Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to
share the outcome of cases of scaphoid non-union
treated with 1,2 intercompartmental supra-
retinacular artery (1,2 ICSRA) vascularised graft
at our institution, as well as to identify the possible
factors for the failure of the procedure.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of 13
cases of scaphoid fracture non-union treated
with 1,2 ICSRA vascularised bone grafting
from October 2000 to March 2003. A clinical
and radiological review was conducted. Linear
regression was performed in order to identify the
factors associated with a negative outcome.
Keywords: avascular necrosis, bone grafting, non-union and avascular necrosis (AVN), especially in Chew WYC, MBBS,
FRCSE, FAMS
non-union, scaphoid cases of proximal pole fractures. Hence, there is a move Senior Consultant
Singapore Med J 2011; 52(9): 658–661 toward vascularised bone graft for the treatment of non- Department of
union, especially when there is associated AVN.(4) Orthopaedics,
Alexandra Hospital,
INTRODUCTION Vascularised bone grafts from the distal radius have 378 Alexandra Road,
Singapore 159964
The scaphoid bone is the most commonly fractured been used for many years. They are based on the pronator
carpal bone. Undisplaced fractures are usually treated quadratus,(5) the volar carpal artery,(6) and more recently, the Tan G, MBBS,
FRCSE, FAMS
conservatively, while open reduction and internal fixation 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery (1,2 ICSRA), Consultant and Head
is the standard treatment for displaced fractures. With as described by Zaidemberg et al(7) and Sheetz et al.(8) This Correspondence to:
graft has been increasingly used over the years. In our
Dr Ong Hang Shyan
the introduction of percutaneous screw fixation, there is (4)
Tel: (65) 6357 7713
now an increasing preference for closed reduction and institution, it has been used for reconstruction of scaphoid Fax: (65) 6357 7715
Email: hang_shyan_
percutaneous fixation, even for minimally displaced or non-unions since the year 2000. ong@ttsh.com.sg
Singapore Med J 2011; 52(9) : 659
Table III. Patients’ age, time to fracture, fixation type Table IV. Location of fracture, avascular necrosis and
and fracture union rate. union rate.
Fracture Fracture p-value No. of patients (%) p-value
union non-union
Fracture Fracture
(n = 10) (n = 3)
union non-union
Mean age at injury (yrs) 23.17 25.73 0.412 (n = 10) (n = 3)
until healthy bleeding bone was seen. The required bone Table V. Functional outcome.
graft was then harvested with a sleeve of periosteum Scoring method Score; range
containing the 1,2 ICSRA. The arc of rotation provided Fracture union Fracture non-
by the pedicle also allowed for rotation of the graft into (n = 10) union (n = 3)
the recipient site. The vascularity of the bone graft was Green and O’Brien
Good 9 1
checked by deflating the tourniquet and the graft placed Fair 1 2
as an interpositional bone graft. Fixation was achieved Mean DASH 10.3; 2.5–26.7 9.2; 4.17–14.17
with either a variable pitch headless screw (62%) or ORIF: open reduction and internal fixation
Kirschner wires (38%).
Radiological union was assessed by plain
radiographs in all cases (Fig. 3). Computed tomography the union group, the mean postoperative intrascaphoid
(CT) was performed at the six-month follow-up in angle after bone grafting was 50.4° (range 30.0°–78.0°),
seven patients using bridging trabeculae as the criteria while that for the non-union group was 84.0° (range
for union. This was to assess for persistence of fracture 33.5°–104.6°), as compared to a normal angle of 35.0°
lines or lack of progress on serial radiographs. Outcome on the lateral view. This was, however, not found to be
scoring was performed at the end of the follow-up statistically significant (p = 0.088).
period with the modified Green and O’Brien score and Of all the patients who had united fractures, nine
the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) had a good Green and O’Brien score (Table V), while the
score. The data was statistically analysed using Mann- remaining patient had a fair score. The mean DASH score
Whitney U test for quantitative data and Fisher’s exact was 10.3 (Table V), and the mean wrist flexion-extension
test for qualitative data. In addition, the following factors arc was 117.5° (range 110°–125°). The mean wrist radial
were analysed using linear regression for association and ulnar deviation was 38.3° (range 30°–45° and 10°–
with fracture union: age (Table I); mechanism of injury 55°, respectively) each. At follow-up, patients in whom
(Table II); initial treatment modality (Table II); time to the fractures did not unite reported minimal wrist pain
bone grafting (Table III); method of fixation (Table III); that did not affect their return to work. The DASH score
location of fracture (Table IV); and presence of AVN for this group was 9.2 (Table V). Age, race, mechanism
(Table IV). of injury, location of fracture, initial treatment modality,
presence of AVN, time to bone grafting, method of
RESULTS fixation and postoperative intrascaphoid angle were not
Fracture union was achieved in ten (77%) patients after found to have any statistical significance with fracture
a mean period of 152 (range 77–255) days. The fracture union. Although statistically insignificant (p = 0.516),
united in all patients who did not have AVN, as opposed patients with AVN had a lower rate of fracture union than
to only 70% of patients with AVN. This was clinically those without AVN (70% vs. 100%).
significant, although our sample size may have limited
our ability to prove statistical significance. The union DISCUSSION
rate for proximal-pole AVN was 80% (eight of ten Non-union of the scaphoid is a difficult problem to treat.
patients) and that for waist AVN was 66% (two of three Despite advances in bone grafting technique, the rate
patients). As a whole, waist fractures had a lower union of healing is still not optimum. This is especially so for
rate, as all these fractures were associated with AVN. For those with associated AVN. Bone grafting, in addition to
Singapore Med J 2011; 52(9) : 661