Marks City

392 Pune
426 Pune
320 Pune
350 Pune
330 Pune
450 Pune
370 Pune
360 Pune
325 Pune
327 Pune
425 Pune
322 Pune
365 Pune
324 Pune
321 Pune
221 Pune
350 Pune
450 Pune
475 Pune
325 Pune
420 Patna
421 Patna
421 Patna
412 Patna
400 Patna
220 Patna
451 Patna
412 Patna
399 Patna
398 Patna
354 Patna
412 Patna
235 Patna
455 Patna
455 Patna
421 Patna
456 Patna
421 Patna
412 Patna
410 Patna
400 Chandigarh
412 Chandigarh
452 Chandigarh
411 Chandigarh
452 Chandigarh
451 Chandigarh
422 Chandigarh
433 Chandigarh
332 Chandigarh
330 Chandigarh
487 Chandigarh
485 Chandigarh
462 Chandigarh
322 Chandigarh
321 Chandigarh
322 Chandigarh
321 Chandigarh
422 Chandigarh
421 Chandigarh
369 Chandigarh
350 Chennai
221 Chennai
235 Chennai
254 Chennai
265 Chennai
485 Chennai
495 Chennai
433 Chennai
365 Chennai
321 Chennai
222 Chennai
258 Chennai
236 Chennai
236 Chennai
236 Chennai
236 Chennai
223 Chennai
236 Chennai
236 Chennai
241 Chennai
 A B C D
Pune Patna Chandigarh Chennai
1 392 420 400 350
2 426 421 412 221
3 320 421 452 235
4 350 412 411 254
5 330 400 452 265
6 450 220 451 485
7 370 451 422 495
8 360 412 433 433
9 325 399 332 365
10 327 398 330 321
11 425 354 487 222
12 322 412 485 258
13 365 235 462 236
14 324 455 322 236
15 321 455 321 236
16 221 421 322 236
17 350 456 321 223
18 450 421 422 236
19 475 412 421 236
20 325 410 369 241

Absolute deviation
Pune Patna Chandigarh Chennai
1 392 420 400 350
2 426 421 412 221
3 320 421 452 235
4 350 412 411 254
5 330 400 452 265
6 450 220 451 485
7 370 451 422 495
8 360 412 433 433
9 325 399 332 365
10 327 398 330 321
11 425 354 487 222
12 322 412 485 258
13 365 235 462 236
14 324 455 322 236
15 321 455 321 236
16 221 421 322 236
17 350 456 321 223
18 450 421 422 236
19 475 412 421 236
20 325 410 369 241
 Pune Patna Chandigarh Chennai
1 392 420 400 350
2 426 421 412 221
3 320 421 452 235

4 350 412 411 254 Testing Assumption of

5 330 400 452 265
6 450 220 451 485 Data->Data Analysis-> descriptive statistics->Inp
7 370 451 422 495
8 360 412 433 433
9 325 399 332 365 Column1
10 327 398 330 321
11 425 354 487 222 Mean
12 322 412 485 258 Standard Error
13 365 235 462 236 Median
14 324 455 322 236 Mode
15 321 455 321 236 Standard Deviation
16 221 421 322 236 Sample Variance
17 350 456 321 223 Kurtosis
18 450 421 422 236 Skewness
19 475 412 421 236 Range
20 325 410 369 241 Minimum
Maximum
Sum
Count

Kurtosis and Skewness value lies between -2 an

OR
We can test the normality for entire data as und

Marks
392 Column1
426
320 Mean
350 Standard Error
330 Median
450 Mode
370 Standard Deviation
360 Sample Variance
325 Kurtosis
327 Skewness
425 Range
322 Minimum
365 Maximum
324 Sum
321 Count
221
350
450
475
325
420
421
421
412
400
220
451
412
399
398
354
412
235
455
455
421
456
421
412
410
400
412
452
411
452
451
422
433
332
330
487
485
462
322
321
322
321
422
421
369
350
221
235
254
265
485
495
433
365
321
222
258
236
236
236
236
223
236
236
241
g Assumption of Normality
alysis-> descriptive statistics->Input Range select the entire data-->Group by column--> select the cell where you want to display results.

Column2 Column3 Column4

361.4 Mean 399.25 Mean 401.35 Mean 289.2

13.46895 Standard E 14.17575 Standard E 13.02917 Standard E 19.89533
350 Median 412 Median 416.5 Median 238.5
350 Mode 421 Mode 452 Mode 236
60.23498 Standard D 63.39589 Standard D 58.26823 Standard D 88.97463
3628.253 Sample Var 4019.039 Sample Var 3395.187 Sample Var 7916.484
0.460642 Kurtosis 4.521837 Kurtosis -1.346572 Kurtosis 0.915959
0.059978 Skewness -2.193218 Skewness -0.262891 Skewness 1.470802
254 Range 236 Range 166 Range 274
221 Minimum 220 Minimum 321 Minimum 221
475 Maximum 456 Maximum 487 Maximum 495
7228 Sum 7985 Sum 8027 Sum 5784
20 Count 20 Count 20 Count 20

ewness value lies between -2 and +2 , it can be concluded that data came from normal population. Here assumption of normality is met

e normality for entire data as under

Column1
Kurtossis and Skewness value lies between -2 and +2 , it conclude that data came from normal populati
362.8
9.113323
369.5
236
81.51204
6644.213
-1.032536
-0.384875
 275
220
495
29024
80
Testing Assumption of Homogenity of Variance
u want to display results.

mption of normality is met for three groups and one group group in not normal. Since ANOVA is robust model hence we can accept it for A

ame from normal population. Here assumption of normality is met.

ence we can accept it for ANOVA analysis
 Homogeneity of varianc
Pune Patna Chandigarh Chennai To test the homogeinty of variance , first calcula
1 392 420 400 350
2 426 421 412 221 Ho: Variances are equal / There is no signifiican
3 320 421 452 235 H1: Variances are different / There issignifiican
4 350 412 411 254 Anova: Single Factor
5 330 400 452 265
6 450 220 451 485 SUMMARY
7 370 451 422 495 Groups
8 360 412 433 433 30.6
9 325 399 332 365 20.75
10 327 398 330 321 1.35000000000002
11 425 354 487 222 60.8
12 322 412 485 258
13 365 235 462 236
14 324 455 322 236 ANOVA
15 321 455 321 236 Source of Variation
16 221 421 322 236 Between Groups
17 350 456 321 223 Within Groups
18 450 421 422 236
19 475 412 421 236 Total
20 325 410 369 241
Mean 361.4 399.25 401.35 289.2

Absolute deviation individual observation- mean score Interpretation: since p value(0.132) is greater th
Pune Patana Chandigarj Chennai
1 30.6 20.75 1.35 60.8
2 64.6 21.75 10.65 68.2
3 41.4 21.75 50.65 54.2
4 11.4 12.75 9.65 35.2
5 31.4 0.75 50.65 24.2
6 88.6 179.25 49.65 195.8
7 8.6 51.75 20.65 205.8
8 1.4 12.75 31.65 143.8
9 36.4 0.25 69.35 75.8
10 34.4 1.25 71.35 31.8
11 63.6 45.25 85.65 67.2
12 39.4 12.75 83.65 31.2
13 3.6 164.25 60.65 53.2
14 37.4 55.75 79.35 53.2
15 40.4 55.75 80.35 53.2
16 140.4 21.75 79.35 53.2
17 11.4 56.75 80.35 66.2
18 88.6 21.75 20.65 53.2
19 113.6 12.75 19.65 53.2
20 36.4 10.75 32.35 48.2
geneity of variance
mogeinty of variance , first calculate the absolute deviation ( individual observation - mean value) and run ANOVA Test steps- Data--> D

are equal / There is no signifiicant difference in varriances among group

are different / There issignifiicant difference in varriances among group

Count Sum Average Variance

19 893 47 1446.08
19 759.75 39.98684 2530.621
19 986.25 51.90789 739.587
19 1366.8 71.93684 2688.516

SS df MS F P-value F crit
10731.16 3 3577.052 1.932287 0.132001897425 2.73180703704336
133286.5 72 1851.201

144017.6 75

n: since p value(0.132) is greater than 0.05. The null is accepted ,hence we can conclude that variances are equal.
NOVA Test steps- Data--> Data analysis-one way single factor-select the vaules of absolute devation as input range and then select the o

qual.
ange and then select the out put cell where you wish to display the results, select summary statistics nad choose alpha level=0.05 and clic
e alpha level=0.05 and click ok
 Ho. There is no significant difference in
A B C D H1. There is significant difference in me
Pune Patna Chandigarh Chennai
392 420 400 350 Anova: Single Factor
426 421 412 221
320 421 452 235 SUMMARY
350 412 411 254 Groups
330 400 452 265 Pune
450 220 451 485 Patna
370 451 422 495 Chandigarh
360 412 433 433 Chennai
325 399 332 365
327 398 330 321
425 354 487 222 ANOVA
322 412 485 258 Source of Variation
365 235 462 236 Between Groups
324 455 322 236 Within Groups
321 455 321 236
221 421 322 236 Total
350 456 321 223
450 421 422 236
475 412 421 236 Tuckey-Kramer Procedure
325 410 369 241 Comparison
Pune-Patna
sum 7228 7985 8027 5784 Pune-Chandigarh
Mean 361.4 399.25 401.35 289.2 Pune-Chennnai
Variance 3628.253 4019.039 3395.1868421 7916.48421 Patna-Chandigarh
S^2 pooled 4739.741 Patna-Chennai
Factor Levels 4 Chandigarh-chennai
n 80
n dot 20
CR=Q*sqrt9pooled variance)/n dot

Interpretation:There was a statistically significant

Here p value is less than 0.05 ; Also F (calcualt
A Tukey post hoc test revealed that ther
o significant difference in mean score of the students from diifferent cities
ignificant difference in mean score of the students from diifferent cities

Count Sum Average Variance

20 7228 361.4 3628.25263
20 7985 399.25 4019.03947
20 8027 401.35 3395.18684
20 5784 289.2 7916.48421

SS df MS F P-value
164672.5 3 54890.8333333334 11.5809779 2.47451E-06
360220.3 76 4739.74078947368

524892.8 79

Q 3.715
er Procedure Num df 4 Dem df 76
Absolute difference Critical Range Results
37.85 57.19 Not significantly different
39.95 57.19 Not significantly different
72.2 57.19 means significantly diifferent
2.10000000000002 57.19 Not significantly different
110.05 57.19 means significantly diifferent
112.15 57.19 means significantly diifferent

450

400

350

300

250
Row
25
200

150

100

50

0
1 2 3 4
 150

100

50

0
1 2 3 4

s a statistically significant difference between groups as determined by one-way ANOVA (F(3,76) = 11.58,  p = .000).
han 0.05 ; Also F (calcualted value 11.58 ) is greater than F Critical Value (2.72) , Hence reject the null hypothesis.
oc test revealed that there is significant difference in the score in Patna-Chennai and Chandigarh-chennai.
 F crit
2.724944

(n-c) Q=3.715

11.58
Unit 2 Q1. Calculate descriptive statistics for " Marks " Scored by students from different citites in CBSE Exam
Unit 2 Q2. Use " Independent sample t- test "to compare the means of "Marks" Scored by students from Pune and Chen
Unit 5 Q3. Use " One-Way ANOVA" and comment on results
s in CBSE Exam
ents from Pune and Chennai and comment on results