You are on page 1of 10

Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284

Modelling the orthogonal machining process using coated


carbide cutting tools
J. Monaghan 1, T. MacGinley *
Department of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering, Metal Processing Research Unit, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

Abstract
In this paper ®nite element methods were used to determine the in¯uence of various coated and uncoated tungsten
carbide cutting tools on the machining of a nickel-based super alloy Inconel 718. Disposable coated and uncoated
carbide inserts were used both experimentally and as FEA models to study how the stress distribution within di€erent
coatings and carbide grades compared to each other, under a range of cutting conditions. Simulation of an orthogonal
metal cutting process was performed using FORGE2, an elasto-visco plastic FEA code. All FE models were assumed to
be plane strain. The results include the stress and temperature distributions through the primary shear zone, the chip/
tool contact region and the coating/substrate boundaries. The tool wear and stress results from the FE modelling agree
favourably with those obtained from experimental work. Ó 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Coated carbide cutting tools; Finite element analysis (FEA); Machining

Nomenclature K1 material consistency as a


b material e€usivity function of strain and strain
b1 , b 2 e€usivity of tool and work- rate
piece, respectively m strain rate sensitivity index
C strength coecient n strain hardening index
c 1 , c2 speci®c heat capacity of tool Q activation energy for self-dif-
and workpiece, respectively fusion
E YoungÕs modulus R gas constant
k material conductivity s deviatoric stress tensor
K material consistency as a t1 undeformed chip thickness
function of strain, strain rate t2 deformed chip thickness
and temperature T temperature (K)
W rate of heat generation due to
viscoplastic deformation
a average heat coecient be-
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +353-1-608-3430; fax: +353-1- tween the tool and workpiece
679-5554.
b ratio of activation energy for
E-mail addresses: jmonghan@tcd.ie (J. Monaghan), tmcgin-
ly@tcd.ie (T. MacGinley). self-di€usion to the universal
1
Tel.: +353-1-608-1936. gas constant

0927-0256/99/$ - see front matter Ó 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 7 - 0 2 5 6 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 7 0 - 1
276 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284

DT di€erence in temperature
DV di€erence in velocity compo-
nents between the rake face
of the tool and the sliding
chip material
e material strain
e_ material strain rate
q density of material
/ shear angle
/fr heat generated due to fric-
tional sliding
g deformation eciency
t PoissonÕs ratio Fig. 1. Idealised stress zones during orthogonal machining.
r1 , r2 , r3 principal stress components
in the x-, y- z-directions, re-
zones 1 to 2, the material from the shear zone
spectively
slides up the rake face of the tool. This causes
ro ¯ow stress of the material
further energy to be dissipated in friction as the
chip slides relative to the tool. Sticking friction
1. Introduction occurs towards the bottom of the rake face and
sliding friction at the top. As the tool is not per-
A high nickel content super alloy, such as In- fectly sharp ± it has a small corner radius, rubbing
conel 718, is widely used in the manufacture of occurs and this generates frictional heating which
aircraft turbine engine components, liquid rockets, further a€ects the stresses in this region. This can
cryogenic tanks, etc. These alloys possess high be seen to occur in zone 3. The round nose of the
yield and ultimate strengths, high fatigue strengths tool also causes frictional heating of the workpiece
and are extremely corrosive resistant [1]. However materials is zone 4. Strain hardening occurs in
this alloy is extremely dicult to machine [2] due zone 5 caused by plastic deformation spreading
to high shear stresses, high work hardening ca- below the depth of the undeformed chip.
pacities, hard abrasive carbides in the microstruc- The use of hard ceramic coatings applied to a
ture, low thermal conductivity and speci®c heat tougher substrate is increasingly being used to
and also because it is a gummy material with a improve the wear resistance and the working life of
strong tendency to weld to the cutting tool insert a range of engineering components. The more
and form a built-up edge. popular coatings used in the metal cutting industry
As a result, both the cutting forces and tem- include TiN, TiC, TiCN, Al2 O3 . It has been pre-
peratures in the cutting zone are extremely high viously established [4] that the failure of any given
and therefore machining rates and tool life values tool is often more dependent on the break up and
are usually low. As this study is mostly concerned detachment of the coating rather than from ex-
with the behaviour of coated tools subjected to cessive tool wear. Failure of the coating may arise
compression, tension and shear stresses then from either adhesive or cohesive e€ects. Cohesive
turning is the most appropriate machining method failure is generally a result of internal stresses
to illustrate these di€erent types of stresses [3]. within the coating or at the surface of the coating
Fig. 1 illustrates an idealised model of orthogonal while adhesive failure generally occurs at the in-
machining showing each of the di€erent defor- terface between the coating layers or between the
mation zones. coating and the substrate.
Zone 1 is the primary shear zone where shear In order to model coating failure it is necessary
takes place across the narrow plane AB at an angle to have a detailed knowledge of both the direct
/ to the workpiece. As the materials moves from and shear stresses at the coating surface and also
J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284 277

at the interface between the coating and the sub- 2. Finite element modelling
strate. Stresses within a coated insert can arise
from three main sources. The ®rst as residual 2.1. Steady state orthogonal machining of Inconel
stresses due to the thermal mismatch between the 718 using FORGE2
coating and the substrate during cooling from the
deposition process. The second as stresses arising The cutting tool modelled with FEA was an
from the deposition process itself and the last as a SNMA tungsten carbide insert with a nose radius of
result of an externally applied load. Only the last 0.8 mm. The ISO standard designation of SNMA
of these stress inducing states is addressed in this describes a rectangular insert with 6° negative rake
work and as a result the insert is said to be initially and 6° side clearance. The initial tool geometry was
stress free ± ignoring the in¯uence of deposition drawn in AutoCAD and imported into FORGE2 in
and thermal e€ects. IGES format. In order to compare the ®nite ele-
In this paper, the FORGE2 ®nite element code ment analysis results to those obtained experi-
allows for non-linear adaptive remeshing during mentally the following approach was used. All tools
simulation. No prior assumptions regarding chip were simulated having both positive and negative
geometry or material ¯ow were made. The me- rake angles of 6° with no chipbreaker. Three dif-
chanical and thermal properties used in the model ferent tool groups were constructed. These were
were obtained from experimental results and rigid tools, uncoated deformable tools and coated
from literature. To date, ®nite element modelling deformable tools. The workpiece was assumed to
of metal cutting has been primarily concerned be elasto-viscoplastic whilst the deformable tools
with two-dimensional orthogonal cutting with were assumed to be elastic. The cutting speed used
continuous chip formation [5]. There have been for the simulations was 330 mm/s and depth of cut
some exemptions such as the work carried out by of 1 mm to mirror experimental conditions. Twenty
Ceretti et al. [6] or Hashemi et al. [7], both of inserts were investigated which included 4 rigid and
whom concentrated on segmental chip formation. 16 deformable tools. The workpiece was rigidly
Segmental chip formation involves a process of held as shown in Fig. 2 to prevent movement along
shear-localisation in which micro-cracks are the non-machined surfaces. The single coated tools
propagated along the shear plane. Others [8,9] are shown in Fig. 3, were modelled with a coating of
based on the assumption that shearing/chip for- TiN, Al2 O3 or TiC whilst the double coated tools
mation initiates along some prede®ned line below had coatings applied to match the manufacturers'
the workpiece surface and upon reaching a criti- speci®cation [13,14].
cal stress or strain, the node ahead of the ap-
proaching cutting tool would split into a new
2.2. Computational mechanics within FORGE2
surface along this line. The point at which node
splitting occurs is realistic for a particular mate-
When modelling continuous chip formation
rial, tool geometry and cutting conditions, but for
during orthogonal cutting, the ®nite element work
a more generalised approach to FE modelling of
metal cutting, the use of a package that incor-
porates an adaptive non-linear remeshing algo-
rithm is essential.
There has also been work done on the simula-
tion of the response of coatings on substrates un-
der various loading techniques but most [10±12]
dealt with simple Hertzian pressure distributions
simulating the normal and shear stresses associ-
ated with ¯ow of the chip over the tool. Most are
sub-models of the orthogonal machining process,
centring on the ¯ow of the chip over the rake face. Fig. 2. The set up of the meshed tool and workpiece.
278 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284

Fig. 3. Single coated tool with 5 lm coating. Mat. 1: tungsten carbide (WC) Mat. 2: Ti N or Al2 O3 or Ti C.

was treated as a coupled thermo-mechanical where K is a temperature related material consis-


analysis. The material and heat ¯ow values were tency. The dependence of the material consistency
solved independently at each time step. The results on temperature can be expressed using the
of the material ¯ow were used to update the Arrhenius law:
workpiece geometry. Internal heat generation by
viscoplastic work and frictional sliding also en- K1 ˆ Keb=T ; …5†
abled the material properties to be updated.
The ¯ow stress of the material is dependent on where
the strain, strain rate and the temperature of the Q
workpiece. The material ¯ow stress is represented bˆ ; …6†
R
by the equation
Q is the activation energy for self-di€usion and R
r0 ˆ Cen e_m ; …1† is the universal gas constant. b can also be found
where C is a strength coecient and the super- experimentally by means of tensile tests performed
scripts n and m are the strain hardening and the at di€erent temperatures and di€erent strain rates.
strain rate indices, respectively. Both these values Linear regression can then be used to obtain the
were obtained from experimental tensile tests car- slope (b) from a graph of ln (r0 ) VÕs (1/T).
ried out on Inconel 718. The FORGE2 code [15] Contact between the cutting tool and the
represents the material ¯ow stress using the fol- workpiece material was characterised by a com-
lowing expression: bined Coulomb±Tresca friction law. The temper-
p…m‡1† n m ature change in the system was a result of the
r0 ˆ 3 K1 e e_ ; …2† competition between the internal heat conduction
and internal heat dissipation. This heat balance
where the consistency of the material is de®ned by equation for the system can be written as
the term K1 and is as
c oT
K1 ˆ p…m‡1† ; …3† qc ˆ div …k grad T † ‡ W : …7†
ot
3
where c is the heat capacity of the material. K1 The left-hand side of the equation represents the
relates the deviatoric stress tensor s to the strain temperature change, whilst the right-hand side
rate tensor e through the following expression: represents internal conduction with W being the
 p …m‡1† internal heat generated by viscoplastic deforma-
_ T
s ˆ 2K e; e; 3e_ _
e; …4† tion. This internal heat generated was calculated
using a Norton±Ho€ law:
J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284 279

p m‡1 give a cutting speed of 20 m/min. The feed rate


W ˆ gK 3e_ ; …8†
remained constant at 0.24 mm/rev. A depth of cut
where g is the deformation eciency, K the con- of 1 mm was chosen so that the results could be
sistency, e_ is the strain rate and m being the sen- correlated against the ®nite element results. The
sitivity to strain rate. Frictional heat ¯ux at the tool holder used was model PSSNR 2020K12 with
tool/workpiece interface is shared according to a plan approach angle of 45°. For the purpose of
their respective e€usivities. The heat generated by measuring the cutting forces the toolholder was
frictional sliding is represented by the expression mounted on a Kistler 9263A piezoelectric tool-
force dynamometer connected to three Kistler
b1
/fr ˆ  a  K  DV m‡1 ; …9† 5006 charge ampli®ers. The output from these was
b 1 ‡ b2 passes to an Amplicon PC26AT Analog/Digital
where b1 is the tool material e€usivity, b2 the input board. A Windows-based data acquisition
workpiece material e€usivity, a being the heat package, DASH 300, was used to obtain readings
transfer coecient between the tool and the ma- of the axial, radial and tangential components of
terial, K the consistency, DV the di€erence in ve- the cutting forces from the PC26AT A/D con-
locity between the tool and the workpiece and m is verter.
the sensitivity due to strain rate. The e€usivity of a
component can be calculated as follows: 3. Results
p
b ˆ k  q  c; …10†
3.1. Comparative study of ®nite element results
where k is the conductivity, q the density and c is
the speci®c heat capacity of the material. The vertical or tangential cutting force ob-
tained from the experimental tests in Fig. 4(a) and
2.3. Numerical inputs for FORGE2 can be seen to have an average value of approxi-
mately 1350 N. The results given in Fig. 4(b) show
The work material consisted of an Inconel 718 the predicted tangential force from FORGE2 to
alloy bar, a half metre in length and 100 mm in be approximately 1200 N, and this is within 12%
diameter. It was supplied as precipitation hard- of the experimental value. The di€erence between
ened (aged) material of AMS 5663 speci®cation the experimental and FEA results can be ex-
with a hardness of 550HV. Various coated and plained in various ways. The ®rst being that In-
uncoated inserts from two tool manufacturers conel is a very gummy material that will stick to
were tested. Tool geometry was standardised on the tool and forms a stable built-up edge on the
square inserts without chipbreakers (SNMA cutting tool tip. One e€ect of this BUE is to in-
120408) in order to facilitate a study of compara- crease the cutting forces. The FORGE2 model did
tive coating/carbide grade performance. The ma- not take this BUE into account and hence un-
terial properties of the substrate and the three derestimates the magnitude of the cutting force.
ceramic coatings are given in Table 1. Comparing the experimental and FEA values for
All turning tests were carried out on a URSUS the axial cutting forces shows a di€erence of 5%
225 centre lathe. The spindle speed was selected to between these results.

Table 1
Materials properties used in the ®nite element analysis
YoungÕs modulus (N/mm2 ) PoissonÕs ration Coecient of thermal expansion
3
94% WC & 6% Co (Substrate) 640  10 0.26 5:4  10ÿ6
TiC 450  103 0.19 7:2  10ÿ6
TiN 250  103 0.25 9:3  10ÿ6
Al2 O3 390  103 0.23 9:0  10ÿ6
280 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284

Four rigid geometries were considered. As


shown in Fig. 6(a) and (b) these had positive and
negative rake angles of 6°, each with and without a
chipbreaker. The predicted abrasive wear on each
tool can be seen in Fig. 6(a) and (b). Comparing
the four diagrams, it can be seen that the abrasive
wear is greatest on the negative rake cutting tools.
This is due to the increased normal stress on the
rake face of negative rake tools compared to that
(a)
of positive rake cutting tools. For tools with a
chipbreaker, the positive rake tool sustains little
crater wear, but in the case of the negative rake
tool, the crater wear increases and spreads up the
rake face. Also noticed is that areas of common
high wear occur on the land and also at the exit of
the chipbreaker. For the tools without a chip-
breaker, the wear pattern acts mainly over the rake
face. The wear is a maximum on the rake face just
past the nose radius where the normal stress is
expected to be a maximum. This is due to the
combined e€ects of friction and deformation as-
sociated with the primary shear zone (Fig. 1).

(b) 3.3. Deformable cutting tools


Fig. 4. (a) Experimental tangential cutting force. (b) Finite el-
FEA simulations were carried out in which the
ement tangential cutting force.
cutting tool was allowed to deform elastically in
order to estimate the stresses acting upon the insert
3.2. Wear simulations during the machining operation. Fig. 7 shows the
equivalent stress pattern obtained for an uncoated
The wear function U is expressed as tool with a negative rake face without a chip-
breaker. As can be seen from Fig. 7, areas of high
Z t
localised stress are to be found around the nose
Uˆ rn Vt dt; …11† radius of the tool where a maximum equivalent
0
stress of 3149 MPa occurred. As the material ¯ows
where rn is the normal stress and Vt is the tan- through the primary shear zone and up along the
gential sliding velocity as shown in Fig. 5. rake face, high stresses are generated. Conse-
quently these high local stresses around the nose of
the tool can lead to rapid tool wear and premature
failure.

3.4. Coated deformable cutting tools

Simulations were also performed in which ce-


ramic coatings were applied to the tool mentioned
in the previous section. This was done to deter-
mine if this coating protected the tool from the
Fig. 5. Diagram of how the wear function U is calculated. various stresses acting upon it. For the case of a
J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284 281

(a)

(b)
Fig. 6. (a) Tool wear on positive and negative rake tools without chipbreaker. (b) Tool wear on positive and negative rake tools with
chipbreaker.

Fig. 7. Equivalent stresses in the uncoated deformable cutting tool.

single coated TiN insert, it can be seen in Fig. 8 which is in the corner radius of the substrate.
that the maximum equivalent stress occurs at the However the maximum stress in the tool decreases
same location as on the uncoated tool (Fig. 7), from 3149 to 1737 MPa due to the addition of this
282 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284

Fig. 8. Equivalent stresses in the single coated deformable cutting tool.

single coat of TiN. One reason for this decrease in 1749 MPa also occurred on the nose radius of the
stress is that a TiN coating has very high lubricity substrate.
which resists the formation of a built-up edge and
also decreases friction along the rake face. There-
fore stresses are accordingly lower. It can also be 4. Discussion
seen from Figs. 7 and 8 that the stresses in the
workpiece for both the uncoated and coated de- The results of the ®nite element modelling in-
formable tool models remain the same at about dicate that the orthogonal machining process with
700 MPa. Therefore the same strain is being gen- continuous chip formation can indeed be modelled
erated in the workpiece, but a di€erent strain oc- with FORGE2. However the error between the
curs in each type of tool and this must be due to ®nite element results and the experimental test
the coating. results can be explained in a number of ways.
Another reason for the reduced stress is Initially the tool is said to be stress free. That is, no
the di€erence in the value for YoungÕs mod- residual stresses arise from the mismatch of the
ulus between the coating and the substrate. For coecients of thermal expansions for the di€erent
the same value of strain, or displacement, the materials. The underlying mechanics associated
stresses are proportional to the sti€ness of the with the interfacial fracture of two elastic solids
materials. Hence the sti€er the material, the higher has been shown to be a mixed-mode fracture
the stress in that material for the same amount of process [16]. Consequently it is important to know
de¯ection. the direct and shear stresses between the coating
Simulations were also performed in which two and substrate, the coating surface and the layers in
di€erent layers of ceramic were applied on the between the coatings. The ®nite element results
tungsten carbide substrate. The outermost layer indicate that the ratio between the elastic moduli
was TiN and the inner layer was Al2 O3 . As can be (Table 1) for the substrate and the coatings has a
seen from Fig. 9, a maximum equivalent stress of signi®cant in¯uence on the stress states. It was also
J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284 283

Fig. 9. Equivalent stresses in the double coated deformable cutting tool.

found that the thickness and type of coating in- 5. Conclusions


¯uenced the stresses at the various interfaces.
The value of the tangential stress at the surface This work has demonstrated that ®nite ele-
and over the various interfaces of a coated com- ment analysis can be adapted to e€ectively model
ponent has a signi®cant in¯uence on the working a metal cutting process. The results of the ®nite
life of the component. If this tangential stress is element models correlated closely with those of
highly compressive, it can lead to buckling, and if the experimental cutting tests. Detailed stress
tensile, it can lead to detachment of the coatings. distributions were plotted throughout the chip
In all of the coating systems investigated the and deformable tools for the various tool ge-
magnitude of the tangential stress decreased with ometries modelled. Distinctive shear zones were
increasing distance below the outer surface of the produced using both positive and negative rake
tool. However due to the sti€ness of the substrate, cutting tools. It was shown that the magnitude of
the maximum equivalent stress occurs in the sub- the equivalent stress was greatest when machin-
strate for all models simulated. ing with a negative rake tool without a chip-
For all coated deformable models, the tangen- breaker.
tial stress was compressive between the substrate After depositing a single coating on the surface
and innermost coating and so the coating would of the deformable tool and rerunning the simula-
have failed by buckling. Experimental results from tion, it was discovered that the stress within the
earlier work [17,18] have shown that uncoated tool decreased, whilst the stress acting on the
tools fail ISO test standards of 0.3 mm ¯ank wear workpiece remained on the whole, unchanged.
[19] after only three minutes whereas coated tools This was due to a reduced friction coecient with
last approximately for 14 min before failing at the the titanium nitride along with it being a less rigid
same cutting speeds and depth of cut. This is due material. It was also shown that the maximum
to the protection a€orded by the coatings. equivalent stress occurred in the same location on
284 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284

all three deformable models, namely on the nose orthogonal cutting, Journal of Material Engineering and
radius of the substrate. Performance 3 (5) (1994) 712±721.
[8] A.J. Shih, Finite element simulation of orthogonal metal
cutting, Journal of Engineering for Industry 117 (1995)
84±93.
Acknowledgements [9] B. Zhang, A. Bagchi, Finite element simulation of chip
formation and comparison with machining experiment,
The authors are very grateful to Materials Ire- Journal of Engineering for Industry 116 (1994) 289±297.
land Metal Processing Research Unit at Trinity [10] K. Komvopoulos, Finite element analysis if a layered
College, Dublin for their continued technical and elastic solid in normal contact with a rigid surface, Journal
of Tribology 110 (1988) 477±485.
®nancial support. [11] H. Djabella, R.D. Arnell, Finite element analysis of the
contact stresses in elastic coating/substrate under normal
and tangential load, Thin Solid Films 224 (1993) 87±97.
References [12] H. Djabella, R.D. Arnell, Finite element analysis of
contact stresses in elastic double-layer systems under
[1] American Society for Metals, Machining Dicult Alloys, normal load, Thin Solid Films 223 (1993) 98±108.
ISBN 0198590202. [13] Sandvik Coromant. Metal Working Products 93/94 ±
[2] M. Alauddin, M.A. Baradie, End-milling machinability of Turning Tools, Reference Guide.
Inconel 718, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechan- [14] Krupp Widia, Widia Inserts: The Complete Range, Ref-
ical Engineers, IMechE 1996, vol. 210, 1996. erence Guide.
[3] R. Komanduri, T.A. Schroeder, On shear instability in [15] FORGE2 Reference Manual, Transvalor, Sophia Anti-
machining a nickel±iron base superalloy, Journal of polis.
Engineering for Industry 108 (1986) 93±100. [16] A.G. Evans, J.W. Hutchinson, International Journal Solids
[4] J. Monaghan, M. Murphy, An analysis of the stress Structures 20 (1988).
distribution within the layers of multi-coated forming and [17] T. MacGinley, J. Monaghan, An investigation into tool
cutting tools, Frontiers for Engineering Materials, Key wear whilst machining nickel based super alloys using
Engineering Materials, vol. 118/119, pp. 131±138. carbide cutting tools, in: Proceedings of the 14th Confer-
[5] K. Komvopoulos, S.A. Erpenbeck, Finite element model- ence of the Irish manufacturing Committee (IMC14),
ling of orthogonal metal cutting, Journal of Engineering 1997.
for Industry 113 (1991) 253±267. [18] T. MacGinley, J. Monaghan, A ®nite element investigation
[6] E. Ceretti, P. Fallbohmer, W.T. Wu, T. Altan, Application into orthogonal machining using coated carbide cutting
of 2D FEM to chip formation in orthogonal cutting, Journal tools, in: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the Irish
of Materials Processing Technology 59 (1996) 169±180. manufacturing Committee (IMC15), 1998.
[7] J. Hashemi, A.A. Tseng, P.C. Chou, Finite element [19] International Standards Organisation, Tool Life testing
modelling of segmented chip formation in high speed with single point cutting tools, ISO 3685, 1997.

You might also like