Name : Robby saputra

Npm :1931090392

Study Program : Sosiologi Agama

Semester :3

Class :E

Prodi : Study naskah bahasa inggris.

UAS STUDI NASKAH BAHASA

INGGRIS”

Introductory Paragraph

I strongly agree if corruptors are sentenced to death, as in the recent corruption case
committed by the Minister of Social Affairs, Juliari Batubara. I totally agree that it has not been
sentenced to death, because in the Law on Corruption Eradication, it is possible that the
perpetrator of corruption is punished death, namely in corruption when the state is in certain
circumstances such as an economic crisis and natural disasters (Article 2 and its explanations).
The Criminal Code (KUHP) and the revised KUHP currently being discussed by the DPR also
state the death penalty. Legislative members and state officials with various state facilities and
welfare / income levels above Rp100 million / month may never experience economic problems.
It is difficult for them to have a sense of taste about how hard and hard life is. Seeing that this
country is rich, its elite is prosperous, but its poor people are treated with feelings to interpret
that injustice is still happening. Corrupted public money causes poverty, disability,
backwardness, ignorance, and reduces the quality of life. Children cannot attend education,
children under the age of five are malnourished, resulting in the lost generation. The conditions
created by corruption cannot be compensated for at any cost. In this context, the death penalty
for corruptors has a logical reason. Especially for corruptors who are corrupt because they are
greed (by greed) and planned (by design). Not because of lack (by need) and not because it is
influenced / pressured by the environment (by accident). Regarding initiators (intellectual actors)
and the main perpetrators of corruption in natural disaster funds, in my opinion, there is no need
for much consideration to punish them as severely as possible so that they become an effective
deterrence effect in preventing corruption.
 The Thesis Statement

 The government so that if it can take firm steps without indifference to the corruptors to
be given the death penalty

 Applying the death penalty to corruptors is a right step to reduce and even eradicate
corruption cases in the Indonesian state

 A firm law is proof of the government's firmness and concern to seriously pay attention
to all existing criminal matters, including cases of corruption.

Body Paragraphs

Justice that is difficult to enforce is to give a very fair sentence without discrimination to anyone,
including the corruptors with their very cruel criminal cases. corruptors and making laws and
articles that regulate the death penalty for corruptors so that it is enforced, justice will stand firm
indiscriminately and the level of corruption in Indonesia begins to decline, previously Indonesia
was ranked 3rd as the most corrupt country, so if the government with Firm and courageous in
imposing the death penalty on Indonesian corruptors means that they have come out and
welcomed an honest future carried by its officials who are guaranteed not to dare to commit acts
of corruption again because their lives are at stake. With the realization of this, Indonesia has
enforced the law according to what was done by the perpetrator, so it is appropriate to give the
death penalty to corruptors.

Conclusion

We can conclude that giving a sentence that is in accordance with the crime that has been
committed is a matter of justice that must be applied, including the punishment for corruptors
with such a large criminal rate of corruption of public or state money even though it is shared
money with it is a suitable and balanced punishment. given to be fair to the corruptors is a death
sentence which gives the effect of being afraid to think again if you dare to commit acts of
corruption