Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2020 Application of Modified Kna Cycle in Biomass CHP Plants 7
2020 Application of Modified Kna Cycle in Biomass CHP Plants 7
use the exhaust gases from the turbine as a heat source. innovative sources. Besides exhaust gases, suggested as
Vapor of working solution (stream 15) is then sent to six heat source in Reference 29, other sources, such as bio-
consecutive turbines, T1-T6 (radial inflow type), where it mass waste heat or geothermal wells, can be used. In
expands creating mechanical work (streams 16-21). comparison to the NBC, other systems, such as the
Vapor is expanded in the turbine, T6, at such a low pres- ORC, have been demonstrated to be less effective in
sure that it cannot be condensed at a given ambient tem- these particular applications. For example, as a conse-
perature. Hot vapor at turbine, T6, exit (stream 21) is quence to this fact, the National Energy Development
cooled first in the heater, H4 (RQ) (resulting in stream Organization (NEDO) in Japan has identified the
22), and then in the economizer, RQ2 (stream 23), thus Kalina's NBC as one of the most suitable technologies
providing energy necessary for separation of the working for further improving the energy efficiency of the Japa-
fluid. This working solution is mixed with the flash tank, nese steel industry.31
FD, liquid downstream of the economizer, RQ3 (stream
11), which is first throttled by means of valve, PV, to the
lower pressure (that of stream 23), resulting in once again 6 | MODIFIED NBC ( MNBC)
in “basic composition” fluid (stream 24). Finally, the fluid
is completely condensed by using cooling fluid in the Original NBC, presented by Kalina in Reference 29, can
heat exchanger, H1 (HEC/HESC), resulting in “basic be somewhat simplified using the cycle shown in
composition” liquid (feed-stream 1) and the process is Figure 4. This modified cycle is simplified so that it con-
repeated. tains only two heat recuperators, while the original NBC
NBC, presented by Kalina in Reference 29, is some- from Reference 29 contains a total of four heat rec-
what different from the cycle shown in Figure 4. These uperators. This suggests lower capital expenditures and
differences are only visual (ie, technologically both pro- simpler cycle management and regulation.
cesses are identical) and are as follows: Cycle shown in Figure 5 is calculated based on the
assumption that stream number 7 is divided in DIV 1
• in Reference 29, a single cooler of working fluid is equally among streams 8 and 11, while stream 4 is
shown with two working fluid streams and one cooling divided in DIV2 equally among streams 5 and 7.
fluid stream (having a total of three streams in a single Overall efficiency of the thermal cycle is defined as
heat exchanger), while Figure 4 shows two distinct the ratio of the work produced by the turbine reduced by
coolers, H1 and H2, with two streams each (one work- the pumps work and the input energy (heat) of preheater,
ing fluid and one cooling fluid); boiler, and superheater. It is calculated using the follow-
• in Reference 29, a single heat recuperator is shown ing equation:
with a total of four working streams, while Figure 4
shows three recuperators (RQ2-RQ4) with two N T −N P1 −N P2 N T −N P1 −N P2
ηTH = = ð2Þ
streams each. Q_ in Q_ PH + Q_ B + Q_ S