Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Introduction: We undertook a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the literature to identify how professionalism is
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
I do not strive for a clear and unambiguous definition . The literature reflects a considerable difference of
of ‘‘professionalism’’ because I do not believe one is opinion as to what defines professionalism in the
possible (Erde 2008, p. 7). context of medicine.
The issue of professionalism (Huddle 2005), or humanism . Conceptual overlaps exist between professionalism,
(Swick 2007), as it is variously known, in medicine has humanism, and personal and professional development
received increased attention in medical education over the (PPD).
past several years. To some professionalism means defending . Major conceptual divides are over whether profession-
the profession against external threats, particularly corpor- alism should be viewed as a set of attribute or as an
atized health care in the US. To others, it is the art that overarching ethos grounding an approach to medical
practice.
complements the science in an effective, well rounded
physician. Baldwin (2006, p. 103) considers professionalism
as a ‘‘value-oriented ideologically based construct’’. Freidson
(2001, p. 122) saw professionalism as ‘‘independence of
Our team undertook a systematic review and qualitative
judgement and freedom of action’’. There is now a vast
meta-synthesis of the literature to examine the state of
literature on the subject, but still no clearly resolved definition,
knowledge of professionalism and identify the best evidence
let alone teaching or assessment methods.
for how professionalism should be defined. Our aim was to
13
. autonomy in action and self-regulation by members of the broad range of studies. We included descriptive papers to
profession. capture information about current practices and to provide
. an identified moral code developed by those within the context. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were
profession, to which all pledge (vow) to adhere. reviewed.
. a separate, distinct place (status) within but at the same time We treated the issue of the definition of professionalism as
outside of the society in which they practice. an emerging issue in medical education that would benefit
. a particular corpus of knowledge, developed and main- from holistic conceptualization and synthesis of the literature
tained from within the profession, which serves as the basis to date (Torraco 2005). We have therefore employed an
for practice (Krause 1996; Freidson 2001, 2004; Bloom integrative literature review (Whittemore & Knafl 2005)
2002). methodology, integrating analysis and synthesis.
Correspondence: Nel Glass, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, 17 Young Street, Fitzroy, VIC 3065,
Australia. Tel: þ61 3 9953 3478; email: Nel.Glass@acu.edu.au
ISSN 0142–159X print/ISSN 1466–187X online/14/10047–15 ß 2014 Informa UK Ltd. 47
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.850154
H. Birden et al.
2009) and the Best Evidence in Medical Education (BEME) surveys or qualitative designs, and so the effort was to cast a
guidance publications (Harden et al. 1999; Hammick 2005; wide net across the 10 years of literature searched.
Hammick et al. 2010) for guidance in developing the review.
We sought to identify key papers that have contributed
substantially to the conceptual and theoretical development of Exclusion criteria
professionalism. Our attempt was to identify a construct of Papers focusing on professionalism in professions other than
professionalism; a comprehensive definition of medical pro- medicine were excluded. Since we were searching for
fessionalism that is more than a list of attributes (Cruess et al. evidence of a universal definition, we also excluded, papers
2004), and which can be measured directly, without the need focusing on a single component attribute of professionalism
to rely on proxy measures (Jha et al. 2007). Our primary and papers focusing on professionalism in subspecialties of
desired outcome was a comprehensive, universally accepted medical practice.
For personal use only.
‘professionalism’/de OR professionalism:ti OR professionalism:ab OR ‘professional standard’/de OR ‘professional role’ OR behav* NEAR/3 ethic* OR behav*
NEAR/3 professional OR behav* NEAR/3 professionally OR act NEAR/3 ethic* OR act NEAR/3 professional OR act NEAR/3 professionally OR acts NEAR/3
ethic* OR acts NEAR/3 professional OR acts NEAR/3 professionally OR action* NEAR/3 ethic* OR action* NEAR/3 professional OR action* NEAR/3
professionally OR values NEAR/3 ethic* OR values NEAR/3 professional OR values NEAR/3 professionally
AND
(‘physician’/exp OR ‘medical specialist’/exp OR doctor* OR gp OR ‘medical professional’ OR ‘medical professionals’ OR surgeon* OR registrar* OR ‘general
practitioner’:ti OR ‘general practitioners’:ti OR ‘general practitioner’:ab OR ‘general practitioners’:ab OR specialist*:ti OR specialists:ab OR ‘medical student’/exp
OR medic* NEAR/2 graduate*)
AND
[embase]/lim AND [medline]/lim
AND
[1999–2009]/py
Reference list (ancestry) before the time period covered by this review. For example,
Hafferty’s 1994 paper on the ‘‘hidden curriculum’’ has been
Reference lists from all papers meeting quality criteria were
cited 277 times at date of this writing. Among its progeny were
reviewed, with relevant papers identified and obtained.
five relevant papers not captured in the initial searches or hand
searches.
Citations ( progeny)
The most productive source of relevant papers for the review
Grey literature
that were not obtained from the initial search or team
members’ libraries consisted of ‘‘cited by’’ searches carried The most prominent authors in this area were contacted with a
out in selected seminal papers, some of which were published request for ‘‘grey literature’’: conference proceedings,
49
H. Birden et al.
Table 2. Yield of abstracts reviewed by database. opted for a semi-structured analysis with unprompted judge-
ment (Dixon-Woods et al. 2007) for quality evaluation,
Location Found Kept inclusion in the final set of papers for review, and synthesis
of evidence. In this method, the reviewers rely on their
Existing libraries 753 753
Medline 6506 1130 collective professional judgment to assess the worth of a given
PreMedline 18 3 study, looking at studies in a holistic manner rather than
CINHAL 62 11
Embase 11 439 1585
focusing on methodologic and procedural aspects.
Phil Index 44 3 As a quality criterion for inclusion in data synthesis, we
LegalTrac 31 0 only included papers for which the review team could
Informit 36 2
Sociological abstracts 225 7
collectively agree on the answer ‘‘yes’’ to all 12 of the
PsychINFO 132 26 ‘‘Questions to ask of evidence based on experience, opinion,
Capital monitor 12 0 or theory’’ put forth in the first BEME Guide (Harden et al.
Lib Australia 5 2
Total 19 263 3522
1999, p. 557).
We developed an instrument to aid us in the determination
Excluded as obviously irrelevant ¼ 15 741 of quality and addition to the synthesis, taking into account
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
were not on the topic (definition, teaching or assessment of some of them negative. An important paper with seminal ideas
professionalism in medicine), focused on a narrow specialty/ will be cited extensively, and rightly so. But a controversial or
discipline within medicine or a single attribute of profession- flawed paper may also be highly cited by subsequent authors
alism, or focus on a profession other than medicine. who challenge or refute the findings or assertions in it. An
As there was considerable heterogeneity among the studies author is compelled to cite her/his own prior work, either
included in the review (and very little quantitative analysis), because their recent work builds on older work or because in
we could not undertake a meta-analysis. We also rejected the the academic world increasing your citation count is a
approach of a comparative and thematic synthesis, essentially necessary factor in promotion.
a qualitative meta-synthesis (Sandelowski et al. 2007).
In order not to reject key insights of this type out of hand by
restricting the data synthesis to reviews of a particular design Results
type (Edwards et al. 1998), we included viewpoint and opinion
Electronic searches identified 3522 references, of which 1077
pieces as well as empirical research. In fact, the vast majority of
were kept after abstract review. Of these, 753 were duplicates
the literature on medical professionalism is of this type.
of papers previously identified, 43 were from progeny
Therefore, a narrative synthesis emerged as the method best
(citation) lists, and 25 were from ancestry (reference lists).
suited to synthesize this large and disparate body of
This supports Greenhalgh’s contention that for complex areas,
knowledge.
traditional search strings are not enough (Greenhalgh &
This method is more appropriate than thematic analysis
Peacock 2005).
when synthesizing different types of evidence (qualitative,
Full text copies were obtained and reviews of all papers
quantitative, viewpoint, and for purposes such as this, where a
identified as being relevant through abstract review. Of these,
rich description of a literature, rather than development of
we identified 195 studies meeting inclusion criteria on the
theory, is the objective (Lucas et al. 2007). We used the
topic of definitions of professionalism.
Institutes for Health Research UK Economic & Social Research
Of the 195 papers on the topic of professionalism, we rated
Council ESRC Narrative Synthesis Guidance Document (Popay
26 as best evidence for inclusion in data synthesis. Figure 1
et al. 2006) to guide our methodology. There is a growing
presents the flow diagram through the review process,
body of literature on techniques for combining different types
indicating numbers of records reviewed and retained at each
of evidence in a systematic review (Harden et al. 2004; Dixon-
stage.
Woods et al. 2005; Oliver et al. 2005; Pawson et al. 2005),
although this evolution is very much a work in progress, with Outcome 1: comprehensive, universally accepted definition of
no established consensus on how to establish quality (Dixon- medical professionalism: No such definitions were evident in
Woods et al. 2007; Ring et al. 2011, p. 13). We modelled our the literature.
methodology on techniques emerging from this literature. Outcome 2: closely argued view, widely accepted, concerning
After experimenting with several critical appraisal tools, we what such a definition should consist of.
50
Professionalism in medical education
Prestigious journal
papers are listed in Table 4. Table 5 lists papers by study type.
Seminal paper
Table 6 presents countries from which the most highly cited
Highly cited
definitional papers came from. Table 7 lists journals in which
high-quality papers appeared. Table 8 summarizes some of the
major conceptual definitions for professionalism in medicine.
A closely reasoned intuitive approach
Overview of literature
Good medical education journal
Contains new, interesting ideas
education
synonymous.
publications
Obscure journal
Barely relevant
Redundant
‘‘professions’’.
The University of Washington deleted the word profes-
sionalism from its curriculum in 2005, replacing it with
professional values, in response to complaints from students
that the word was overused (Goldstein et al. 2006).
Conceptual basis
Inclusion?
Idenficaon
Records idenfied through Addional records idenfied
database searching through other sources
(n = 19263) (n = 70)
(n = 195)
For personal use only.
(n = 26)
There is considerable overlap, or at least a vagueness of high degree of overlap in these ‘‘value-oriented ideologically
definition leading to confusion of usage, between profession- based constructs’’ ( p. 103), with 35% being assigned to all
alism and the concept of humanism. Humanism in medicine four. He asks, not rhetorically, ‘‘[h]ow can a particular
(Marcus 1999; Markakis et al. 2000; Misch 2002) has been quality that is so important and highly regarded be learned
defined variously as ‘‘the application of science in recognition and successfully attained if it cannot be defined and measured
of human values and in service of human needs’’ (Kumagai with the precision of the rest of science and education?’’
2008, p. 653) and ‘‘the physician’s attitudes and actions that ( p. 104).
demonstrate interest in and respect for the patient and that Also focusing on a definition based on discrete attributes,
address the patient’s concern’s and values’’ (Branch et al. 2001, Brownell & Côté (2001) asked senior residents (registrars)
p. 1067). Swick (2007) offers a conceptualization that empha- what they thought professionalism was, and got a list of 1052
sizes that each can enrich the other as complementary attributes, which condensed into 28 groups. These overlap, but
(but distinct) attributes of excellence in medical practice, do not exactly coincide with, attributes included in other lists.
each enriching the other. He suggests that they be integrated Since their respondents were at a stage of their career where
in medical education curricula. Gracey et al. (2005) studied they have attained the role of expert practitioner, and so are
ways of teaching humanism without seeing a need to continually engaged with clinical decision making, ethical
define the term, apparently taking it as a given that the issues, and direct patient care, their concept of professionalism
meaning was clear. is drawn from that reality of practice.
Baldwin (2006) compiled a list of attributes associated with Goldberg (2008) also sees a distinction, and worries that a
professionalism/humanity/morality/spirituality, then presented careless conflation of humanism with professionalism devalues
his list to colleagues, asking them to identify which of the the former, as the latter, in his view, is merely the culturally
four constructs they would place the attribute in. He found a determined practices of a privileged elite. For him: ‘‘humanism
52
Professionalism in medical education
Table 4. Journal in which paper published. Table 6. Most highly cited definitional papers.
31 Brainard 2007 23
Study design Number of papers 32 Smith 2005 23
33 Chervenak 2001 23
Viewpoint/opinion 156 34 Kao 2004 22
Books/book chapters 19 35 Stevens 2002 22
Qualitative methods 14 36 Larkin 2003 21
Quantitative methods 3 37 Sullivan 2000 21
Systematic reviews 3 38 Cohen 2006 20
39 Miettinen 2003 20
40 McCullough 2004 19
41 Bloom 2002 19
is too precious to be swallowed up by pretentious profession- 42 Gofton 2006 17
alism’’ ( p. 721). 43 Cruess 2006 17
44 Jotterand 2005 17
Cohen (2007) differentiates humanism from professional-
45 Jotkowitz 2004 17
ism. Humanism, he argues, is a set of beliefs, convictions, or 46 Cruess 2000 17
virtues, including altruism, compassion, and respect for others. 47 Cruess 2000 17
48 Kearney 2005 15
Professionalism, by contrast, is a set of actions and behaviours 49 Askham 2006 14
(that can be influenced by humanism). An important aspect of 50 Surdyk 2003 14
the distinction he makes is his argument that doctors could act 51 Robins 2002 14
52 Irvine 2007 13
as professionals because they know that they are supposed to, 53 Jha 2006 13
without actually believing in the intrinsic worth of doing so. To 54 Hafferty 2006 13
him,’’[h]umanism provides the passion that animates authentic 55 Beauchamp 2004 13
56 Shelton 1999 13
professionalism’’ ( p. 1029). 57 Cohen 2007 12
Stern et al. (2008) also attempt to offer a differentiation 58 Holsinger 2006 12
between professionalism and humanism before proceeding to 59 Veatch 2002 12
60 Sox 2007 11
describe how best to teach ‘‘humanism’’. Citing the Cohen 61 Irvine 2004 11
quote mentioned earlier (Cohen is a co-author in this work), 62 Doukas 2003 11
63 Coulehan 2003 11
they review the distinction from the Hippocratic oath through
64 DeRosa 2006 10
recent American professional societies and regulatory bodies’ 65 Cowley 2005 10
work. They see professionalism associated with actions and 66 Leach 2004 10
67 Ginsgburg 2004 10
behaviours, humanism with a set of beliefs that influence those
68 Egan 2004 10
actions and behaviours ( p. 496). 69 Howe 2003 10
Huddle (2005) equates professionalism with medical mor- 70 Rowley 2000 10
ality. She argues that the truest test of moral fibre lies not in
seeing the right moral stance in the difficult cases usually
presented in ethics tutorials in the established curriculum.
53
H. Birden et al.
Rather, it lies in the choice of actions made by practicing domains of professionalism. One set of these consists of
doctors under system-imposed stresses (time pressure, paper- personal (intrinsic) attributes, including ethical practice, reflec-
work) and internal stresses (time pressure, family issues, tion and self-awareness, and responsibility/accountability for
fatigue, hunger) in mundane, routine patient encounters. The actions (including commitment to excellence/lifelong learn-
proving ground is even tougher during training, as students ing/critical reasoning). The other set constitutes co-operative
have to answer to the faculty and supervisors as well as attributes such as respect for patients, working with others
perform (albeit under supervision) within the system. (teamwork), and social responsibility. While many of these
Hilton & Slotnick (2005) consider professionalism to be ‘‘an domains are life skills useful in any social interactive occupa-
acquired state, rather than a trait’’ ( p. 59). They identify six tion, Hilton & Slotnick suggest that they encompass the scope
of medical practice and propose a simple follow-on definition
Table 7. High-quality definitional papers by country/region of of professionalism as ‘‘a doctor who is reflective and who acts
study origin. ethically’’ ( p. 61), assuming consensus definitions of ‘‘reflect-
ive’’ and ‘‘ethics’’.
Country Number of papers A collaboration convened in 2002 between the American
Board of Internal Medicine Foundation (ABIM), the American
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
USA 20
UK 4 College of Physicians Foundation, and the European
Canada 3 Federation of Internal Medicine, named the Professionalism
The Netherlands 2 Charter Project (ABIM Foundation and ACP-ASIM Foundation
South Africa 1
Total 29 European Federat Internal Med 2002; Blank 2002; Brennan
et al. 2002; Sox et al. 2002; Blank et al. 2003; Smith et al. 2007),
developed a working definition of professionalism, an
Source Definition
For personal use only.
Swick (2000) Medical professionalism consists of those behaviors by which we as physicians demonstrate that we are
worthy of the trust bestowed upon us by our patients and the public, because we are working for the
patients’ and the public’s good. Failure to demonstrate that we deserve that trust will result in its loss,
and, hence, loss of medicine’s status as a profession.
Medical professionalism, then, comprises the following set of behaviors:
Physicians subordinate their own interests to the interests of others.
Physicians adhere to high ethical and moral standards.
Physicians respond to societal needs, and their behaviors reflect a social contract with the communities
served.
Physicians evince core humanistic values, including honesty and integrity, caring and compassion,
altruism and empathy, respect for others, and trustworthiness.
Physicians exercise accountability for themselves and for their colleagues.
Physicians demonstrate a continuing commitment to excellence.
Physicians exhibit a commitment to scholarship and to advancing.
Physicians deal with high levels of complexity and uncertainty.
Physicians reflect upon their actions and decisions.
Ber & Alroy (2002) Medical professionalism includes expert knowledge, self-regulation and fiduciary responsibility to place the
Stephenson et al. (2006) needs of patients ahead of the self-interest of physicians (from Freidson 1970).
Buyx et al. (2008) Professionalism mainly consists of adherence to a specific set of professional attributes constitutive of
medical role morality and readily identifiable as virtues of medical professionalism (VMP).
Dornan et al. (2007) A state of mind that includes confidence, motivation and a sense of professional identity.
Gordon (2003) Altruism, accountability, duty, integrity, respect for others and lifelong learning in doctors.
Cruess et al. (2004) Profession: An occupation whose core element is work based upon the mastery of a complex body of
knowledge and skills. It is a vocation in which knowledge of some department of science or learning or the
practice of an art founded upon it is used in the service of others. Its members are governed by codes of
ethics and profess a commitment to competence, integrity and morality, altruism, and the promotion of
the public good within their domain. These commitments form the basis of a social contract between a
profession and society, which in return grants the profession a monopoly over the use of its knowledge
base, the right to considerable autonomy in practice and the privilege of self-regulation. Professions and
their members are accountable to those served and to society ( p. 74).
Lown et al. (2007) Caring attitudes: feelings and opinions that arise from values that affirm the importance of understanding
others as individuals with unique needs, in the context of individual, community and cultural relationships.
Behaviors that reflect these attitudes include: demonstrating empathy, communicating sensitively and
responsively, engaging in mutual decision making, committing to ongoing self-reflection, and welcoming
feedback ( p. 1515).
Royal College of Physicians (2005). Medical professionalism signifies set of values, behaviours, and relationships that underpins the trust the
public has in doctors ( p. 45).
54
Professionalism in medical education
‘‘operational definition of medical professionalism rooted in which must of necessity include within its meaning a range
prevailing circumstances’’ (Cohen 2006, p. 609), and a set of and depth of complexity, cannot do justice to that complexity
guidelines for its teaching and evaluation. Their Physician in being truncated, cannot ‘‘include. . .all it should and
Charter, which has been dubbed a ‘‘modern-day Hippocratic exclude. . .all it should’’ ( p. 8), and then ends up being used
oath’’ (Rabow et al. 2009) identified three fundamental as a slogan, used by ‘‘insiders’’ ‘‘mindlessly and inappropri-
principles of professionalism: ately’’. He attacks the prominent definitions on semantic and
philosophical grounds.
. primacy of patient welfare
The definition created by Cruess et al. (2004),
. respect for patient autonomy
‘‘Profession: An occupation whose core element is work
. commitment to social justice (Sox et al. 2002)
based upon the mastery of a complex body of knowledge
The Charter follows a long tradition of the medical and skills. It is a vocation in which knowledge of some
profession establishing professional codes of conduct for its department of science or learning or the practice of an art
members (Sox 2007). This work is heavily cited, and so may be founded upon it is used in the service of others. Its
considered a turning point in the emergence of professional- members are governed by codes of ethics and profess a
ism as a field of focus in medical education, if not the commitment to competence, integrity and morality, altruism,
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
beginning of the formal debate. and the promotion of the public good within their domain.
However it is not without its critics, who see it as These commitments form the basis of a social contract
disingenuous or vague (Jotterand 2005; Van Rooyen & between a profession and society, which in return grants the
Treadwell 2007). It is also difficult to find a difference made profession a monopoly over the use of its knowledge base,
by the Charter in either the practice or teaching of medicine. the right to considerable autonomy in practice and the
Wear & Nixon (2002) point out a fundamental, and revealing, privilege of self-regulation. Professions and their members
poor choice of wording used in the seminal and oft-cited ABIM are accountable to those served and to society.’’ ( p. 74) is a
Project Professionalism manifesto (ABIM Foundation et al. valiant attempt, if over-broad, as Cruess’ team creates a
2002). The word that ABIM used to describe the process of definition of professions and then fit medicine into that,
introducing professionalism to medical students is inculcate, rather than attempting to define professionalism as it fits
which, as Wear & Nixon point out, denotes a forceful, top within the field of medicine.
For personal use only.
down method. They prefer foster, with its more enlightened Several writers stress the context-dependent nature of
and egalitarian connotations. professionalism (Verkerk et al. 2007; van Mook et al. 2009a),
Van Rooyen & Treadwell (2007) report on a qualitative including Hafferty (2008, p. 21), who sees professionalism as
study in which South African medical students found that the ‘‘something that resides in the interface between the posses-
Physicians’ Charter definition was not particularly relevant sion of specialized knowledge and a commitment to use that
there due to the mix of cultures and language, and the sharp knowledge for the betterment of others’’.
divides in social class and religion in that country.
Medical trainees surveyed by a working party convened
Books
by The Royal College of Physicians defined medicine as ‘‘a
profession which is learnt through apprenticeship and By nature of the publication process, material compiled in
defined by responsibility towards patients, and which book form is not at the cutting edge. However, a thorough
requires qualities such as altruism and humility’’ (Chard review of best evidence in medical professionalism
et al. 2006, p. 68). The (UK) General Medical Council sought would not be complete without mention of the several
to operationalize this definition in their Good Medical books that provide valuable material on which to build a
Practice (Irvine 1999, 2001). Rothman (2000) took a similar curriculum.
operational approach for the US context, emphasizing the Most of these books establish a working definition of
particular structural barriers to best practice inherent in the professionalism to support the main focus of the book;
US health care system. teaching professionalism (Savett 2002; Egan 2006; Parsi &
Wilkinson et al. (2009) performed a thematic analysis Sheehan 2006; Cruess et al. 2008; Eckenfels 2008; Wear &
of definitions of professionalism as part of a review the aim of Bickel 2008; Spandorfer et al. 2009), assessing professionalism
which was to link assessment methods with attributes of (Frank 2005; Stern 2006), or both (Kasar & Clark 2000;
professionalism. They identified five major themes in the Thistlethwaite & Spencer 2008). Others defined professional-
definitions they reviewed: ‘‘adherence to ethical practice ism and then focused on one aspect of it, such as ethics (Kao
principles, effective interactions with patients and with 2001; Irvine 2003; Abrams 2006; Faunce 2007), or empathy
people who are important to those patients, effective inter- (Halpern 2001). A few took a broad look at professionalism
actions with people working within the health system, (Irvine 2003; Mills et al. 2005; Wear & Bickel 2008;
reliability, and commitment to autonomous maintenance/ Wimmer 2009). Table 9 lists books published during the
improvement of competence in oneself, others, and systems’’ review time period.
(from the abstract). They found self-reflection to be an attribute
common to nearly all definitions.
Previous systematic reviews
Erde (2008), agreeing that there is still no clear definition,
adds that he does not think that one is possible. His premise is Veloski et al. (2005) performed a review of the literature with
that a broad term such as ‘‘professionalism in medicine’’, the purpose of ascertaining the utility of measurement
55
H. Birden et al.
Table 9. Books on medical professionalism. Van De Camp et al. (2004, p. 696) observed that profes-
sionalism is ‘‘passively ‘caught’: students are expected to
ABRAMS, F. R. 2006. Doctors on the Edge: Will your Doctor Break the emulate the values and behaviours modelled by their
Rules for you?, Boulder: Sentient Publications. teachers’’. They attempted to arrive at a consensus definition
CRUESS, R. L., CRUESS, S. R. & STEINERT, Y. (eds.) 2008. Teaching of professionalism, first through a systematic review of the
Medical Professionalism, New York: Cambridge University Press.
literature to identify quality papers addressing the meaning of
ECKENFELS, E. J. 2008. Doctors Serving People: Restoring Humanism to
Medicine through Student Community Service, New Jersey: Rutgers professionalism or its constituent elements, and then by doing
University Press. a qualitative analysis of thematic elements identified through it,
EGAN, E. A. 2006. Living Professionalism: Reflections on the Practice of with results vetted by an expert panel (Van De Camp et al.
Medicine, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
2004). They concluded that there was no consensus within the
FAUNCE, T. 2007. Who owns our health?: Medical Professionalism, Law
medical community on a definition of professionalism, and
and Leadership Beyond the Age of the Market State, Sydney:
University of New South Wales Press Ltd. suggest that conceptualization of professionalism is dependent
FRANK, J. R. (ed.) 2005. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency on context – primarily the context of medical practice/
Framework: Better Standards. Better Physicians. Better Care, Ottawa: specialty from which the perspective of professionalism is
The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
seen. In subsequent work she refines her model into a
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
Professionalism Primer, Lanham MD USA: Rowman & Littlefield require a wholesale rethinking of how professionalism is
Publishers. taught and assessed, and also how unprofessional behaviour is
SAVETT, L. A. 2002. The Human Side of Medicine: Learning What It’s Like addressed in organizational contexts.
to be a Patient and What It’s Like to be a Physician, Praeger.
SPANDORFER, J., POHL, C., NASCA, T. & RATTNER, S. L. (eds.) 2009.
Professionalism in Medicine: A Case-Based Guide for Medical
Students: Cambridge University Press. Major theme issues of journals
STERN, D. (ed.) 2006. Measuring Medical Professionalism, New York:
Oxford University Press. The foremost journals and theme issues dedicated to the topic
THISTLETHWAITE, J. & SPENCER, J. 2008. Professionalism in Medicine, of professionalism are: Academic Medicine, in 2002;77(6) and
Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Radcliffe Medical PR. 2007;82(11); Medical Education in 2005;39(1); Perspectives in
WEAR, D. & AULTMAN, J. M. (eds.) 2006. Professionalism in Medicine: Biology and Medicine 2008;51(4) and The American Journal of
Critical Perspectives: Springer.
Bioethics 2004;4(2).
WEAR, D. & BICKEL, J. (eds.) 2008. Educating for Professionalism:
Of these, Wear & Kuczewski’s paper (2004), along with
Creating a Culture of Humanism in Medical Education: Iowa City:
University of Iowa Press. the 26 invited response pieces that accompany it, provide a
WIMMER, P. 2009. The Professionalism Of Medical Practitioners: A Case particularly fresh philosophical frame for the professionalism
Study of Rural Physicians VDM Verlag. debate. Wear & Kuczewski argue that the ongoing dialogue
on professionalism had by that time become too abstract,
ignoring the realities of the modern medical education
environment, especially social factors, most especially
gender. They present a series of recommendations that
tools for professionalism in medical students and residents.
challenge educators to engage more with students in the
They came to a number of conclusions that informed this
development of professionalism curricular components, such
review:
that the structures of curricula themselves become more
. Research in this field has grown in the current decade, compassionate and respectful. Theirs is a view of profession-
indicating that much research is in progress and will be alism as an overarching construct, more than a set of
published. attributes, and a concept that needs to be lived by educators,
. The instruments used in measuring professionalism may be not merely presented to students as a package of lore
used in other health care professional development settings, dissociated from practice: ‘‘we need to think about what
and so those bodies of work also should be searched to find happens once the abstractions are uttered, because there is
the best instruments and their best use. no movement to filter them through the cultural practices of
. The evidence base for content validity, reliability, and academic medicine – in particular the formal, informal, and
practicality as revealed through their review, was weak at hidden curriculum – as they are experienced by students,
that time (the review ended in 2002). patients, and physicians’’ ( p. 5).
56
Professionalism in medical education
result easily becomes ‘‘a set of ‘hooray’ words that no one professional is someone who can explain why in this case, for
would either disagree with or find informative’’ (Tallis et al. this patient, the professional’s behaviour or decision was
2005, p. 8). appropriate (Verkerk et al. 2007).
The focus on professionalism in medicine, and medical The concept also differs by the region in which the
education, has developed in response to perceived threats to debate is evolving, particularly the UK vs. the US. The
medicine. Most authors in our first tier group spend a deal of focus of professionalism in medicine (new professionalism
time on the evolution of the discourse on professionalism. in the UK) came about largely because of the creeping
The occupation as it has traditionally fit in western culture threat of commercialism in the US (Coulehan 2005) and
was considered to be endangered (Blank 2002; Sox et al. 2002) bureaucracy in the UK (Irvine 1999). The British approach
specifically by failures of self-regulation by the profession to professionalism is considered by Hafferty (2006a,b) to be
(Cruess 2006) or loss of autonomy and respect (Irvine 1999; more patient centred, while Irvine (2001) considers it too
For personal use only.
Hilton & Slotnick 2005; Sox 2007; Swick 2007). Other threats oriented towards doctors. Both think that that the British
included commercialization of medicine (Rothman 2000; approach pays too little attention to humanism (Irvine 2001;
Blank 2002; Sox et al. 2002; Cruess et al. 2004; Cruess 2006; Hafferty 2006a,b).
Sox 2007; Swick 2007; Woodruff et al. 2008) current students’ Medicine is a calling, not just an occupation (Swick 2000),
moral compass not being as robust as that of students in past an identity, not just a set of skills and knowledge (Wagner et al.
generations (Coulehan 2005; Erde 2008), higher modern 2007), and so a definition of professionalism should perhaps
standards of medical accountability (Cruess 2006), a better be a multi-dimensional concept (Van de camp et al. 2004) that
educated public more willing to second guess doctors (Irvine evolves to meet the changing needs of the medical profes-
1999, 2001; Cruess 2006; Woodruff et al. 2008), and the sion’s contract with society, a continuum that evolves with an
perceived evolution of medicine away from humanistic values individual’s growth through medical training and beyond
towards the biological and technical aspects of practice (Wear (Woodruff et al. 2008). As medical practice has diversified and
& Kuczewski 2004). become more complex, definitions have to be stretched or
Collectively, these papers approach the definition of modified (Cruess 2006; Hafferty 2006a,b). And so, for Cohen
professionalism from historical, managerial, consensus build- (2007), professionalism is a way of acting and behaving in
ing, and practical/pragmatic perspectives. Many authors find accordance with certain normative values.
existing definitions lacking in focus or details. For example, Some authors argue that professionalism should be narra-
Erde (2008) finds the ACGME definition too naı̈ve and using tive based as opposed to rule based, as rules and behaviours
too many items needing further definition. He thinks the can not be assessed and morality is learned from role models,
concept should be ‘‘professionalism and ethics’’, signalling that good and bad, more than formal training (Coulehan 2005).
professionalism needs a filter with it to keep it good or right. Verkerk et al. (2007) also consider it a personal, as opposed to
Some argue that defining professionalism is not possible a behavioural trait. It also varies with different patient settings
(Swick 2000; Erde 2008), or only possible with qualification and circumstances. Swick (2000) considers that ‘‘expert
(Jha), or has not been developed yet (Cruess et al. 2004; professionalism’’ has supplanted ‘‘social-trustee professional-
Hafferty 2006a,b) or is not agreed upon (Arnold 2002; Van de ism’’. Hafferty (2006a,b) prefers succinct over inclusive, and
Camp et al. 2004) or is vague (Erde 2008). While profession- argues that the Physicians’ charter is a statement of profes-
alism was expected, and had to be taught, it had to be defined sional principles, but not a definition. Coulehan (2005) writes
(Cruess et al. 2004; Van de camp et al. 2004; Hafferty 2006a,b; of narrative professionalism, Van De Camp et al. (2004) of
Erde 2008; Woodruff et al. 2008). interpersonal professionalism as opposed to public profes-
Walsh & Abelson (2008) argue that the definition of sionalism and intrapersonal professionalism. Verkerk et al.
professionalism should be linked to context. A problem with write of reflective professionalism. They see professionalism as
definitions based on list of attributes is that they miss the a personal or a behavioural characteristic, a second order
context dependent nature of the attributes ‘‘abstractions beg competency that can only be judged in the context of other
for a context, for particularity’’ (Wear & Kuczewski 2004, p. 3). competencies (Verkerk et al. 2007).
57
H. Birden et al.
Hafferty’s (2006a,b) preferred medical definition of profes- Surveying one discipline in isolation misses common content
sionalism would be based on core knowledge and skills, and underpinnings.
ethical principles, and a selfless devotion to service. He also Other limitations include the new and evolving nature of
acknowledges a sociological definition grounded in expert the data synthesis techniques that we have incorporated. Our
knowledge self-regulation and altruism that balances medical very subjective approach to assessment of quality, in particu-
values with other societal values. Erde (2008) argues further lar, has the potential to be reductionist, if not arbitrary
that a definition should also set limits on what a doctor is (Barbour 2001). While the systematic advance planning of a
expected to do for a patient. Wear & Kuczewski (2004), alone systematic review ensures that the initial search strategy and
of these authors, wrestle with the issue of gender. inclusion criteria are objective, all synthesis strategies incorp-
There is a commonly perceived notion within health care, orate some element of subjectivity, and so are invariably
but not well established yet in the literature, that the attributes interpretive in nature (Sandelowski 2008). Reviews such as
of professionalism may differ by specialty and individual this, combining qualitative and quantitative (and even opinion)
practitioner (Rowley et al. 2000; Garfield et al. 2009; Bryden are prone to criticism from the appearance of driving one
et al. 2010; Pryor 2010). Kinghorn et al. (2007) add the agenda over others. We acknowledge the risk inherent in our
observation that most formal statements on professionalism, as quality assessment tool; that such a checklist has the potential
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
‘‘promulgated’’ by various professional bodies, reflect consen- to be reductionist if not arbitrary (Barbour 2001), and to skew
sus within those bodies but do not reflect the community results towards aspects of execution or reporting of qualitative
cultural and moral traditions within which medicine must data, rather than a holistic judgement (Dixon-Woods et al.
operate. Woodruff et al. (2008) also present a compelling 2007).
argument against definitions of professionalism that are This study will have relevance to those who are developing
tailored to different medical sub-specialties. professionalism curricula and to those interested in the
Seven years on from its publication, we find that the sociology and philosophy of medicine in the modern world.
conclusion of Van De Camp’s team, that ‘‘there is absolutely no
consensus within the medical community about what consti-
tutes professionalism’’ (Van De Camp et al. 2004, p. 700) still Conclusion
remains true. Van De Camp’s team opt for the ‘‘attributes’’
Explicit definitions are explicit heuristics: they guide
For personal use only.
While there have been many attempts at definition, none is Brennan TA. 2002. Physicians’ professional responsibility to improve the
quality of care. Acad Med 77:973–980.
standardized or has universal agreement. A definition is
Brennan T, Blank L, Cohen J, Kimball H, Smelser N, Copeland R, Lavizzo-
necessary to convey meaning – both to those within the Mourey R, McDonald W, Brenning G, Davidson C, et al. 2002. Medical
profession, conferring a shared identity, and to those outside professionalism in the new millennium: A physicians’ charter – Medical
the field, particularly the lay public, to identify what the professionalism project. Clin Med 2:116–118.
profession is dedicated to and what it values. A definition is *Brownell AK, Côté L. 2001. Senior residents’ views on the meaning of
also a fundamental basis for assessment of medical students, professionalism and how they learn about it. Acad Med 76:734–737.
Bryden P, Ginsburg S, Kurabi B, Ahmed N. 2010. Professing profession-
and for performance appraisal/evaluation in practitioners.
alism: Are we our own worst enemy? Faculty members’ experiences of
teaching and evaluating professionalism in medical education at one
school. Acad Med 85:1025–1034.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of
Chard D, Elsharkawy A, Newbery N. 2006. Medical professionalism: The
interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and trainees’ views. Clin Med 6:68–71.
writing of the article. Cohen JJ. 2006. Professionalism in medical education, an American
perspective: From evidence to accountability. Med Educ 40:607–617.
*Cohen JJ. 2007. Viewpoint: Linking professionalism to humanism: What it
means, why it matters. Acad Med 82:1029–1032.
Notes on contributors
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
59
H. Birden et al.
Green M, Zick A, Makoul G. 2009. Defining professionalism Krause EA. 1996. Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advance
from the perspective of patients, physicians, and nurses. Acad Med of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press.
84:566–573. Kumagai AK. 2008. A conceptual framework for the use of illness narratives
Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. 2005. Effectiveness and efficiency of search in medical education. Acad Med 83:653–658.
methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary Levine RB, Haidet P, Kern DE, Beasley BW, Bensinger L, Brady DW, Gress
sources. BMJ 331:1064–1065. T, Hughes J, Marwaha A, Nelson J, et al. 2006. Personal growth during
Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. internship: A qualitative analysis of interns’ responses to key questions.
2005. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative J Gen Intern Med 21:564–569.
approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med 61:417–430. Lucas PJ, Baird J, Arai L, Law C, Roberts HM. 2007. Worked examples of
Hafferty F. 2004. Toward the operationalization of professionalism: A alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative
commentary. Am J Bioeth 4:28–31. research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:4.
Hafferty F. 2006a. Viewpoint: The elephant in medical professionalism’s Marcus ER. 1999. Empathy, humanism, and the professionalization process
kitchen. Acad Med 81:906–914. of medical education. Acad Med 74:1211–1215.
*Hafferty FW. 2006b. Definitions of professionalism: A search for meaning Markakis KM, Beckman HB, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. 2000. The path to
and identity. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res 449:193–204. professionalism: Cultivating humanistic values and attitudes in resi-
Hafferty F. 2008. In search of a Lost Chord: Professionalism and medical dency training. Acad Med 75:141–150.
education’s hidden curriculum. In: Wear D, Bickel J, editors. Educating Martimianakis MA, Maniate JM, Hodges BD. 2009. Sociological interpreta-
for professionalism: Creating a culture of humanism in medical tions of professionalism. Med Educ 43:829–837.
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
education. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press. Mills A, Chen DT, Werhane PH, Wynia MK. 2005. Professionalism in
Hafferty FW, Levinson D. 2008. Moving beyond nostalgia and motives: tomorrow’s healthcare system: Towards fulfilling the ACGME require-
Towards a complexity science view of medical professionalism. ments for systems-based practice and professionalism. Hagerstown,
Perspect Biol Med 51:599–615. MD: Univ Pub Group.
Halpern J. 2001. From detached concern to empathy: Humanizing medical Misch DA. 2002. Evaluating physicians’ professionalism and humanism:
practice. New York: Oxford University Press. The case for humanism ‘‘connoisseurs’’. Acad Med 77:489–495.
Hamilton N. 2008. Assessing professionalism: Measuring progress in the Oliver S, Harden A, Rees R, Shepherd J, Al E. 2005. An emerging framework
formation of an ethical professional identity. Univ St. Thomas Law J for including different types of evidence in systematic reviews for
5:101–143. public policy. Evaluation 11:426–446.
Hammick M. 2005. A BEME review: A little illumination. Med Teach 27:1–3. Parker M, Luke H, Zhang J, Wilkinson D, Peterson RM, Ozolins I. 2008. The
Hammick M, Dornan T, Steinert Y. 2010. Conducting a best evidence ‘‘Pyramid of Professionalism’’: Seven years of experience with an
systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. integrated program of teaching, developing, and assessing profession-
13. Med Teach 32:3–15. alism among medical students. Acad Med 83:733–741.
Parsi K, Sheehan M. (editors) 2006. Healing as vocation: A medical
For personal use only.
Smith KL, Saavedra R, Raeke JL, O’Donell AA. 2007. The journey to creating *van de Camp K, Vernooij-Dassen MJFJ, Grol RPTM, Bottema BJAM. 2004.
a campus-wide culture of professionalism. Acad Med 82:1015–1021. How to conceptualize professionalism: A qualitative study. Med Teach
Smith LG. 2005. Medical professionalism and the generation gap. Am J Med 26:696–702.
118:439–442. van Mook WNKA, de Grave WS, Wass V, O’Sullivan H, Zwaveling JH,
*Sox H, Blank L, Cohen J. 2002. ACP ASIM Foundation & European Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CPM. 2009a. Professionalism: Evolution
Federation of Internal Medicine. 2002. Medical professionalism in the of the concept. Eur J Int Med 20:e81–e84.
new millennium: A physician charter. Ann Int Med 136:243–246. van Mook WNKA, van Luijk SJ, O’Sullivan H, Wass V, Harm Zwaveling J,
*Sox HC. 2007. The ethical foundations of professionalism: A sociologic Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CPM. 2009b. The concepts of
history. Chest 131:1532–1540. professionalism and professional behaviour: Conflicts in both definition
Spandorfer J, Pohl C, Nasca T, Rattner SL. (editors) 2009. Professionalism in and learning outcomes. Eur J Intern Med 20:e85–e89.
medicine: A case-based guide for medical students. NY: Cambridge van Rooyen M, Treadwell I. 2007. Pretoria medical students’ perspectives
University Press. on the assessable attributes of professionalism. S Afr Fam Pract
Stern D. (ed.) 2006. Measuring medical professionalism. New York: Oxford 49:17-17f.
University Press. Veloski JJ, Fields SK, Boex JR, Blank LL. 2005. Measuring professionalism: A
*Stern DT, Cohen JJ, Bruder A, Packer B, Sole A. 2008. Teaching humanism. review of studies with instruments reported in the literature between
Perspect Biol Med 51:495–507. 1982 and 2002. Acad Med 80:366–370.
Sullivan WM. 2000. Medicine under threat: Professionalism and profes- *Verkerk MA, de Bree MJ, Mourits MJE. 2007. Reflective professionalism:
sional identity. CMAJ 162:673–675. Interpreting CanMEDS’ ‘‘professionalism’’. J Med Ethics 33:663–666.
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by ACU Australian Catholic University on 12/19/13
*Swick HM. 2000. Toward a normative definition of medical profession- *Wagner P, Hendrich J, Moseley G, Hudson V. 2007. Defining medical
alism. Acad Med 75:612–616. professionalism: A qualitative study. Med Educ 41:288–294.
*Swick HM. 2007. Viewpoint: Professionalism and humanism beyond the *Walsh C, Abelson HT. 2008. Medical professionalism: Crossing a
Academic Health Center. Acad Med 82:1022–1028. generational divide. Perspect Biol Med 51:554–564.
Tallis R, Cumberlege B, Shepherd S, Black C, Dickson N, Doe W, Wear D, Bickel J. (editors) 2008. Educating for professionalism: Creating a
Elsharkawy A, Hayward M, Hilton S, Horton R, et al. 2005. Doctors in culture of humanism in medical education. Iowa City: University of
society: Medical professionalism in a changing world. Clin Med J R Coll Iowa Press.
Phys London 5:S1–S40. *Wear D, Kuczewski MG. 2004. The professionalism movement: Can We
Thistlethwaite J, Spencer J. 2008. Professionalism in medicine. Milton Pause? Am J Bioeth 4:1–10.
Keynes: Radcliffe Medical PR. Wear D, Nixon L. 2002. Literary inquiry and professional development in
Torraco RJ. 2005. Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and medicine: Against abstractions. Perspect Biol Med 45:104–124.
examples. Human Res Dev Rev 4:356–367. White A, Schmidt K. 2005. Systematic literature reviews. Complement Ther
Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. 2011. The art and science of knowledge Med 13:54–60.
synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 64:11–20. Whittemore R, Knafl K. 2005. The integrative review: Updated methodol-
For personal use only.
University of York. Centre for Reviews Dissemination. 2009. Akers J. 2009. ogy. J Adv Nurs 52:546–553.
Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health Wilkinson TJ, Wade WB, Knock LD. 2009. A blueprint to assess
care. Layerthorpe, York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, professionalism: Results of a systematic review. Acad Med 84:551–558.
University of York. Wimmer P. 2009. The professionalism of medical practitioners: A case study
van de Camp K, Vernooij-Dassen M, Grol R, Bottema B. 2006. of rural physicians. Masters thesis. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia
Professionalism in general practice: Development of an instrument to Polytechnic Institute.
assess professional behaviour in general practitioner trainees. Med *Woodruff JN, Angelos P, Valaitis S. 2008. Medical professionalism: One
Educ 40:43–50. size fits all? Perspect Biol Med 51:525–534.
61