared thermometer and an essential to estimate overall system
the newly installed PV system. irradiance meter. efficiency. This step C O N T I N U E D O N P A G E 2 6
Example study.
4.50
The following example 4.50

is an actual study of a 4 4.00 4.00 1,000 W/m2

kW, grid-direct PV sys- 3.50 3.50


tem in Santa Barbara, 800 W/m2
3.00 3.00
California. The system 75˚ C
Current (A)
Current (A)

2.50 600 W/m2


consists of 20 Sanyo 2.50
50˚ C
HIP-200BA19 mod- 2.00 2.00
25˚ C 400 W/m2
ules and a single SMA 1.50 1.50
SB4000US. Each series 0˚ C
D at a co u r t e s y s a n yo . c om

1.00 1.00
string consists of five 200 W/m2

200 W modules with 0.50 0.50

four strings paralleled 0.00 0.00


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
to the inverter. The 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Voltage (V) Voltage (V)
system was installed in
September 2008. Dependence on Temperature Dependence on Irradiance
Verifying instanta-
neous output power Sanyo 200 spec sheet Irradiance and temperature in the field affect instantaneous module output.

24 S O L A R PR O | February/March 2009
Q&A
proportional to the intensity of the
sunlight striking the array, and rated
power assumes an irradiance of 1,000
W/m2. In this case the measured irra-
diance is 830 W/m2, meaning that the
intensity of the sunlight on the array is
83% of STC. The decimal derate factor
of irradiance is therefore 0.830.
To convert the temperature mea-
surement to a decimal derate value,
first compare cell temperature in the
field to cell temperature at STC. In this
case, the temperature differential is
54°C–25°C, for a differential of 29°C.
C ou r te sy n re l.gov/ r re dc

The next step is to locate and apply


the module’s temperature coefficient
of maximum power. For the Sanyo
HIP-200BA19 the Pmax coefficient is
-0.29%/ºC. Applying this coefficient to
the 29°C cell temperature differential
results in a temperature derate value
Table 1 Using the PVWATTS calculator to estimate total system efficiency is a of -8.41% (29°C x -0.29%/°C = -8.41%).
subjective exercise, but one that the system designer or installer is uniquely The decimal equivalent of this derate
qualified to perform. value is 1.00 – 0.0841, or 0.916.
After converting these three indi-
takes into account systemic factors— this case, is less that 15 feet in length. vidual derate values to decimal equiva-
such as wire losses and inverter This is a new installation, so I used an lents, they are multiplied together for
efficiency—that reduce instantaneous age derate value of 1.00 and a soiling a total instantaneous and systemic
output power. These losses are not eas- derate value of 0.99. For older systems, derating:
ily measured, but they have generally I recommend an age derate value of 0.948 PVWATTS
accepted ranges in a properly designed 1% per year. Since the system being 0.830 Irradiance
and installed PV system. I recommend tested is operational and in full sun, x 0.916 Temperature
using the PVWATTS dc-to-ac derate the maximum values are used for 0.721 Total
factors for this purpose. Even though system availability and shading, 0.995
PVWATTS is intended to calculate and 1.00 respectively. Default values The final step in this exercise is
energy production, the derate cal- for mismatch, diodes and connections, to apply the calculated total derate
culator is easily adapted to estimate and sun tracking were used. value to the array’s dc nameplate
instantaneous output power losses. Using the logic above, I arrived at rating: 4,000 W_STC x 0.721 = 2,884
The derate values selected for an estimated 0.948 overall dc-to-ac W. If the PV system in this example is
this system are illustrated in Table 1, derate factor for this system. operating properly, its instantaneous
a PVWATTS v.1 screen capture. The Sample calculations. The output power will be approximately
Sanyo modules have a power toler- PVWATTS derate factor is defined as equal to 2,884 watts. An acceptable
ance of -0%/+10%, so I chose a mod- a decimal value and is therefore ready range of variation is -5%/+5%, so we
ule nameplate derate value of 1.05. for use. It just remains necessary to would expect the system to be produc-
The SMA SB4000US has a weighted convert cell temperature and irradi- ing between 2,740 and 3,028 watts.
efficiency rating of 96%, so I used an ance to decimal values. These decimal Considering that the instantaneous
inverter and transformer derate of values will then be combined and output power reading at the time of
0.96. Because total system line losses applied to the array STC rating. the test was 2,953 watts, my customers
of less than 2% are typical of many In the case of irradiance, it is very and I can have confidence that this PV
high dc voltage grid-direct PV systems, easy to convert the Daystar solar system is working optimally.
I used a derate value of 0.99 for both meter field measurement to a deci- —Richard Dean / R&M Technologies /
the dc and ac wiring. The ac wiring, in mal value. Output power is directly Santa Barbara, CA / rmtec.net

26 S O L A R PR O | February/March 2009

You might also like