Professional Documents
Culture Documents
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Pervious concrete is a sustainable pavement with high permeability. The purpose of this study is to
Received 11 May 2015 evaluate physical and mechanical properties of the pervious concrete including density, strength,
Received in revised form 30 August 2015 porosity, and permeability. Taguchi design of experiments was used to optimize the performance of these
Accepted 16 October 2015
characteristics. The relationship between properties dependent on coarse aggregate size. As the maxi-
mum size of the coarse aggregate increases, both the permeability and porosity grows up. Also, it results
in a significant decrease in compressive strength. There is a trade-off between strength and permeability
Keywords:
which should be considered to meet the minimum requirements for the pervious concrete.
Pervious concrete
Taguchi approach
Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Coarse aggregate
Strength
Permeability
Porosity
Mixture design
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.094
0950-0618/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
318 A. Joshaghani et al. / Construction and Building Materials 101 (2015) 317–325
Table 1
Physical and chemical properties of the portland cement.
Physical properties
Fineness (cm2/gr) Retained on Autoclave Normal Setting time Compressive Flow table
sieve # 70 (%) expansion (%) consistency (%) strength
(MPa)
Initial Final 3-day 7-day
(minutes) (minutes)
2848 11.41 0.51 25.2 165 225 15.9 21.6 145
Chemical properties
Components Silicon Dioxide (SiO2) Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3) Ferric Oxide (Fe2O3) Calcium Oxide (CaO)
Results obtained (%) 22.52 5.24 3.86 59.8
A. Joshaghani et al. / Construction and Building Materials 101 (2015) 317–325 319
Table 2
Summary of aggregate properties.
Table 3
Mixture design.
Specimen Aggregate size (mm) Water-cement ratio P/G⁄ (Vol.) Unit Weight (kg/m3) Target void ratio (%)
Cement Water Aggregate
C1-1.25.14 4.75–9.5 0.25 0.22 247.78 61.94 1672.28 30
C2-1.30.21 4.75–9.5 0.30 0.34 341.46 102.42 1672.28 22
C3-1.35.28 4.75–9.5 0.35 0.45 421.05 147.35 1672.28 15
C4-2.25.21 9.5–12.5 0.25 0.35 371.68 92.92 1590.30 22
C5-2.30.28 9.5–12.5 0.30 0.47 455.28 136.50 1590.30 15
C6-2.35.14 9.5–12.5 0.35 0.23 210.52 73.67 1590.30 30
C7-3.25.28 12.5–19 0.25 0.48 495.57 123.89 1565.08 15
C8-3.30.14 12.5–19 0.30 0.24 227.64 68.29 1565.08 30
C9-3.35.21 12.5–19 0.35 0.36 341.46 119.51 1565.08 22
P/G: paste/aggregate.
Table 4
Pervious concrete strength results at 7-, 28- and 56-day.
Mixture design Parameters Compressive strength Splitting-tensile strength Flexural strength (MPa)
(MPa) (MPa)
Aggregate (mm) Water-cement ratio (%) Paste ratio (%) 7-day 28-day 56-day 7-day 28-day 56-day 7-day 28-day 56-day
C1-1.25.14 4.75–9.5 25 14 5.4 6.6 7.2 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.3 1.8 2.2
C2-1.30.21 4.75–9.5 30 21 6.1 7.2 8.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.5 2.1 2.6
C3-1.35.28 4.75–9.5 35 28 7.8 9.4 10.4 1.8 2.2 2.4 3.1 3.7 4.7
C4-2.25.21 9.5–12.5 25 21 5.1 6.3 7.4 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.9
C5-2.30.28 9.5–12.5 30 28 7.0 8.2 9.6 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.8
C6-2.35.14 9.5–12.5 35 14 5.3 6.2 7.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.0
C7-3.25.28 12.5–19.0 25 28 5.2 7.2 6.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.9
C8-3.30.14 12.5–19.0 30 14 4.9 5.5 6.2 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
C9-3.35.21 12.5–19.0 35 21 6.6 7.2 8.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.1
320 A. Joshaghani et al. / Construction and Building Materials 101 (2015) 317–325
2.5
visually both angular, round, and a combination which classified
2.1
as semi angular. Fine aggregate was deliberately omitted in the
2.0
1.7 1.7 mixture designs. Pervious concrete investigated in this study
1.5 1.5 incorporated three size of aggregate including 4.75–9.5 mm or
1.5 1.3 1.3
1.2 9.5–12.5 mm or 12.5–19 mm. The details of specifications of the
aggregates are listed in Table 2. The aggregates were batched in
1.0
the saturated surface dry condition and no chemical admixture
was used in the concrete mixtures.
0.5
The mixture design for each pervious concrete batch had a tar-
get void content of 15–30% as recommended by ACI Committee
522-R [1]. Fig. 2 indicates that the actual measured void ratios
Mix Design
were 15–30%, and paste content 14–28%, respectively. This design
B. Splitting-tensile strength resulted in mixture proportions of 210–421 kg/m3 of binder mate-
rial, 1565–1672 kg/m3 of coarse aggregate and the water to cement
6 ratio ranged from 0.25 to 0.35 for a 1 m3 batch of concrete. The
details of mixture design are shown in Table 3.
5 4.7
4.3. Sampling preparation
Flexural strength, (MPa)
11.0 y = 14.056x-0.221
Fig. 4. Influence of aggregate size on the compressive strength of the pervious concrete at the age of 56-day.
9
8.6
8 8.0
y = 14.056x-0.221
7.3
7 R² = 0.9997
6
Strength, (Mpa)
5 Compressive
Tensile
4
Flexual
3 3.1
y = 12.078x-0.626
2 2.1 2.2 2.0 R² = 0.8575
1.4 1.4
1 y = 6.3164x-0.534
R² = 0.6969
0
9 11 13 15 17 19
Aggregate Size, (mm)
Fig. 5. Correlation between the compressive, splitting-tensile and flexural strengths at the age of 56-days.
4.0
Splitting-tensile and Flexural
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5 Splitting-tensile strength = 0.1338(Compressive strength)1.2161
R² = 0.7067
0.0
5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
Comressive Strength, (MPa)
Power (Splitting-tensile strength) Power (Flexural Strength)
Fig. 6. Correlation between compressive strength with splitting-tensile and flexural strength.
Table 5
Density and types of void ratio of the pervious concrete mixtures.
Mixture design Density Target void ratio (%) Open void ratio (%) Close void ratio (%) Total void ratio (%) Permeability (mm/s)
C1-1.25.14 1794 30 25.2 6.1 31.4 13.6
C2-1.30.21 1863 22 30.1 7.0 37.2 9.5
C3-1.35.28 1901 15 13.5 5.3 18.7 8.8
C4-2.25.21 1824 22 23.0 7.2 30.2 14.1
C5-2.30.28 1869 15 16.4 6.2 22.6 12.4
C6-2.35.14 1723 30 33.1 7.2 40.4 16.3
C7-3.25.28 1835 15 14.7 5.0 19.7 12.8
C8-3.30.14 1719 30 29.4 8.2 37.6 16.2
C9-3.35.21 1769 22 22.4 7.3 29.8 15.7
322 A. Joshaghani et al. / Construction and Building Materials 101 (2015) 317–325
with steel tamping rod 600 mm long rounded at one end to provide 18
16.3 16.2
low compaction on the top of the cylinder to ensure uniform com-
16
paction in each lift. The molds were filled in three equal layers and 13.6 14.1 13.9
each layer uniformly rodded 20 times in accordance with the 14
Permeability, (mm/s)
12.1 11.9 12.2
procedures outlined in ASTM C192 [2]. The freshly consolidated 12
concrete specimens were covered with plastic at temperature of 9.6
10
approximately 24 °C.
8
16
concrete void ratio experiment method [12]: opened void ratio 8 15
and closed void ratio. Cylindrical specimens of 100 mm in diameter 14
and 200 mm in length are used. The opened and closed void ratio 6 13
was calculated using Eqs. (3) and (4), respectively [21]. 12
4 11
W2 W1
Aopen ¼ 1 100 ð3Þ 10
V 1 qw 2
9
0 8
W3 W1 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Aclose ¼ 1 100 Aopen ð4Þ
V 1 qw Porosity, (%)
Compressive Strength Permeability
where Aopen and Aclose are the opened and closed void ratio of con-
crete (%), respectively, W1 is the weight of the specimen under Fig. 8. Relationships among porosity, strength and permeability for pervious
water, W2 weight of the specimen following 24 h exposure to the concrete.
A. Joshaghani et al. / Construction and Building Materials 101 (2015) 317–325 323
porosity. Strength variability within each aggregate size grouping the response using chosen S/N ratio. Broadly speaking, the S/N ratio
(replicates) were negligible. Fig. 3 asserts that although values of is the ratio of the mean (signal) to the standard deviation (noise). In
individual testing are different, trends are almost the similar. That this research ‘‘the larger the better” type of quality characteristic is
is, the mix designs 3 and 5 had the highest strength values in all considered since the objective is to maximize the strengths of per-
three testing and approximately the same for the minimum values vious concrete.
(e.g., mixture design C8-3.30.14). The mean values in terms of S/N ratio for all the three control
Fig. 4 shows strong relationship between compressive strength factors were depicted in Fig. 9 with main effects of the parameters
and aggregate size that is as the aggregate size increases, the on the mean response. The analysis states the lowest aggregate
strength of the pervious concrete decreases. The bigger size of size (4.75–9.5 mm), the highest water to cement ratio (0.35), and
aggregates results in decreasing the bulk density of aggregate. the highest paste content (28%) are positively affecting all kinds
Therefore the contact forces among the aggregates becomes of strengths in pervious concrete. In compressive strength, paste
weaker which leads to reduction of strength of the pervious content is more important than aggregate size and the water to
concrete. cement ratio. In other words, the mean of S/N ratio of paste content
Fig. 5 depicts the strong correlation between compressive, is 18.87 which is higher than any other ratios. However, in
splitting-tensile, and flexural strength and aggregate size. Similar splitting-tensile strength and flexural strength aggregate size is
to the trend shown in Fig. 4, the higher the aggregate size, the less playing the most critical role. Therefore, Minitab suggests a mix-
strength was achieved. The similar trends of compressive, ture design with aggregate size ranges between 4.75 mm and
splitting-tensile, and flexural strength expresses the relationship 9.5 mm, water to cement ratio of 0.35, and the paste content of
between these values which will be discussed later. 28% as the optimum design.
Fig. 6 shows the average strength of replicates at the age of
28-day. It expresses a strong relationships between compressive
6. Conclusions
strength and splitting-tensile strength and flexural strength. As
expected by increasing compressive strength, the flexural and
This study is conducted to investigate the application of Taguchi
splitting-tensile strength are increased.
method on optimizing mixture design of pervious concrete. Based
on the results from this experimental research on pervious con-
5.2. Porosity and permeability
crete, the following conclusions have been drawn:
[8] P. Chindaprasirt, S. Hatanaka, T. Chareerat, N. Mishima, Y. Yuasa, Cement paste [18] Minitab 16 Statistical Software, (2013), State College, PA: Minitab, Inc.
characteristics and porous concrete properties, Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (5) software available at http://www.minitab.com/.
(2008) 894–901. [19] A.A. Ramezanianpour, A. Kazemian, E. Radaei, H. AzariJafari, M.A. Moghaddam,
[9] C.S. Chou, R. Yang, J.H. Chen, S.H. Chou, The optimum conditions for preparing Influence of Iranian low-reactivity GGBFS on the properties of mortars and
the lead-free piezoelectric ceramic of Bi 0.5 Na 0.5 TiO3 using the Taguchi concretes by Taguchi method, Comput. Concrete 13 (4) (2014) 423–436.
method, Powder Technol. 199 (2010) 264–271. [20] C. Sanford, M. Onyango, T. Thomas, F. Jones, B. Rollins, Evaluation of cleaning
[10] K. Ćosić, L. Korat, V. Ducman, I. Netinger, Influence of aggregate type and size methods of pervious concrete pavement, Innov. Mat. Design Sustain.
on properties of pervious concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 78 (2015) 69–76, Transport. Infra. (2015) 58–70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.073. [21] D.S. Seo, An experimental study on sound absorption properties of
[11] B.M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, fifth ed., Thomson Learning, multifunctional porous concrete for building materials (Ph.D. thesis),
2001. 608 pp. Chungnam National University, 2006.
[12] Eco-Concrete Research Committee, Report of the Eco-Concrete, Japan Concrete [22] V.R. Schaefer, K. Wang, M.T. Suleiman, J.T. Kevern, (2006), Mix design
Institute, Tokyo, 1995. development for pervious concrete in cold weather climates, Final Report,
[13] A. Golroo, Pervious Concrete Pavement: Performance in Cold Climates, first ed., center for transportation research and education, Iowa State University,
LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010. 2 p. February 2006, 85p.
[14] N. Ghofoori, S. Duta, Development of no-fine concrete pavement application, J. [23] P.D. Tennis, M.L. Leming, D.J. Akers, National Ready Mixed Concrete
Transport. Eng. 121 (3) (1995) 282–288. Association, Pervious Concrete Pavements, Portland Cement Association, 2004.
_
[15] E. Güneyisi, M. Gesoğlu, Q. Kareem, S. Ipek, Effect of different substitution of [24] K. Wang, V. Schaefer, J. Kevern, M. Suleiman, (2006), Development of mix
natural aggregate by recycled aggregate on performance characteristics of proportion for functional and durable pervious concrete. Paper presented at
pervious concrete, Mater. Struct. (2014). the Proceedings of the 2006 NRMCA Concrete Technology Forum—Focus on
[16] J. Kevern, K.Wang, M.T. Suleiman, V.R. Schaefer, (2005) ‘‘Mix Design Pervious Concrete.
Development for Pervious Concrete in Cold Climates,” In: Proceedings of the [25] Water Environment Research Foundation. ‘‘International stormwater best
2005 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Iowa State management practices databases.” <http://www.bmpdatabase.org>, 2005
University, Ames, IA, 67 pp. (accessed May 2, 2005).
[17] C. Lian, Y. Zhuge, Optimum mix design of enhanced permeable concrete – an [26] J. Yang, G. Jiang, Experimental study on properties of pervious concrete
experimental investigation, Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (12) (2010) 2664–2671. pavement materials, Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (3) (2003) 381–386.