Nama : Viki Canggih Kurnia

Npm : 1931090380
Semester : 3
Prodi/Kelas : Sosiologi Agama/E
Mata Kuliah :Study Naskah Bahasa Inggris ( UAS)

Introductory Paragraphs
Corruption in Indonesia develops systemically. For many people corruption is no longer a
violation of the law, but simply a habit. In all comparative studies on corruption between
countries, Indonesia always occupies the lowest position. This situation could lead to increased
corruption eradication in Indonesia by the authorities.
Indonesia is still one of the countries with the biggest problems in the eradication of
corruption. Corruption and its derivatives, ranging from bribery to collusion, have become a
barrier to the nation's economic, social, political and cultural development.
Thesis Statement
I strongly agree if the death penalty is applied in Indonesia, because with this death
penalty, it will help or be able to eradicate corruption. If not sentenced to death, it is better if the
corrupt person is obliged to return 100% of the money taken and imprisoned according to his
mistake and expelled from the agency where the person works.
Body Paragraphs
The low convictions for corruptors are indeed a problem in efforts to eradicate
corruption, but being obligated for corruptors is not appropriate. The more deadly effect was
used as an excuse for a deterrent effect. The deterrent effect of the dead organics is an absurd
reason, considering that it cannot correct its actions. In the wider crime scene, never reducing
crime decreases crime rate. Countries with a corruption perception index (IPK) rating do not
even apply for corruptors. These countries are Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Singapore and
Sweden. Despite the death penalty, Singapore does not apply the death penalty for corruption.
The famous Chinese, which is famous for the death law, in 2018 was actually ranked
87th with a score of 39 in the GPA. Another reason for dying is not as an act of respect for
humanity. The death penalty violates the right to life and is the most abominable form of human
rights.By refusing to die, then choosing what is appropriate for the corruptor? This question will
always arise if the argument with facts is still rampant corruption in Indonesia. If examined more
than that, in fact there are a number of rare attempts to impose punishment by law enforcers.
First, the maximum sentence, namely 20 years or maximum life. Life sentence that was once
acquitted of former Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court. Second, deprivation of political
rights.
 The Corruption Act and the Criminal Code have added to political rights revocation as
additional penalties. Revocation of political rights, namely reducing the right to vote and / or be
elected in general elections, can be imposed on corruptors. Of course this step must be done in a
transparent and in order to remain in line with human rights. Third, the impoverishment of
corruptors. Law enforcement officials must intensify the use of the Law on the Prevention and
Eradication of Money Laundering to seize the assets of corruptors. Even though it is regulated by
positive law in Indonesia, it should not be an option. Another sentence that is more worthy of
being released to have a deterrent effect on corruptors.
Conclusion First
In principle, the application and enforcement of the death penalty for murder in Indonesia
does not violate human rights or the existing legal system, because in its implementation, the
government uses the death penalty very carefully. as evidenced by the existence of the Draft
Criminal Code 2017. the death penalty in the crime case of murder that still exists and has not
been abolished and even adds several articles related to the sanctions imposed on the perpetrators
of murder. Second, until now the death penalty has not fully influenced the reduction of the
crime of murder, because in the enforcement and execution of executions it is still not firm and
good, which can be proven by existing data (previously described in chapter) 4) where in the
case of murder that occurred in during the period of 5 years (2012-2016), there were 6,874 cases
where all of them had not yet received a judge's decision regarding the imposition of the death
penalty, while those who had just received the judge's decision to carry out the death penalty
were 28 cases, both were executed at zero percent.