Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
In this paper ®nite element methods were used to determine the in¯uence of various coated and uncoated tungsten
carbide cutting tools on the machining of a nickel-based super alloy Inconel 718. Disposable coated and uncoated
carbide inserts were used both experimentally and as FEA models to study how the stress distribution within dierent
coatings and carbide grades compared to each other, under a range of cutting conditions. Simulation of an orthogonal
metal cutting process was performed using FORGE2, an elasto-visco plastic FEA code. All FE models were assumed to
be plane strain. The results include the stress and temperature distributions through the primary shear zone, the chip/
tool contact region and the coating/substrate boundaries. The tool wear and stress results from the FE modelling agree
favourably with those obtained from experimental work. Ó 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Coated carbide cutting tools; Finite element analysis (FEA); Machining
0927-0256/99/$ - see front matter Ó 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 7 - 0 2 5 6 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 7 0 - 1
276 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284
DT dierence in temperature
DV dierence in velocity compo-
nents between the rake face
of the tool and the sliding
chip material
e material strain
e_ material strain rate
q density of material
/ shear angle
/fr heat generated due to fric-
tional sliding
g deformation eciency
t PoissonÕs ratio Fig. 1. Idealised stress zones during orthogonal machining.
r1 , r2 , r3 principal stress components
in the x-, y- z-directions, re-
zones 1 to 2, the material from the shear zone
spectively
slides up the rake face of the tool. This causes
ro ¯ow stress of the material
further energy to be dissipated in friction as the
chip slides relative to the tool. Sticking friction
1. Introduction occurs towards the bottom of the rake face and
sliding friction at the top. As the tool is not per-
A high nickel content super alloy, such as In- fectly sharp ± it has a small corner radius, rubbing
conel 718, is widely used in the manufacture of occurs and this generates frictional heating which
aircraft turbine engine components, liquid rockets, further aects the stresses in this region. This can
cryogenic tanks, etc. These alloys possess high be seen to occur in zone 3. The round nose of the
yield and ultimate strengths, high fatigue strengths tool also causes frictional heating of the workpiece
and are extremely corrosive resistant [1]. However materials is zone 4. Strain hardening occurs in
this alloy is extremely dicult to machine [2] due zone 5 caused by plastic deformation spreading
to high shear stresses, high work hardening ca- below the depth of the undeformed chip.
pacities, hard abrasive carbides in the microstruc- The use of hard ceramic coatings applied to a
ture, low thermal conductivity and speci®c heat tougher substrate is increasingly being used to
and also because it is a gummy material with a improve the wear resistance and the working life of
strong tendency to weld to the cutting tool insert a range of engineering components. The more
and form a built-up edge. popular coatings used in the metal cutting industry
As a result, both the cutting forces and tem- include TiN, TiC, TiCN, Al2 O3 . It has been pre-
peratures in the cutting zone are extremely high viously established [4] that the failure of any given
and therefore machining rates and tool life values tool is often more dependent on the break up and
are usually low. As this study is mostly concerned detachment of the coating rather than from ex-
with the behaviour of coated tools subjected to cessive tool wear. Failure of the coating may arise
compression, tension and shear stresses then from either adhesive or cohesive eects. Cohesive
turning is the most appropriate machining method failure is generally a result of internal stresses
to illustrate these dierent types of stresses [3]. within the coating or at the surface of the coating
Fig. 1 illustrates an idealised model of orthogonal while adhesive failure generally occurs at the in-
machining showing each of the dierent defor- terface between the coating layers or between the
mation zones. coating and the substrate.
Zone 1 is the primary shear zone where shear In order to model coating failure it is necessary
takes place across the narrow plane AB at an angle to have a detailed knowledge of both the direct
/ to the workpiece. As the materials moves from and shear stresses at the coating surface and also
J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284 277
at the interface between the coating and the sub- 2. Finite element modelling
strate. Stresses within a coated insert can arise
from three main sources. The ®rst as residual 2.1. Steady state orthogonal machining of Inconel
stresses due to the thermal mismatch between the 718 using FORGE2
coating and the substrate during cooling from the
deposition process. The second as stresses arising The cutting tool modelled with FEA was an
from the deposition process itself and the last as a SNMA tungsten carbide insert with a nose radius of
result of an externally applied load. Only the last 0.8 mm. The ISO standard designation of SNMA
of these stress inducing states is addressed in this describes a rectangular insert with 6° negative rake
work and as a result the insert is said to be initially and 6° side clearance. The initial tool geometry was
stress free ± ignoring the in¯uence of deposition drawn in AutoCAD and imported into FORGE2 in
and thermal eects. IGES format. In order to compare the ®nite ele-
In this paper, the FORGE2 ®nite element code ment analysis results to those obtained experi-
allows for non-linear adaptive remeshing during mentally the following approach was used. All tools
simulation. No prior assumptions regarding chip were simulated having both positive and negative
geometry or material ¯ow were made. The me- rake angles of 6° with no chipbreaker. Three dif-
chanical and thermal properties used in the model ferent tool groups were constructed. These were
were obtained from experimental results and rigid tools, uncoated deformable tools and coated
from literature. To date, ®nite element modelling deformable tools. The workpiece was assumed to
of metal cutting has been primarily concerned be elasto-viscoplastic whilst the deformable tools
with two-dimensional orthogonal cutting with were assumed to be elastic. The cutting speed used
continuous chip formation [5]. There have been for the simulations was 330 mm/s and depth of cut
some exemptions such as the work carried out by of 1 mm to mirror experimental conditions. Twenty
Ceretti et al. [6] or Hashemi et al. [7], both of inserts were investigated which included 4 rigid and
whom concentrated on segmental chip formation. 16 deformable tools. The workpiece was rigidly
Segmental chip formation involves a process of held as shown in Fig. 2 to prevent movement along
shear-localisation in which micro-cracks are the non-machined surfaces. The single coated tools
propagated along the shear plane. Others [8,9] are shown in Fig. 3, were modelled with a coating of
based on the assumption that shearing/chip for- TiN, Al2 O3 or TiC whilst the double coated tools
mation initiates along some prede®ned line below had coatings applied to match the manufacturers'
the workpiece surface and upon reaching a criti- speci®cation [13,14].
cal stress or strain, the node ahead of the ap-
proaching cutting tool would split into a new
2.2. Computational mechanics within FORGE2
surface along this line. The point at which node
splitting occurs is realistic for a particular mate-
When modelling continuous chip formation
rial, tool geometry and cutting conditions, but for
during orthogonal cutting, the ®nite element work
a more generalised approach to FE modelling of
metal cutting, the use of a package that incor-
porates an adaptive non-linear remeshing algo-
rithm is essential.
There has also been work done on the simula-
tion of the response of coatings on substrates un-
der various loading techniques but most [10±12]
dealt with simple Hertzian pressure distributions
simulating the normal and shear stresses associ-
ated with ¯ow of the chip over the tool. Most are
sub-models of the orthogonal machining process,
centring on the ¯ow of the chip over the rake face. Fig. 2. The set up of the meshed tool and workpiece.
278 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284
Fig. 3. Single coated tool with 5 lm coating. Mat. 1: tungsten carbide (WC) Mat. 2: Ti N or Al2 O3 or Ti C.
Table 1
Materials properties used in the ®nite element analysis
YoungÕs modulus (N/mm2 ) PoissonÕs ration Coecient of thermal expansion
3
94% WC & 6% Co (Substrate) 640 10 0.26 5:4 10ÿ6
TiC 450 103 0.19 7:2 10ÿ6
TiN 250 103 0.25 9:3 10ÿ6
Al2 O3 390 103 0.23 9:0 10ÿ6
280 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6. (a) Tool wear on positive and negative rake tools without chipbreaker. (b) Tool wear on positive and negative rake tools with
chipbreaker.
single coated TiN insert, it can be seen in Fig. 8 which is in the corner radius of the substrate.
that the maximum equivalent stress occurs at the However the maximum stress in the tool decreases
same location as on the uncoated tool (Fig. 7), from 3149 to 1737 MPa due to the addition of this
282 J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284
single coat of TiN. One reason for this decrease in 1749 MPa also occurred on the nose radius of the
stress is that a TiN coating has very high lubricity substrate.
which resists the formation of a built-up edge and
also decreases friction along the rake face. There-
fore stresses are accordingly lower. It can also be 4. Discussion
seen from Figs. 7 and 8 that the stresses in the
workpiece for both the uncoated and coated de- The results of the ®nite element modelling in-
formable tool models remain the same at about dicate that the orthogonal machining process with
700 MPa. Therefore the same strain is being gen- continuous chip formation can indeed be modelled
erated in the workpiece, but a dierent strain oc- with FORGE2. However the error between the
curs in each type of tool and this must be due to ®nite element results and the experimental test
the coating. results can be explained in a number of ways.
Another reason for the reduced stress is Initially the tool is said to be stress free. That is, no
the dierence in the value for YoungÕs mod- residual stresses arise from the mismatch of the
ulus between the coating and the substrate. For coecients of thermal expansions for the dierent
the same value of strain, or displacement, the materials. The underlying mechanics associated
stresses are proportional to the stiness of the with the interfacial fracture of two elastic solids
materials. Hence the stier the material, the higher has been shown to be a mixed-mode fracture
the stress in that material for the same amount of process [16]. Consequently it is important to know
de¯ection. the direct and shear stresses between the coating
Simulations were also performed in which two and substrate, the coating surface and the layers in
dierent layers of ceramic were applied on the between the coatings. The ®nite element results
tungsten carbide substrate. The outermost layer indicate that the ratio between the elastic moduli
was TiN and the inner layer was Al2 O3 . As can be (Table 1) for the substrate and the coatings has a
seen from Fig. 9, a maximum equivalent stress of signi®cant in¯uence on the stress states. It was also
J. Monaghan, T. MacGinley / Computational Materials Science 16 (1999) 275±284 283
all three deformable models, namely on the nose orthogonal cutting, Journal of Material Engineering and
radius of the substrate. Performance 3 (5) (1994) 712±721.
[8] A.J. Shih, Finite element simulation of orthogonal metal
cutting, Journal of Engineering for Industry 117 (1995)
84±93.
Acknowledgements [9] B. Zhang, A. Bagchi, Finite element simulation of chip
formation and comparison with machining experiment,
The authors are very grateful to Materials Ire- Journal of Engineering for Industry 116 (1994) 289±297.
land Metal Processing Research Unit at Trinity [10] K. Komvopoulos, Finite element analysis if a layered
College, Dublin for their continued technical and elastic solid in normal contact with a rigid surface, Journal
of Tribology 110 (1988) 477±485.
®nancial support. [11] H. Djabella, R.D. Arnell, Finite element analysis of the
contact stresses in elastic coating/substrate under normal
and tangential load, Thin Solid Films 224 (1993) 87±97.
References [12] H. Djabella, R.D. Arnell, Finite element analysis of
contact stresses in elastic double-layer systems under
[1] American Society for Metals, Machining Dicult Alloys, normal load, Thin Solid Films 223 (1993) 98±108.
ISBN 0198590202. [13] Sandvik Coromant. Metal Working Products 93/94 ±
[2] M. Alauddin, M.A. Baradie, End-milling machinability of Turning Tools, Reference Guide.
Inconel 718, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechan- [14] Krupp Widia, Widia Inserts: The Complete Range, Ref-
ical Engineers, IMechE 1996, vol. 210, 1996. erence Guide.
[3] R. Komanduri, T.A. Schroeder, On shear instability in [15] FORGE2 Reference Manual, Transvalor, Sophia Anti-
machining a nickel±iron base superalloy, Journal of polis.
Engineering for Industry 108 (1986) 93±100. [16] A.G. Evans, J.W. Hutchinson, International Journal Solids
[4] J. Monaghan, M. Murphy, An analysis of the stress Structures 20 (1988).
distribution within the layers of multi-coated forming and [17] T. MacGinley, J. Monaghan, An investigation into tool
cutting tools, Frontiers for Engineering Materials, Key wear whilst machining nickel based super alloys using
Engineering Materials, vol. 118/119, pp. 131±138. carbide cutting tools, in: Proceedings of the 14th Confer-
[5] K. Komvopoulos, S.A. Erpenbeck, Finite element model- ence of the Irish manufacturing Committee (IMC14),
ling of orthogonal metal cutting, Journal of Engineering 1997.
for Industry 113 (1991) 253±267. [18] T. MacGinley, J. Monaghan, A ®nite element investigation
[6] E. Ceretti, P. Fallbohmer, W.T. Wu, T. Altan, Application into orthogonal machining using coated carbide cutting
of 2D FEM to chip formation in orthogonal cutting, Journal tools, in: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the Irish
of Materials Processing Technology 59 (1996) 169±180. manufacturing Committee (IMC15), 1998.
[7] J. Hashemi, A.A. Tseng, P.C. Chou, Finite element [19] International Standards Organisation, Tool Life testing
modelling of segmented chip formation in high speed with single point cutting tools, ISO 3685, 1997.