Operators regularly spend considerable time and resources
on inspections to maintain plant integrity. Safely ensure more up-time productivity by increasing asset reliability To increase asset reliability, Integrity Management has The next evolution for asset monitoring and inspections shifted from a broad time or risk based approach to a targeted and cohesive approach using Process Control and Integrity Operating Windows API RP 584 (American Petroleum Industry Recommended Practice). Time Based Risk Based Process Control and Integrity Inspections Inspections Operating Windows Integrity Operating Windows (IOWs) are created as a subset of your Process Control operating limits. IOWs link operating limits, with impacts of process variables—feedstock quality, operating conditions or process configurations—to identify predictive limits that can be monitored and Integrity Operating Windows are a predictive and proactive approach controlled, to reduce the likelihood and rate of damage. to strengthening your Integrity Management program. By understanding the consequences of excursions outside of Time based inspection IOWs you can proactively manage integrity and target why, results in reactive Integrity Operating what and when you need to inspect, resulting in: maintenance or replacement. Windows (IOWs) provide Process Control Process • Minimising unplanned down time and shortening the rigorous basis for Operating Control planned shutdowns; Risk based inspection proactively managing Limits Variables • Enhancing profitability by eliminating cost and prioritises inspections plant integrity. based on likelihood of improving reliability; and failure and consequence. IOWs • Reducing risk and meeting regulatory obligations. Our team pride themselves on the strong relationships, founded on trust, they have with our customers—they ensure Objective Based Regulation is recognised dollars aren't spent when they don't need to be. internationally by regulatory authorities, risk Known modes Connect with us to discover more. management professionals and academics as being of damage Peter Wilson the most appropriate regulatory framework for +61 1300 308 257 high hazard industries*
*NOPSEMA Annual Report 2016
Implement Integrity Operating Windows Predict, avoid and prevent unexpected equipment degradation that could lead to loss of containment by implementing Integrity Operating Windows API RP 584*
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3
Identify the drivers of damage that Use process control and knowledge of Manage plant within predefined IOWs that meet potentially threaten plant integrity. degradation to target what, why and business production objectives and optimise reliability. when to inspect.
IOWs SOPs for
exceedances Manual response
Define Asset Review Define Integration of Update Safety
Implementation Feedback (including Current Integrity API RP 584 with Case and Documentation from Process modes of Integrity Operating existing Risk Critical Process Training Indicators damage) Status Windows Control System Safety Controls
Targeted Corrosion Ongoing Process
Critical limit high Failure occurs quickly Inspection Management Monitoring and Program Manual Control Failure occurs within Standard level high sustained operations Provides limits for informational, standard Establishes consequences or critical thresholds Target range high of excursions outside of FOR EXAMPLE: IOWs Carbon steel corrosion rate in dry gas is Stable, reliable Target Optimal Safe to operate insignificant at < 0.01 mm/yr. Knowing the Identifies instruments for reporting critical moisture content eliminates the need for process or mechanical control parameters Includes responses to Target range low inspection of wall thickness. (e.g. pressure; CO2; cyclic strain) exceedances Standard level low Failure occurs within sustained operations Piping integrity is ensured by consistent operation within the IOW limits for Critical limit low Failure occurs quickly moisture, to be validated by process control records.