The 9-step process for case study analysis and problem solving includes: 1) Identifying a single problem, 2) Establishing reasons for the problem without assumptions, 3) Stating an objective to overcome the problem, 4) Generating alternatives, 5) Developing evaluation criteria, 6) Evaluating alternatives against criteria, 7) Prioritizing alternatives based on criteria satisfaction, 8) Creating an action plan using the top alternative, and 9) Establishing a contingency plan using the second alternative.
The 9-step process for case study analysis and problem solving includes: 1) Identifying a single problem, 2) Establishing reasons for the problem without assumptions, 3) Stating an objective to overcome the problem, 4) Generating alternatives, 5) Developing evaluation criteria, 6) Evaluating alternatives against criteria, 7) Prioritizing alternatives based on criteria satisfaction, 8) Creating an action plan using the top alternative, and 9) Establishing a contingency plan using the second alternative.
The 9-step process for case study analysis and problem solving includes: 1) Identifying a single problem, 2) Establishing reasons for the problem without assumptions, 3) Stating an objective to overcome the problem, 4) Generating alternatives, 5) Developing evaluation criteria, 6) Evaluating alternatives against criteria, 7) Prioritizing alternatives based on criteria satisfaction, 8) Creating an action plan using the top alternative, and 9) Establishing a contingency plan using the second alternative.
9 Stages of Critical Thinking Skills/Problem Solving
Module/Decision Making Module
Case Study Analysis Steps
1. Identification of the Problem: Identify ONLY ONE
problem from the case study clearly and specifically in a single sentence. There may be multiple problems in the case study but we will consider only ONE.
2. Establishment of the Problem- Write the
reasons/justifications for identifying the problem, pulled out from the case study. NO Assumptions. Each point in validation should establish the problem objectively and consistently. These may be pieces of pertinent information from the case study or interpretations made.
3. Objective related to the problem- Write the
objective/purpose for doing the above identification of the problem. What will you achieve by doing the analysis? Eg., To overcome the problem
4. Generation of Alternatives – Write all the options and
alternatives (4-5) that can be used to resolve the problem as mentioned by you in Step 1. 5. Development of Criteria – Write the parameters (3-4) that can be used to evaluate and compare all the above stated alternatives.
6. Evaluation of Alternatives Against Criteria-
Evaluate each alternative against each criterion in detail. This is the main part of the analysis. Each alternative will either SATISFY or NOT SATISFY each criterion and why? Eg.,
Criterion 1 Criterion 2 Criterion 3 Total
Alternative Satisfy Not satisfy satisfy 2 1 Alternative Satisfy Satisfy Satisfy 3 2 Alternative Not satisfy Not satisfy Satisfy 1 3 Alternative Not satisfy Not satisfy Not satisfy 0 4
Explain why a certain alternative will satisfy or not satisfy
the criterion. Criteria is plural Criterion is singular
7. Prioritisation of Alternatives – On the basis of the
above mentioned evaluation, list down all the alternatives in their order of priority. The first priority is for the alternative that satisfies maximum number of criteria. Eg., Priority 1 = Alternative 2 Priority 2 = Alternative1 Priority 3 = Alternative 3 Priority 4 = Alternative 4
8. Action Plan – The first prioritized alternative in Step 7
becomes the Action Plan. Eg., Alternative 2. Write down steps of implementation here in detail.
9. Contingency Plan – the second best prioritized
alternative in Step 7 is the back up or the contingency plan. Eg., alternative 1