Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/250206145
CITATIONS READS
82 4,352
2 authors, including:
David S. Horne
University of Wisconsin–Madison
190 PUBLICATIONS 7,637 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by David S. Horne on 27 November 2016.
0
1 the milk. This shift in mineral balance is also
.... thought to be the source of the beneficial effect
.jJ
10
[[
••
shelf-life of cream liqueur at 4S·C. a.
u •
Shelf-life Apparent U 20
• •
Treatment (d) pH 0
0 • •
ru
• • •
• •... ...... ...
Control 8 6.72
Anhydrous milk fat 63 6.61 •
>-
16
• •
• •• •
Washed cream 78 6.82 ...
Trisodium citrate 1 +'
Citric acid estCl' of GMS 2
74
71
6.80
6.95
....
OJ
0 12
.............
........
lAdded at 10 mmol/L of product. u
OJ
It . . 00000 0
201ycerol mODOstcarate. added at .5%/L of product; .... 0000 0000
added caseinate reduced from. 3 to 1%. > 8
0 5 10 15 20
Storage Time (d @ 45°C)
of just such a new product. Even though mix- FlgUI'e 3. Effect of ionic strength (added NaCl) on the
tures of alcohol with milk or cream have their stability of high proof cream liqueurs, alcohol content
origins in antiquity, the modem equivalents- 192% wt/wt. Control (0); + 10 mM NaCl (A); + 20 mM
cream liqueurs-bave been successfully deve- (.); + 50 mM<->; + 100 mM (e).
loped only in the last decade.
The earliest of these products gained im-
mediate consumer acceptance but suffered from each of these options cleansing the system of
defects that led to a limited shelf-life. First, a residual calcium (3).
plug of fat in the neck of bottles was commonly More recent work has focused attention on
found. This problem was the result of ineffi- the production of cream liqueurs with alcohol
cient homogenization; large fat globules readily contents up to 24% by volume. At high alcohol
cream on storage. The cure, once the problem
levels, not only is the presence of calcium
was recognized, was careful control of homog-
deleterious, but all ions have a detrimental ef-
enization conditions during manufacture.
fect on emulsion stability and product quality.
The liqueur is an emulsion of milk fat in an
aqueous alcohol solution. The second defect With viscosity increase used as an indicator of
manifested itself as a slow coagulation, ulti- destabilization, the deleterious effect of added
mately separating into a curd and a clear serum. sodium chloride becomes apparent during
The emulsion droplets were stabilized by a prolonged storage at 45"C (Figure 3). Measure-
coating of casein. Casein micelles could be ments cease at high salt concentrations due to
regarded as protein droplets similarly stabilized the occurrence of complete coagulation accom-
by a protein coat, again casein. We now know panied by serum separation. Once more, the
that the chief agent in controlling the ethanol emulsion behavior of liqueurs paralleled effects
stability of casein micelles is ionic calcium. seen in milks in which ionic effects predomi-
The cream, derived from milk, contains signifi- nated in stable regions in which high concentra-
cant levels of residual soluble milk compo- tions of ethanol were required to induce precip-
nents, including calcium. These low concen- itation. The solution to this problem is that
trations-about one-sixth of those found in already mentioned in dealing with soluble cal-
milk-are in sufficient quantity to affect the cium, either to remove the ionic constituents of
long-term stability of the product liqueur. The the cream by washing with water or to use
solution to this defect, calcium-associated insta- anhydrous milk fat (3).
bility, was to incorporate a calcium sequestrant
such as citrate into the formulation (4). Ac- CORRELATION BETWEEN ALCOHOL
celerated stability tests, based on storage of AND HEAT STABILITIES
product liqueur at 45"C, demonstrated the effi-
cacy of modest additions of citrate (5 to 10 The general shape of the ethanol stability to
mM) in extending shelf-life (fable 1). Similar pH profile is characteristically sigmoidal. The
increases were obtained by using washed cream work of Rose (53, 54) is frequently quoted
or anhydrous milk fat as the fat component, when discussing the effects of pH adjustment
ing. In the heat stability test of Miller and of a repulsive electrostatic component that must
Sommer (40), they too, were only interested in be overcome before aggregation can proceed.
a rapid reaction and were seeking to determine Simplistically, this energy is estimated as
that temperature at which heat coagulation oc- proportional to the square of the electrostatic
curred within 2 min of the sample being in- surface potential, '1', and to the dielectric con-
serted into the hot oil bath. stant, E. The log of the rate constant is then
The similarities in protocols defining the test given by the equation:
situations and the similarities in response to pH
and calcium adjustment suggest that in both
tests a similar, if not identical, reaction pathway
might be followed. The following simple argu-
ment gives some idea of how this behavior may
be satisfied. where:
Colloids-and casein micelles are colloidal
particles-are stable because a sufficiently large No = Avogadro's number.
repulsive energy barrier exists between particles
to prevent coagulation. The Arrhenius equation Thus, as the ethanol concentration is increased,
relates the rate constant (k) for a reaction, or a the dielectric constant and the term on the
reaction step, to the system temperature through right-hand side of the equation is decreased
the equation, shown below in its logarithmic until rapid coagulation occurs. Equally, the
form, right-hand tean can be reduced simply by in-
creasing the temperature. However, this would
In k = In A - ElRT assume that the surface potential was the same
in each situation at the instant coagulation oc-
where: curs, not necessarily before the alcohol was
added or the heating commenced, and this we
A = collisional frequency factor, have yet to prove. But the speculation is in-
R = molar gas constant, and teresting nevertheless.
T = temperature ("K). More interesting are the differences between
the Miller and Sommer heat stability profiles
In this sample argument, the activation energy, and those we generally see in current studies.
E, is equated with the energy barrier height. This is discussed in the following section.
Current thinking concerning casein micelles in-
cludes a steric stabilization component in the HEAT STABILITY
repulsive energy contributing to this barrier-the
"hairy micelle" concept of Holt (18) and WaI- In this short review of heat stability, we
stra (65). But, for destabilization induced by cannot do justice to all that has been published
addition of ethanol, the light scattering studies on the subject over the last half century. For
of Home (20, 21, 23) have shown the collapse more detailed infonnation on aspects not cov-
of the hairs and the consequent loss of the ered here, refer to the excellent reviews of Fox
sterlc component with subcritical amounts of and Morrissey (14), Fox (12), and Muir (42).
ethanol. Even with this loss, an electrostatic This section concentrates on the following:
component still remains a possibility. As evi- first, an explanation of why the sigmoidal pH
dence of its existence, we may cite the follow- profile observed by Miller and Sommer (40), so
ing: the observation that the effects produced reminiscent of the ethanol stability to pH pro-
by substituting a range of alcohol is merely one file, changes when the method of defining heat
of dielectric constant (27); the effects of chemi- stability is altered; and second, a reassessment
cal modification that can be reconciled as a of the situation regarding the origins of the
change in protein charge (29); the influence of minimum in the Type A heat stability curve.
calcium and pH on the kinetics of aggregation
(Home, unpublished); and the direct measure- pH Dependence of Heat Stability
ment of electrophoretic mobility over the crit-
ical range of ethanol concentration (Home, un- Miller and Sommer (40) defined heat stabil-
published). This evidence points to the presence ity as the temperature required to instantane-
Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 73, No. 12, 1990
BORDEN SYMPOSIUM: STABnlTY OF PROTPlNS IN DAIRY FOODS 3619
ously coagulate milk protein (effectively within Many of these reactions proceed concurrent-
2 min). Today, the accepted definition of heat ly. Probably not all reactions lead directly to
stability is the time taken for coagulation to coagulation, but each has its own temperature
occur under standard conditions, usually 14O"C dependence, and the products of one reaction
for milks of nonna! concentration or 120"C for may influence the course of another. Thus, as
concentmted milks. As first observed by Rose an example, the Maillard reaction is pH depen-
(53, 54), this difference of time versus tempera- dent. Other reactions acidifying the milk and
ture leads to a manifestly different heat stability lowering the system pH will thus slow the
to pH curve (Figure 5). Rose found that coagu- Maillard reaction. The more rapid reactions,
lation time to pH curves fell into two classes. such as whey protein denaturation and calcium
The Type A milk, with the pronounced mini- phosphate precipitation, are complete within 5
mum, and the Type B, with the progressive min at 14O"C. Changes in the latter reaction
increase in coagulation time as pH is increased, with pH are the most likely candidates for
both differing from the sigmoidal behavior increasing heat stability in the Miller and Som-
found by Miller and Sommer (40) on acidifying mer scenario (40) along the lines Home (22)
milk. previously explored for ethanol stability.
When milk is heated. several competitive Coagulation times are generally longer than 5
and often interdependent reactions occur. Fox min, however, and during the prolonged heat-
(11) reviewed the heat-induced changes in milk ing prior to precipitation, all of the reactions
preceding coagulation and classified them into detailed progress to a greater or lesser extent.
five groups: acid development, precipitation of Each reaction, of course, is influenced by
calcium phosphate, Maillard reactioos, casein changes in milk composition, although in many
modification, and interaction of sulfhydryl instances detailed studies are lacking. We still
groups, the latter including whey protein await an all-encompassing mechanism for the
denaturation. heat-induced destabilization of milk protein.
Type A Type B
35 3l!!
30 30
C
.rf 25 2!5
E
20 20
Gl
E
.rf
t- 15 1!5
01
III 10 10
0
U
5
0 0
6.3 6.6 6.7 6.9 7.1 7.3 15.3 B.e e.7 e.1i 7.1 7.3
pH pH
Figure 5. Typical Type A llDd Type B coagulation time to pH beat stability curves.
have the higher activation energy, and it is, in by postulating an influence of calcium ion on
fact, observed to have an activation energy 30 the actual formation reaction for the protein
to 40 kllmol higher than that for the coagula- complex.
tion of micelles at the pH of maximum stability The evidence seems incontrovertible that the
(44). However, reaction mtes are also concen- formation of the l3-lactoglobulin and lC-casein
tration dependent, and failure to observe the complex is the switch that triggers entry into
temperature effect on every occasion is proba- the minimum in the Type A cure. Before 1985,
bly associated with compositional differences researchers commonly accepted that this sur-
affecting the availability of reactants for the face coating of l3-lactoglobulin/lC-casein com-
two pathways. Genemlly, researchers agree that plex sensitized the micelle to coagulation, at-
the presence of the minimum in a Type A curve tributed by Morrissey (41) to heat-induced
is associated with the formation of a complex precipitation of calcium phosphate. The in-
between 13-lactoglobulin and lC-easein. Many volvement of calcium phosphate in this fashion
Type B milks are low in lactoglobulin and can seems unlikely in view of the decreasing stabil-
be converted to Type A by the addition of this ity of calcium phosphate over the entire pH
whey protein (10, 64). The lC-easein partner, range at which milk. is genemlly increasing in
however, must be micellar. Addition of free lC- stability.
casein to the milk. allows the complex forma- In 1985, Singh and Fox (57) published the
tion to take place in the serum phase, and a first of a series of papers that confirmed the
Type B curve results (64). Similarly, forcing earlier work of Creamer and Matheson (5), who
the dissociation of lC-casein from the micelle found that the lC-casein and j3-lactoglobulin
into the serum phase by the addition of NaCI complex dissociates from the micelle above pH
produces a Type B profile (64). 6.9. Concurring with the earlier view of Kudo
Although 13-lactoglobulin is the principal (35), Singh and Fox suggested that the denuded
whey protein, other whey proteins such as a- micelle is calcium-sensitive and that the origin
lactalbumin and bovine serum albumin can of the Type A minimum thus lies in the actual
destabilize milk. subjected to heating. The effect dissociation of the complex from the micelle.
of a-lactalbumin is similar to that of P-lac- At pH greater than 7, heat stability increases
toglobulin, whereas addition of bovine serum once more, presumably because of an increased
albumin results in a more general destabiliza- micellar negative charge, and also, we would
tion (13). suggest, decreased availability of ionic calcium.
If we postulate an equilibrium between se- A comparison of the pH dependence of the
rom and micellar lC-easein mediated by calcium Singh and Fox data (56) for complex release
ion activity, we can mtionalize a few more of with any of their Type A heat stability curves
the observations in Table 2. For example, if a shows the following features. The plot for N-
Type B milk. were low in calcium, then higher acetyl neuraminic acid, an indicator of lC-casein,
levels of calcium favoring the binding of lC- parallels that for total nonsedimentable nitro-
casein to the micelle would induce a conversion gen, both horizontal to the pH axis until pH 6.8
to Type A. The behavior of dialyzed milks is and rising thereafter at higher pH. The Type A
also explicable on the basis of calcium move- coagulation time profiles of Singh and Fox (56,
ment, if the Type A milk. has the higher free 57) are maximal by pH 6.7, well into the
calcium level, which transfers to the Type B, minimum by pH 6.8, and minimal at pH 6.9 to
and induces conversion. As to the effect of 7.0 before rising again. Therefore, the micelles
colloidal calcium phosphate depletion, this exhibit marked levels of sensitization and insta-
could be considered as a buffer regulating the bility before any signs of dissociation are dis-
amount of free calcium ion. Removal of this cernible. This lack of alignment in pH depen-
sink or of the phosphate anion itself reduces the dence raises doubts as to the validity of the
amount of bound calcium, increases micellar mechanism proposed by Singh and Fox (57).
charge and stability, and results in a Type B More convincing, if largely circumstantial, evi-
profile. Much of this last paragmph is highly dence favors the original idea of the micellar-
speculative. Many of the observations, which bound complex sensitizing the milk protein to
are by no means as clear cut as in the ethanol coagulation. This involves accommodating into
stability situation, could equally be explained the mechanistic framework the observations re-
garding the influence of milk urea levels on cyanate-sulfhydryl reaction offers a second
heat stability. pathway to coagulation, one that prevents the
Urea plays a marked role in increasing the lC-easein and P-Iactoglobulin reaction, the route
heat stability of milk when a single-stage to premature coagulation in the Type A mini-
coagulation occurs, as in a Type B milk or in a mum.
Type A milk. at pH values outside the mini- To summarize, urea and P-lactoglobulin pro-
mum, but is less effective when two-stage vide two separate and mutually exclusive reac-
coagulation dominates, as within the minimum tion partners for the two sulfhydryl groups of
of a Type A profile (43). lC-casein. Outside the minimum, the cyanate-
Because the natural pH of milk usually falls sulfhydryl reaction must be favored, because
outside the minimum and generally corresponds heat stability here correlates so well with urea
to that of the maximum in a Type A profile for level. Inside the minimum, the P-lactoglobulin-
most of the year in Scotland, Holt et aI. (19) lC-casein reaction is dominant and the balance
were able to demonstrate a very highly signifi- can be shifted only by greatly increasing the
cant correlation between the natural coagulation urea level. Something must happen near pH 6.8
time of farm and creamery bulk milk with the to enhance the P-lactoglobulin and lC-casein
urea content of milk. Subsequent studies in reaction. The most obvious candidate is the
Ireland (34) confinned these observations; 89% known and extensively studied dissociation and
of the seasonal variance in natural coagulation conformation change in the p-lactoglobulin.
time was accounted for by variations in urea Recent results (33) indicate that although the
level. Clear evidence shows that the urea level thiol group is on the solvent accessible surface
in milk is controlled by feeding practice (32). of the P-lactoglobulin monomer, it is buried in
In two separate serles of experiments, the direct the dimer, the solution state below pH 6.8. In
link between diet, blood urea level, milk urea our view, this increase in accessibility and reac-
concentration, and heat coagulation time was tivity following dissociation, with the conse-
clearly established (2). Urea level, the single quent increase in complex formation, induces
most important factor in controlling heat stabil- instability above pH 6.8 and thereby creates the
ity at the natural pH of milk, is subject to minimum in the Type A heat stability profile.
dietary manipulation and control. However, the This is the source of the instability mther than
coagulation time within the minimum of a Type the dissociation of the complex from the
A heat stability profile can only be increased by micelle.
the addition of very large amounts of urea (44). As to why the coated micelle should be
Fox et al. (15) have suggested that urea acts unstable, much has been said in recent years
simply by the buffering action of its reaction concerning the presence of a sterlc stabilization
products produced on heating. O'Reilly and component in the repulsive intermicellar poten-
Kelly (48), using 14c-labeled urea, found that a tial. Electrostatic repulsion due to micellar
significant proportion of the radioactive label charge has never been considered sufficient in
was incorporated into the protein after heating, itself (52). The external coat of lC-casein has
the proportion decreasing if the milk was pre- been assigned the role of providing this
treated with formaldehyde or N-ethyl malei- component-the so-called "hairy" micelle mod-
mide. Manson and Annan (38), discussing the el, proposed independently by Holt (18) and
chemistry of heated milk, focused attention on Walstm (65). The loss of this sterlc stabiliza-
the potential reaction between sulfhydryl tion component has been demonstrated as a
groups and cyanate, a rearrangement product of preliminary step in both rennet coagulation,
urea produced on heating. Such a reaction during which the lC-easein hairs are shaved by
would be wholly consistent with the observed the enzyme (66), and in ethanol-induced precip-
heat stability phenomena. First, it accounts for itation, during which the hairs are collapsed or
the chemical incorpomtion of radioactive label combed (20, 21, 23). The subsequent coagula-
after heating. Second, the enhancement of reac- tion reactions are still influenced by the miner-
tivity at high temperatures is accommodated, al, particularly calcium, content of the milk
because native P-Iactoglobulin has one free because of the remaining electrostatic potential.
sulfhydryl group and only after heating are the In the case of heat stability, the possibility
other sulfhydryl groups exposed. Third, the arises that the intemction of lC-casein with 13-
lactoglobulin could make the 1(~ins hairs to pH profile (45). The minimum of the curve
rigid, a crosslinldng reaction that would neu- deepens with increasing concentration until, at
tralize their steric stabilizing activity and render concentrations greater than about 17% total
the micelles prone to a calcium-moderated pre- solids, the milk becomes highly unstable when
cipitation. heated at pH values greater than 7.0. With
Although this theory has the advantage of further concentration, the maximum coagula-
providing a unifying theme for the mechanism tion time, which occurs at about pH 6.6, contin-
of micellar destabilization, however this is in- ues to decrease. In addition, the stabilizing
duced, it is somewhat speculative. Conclusive action wrought by increasing the urea level has
evidence as to what is actually taking place in progressively less effect. Muir and Sweetsur
heat coagulation over this narrow range of pH (45) also found that even at the maximum of
will require in-depth study of the physical state the heat stability profile, coagulation takes
of the micelle, together with full determination place in a two-stage process, i.e., in the same
of the nitrogen depletion curves and quantita- manner as in the minimum of a Type A prome
tive measurement of partitioning of all protein from an unconcentrated milk.
components between serum and micellar The major influence of whey proteins on the
phases. The rewards are great. Not only will pH dependence of unconcentrated milk has
micellar heat stability be explained, but the been detailed in the preceding section. Muir
knowledge gained will also assist in overcom- and Sweetsur (45) demonstrated that concen-
ing problems associated with the incorporation trates prepared with a high level of 13-lac-
of whey proteins into cheese and in the manu- toglobulin were significantly less stable than
facture of yogurt, in which heat treatment is those with lower amounts of the whey protein
applied without full understanding of its and that this destabilization took place over the
benefits. entire pH range. They also showed that addition
of 1(~ein increased the heat stability of the
CASE STUDY: CONCENTRATED MILKS concentrates. Additional confinnation regarding
the influence of whey proteins comes from the
Research into the heat stability of milk was work of Newstead et al. (46), who found that
undertaken with the aim of predicting the abil- selective reduction of whey protein content by
ity of evaporated concentrates to withstand in- ultrafJJ.tration increased heat stability, whereas
can sterilization. The initial failure to fulfill this increasing whey protein content was very
goal led to the dairy industry's adoption of ad detrimental to heat stability.
hoc empirical procedures to overcome prob- The influence of the mineral content of milk
lems in the manufacture of these products. on the heat stability of concentrated milk has
Forewarming, homogenization, and addition of long been recognized (58, 59), although the
permitted additives, such as citrate or poly- actual mechanism is still unclear. Recent
phosphates, all became part of the annory of studies of Hardy et al. (16) disclosed new evi-
fire-fighting techniques to improve stability. So dence to suggest that mineral equilibria in
successful were these empirical solutions that evaporated milk probably act on heat stability
comparatively little research has been carried through differences in the concentration of
out on evaporated milks in recent times, a soluble calcium. During processing of milk,
situation exacerbated by a declining market for they found a progressive transfer of both cal-
most products. A recent exception to this cium and phosphate from the soluble to the
decline has been a growing demand for a full- colloidal phase. The effect of adding phosphate
cream product for export from the United King- prior to forewarming led to further progressive
dom for sale in warmer climates. The necessity reductions in soluble calcium and indicated a
for countering a more severe temperature regi- possible cause of the stabilizing action of this
men and the extension of the shelf-life require- additive. Such results are consistent with many
ment from 1 to 2 yr has provided the impetus reports that addition of calcium destabilizes
for recent studies on concentrated milk concentrated milk (45, 61) and with previous
products. observations that, over an entire season, the
As skim milk is concentrated, progressive heat stability of concentrated skim milk is sig-
changes occur in the nature of the heat stability nificantly correlated with soluble calcium in
raw milk (61). Nieuwenhuijse et al. (47), ex- its operation are still underway. Preliminary
tending the study of calcium and phosphate results using model milks prepared from skim
partition in concentrated milk to include the milk powder and anhydrous milk fat indicate
influence of pH variation, demonstrated a that 1) the phospholipids bind to the fat parti-
monotonic decrease in calcium ion activity, cles but do not displace protein already on the
ultrafilterable calcium, and inorganic phosphate fat surface, and 2) from experiments using iso-
with pH. This led them to conclude that the lated soya lecithin fractions, acidic phospholi-
typical heat stability profile with its maximum pids are responsible for the increase in heat
cannot be related to the variation of any of stability (McCrae-Homsma and Muir, unpub-
these parameters with pH, although Ca2+ activ- lished).
ity appears to be an essential factor for the heat
stability of concentrated milk at pH values be- CONCLUSIONS
low the maximum.
In summary, an extensive body of evidence This paper has attempted to summarize the
can be interpreted to show that as milk is present state of our knowledge of ethanol sta-
concentrated, premature coagulation-of the bility and some related aspects of the heat
kind found in the Type A heat stability profile stability of milk protein. Considerable advances
for unconcentrated milk-becomes predominant. have been made in our understanding of the
Soluble calcium then becomes one determinant factors controlling ethanol stability, particularly
of heat stability and. with other factors con- of the central role played by ionic calcium. The
stant, may become dominant. mechanism postulated for ethanol-induced
Milk can be both selectively concentrated coagulation is dominated by physical interac-
and concomitantly reduced in soluble calcium tions. In this respect, ethanol and heat stability
by ultrafiltration. A significant improvement in tests differ fundamentally because the
heat stability is obtained and products concen- prolonged heating of the heat stability test al-
trated by a factor of 5 can be canned and lows a multitude of concurrent chemical reac-
sterilized using traditional methods (60). The tions to occur, some undoubtedly advantageous,
protein:carbohydrate ratio can be restored to as with urea, but others, as with whey proteins,
that of the original milk by the addition of deleterious. Such reactions proceed at tempera-
reducing sugars without significant loss of sta- ture-dependent rates, and, if curtailed, pennit a
bility (62). This methodology opens a route to a behavioral similarity to ethanol stability to be
completely new generation of sterile milk achieved.
products with stability ensured by control of We have also tried to provide evidence of
calcium ion activity. the validity of the postulate that the calcium
A further significant advance has been made sensitivity of the P-lactoglobulin and K-casein
in the production of homogenized products. complex is central to heat-induced coagulation
Without adequate homogenization, creaming of and frequently becomes dominant in concen-
milk fat occurs on storage. Homogenization trated systems. This suggests that the ultimate
usually results in a marked decrease of initial coagulation pathways of the two routes to
heat stability. Studies of Hardy et aI. (17) ex- destabilization may be closer than we presently
tended the original work of Maxcy and Som- realize. Further research is needed before a
mer (39) and Leviton and Pallansch (37) to complete unified theory of milk protein stabil-
demonstrate that addition of low concentrations ity can be fully developed.
of lecithin (.2% wt/wt) can compensate for this In the meantime, the newfound understand-
decrease in stability. Hardy et al. (17) also ing of the ethanol-induced destabilization of
demonstrated that the use of lecithin completely milk protein has pennitted the formulation of a
or partially eliminated the need for phosphate novel, high value product, the cream liqueur.
inclusion to ensure stability during sterilization. This emulsion of cream, alcohol, and sugar is a
Lecithin incorporation also permitted the appli- prime example of product design technology.
cation of higher than usual homogenization Equally, the advancing knowledge of heat sta-
pressures with a consequent improvement in bility is pointing the way toward greater control
emulsion fineness and inhibition of creaming. of stability in milk concentrates, providing
Further studies in pursuit of the mechanism of scope for new or improved products.
Joumal of Dairy SciCIICC Vol 73, No. 12. 1990
BORDEN SYMPOSIUM: STABILITY OF PR.oTBINS IN DAIRY FOODS 3625
REFERENCES 20 Home, D. S. 1984. Sterle effects in the coagulation of
casein micelles by ethanol. Biopolymers 23:989.
1 Ayers, S. H., and W. T. Iohnson, Ir. 1915. The alcohol 21 Home, D. S. 1986. Sterlc stabilization and casein
test in relation to milk. Ball. No. 202, US Dep. Agric., micelle stability. I. Colloid Interface Sci. 111 :250.
Washington, DC. 22 Home, D. S. 1987. Ethanol stability of casein micelles-
2 Banks, W., 1. L. CIapperton, D. D. Muir, A. K. Powell, a hypothesis concerning the role of calcium phosphate.
and A.W.M. Sweetsur. 1984. The effect of dietary- 1. Dairy Res. 54:389.
induced changes in milk urea levels on the heat stabil- 23 Home, D. S., and C. M. Davidson. 1986. The effect of
ity of milk. 1. Sci. Food Agric. 35:165. environmental conditions on the sterle stabilization of
3 Banks, W., and D. D. Muir. 1988. Stability of a1cohol- casein micelles. Colloid Polym. Sci. 264:727.
containing emulsions. Page 157 in Advmces in food 24 Horne, D. S., and T. G. Parker. 1980. The pH sensitiv-
emulsions and foams. B. Dickinson and G. Stainsby,
ity of the ethanol stability of individual cow milks.
ed. Elsevier Applied Science, London, BDgI.
Neth. Milk Dairy 1. 34:126.
4 Banks, W., D. D. Muir, and A. G. Wilson. 1981.
15 Home, D. S., and T. G. Parker. 1981. Factors affecting
Extension of the shelf-life of cream-based liqueurs at
the ethanol stability of bovine milk. I. Bffect of serum
high ambient temperatures. 1. Food Technol. 16:587.
5 Creamer, L. K., and A. R. Matheson. 1980. Effect of phase components. 1. Dairy Res. 48:273.
heat treatment on the proteins of pasteurized skim 26 Horne, D. S., and T. G. Parker. 1981. Factors affecting
mi1k. NZ. 1. Dairy Sci TechDol. 15:37. the ethanol stability of bovine milk. n. The origin of
6 Dahlberg, A. C. 1944. The application of science to the the pH transition. 1. Dairy Res. 48:285.
dairy industry. 1. Dairy Sci. 27:701. 27 Horne, D. S., and T. G. Parker. 1981. Factors affecting
7 Darling, D. F. 1980. Heat stability of milk. 1. Dairy the ethanol stability of bovine casein micelles. 3. Sub-
Res. 47:199. stitution of ethanol by other organic solvents. Inl 1.
8 Davies, D. T., and I.CD. Wbite. 1958. The relation BioI. Macromol. 3:399.
between the chemical composition of milk and the 28 Horne, D. S., and T. G. Parker. 1981. Factors affecting
stability of the caseinate complex. n. Coagulation by the ethanol stability of bovine milk. IV. Effect of
ethanol. 1. Dairy Res. 15:256. forewarming. 1. Dairy Res. 48:405.
9 Donnelly, W. I., and D. S. Horne. 1986. Relationship 29 Horne, D. S., and T. G. Parker. 1982. Factors affecting
between ethanol stability of bovine milk and natural the ethanol stability of bovine milk. V. Effects of
variations in milk composition. 1. Dairy Res. 53:23. chemical modification of milk protein. 1. Dairy Res.
10 Feagan, 1. T., L. F. Bailey, A. F. Hehir, D. M. McLean, 49:449.
and NJ.S. Ellis. 1972. Coagulation of milk proteins. I. 30 Home, D. S., and T. G. Parket'. 1983. Factors affecting
Effect of genetic variants of milk proteins on rennet the ethanol stability of bovine milk. VI. Effect of
coagulatiou and heat stability of normal milk. Aust. 1. concentration. 1. Dairy Res. 50:425.
Dairy Technol. 27: 129. 31 Home, D. S., T. G. Parker, W. 1. Donnelly, and D. T.
II Fox, P. F. 1981. Heat-induced changes in milk preced- Davies. 1986. Factors affecting the ethanol stability of
ing coagulation. 1. Dairy Sci. 64:2127. bovine milk. vn. Lactational and compositional ef-
12 Fox, P. F. 1983. Heat-induced coagulation of milk. fects. 1. Dairy Res. 53:407.
Page 189 in Developments in dairy chemistry. I. Pr0- 32Ioumet, M., R. Verite, and B. Vignon. 1975. L'azote
teins. P. F. Fox, ed. Blsevier Applied Scieoce, London, non protaque du lait fracteurs de variation. Lait 55:
Engl. 212.
13 Fox, P. F., and C. M. Hearn. 1978. Heat stability of 33 Kella, NK.D., and 1. B. Kinsella. 1988. Structural
milk: influence of deoaturable proteins and detergents
stability of ~lactoglobulin in the presence of kos-
on pH sensitivity. 1. Dairy Res. 45:159.
motropic salts. Int. 1. Pepl Protein Res. 32:396.
14 Fox, P. F., and P. A. Morrissey. 1977. Reviews of the
34 Kelly, P. M., P. Hughes, M. K. Keogh, and 1. A.
progress of dairy science: the heat stability of milk. 1.
Phelan. 1979. Seasonal variation in the heat stability of
Dairy Res. 44:627.
15 Fox, P. F., B. M. Nash, T. 1. Horan, 1. O'Brien, and P. milk. Jr. 1. Food Sci Techno!. 3:62.
A. Morrissey. 1980. Effect of selected amides on heat- 35 Kudo, S. 1980. The heat stability of milk: formation of
induced changes in milk. 1. Dairy Res. 47:211. soluble proteins and protein depleted micelles at
16 Hardy, B. B., D. D. Muir, A.W.M. Sweetsur, and I. G. elevated temperatures. NZ. 1. Dairy Sci. Technol. 15:
Wesl 1984. Changes of calcium phosphate partition 255.
and heat stability during manufacture of sterilized con- 36 Leighton, A., A. G. Benton, L. S. Palmet', and K. 1.
centrated milk. 1. Dairy Sci. 67:1666. Matheson. 1928. Coagulation of milk. Page 188 in
17 Hardy, B. B., A.W.M. Sweetsur, I. G. West, and D. D. Fundamentals of dairy science. Associates of L. A.
Muir. 1985. Heat stability of concentrated milk: en- Rogers, ed. Chemical Catalog Co., New York, NY.
hancement of initial heat stability by incorporation of 37 Leviton, A., and M. 1. Pallansch. 1962. High tempera-
food grade lecithin. 1. Food Technol. 20:97. ture short-time sterilized evaporated milk. IV. The
18 Holt, C. 1975. The stability of bovine casein micelles. retardalion of gelalion with condensed phosphates,
Page 641 in Proceedings of the International Confer- manganous ions, polyhydric compounds and phospha-
ence on Colloid and Surface Science, Budapest. Vol I. tides. 1. Dairy Sci. 45:1045.
B. Wolfram, ed. Akademia Kiado, Budapest. 38 Manson, W., and W. D. Annan. 1983. Aspects of the
19 Holt, C., D. D. Muir, and A.W.M. Sweetsur. 1978. chemistry of heated mi1k. Rep. Hannah Res. Inst., Ayr,
Seasonal changes in heat stability of milk from cream- Scotland.
ery silos in south-west Scotland. 1. Dairy Res. 45:183. 39 Maxcy, R. B., and H. H. Sommer. 1954. Fat sepanttion
in evaporated milk. m. Gravity separation and heat composition of milk from individual cows during lacta-
stability. J. Dairy Sci. 37:1061. tion. J. Dairy Sci. 44:430.
40 Miller, P. G., and H. H. Sommer. 1940. The coagula- 54 Rose, D. 1961. Factors affecting the pH sensitivity of
tion temperature of milk as affected by pH, salts, the heat stability of milk from individual cows. J. Dairy
evaporation and previous heat treatment J. Dairy Sci. Sci. 44:1405.
23:405. 55 Rose, D. 1962. Factors affecting the heat stability of
41 Morrissey, P. A. 1969. The heat stability of milk as milk. 1. Dairy Sci. 45:1305.
affected by variation in pH and milk salts. J. Dairy 56 Singh, H., and P. F. Fox. 1985. Heat stability of milk::
Res. 36:343. the mechanism of stabilization by formaldehyde. J.
42 Muir, D. D. 1985. Heat stability of milk and concen- Dairy Res. 52:65.
trated milk. Int. J. Biochem. 17:291. 57 Singh, H.• and P. F. Fox. 1985. Heat stability of milk:
43 Muir, D. D., and A.W.M. Sweetsur. 1976. The influ- pH-dependent dissociation of miceUar ,,-casein on
ence of naturally occurring levels of urea on the heat heating milk at ultra high temperatures. 1. Dairy Res.
stability of bulk milk. J. Dairy Res. 43:495. 52:529.
44 Muir, D. D., and A W.M. Swectsur. 1977. Effect of 58 Sommer, H. H., and B. B. Hart. 1922. The heat coagu-
urea on the heat coagulation of the caseinate complex lation of milk. J. Dairy Sci. 5:525.
in skim-milk. J. Dairy Res. 44:249. 59 Sommer, H. H., and B. B. Hart. 1926. The heat coagu-
45 Muir, D. D., and AW.M. Sweetsur. 1978. The effect lation of evaporated milk. Res. Bull. Agric. Exp. Stn.
of concentration on the heat stability of skim-milk. J. No. 67. Univ. Wisconsin, Madison.
Dairy Res. 45:37. 60 Sweetsur, A.W.M., and D. D. Muir. 1980. Effect of
46 Newstead, D. F., W. B. Sander8OD, and E. F. Cona- concentration by ultrafiltration on the heat stability of
ghan. 1977. Effects ofwbey protein concentrations and skim-milk. 1. Dairy Res. 47:327.
heat treatment on the heat stability of concentrated and 61 Sweetsur, A.W.M, and D. D. Muir. 1982. Natural
unconcentrated milk. NZ. J. Dairy Sci. Technol. 12:29. variation in the heat stability of concentrated milk
47 Nieuwenhuijse, J. A, W. Tunmermans, and P. Walstra. before and after homogenization. J. Soc. Dairy Tech-
1988. Calcium and phosphate partitions during the nol. 35:120.
manufacture of sterilized collCClltrated milk and their 62 Sweetsur. A.W.M, and D. D. Muir. 1984. Optimiza-
relations to the heat stability. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 42: tion of the heat stability of concentrated milks prepared
387. by ultrafiltration. Milchwissenschaft 40:334.
48 O'Reilly, M., and P. M. Kelly. 1982. Heat-induced 63 Sweetsur, A.W.M., and J.CD. White. 1974. Studies on
urea interaction and their heat stabilizing effects in the heat stability of milk protein. I. lnterconversion of
milk. Jr. J. Food. Sci. Technol. 6:202. type A and type B milk heat-stability curves. J. Dairy
49 Padmos, W. H. 1930. Uber den wert der alkoholprobe Res. 41:349.
fur die Beurteilung der Milch. (On the value of the 64 Tessier, H., and D. Rose. 1964. Influence of kappa
alcohol test for the apptaisal of milk.) J. Dairy Res. 1: casein and beta lactoglobulin on the heat stability of
201.(Abstr.) sJdmmilk J. Dairy Sci. 47:1047.
50 Parker, T. G., and D. G. Dalgleish. 1977. The theory of 65 Walstrs, P. 1979. The voluminosity of bovine casein
branching processes applied to milk proteins. 1. Heat- micelles and some of its implications. J. Dairy Res. 46:
induced coagulation of whole milk. J. Dairy Res. 44: 317.
85. 66 Walstrs, P., v. A. Bloomfield, G. 1. Wei, and R.
51 Parker, T. G., D. S. Horne, and D. G. Dalgleish. 1979. Jenness. 1981. Effect of chymosin action on the
Theory for the heat-induced coagulation of type A hydrodynamic diameter of casein micelles. Biocblm.
milk. J. Dairy Res. 46:377. Biophys. Acta. 669:258.
52 Payens, T.AJ. 1979. Casein micelles: the conoid- 67 White, J.CD., and D. T. Davies. 1966. The stability of
chemical approach. 1. Dairy Res. 46:291. milk protein to heat. m. Objective measurement of
53 Rose, D. 1961. Variations in the heat stability and heat stability of milk. J. Dairy Res. 33:93.