Section—2

Evaluation Criteria

Attention: The bidders must carefully read the instructions in the Bid Data Sheet &
Special Conditions of Contract in Section-I and in the Evaluation Criteria in Section-II of
The SBDs to submit the requisite documents in the sequence indicated in the List of
Documents to be attached along with the Technical Bids. Non-compliance to the stated
Instructions may lead to their technical disqualification.

A) Technical Evaluation Marks ------------------------------------- 70

Passing marks (70% out of 70 marks)-------------------------------
49

1. Product Evaluation-------------------------------------------------- 45
 Compliance to purchaser specification--------------- 30
-Fully compliance with the required specification----- 30
Note: Minor and Major Deviation is describe / mark out in
specifications
-Compliance with minor deviation (up to 10%
Subject to main function is not affected)------------------- 25
- 03 Minor Deviations will result to Major Deviation and
lead to Non Compliance to Purchaser Speciation
(Disqualification)----------------------------------------------- 00
- Major Deviation which change / effect the basic or
main function of equipment and result to non-compliance
to purchaser specification will be straight away disqualify------ 00
 Product Certification------------------------------------------------ 05
-USFDA (US food & Drug Administration 510 K
-CE (European Community) MDD
-JIS (Japan Industrial Standards or MHLW)

- CE & JIS---------------------------------------------------------- 05
- USFDA & CE--------------------------------------------------- 05
- JIS & USFDA------------------------------------------------ 05

 Performance certification------------------------------------- 10
-Product’s local performance certificate
(Each certificate will bear 02mark each) --------------------- 10
- Quality of equipment installed (0.5 marks)
- Observance of timelines in execution of project (0.5 marks)
 - Delays in execution of project (0.5 marks)
- Damages to existing installation during execution of project (0.5 marks)
Note: the performance certificate must be signed and stamp on letter head pad
bearing reference number / Dispatch number of Institution and duly signed by the
competent authorities with Contact Details.

2. Firms Evaluation------------------------------------------ Total marks=25

 Legal requirement-------------------------------------------- 04

-Manufacture authorization certificate

(Attested from embassy of Pakistan in Country of Origin /Attestation
from Embassy correspond to country of origin in Pakistan for
imported items) --------------------------------------------- 04

- Taxation certificate (NTN, profession Tax& GST) from FBR Pakistan

and KPPRA (Mandatory): No marks
- Local Office (Mandatory): No Marks

 Firm Service Evaluation----------------------------------- Total Marks= 15

- Response Time (Certificate from Institution duly signed by authorities

about the Response time of Company to the complaint / fault in
equipment) (Each certificate contain 01-Mark) 04
- Down Time (Certificate from Institution duly signed by authorities about
the Down time of Equipment in a year (Percentage Value) (Each
certificate contain 01-Mark) 04
- Inventory List related to Product (Inventory Stock available in company
ware house related to product. List of items on letter head pad of
company duly attested by authorities--------------------------- 02
- List related to inventory of Calibration Tools
required for equipment duly verified by authorities / List of Technical
Staff along with salary slip duly verified by authorities------- 05

 Warranty Period------------------------------------------------ 06

- Minimum Warranty Required with Parts (3-Years)--------------------

00
- Maximum Warranty Required with Parts (06-Years)----------------- 06
- Warranty Period Over and Above the Minimum required with Parts per
year------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 02
 B. Financial Criteria------------------------------------------------------------ 30 marks
- Lowest price will get full marks
- Formula= lowest price/price of bid under consideration*100*0.30
The bidders achieving a minimum of 49 marks (i.e., 70%) out of 70 marks in the Technical
Evaluation will be declared technically qualified. Financial bids of only technically qualified
bidders will be opened publicly at the time to be announced by the Procuring Agency. The
Financial Bids of technically disqualified bidders will be returned un-opened to the respective
Bidders. After getting the financial score from the remaining 30 marks, the two scores will be
combined to identify the highest ranking firm.
Merit Point Evaluation Methodology: Contract will be awarded to the lowest evaluated
Responsive firm which gets the maximum marks and becomes the highest ranking in
theCombined Evaluation calculated through the Merit Point Average Methodology which puts
greater emphasis on non-price factors like stringent global certifications on Conformance
Specifications (i.e., meeting the required technical specifications), Performance Specifications
(i.e., meeting the requirements the product is designed for) leading to customer satisfaction
verification, certifications of the technical staff, provision of maintenance & services, provision
of training on equipment and post-warranty services etc. The following weight ages will be given
to the technical and financial scores:

Technical Score: 70
Financial Score: 30