Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Haramaya University
Institute of Technology
Department of
Civil Engineering
Table of Contents
List of tables
Table 1-1: Dimensions of the four roof types ...................................................................................................................... 1-2
Table 1-2: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type – 2 ........... 1-3
Table 1-3: Roof-3 Zones dimensions .................................................................................................................................... 1-4
Table 1-4: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–3A ........... 1-5
Table 1-5: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–3B ........... 1-6
Table 1-6: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–3C .................. 1-7
Table 1-7: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–4 ............. 1-8
Table 1-8: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–4 ............. 1-9
Table 2-1: Depth calculation for roof type- 1 ..................................................................................................................... 2-12
Table 2-2: Span and support moments for the roof type - 1 ............................................................................................. 2-13
Table 2-3: Support moment adjustment of each section .................................................................................................. 2-14
Table 2-4 : Span moment adjustment for roof type - 1 ..................................................................................................... 2-15
Table 2-5: Positive reinforcement for roof type – 1 .......................................................................................................... 2-16
Table 2-6 Negative reinforcement for roof type – 1 .......................................................................................................... 2-16
Table 2-7 Load transferred to beams for roof type - 1 ...................................................................................................... 2-17
Table 2-8 : Depth calculation for roof type- 2 .................................................................................................................... 2-17
Table 2-9 : Support, span and cantilever moment determination of roof type -2 ............................................................ 2-18
Table 2-10: Support moment adjustment of roof type -2 ................................................................................................. 2-19
Table 2-11: Positive Reinforcement for roof type - 2 ........................................................................................................ 2-20
Table 2-12: Negative Reinforcement for roof type - 2....................................................................................................... 2-21
Table 2-13: Load transferred to beams for roof type - 2 ................................................................................................... 2-21
Table 2-14: Depth determination for roof type - 3 ............................................................................................................ 2-22
Table 2-15: Span & support moments of roof type 3 ........................................................................................................ 2-23
V
List of figures
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
First we would like to thank God for the paramount help he has given us in our journey this far. We must also
thank our dearest parents for supporting us so steadfastly throughout our lives, for being our most devoted supporters
and for all the reasons they must know so well. We would like to thank Ato Daniel H/Mariyam for overseeing the
project, helping to shape it and his much appreciated advice.
INTRODUCTION
This project is about the design and analysis of two G+4 buildings connected by contraction joint, with
different basement levels, considering all external effects according to EBCS, 1995. Software’s such as SAP&
ETABS have been used throughout the project. It has eight chapters and the contents and the necessary tasks
accomplished in each chapter are explained as follows:
The first chapter deals with the wind load analysis and design of roofs and roof slabs in Chapter two.
The external wind pressures coming from different directions were collected and transferred to frames
according to EBCS, 1995. The roof types have been divided into two; Solid slab roof and Duo-pitched roof. The
Third chapter is about solid slab design of floors. All the slabs are solids.
The Fourth chapter focuses on staircase and ramp design. The staircases are designed as a simply
supported one way slab when resting on beams and while resting on shear walls they are treated as fixed
ends. While designing for ramp, the design of inclined one way slab, fixed at both ends is considered; In
addition to this, the ramp shall carry both moving and uniform loads thus, these loads are transferred to the
supporting beams.
Chapter Five is about the special feature of our building which is the Swimming Pool. We used the BS
8110 and 8007 code, since it accounts for Ultimate & Serviceability limit state, which in accounts for flexural
and direct tension in Mature concrete and direct tension in Immature concrete to control thermal and
shrinkage cracking.
The Sixth chapter with lateral load calculation. The weight of the building was computed by considering
all elements from small to large. The centre of mass and centre of stiffness were taken from ETABS. The lateral
forces were distributed to each floor and subsequently to frame joint according to their stiffness.
Chapters Seven and eight deal with design of beams and columns respectively; these elements were
designed using the loads obtained from analysis by taking the worst effect.
Chapter Nine is concerned about the design of lateral load resisting system, design of shear walls.
Finally, the last chapter is given to the design of foundation and retaining walls of structures. After calculating
the bearing capacity of the soil isolated rectangular footing is considered by taking two worst load
combinations to support and safely distribute the loads coming from the super structure.
OBJECTIVE
Wind load Analysis of solid slab roof and Duo-Pitched roof
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have two categories of roofs:
independently.
1-1
Wind load is one of the loads which should be considered in the design of a building as it has a Pressure
and a Suction effect on the building. Ethiopian Building Code of Standards (EBCS) has set a procedure that has to
be followed in the determination of wind loads on buildings. We have followed these procedures in order to
analyze different parts of the building. Wind load analysis is done for both the roof and the building itself. This
part of the report only covers the wind load analysis of roof.
We have divided the building in to four roof parts according to their elevation as follows:
Roof-1:(flat concrete roof) elevation=34.5m
Roof-2:(flat concrete roof) elevation=33.5m
Roof-3:(flat concrete roof) elevation=29.5m
Roof-4: (pitched roof) elevation=29.5m
The method of analysis that is going to be considered for this particular building is the Quasi static
method of analysis as the building height is less than 200m and Cd < 1.2.
Analysis information
Location: Debere Zeyete Terrain Category IV
Elevation: 2300m Zo =1
p = 0.94 Kt = 0.24
V ref = 22m/s Zmin = 16m
C t(z) = 1; φ < 0.05
The building’s Roof consists of 3 flat concrete roofs and 1 duo-pitched roof which are different in shape,
dimension and altitude as shown below; therefore we have analyzed and designed each roof separately.
Therefore, on the following sections we are going to analyze the wind load for these roof zones and
calculate the ultimate wind load pressure that will be exerted on the building.
Geometric data;-
Width of the roof zone = 16.28m
Cross wind dimension = 16.36m
Elevation Z= 34.5m > Zmin
𝒁𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑪𝒓(𝒛) = 𝑲𝒕 ∗ 𝐥𝐧 𝒁𝟎
= 𝟎. 𝟖𝟒𝟗𝟖
𝟕𝑲𝒕
𝑪𝒆(𝒛) = 𝑪𝟐𝒓(𝒛) ∗ 𝑪𝟐𝒕 𝒛 𝟏 + 𝑪 𝑪𝒓(𝒛)
= 𝟐. 𝟏𝟒𝟗𝟖
𝒕 𝒛
b =16.36m
e = min. → e = 16.36
2h =69m
Table 1-2 Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type – 1
And their respective external and internal wind pressures
WHERE:
Internal wind pressure coefficients
For closed building with internal partitions and opening windows the extreme values are
𝑐𝑝𝑖 = 0.8 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒
𝑐𝑝𝑖 = −0.5 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
External wind pressure
𝑤𝑒 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 𝑐𝑝𝑒 = 0.2275 × 2.1498 × 𝑐𝑝𝑒 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟖𝟗𝟏𝒄𝒑𝒆
Internal wind pressure
𝑤𝑒 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 𝑐𝑝𝑖 = 0.2275 × 2.1498 × 𝑐𝑝𝑖 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟖𝟗𝟏𝒄𝒑𝒊
Net wind pressure
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 (𝑐𝑝𝑒 − 𝑐𝑝𝑖 ) = 0.2275 × 2.1498 × (𝑐𝑝𝑒 − 𝑐𝑝𝑖 ) = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟖𝟗𝟏(𝒄𝒑𝒆 − 𝒄𝒑𝒊 )
(+ve) = 0.3913kN/m2 =
2
(+ve) = 0.0978kN/m2 (+ve) = 0.343kN/m
2
(-ve)= 0.5869kN/m2 (-ve) = 0.245kN/m2 (-ve) = 0.978kN/m
𝒁𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑪𝒓(𝒛) = 𝑲𝒕 ∗ 𝐥𝐧 𝒁𝟎
= 𝟎. 𝟖𝟒𝟐𝟖
𝟕𝑲𝒕
𝑪𝒆(𝒛) = 𝑪𝟐𝒓(𝒛) ∗ 𝑪𝟐𝒕 𝒛 𝟏 + 𝑪 𝑪𝒓(𝒛)
= 𝟐. 𝟏𝟐𝟔𝟐
𝒕 𝒛
b =15.47m
e = min. → e = 15.47
2h =67m
Since the building is with curved eaves of R = 0.7m
R/h =0.0203 use R/h = 0.05
Table 1-2: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type – 2
And their respective external and internal wind pressures
(+ve) = 0.3869kN/m2 =
2
(+ve) = 0.0967N/m2 (+ve) = 0.3386kN/m
2
(-ve)= 0.5805kN/m2 (-ve) = 0.2419kN/m2 (-ve) = 0.9674kN/m
𝒁𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑪𝒓(𝒛) = 𝑲𝒕 ∗ 𝐥𝐧 𝒁𝟎
= 𝟎. 𝟖𝟏𝟐𝟑
𝟕𝑲𝒕
𝑪𝒆(𝒛) = 𝑪𝟐𝒓(𝒛) ∗ 𝑪𝟐𝒕 𝒛 𝟏 + 𝑪 = 𝟐. 𝟎𝟐𝟒𝟓
𝒕 𝒛 𝑪𝒓(𝒛)
b =8.05m
e = min. → e = 8.05
2h =59m
Since the building is with curved eaves of R = 0.7m
R/h =0.0203 use R/h = 0.05
Table 1-4: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–3A
And their respective external and internal wind pressures
WHERE: External wind pressure
𝑤𝑒 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 𝑐𝑝𝑒 = 0.2275 × 2.0245 × 𝑐𝑝𝑒 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟔𝟎𝟔𝒄𝒑𝒆
Internal wind pressure
𝑤𝑒 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 𝑐𝑝𝑖 = 0.2275 × 2.0245 × 𝑐𝑝𝑖 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟔𝟎𝟔𝒄𝒑𝒊
Net wind pressure
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 (𝑐𝑝𝑒 − 𝑐𝑝𝑖 ) = 0.2275 × 2.0245 × (𝑐𝑝𝑒 − 𝑐𝑝𝑖 ) = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟔𝟎𝟔(𝒄𝒑𝒆 − 𝒄𝒑𝒊 )
(+ve) = 0.3685kN/m2 =
2
(+ve) = 0.0921N/m2 (+ve) = 0.3224kN/m
2
(-ve)= 0.688kN/m2 (-ve) = 0.2303kN/m2 (-ve) = 1.057kN/m
𝒁𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑪𝒓(𝒛) = 𝑲𝒕 ∗ 𝐥𝐧 𝒁𝟎
= 𝟎. 𝟖𝟏𝟐𝟑
𝟕𝑲𝒕
𝑪𝒆(𝒛) = 𝑪𝟐𝒓(𝒛) ∗ 𝑪𝟐𝒕 𝒛 𝟏 + 𝑪 𝑪𝒓(𝒛)
= 𝟐. 𝟎𝟐𝟒𝟓
𝒕 𝒛
b =12.45m
e = min. → e = 12.45
2h =59m
Table 1-5: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–3B
And their respective external and internal wind pressures
(+ve) = 0.369kN/m2 =
2
(+ve) = 0.041N/m2 (+ve) = 0.2713kN/m
2
(-ve)= 0.585kN/m2 (-ve) = 0.2303kN/m2 (-ve) = 0.954kN/m
𝒁𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑪𝒓(𝒛) = 𝑲𝒕 ∗ 𝐥𝐧 𝒁𝟎
= 𝟎. 𝟖𝟒𝟗𝟖
𝟕𝑲𝒕
𝑪𝒆(𝒛) = 𝑪𝟐𝒓(𝒛) ∗ 𝑪𝟐𝒕 𝒛 𝟏 + 𝑪 𝑪𝒓(𝒛)
= 𝟐. 𝟏𝟒𝟗𝟖
𝒕 𝒛
b =10.43m
e = min. → e = 10.43
2h =59m
Since the building is with curved eaves of R = 0.7m
R/h =0.0203 use R/h = 0.05
Table 1-6: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–3C
And their respective external and internal wind pressures
WHERE: External wind pressure
𝑤𝑒 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 𝑐𝑝𝑒 = 0.2275 × 2.0245 × 𝑐𝑝𝑒 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟔𝟎𝟔𝒄𝒑𝒆
Internal wind pressure
𝑤𝑒 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 𝑐𝑝𝑖 = 0.2275 × 2.0245 × 𝑐𝑝𝑖 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟔𝟎𝟔𝒄𝒑𝒊
Net wind pressure
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 𝑞𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑐𝑒 𝑧𝑒 (𝑐𝑝𝑒 − 𝑐𝑝𝑖 ) = 0.2275 × 2.0245 × (𝑐𝑝𝑒 − 𝑐𝑝𝑖 ) = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟔𝟎𝟔(𝒄𝒑𝒆 − 𝒄𝒑𝒊 )
Here for roof type -3 the net wind load will be the maximum of the three zones:
2
(+ve) = 0.3224kN/m
2
(-ve) = 1.057kN/m
𝒁𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑪𝒓(𝒛) = 𝑲𝒕 ∗ 𝐥𝐧 𝒁𝟎
= 𝟎. 𝟖𝟒𝟎𝟐𝟓
𝟕𝑲𝒕
𝑪𝒆(𝒛) = 𝑪𝟐𝒓(𝒛) ∗ 𝑪𝟐𝒕 𝒛 𝟏 + 𝑪 = 𝟐. 𝟏𝟏𝟕𝟔
𝒕 𝒛 𝑪𝒓(𝒛)
b d e/4 e/10
12.99m 13m 3.248 1.299
b =12.99m
e = min. → e = 12.99
2h =66.3m
Table 1-7: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–4
0
Direction 0 and their respective external and internal wind pressures
𝒁𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑪𝒓(𝒛) = 𝑲𝒕 ∗ 𝐥𝐧 𝒁𝟎
= 𝟎. 𝟖𝟒𝟎𝟐𝟓
𝟕𝑲𝒕
𝑪𝒆(𝒛) = 𝑪𝟐𝒓(𝒛) ∗ 𝑪𝟐𝒕 𝒛 𝟏 + 𝑪 = 𝟐. 𝟏𝟏𝟕𝟔
𝒕 𝒛 𝑪𝒓(𝒛)
b =13m
e = min. → e = 13
2h =66.3m
Table 1-8: Values of Cpe,1 and Cpe,10 for solid slab slabs with curved eaves according to EBCS – 1 for roof type–4
0
Direction 90 and their respective external and internal wind pressures
(+ve) = 0.385kN/m2 =
2
(+ve) = 0.00KN/m2 (+ve) = 0.00kN/m
2
(-ve)= 0.75kN/m2 (-ve) = 0.00kN/m2 (-ve) = 1.135kN/m
Here for roof type -4 the net wind load will be the maximum of the two wind directions:
The Net wind load for the Whole Roofs will be the maximum of the four Roof types:
2
(+ve) = 0.337kN/m
2
(-ve) = 1.184kN/m
OBJECTIVE
Analysis and design of the different Roofs of the building
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
NB. For two adjacent panel’s combination of (Provided that (∆M/M large)*100 > 20%):
- 2 – Way and 1 – way panes, if M1-way is the larger, it will be taken as M sd.
- 2 – Way and Cantilever, if M2-way is the larger, it will be taken as M sd.
Span moment adjustment
Only those panels whose support moments have decreased will be adjusted
according to EBCS – 2 using the formulas:
M yf(adjusted) = M yf + Cy1 * ∆M xs + Cy2 * ∆M ys
M xf(adjusted) = M xf + Cx1 * ∆M xs + Cx2 * ∆M ys
Design of Reinforcement bars (Design using Design Chart method)
Before we start the design process, we need to check the depth for flexure
Design constants
m = f yd/0.8fcd = 28.77 C1 = 2.5/m = 0.0869
b = 1000mm C2 = 0.32m2*f cd = 3001.62
Steel ratio and depth
𝟏 𝟒𝑴
𝝆 = 𝟐 𝒄𝟏 − 𝒄𝟏 𝟐 − 𝒃𝒅𝟐𝒄 d = 𝑴𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝟎. 𝟖𝒇𝒄𝒅 ∗ 𝝆 ∗ 𝒎 𝟏 − 𝟎. 𝟒𝟗𝝆
𝟐
Maximum Spacing
2d
S max =
350
Μ us = M sd /f cd*b*d2 ; A st = M sd /K z*f yd*d; S = π*Ф2*b /4Ast
Where K z is read from chart
Load transferred to beams
W
Vi = β i *P sd*L x , acting along 0.75L
Load cases
Dead load
3 2
Self-weight of 200mm RC-slab = 0.2 x 25KN/m ………………= 5KN/m
3 2
20mm thick plaster paint = 0.02 x 23KN/m …………………..= 0.46KN/m
3 2
20mm PVC covering = 0.02 x 16KN/m …………………………...= 0.32KN/m
3 2
30mm cement screen = 0.03 x 23KN/m ................................= 0.69KN/m
DL = 6.47KN/m2
Live load: LL = 0.5KN/m2 (from EBCS – 1, Tb.2.14, imposed loads for flat roof)
Wind load
W net 1 = -0.978KN/m2 W net 2 = 0.343KN/m2
Load combinations
Combo 1 : P sd = 1.3DL + 1.6LL P sd = 9.211KN/m2
Combo 2 : P sd = 0.9DL + 1.6WL1 P sd = 6.372KN/m2
Combo 3 : P sd = 0.9DL + 1.6WL2 P sd = 4.258KN/m2
The governing load combination is
Combo 1 : P sd = 9.211KN/m2
Table 2-2: Span and support moments for the roof type - 1
*5.16
*8.06
*5.2
*7.4
Maximum Spacing
S max = 350mm
Positive Reinforcement
Live load: LL = 5KN/m2 (from EBCS – 1, Tb.2.14, imposed loads for flat roof)
Wind load
W net 1 = -0.9674KN/m2 W net 2 = 0.3386KN/m2
Load combinations
Combo 1 : P sd = 1.3DL + 1.6LL P sd = 14.136KN/m2
Combo 2 : P sd = 0.9DL + 1.6WL1 P sd = 4.789KN/m2
Combo 3 : P sd = 0.9DL + 1.6WL2 P sd = 2.7002KN/m2
The governing load combination is:
Combo 1: P sd = 14.14KN/m2
Support, span and cantilever moment determination of roof type -2
Table 2-9 : Support, span and cantilever moment determination of roof type -2
Maximum Spacing
2d = 400
Smax = Smax = 350mm
350
Positive Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
*
8.95
*
9.58
*
10.84
*
12.2
Figure 2-9: Adjusted span moments of roof type - 3 (adjusted span moments are shown as *M)
Negative Reinforcement
Load combinations
Combo1 = 1.3DL1 + 1.6LL1d =0.699KN/m Combo9 = 1.3DL2 + 1.6LL2d =0.123KN/m
Combo2 = 1.3DL1 + 1.6LL1c =0.324KN/m +1.58KN Combo10 = 1.3DL2 + 1.6LL2c =0.057KN/m + 0.27KN
Combo3 = 0.9DL1 + 1.3WLs =-1.24KN/m Combo11 = 0.9DL2 + 1.3WLs =-1.423KN/m
Combo4 = 0.9DL1 + 1.3WLp =0.641KN/m Combo12= 0.9DL2 + 1.3WLp =0.456KN/m
Combo5 = 0.8(1.3DL1 + 1.6LL1d + 1.6WLs) =-0.88KN/m Combo13= 0.8(1.3DL2 + 1.6LL2d + 1.6WLs) =-1.34KN/m
Combo6 = 0.8(DL1 + 1.6LL1d + 1.6WLp)=0.968KN/m Combo14= 0.8(DL2 + 1.6LL2d + 1.6WLp) =0.508KN/m
Combo7 = 0.8(1.3DL1 + 1.6LL1c + 1.6WLs) =-1.18KN/m+1.26KN Combo15= 0.8(1.3DL2 + 1.6LL2c + 1.6WLs) =-1.39KN/m+0.22KN
Combo8 = 0.8(1.3DL1 + 1.6LL1c + 1.6WLp) =0.67KN/m +1.26KN Combo16= 0.8(1.3DL2 + 1.6LL2c + 1.6WLp) =0.46KN/m +0.22KN
After analyzing the purloin using the above load combinations on SAP-2000, we’ve found the following outputs:
Critical load combination: Combo9 = 1.3DL2 + 1.6LL2d =
P sd =-0.166KN V sd = 0.428KN M sd = -0.352KNm
Verification
- The design plastic resistance of the gross section:
N pl,rd = Ag x f y/γm1 > N t,sd
= 2(1235) x 235/1.1 = 527.68KN > 0.616KN …… ok
- Check for the adequacy of the trial section: ε = √235/fy =1
h/t = 102/6.8 =15 ≥ 15ε = 15 ……class-3
(b + h)/2t = 166/13.6 = 12.21 > 11.5ε = 11.5……class-3
- Flexural resistance moment:
M u,rd = W el x f y/γm1 ≥ M sd
= 19000 x 235/1.1 = 4.059KNm > 0.352KNm …..Ok
- Shear buckling resistance (failure) : d = h – t – r = 90.4mm
Since d/t = 90.4/6.8 = 13.3 < 69ε = 69, no need to verify.
- Vertical deflection (according to EBCS -3, Tb: 5.1)
Maximum deflection for floor and roofs supporting plaster other brittle finish
or non-flexible partitions:
δ tot ≤ L/250 = 5000/250 = 20mm
δ LL ≤ L/350 = 5000/350 = 14.286mm
5 𝑊𝑡𝑙 2 5 𝑝𝑙 3
δ tot-1= 384 Є𝐼
+ 384Є𝐼
= 20.45mm ≤ 20mm……. ok
δ tot-2 = 11.96mm ≤ 20mm…….ok
5 𝑊𝐿𝑙 2 5 𝑝𝑙 3
δ LL-1 = 384 Є𝐼
+ 384Є𝐼
= 12.95mm ≤ 14.286mm……. ok
δ LL-2 = 7.52mm≤ 14.286mm…….ok
Where the un-factored loads:
Wt1 = DL1 + LL1d + LL1c = 0.4836KN/m + 0.985KN WL1 = LL1d + LL1c = 0.234KN/m + 0.985KN
Wt2 = DL2 + LL2d + LL2c = 0.0852KN/m + 0.174KN WL2 = LL2d + LL2c = 0.0412KN/m + 0.174KN
Hence, the section is safe: use 2L 102 x 64 x 6.8 double angle steel grade Fe-360
Figure2-11: Roof truss lay out for the left half of end truss
NB. Since the left and right halves have the same properties, for sake of simplicity we designed only for the left half.
(a) (b)
Table 2-21: (a) Member assignment for the left half of the truss, (b) Max. Values for left half part of the truss
Figure 2-13: Roof truss lay out for the left half of middle truss
NB. Since the left and right halves have the same properties, for sake of simplicity we designed only for the left half.
(b) (b)
Table 2-22: (a) Member assignment for the left half of the truss, (b) Max. Values for left half part of the truss
Since the maximum axial load is on member 14 which is a flexural member, the members will be designed as flexural member.
OBJECTIVE
Analysis and design of the different floors of building
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As the floors are of irregular shape, we have tried to analyze them using the yield line
analysis
Load combinations
Combo: 𝑷𝒔𝒅 = 𝟏. 𝟑𝑫𝑳 + 𝟏. 𝟔𝑳𝑳
NB: Panel 2, 3, 4,5,6,10,11,12,13,19 and panel 20 will not have any partition load.
Panel Assignment
Partition loads
Reinforcement Calculation
(Design using Design Chart)
Positive Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
OBJECTIVE
Modeling and analysis of the different stairs and ramps
Design of the different stairs and ramps
Design
Effective depth: ds = D – Cc – ф/2 = 150mm
dL = D – Cc – ф - ф/2 = 130mm
Depth check: Depth check:
(Left Support) (Middle span)
𝑀𝑢 𝑀𝑢
𝑑= 0.2952𝑏𝐹𝑐𝑑
Mu = 71.44KNm, b = 1.4m 𝑑= 0.2952𝑏𝐹𝑐𝑑
Mu = 39KNm, b = 1.4m
d = 123.52mm < 150mm……………..ok d = 91.26mm < 150mm……………..ok
Reinforcement
Design
Effective depth: ds = D – Cc – ф/2 = 150mm
dL = D – Cc – ф - ф/2 = 130mm
Depth check:
𝑀𝑢
𝑑= 0.2952𝑏𝐹𝑐𝑑
Mu = 71.19KNm, b = 1.4m
d = 123.3mm < 150mm……………..ok
Reinforcement
(On landing)
- Marble flooring = 0.03 x 1.4 x 27KN/m3 = 1.134KN/m
- Cement screed = 0.03 x1.4 x 23KN/m3 = 0.966KN/m
- 160mm RC slab = 0.16 x 1.4 x 25KN/m3 = 6.3KN/m
- Plastering = 0.02 x 1.4 x 23KN/m3 = 0.644KN/m
Total DL = 9.044KN/m
Live load = 3KN/m2 (according to EBCS -2)
LL = 3KN/m2 x 1.4 = 4.2KN/m
Design
Effective depth: ds = D – Cc – ф/2 = 160mm
dL = D – Cc – ф - ф/2 = 140mm
Depth check:
𝑀𝑢
𝑑= 0.2952𝑏𝐹𝑐𝑑
Mu = 86.64KNm, b = 1.4m
d = 136.03mm < 160mm……………..ok
Reinforcement
Design
Effective depth: ds = D – Cc – ф/2 = 170mm
dL = D – Cc – ф - ф/2 = 150mm
Depth check:
𝑀𝑢
𝑑= 0.2952𝑏𝐹𝑐𝑑
Mu = 93.51KNm, b = 1.4m
d = 141.32mm < 170mm……………..ok
Reinforcement
Depth determination
𝒇𝒚𝒌 𝒍𝒆𝒇𝒇
𝒅 ≥ 𝟎. 𝟒 + 𝟎. 𝟔 𝟒𝟎𝟎 ∗ ( 𝜷𝒂 ) = 𝟏𝟓𝟒. 𝟕𝐦𝐦 ; L eff = 4.55m , βa = 25
d = 154.7mm
D = Cc + d + ф/2
D = 175.7m
Effective depth:
ds = D – Cc – ф/2 = 159mm
dL = D – Cc – ф - ф/2 = 147mm
Loading:
Dead Load
180mm Self weight of RC slab = 0.18 x 25KN/m3 = 4.5 KN/m2
35mm top floor finish = 0.035 x 23KN/m3 = 0.805 KN/m2
25mm bottom floor finish = 0.025 x 23 KN/m3 = 0.575 KN/m2
Total DL = 5.88 KN/m2
5.88 KN /m2
DL projected = cos 8.50
= 5.95 KN/m2
Live Load
Distributed: LL d = 2 KN/m2
Concentrated: LL c = 10KN/m (axel load placed at 1.8m)
Design Load
P d = 1.3DL + 1.6 LL d = 10.935 KN/m2 and 10 KN/m moving axel load
The Support moment before the load traverses the beam section is given by:
𝑷𝒅 𝑳𝟐
𝑴𝑨 = 𝑴𝑩 = = 𝟑𝟔𝟒. 𝟓𝑲𝑵𝒎
𝟏𝟐
To find the Maximum bending moment when the wheel axle lies on the beam,
first we have to statically determine the reaction R A at a distance ‘x’ from the left end;
𝟐𝟎𝒎𝟐 𝒙
𝑴𝑩 = 𝟎 ==> 𝑹𝑨 ∗ 𝟐𝟎𝒎 − 𝟏𝟎. 𝟗𝟑𝟓 ∗ 𝟐
− 𝟏𝟎𝒙 𝟐𝟎𝒎 − 𝟐 = 𝟎
It is known that the shear force is maximum at a section where the bending moment is zero;
Hence by inspection the maximum shear force occurs at X = 20m
𝑴 𝟐𝟎 = 𝟎 ==> 𝐶 = −666.7
𝒙𝟑
𝑴 𝒙 = + 𝟓. 𝟒𝟕𝒙𝟐 − 𝟏𝟎𝟗. 𝟑𝟓𝒙 − 𝟔𝟔𝟔. 𝟕
𝟏𝟐
The maximum moment at X = 8.39:
𝑴𝒎𝒂𝒙 = −𝟏𝟏𝟓𝟎. 𝟎𝟕𝑲𝑵𝒎
Check the adequacy of the section for flexure
𝑴𝒔𝒅,𝒔
𝒅= 𝟎.𝟐𝟗𝟓𝒇𝒄𝒅
= 𝟓𝟖𝟔. 𝟕𝟓𝒎𝒎
D = 586.75 + 10 + 15 = 611.75mm
Take D = 620mm
d s = 620 – 10 – 15 = 595mm
d L = 620 – 10 – 15 – 20 = 575mm
𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟑𝟏𝟒.𝟏𝟔
A s = ρ*b*d = 8964.2mm2 𝑺𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒏𝒈 = 𝟖𝟗𝟔𝟒.𝟐
= 𝟑𝟓. 𝟎𝟓𝒎𝒎 ≈ 𝟒𝟎𝒎𝒎
The Shear force at a distance d from the face of the support is given by:
V u = -102.76KN
V c = 0.25fctd*K 1*K 2*b w*d
F ctd = 10.3 , ρ = 0.004
K1 = 1 + 50ρ = 1.207 < 2.0…………………..ok
K2 = 1.6 – d = 1.005 > 1 ……………………..ok
Vc = 185.9KN > Vu = 102.76KN …………ok
However all beams, except joints of ribbed slabs, shall be provided with the minimum web
Reinforcement
𝟎. 𝟒
𝝆𝒎𝒊𝒏 = = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑
𝒇𝒚𝒌
𝑨𝒔 = 𝝆𝒎𝒊𝒏 ∗ 𝒃 ∗ 𝒅 = 𝟕𝟗𝟑. 𝟑𝟑𝒎𝒎𝟐
Using ф = 10mm bars to hold the main reinforcement
𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟕𝟖.𝟓
𝑺= 𝟕𝟗𝟔.𝟑𝟑
= 𝟗𝟖. 𝟗𝒎𝒎
𝑲
Lever arm: 𝒁 = 𝒅 𝟎. 𝟓 + 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓 − 𝟎.𝟗 = 148.1mm
𝐌𝐮 𝟖.𝟖𝟖𝐱𝟏𝟎𝟔
A st(min) = 𝟎.𝟖𝟕𝒁𝒇𝒚 = 𝟎.𝟖𝟕𝒙 𝟏𝟒𝟖.𝟏𝒙𝟐𝟓𝟎 = 275.7mm2
2
This requires 10mm bar at 250mm centers, area = 314mm (read from table 5-2)
Table 5-1: Allowable steel stresses in direct or flexural tension for serviceability limit states
Table 5-2: Sectional area per meter width for various bar spacing (mm2)
Note: If the steel ratio is less than this value, the steel will yield in tension resulting in a few cracks; however if it is
greater, then more cracks will be formed when the tension stress caused by the bond b/n the steel and the
concrete exceeds the concrete tensile strength.
𝒇𝒄𝒕 𝑨𝒔
Hence, r critical = 𝒇𝒚
= 𝑨𝒄
A s = r critical x Ac, where A c = b x D w
A s = 0.0064 x 1000 x 200 = 1280mm2/m
Try 12mm bars at 175mm centers are provided in each face, area = 1292mm2
𝟐 𝒙 𝑨𝒔 𝟐 𝒙 𝟏𝟐𝟗𝟐
r= 𝑨𝒄
= 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒙 𝟐𝟎𝟎 = 0.01292
𝒇𝒄𝒕 ф
S max. = 𝒙 , for plain bars f ct = f b
𝒇𝒃 𝟐𝒓
2
Where f b –the average bond strength b/n concrete and steel and f ct -3 day tensile strength = 1.6N/mm for C-35A
𝟏 𝐱 𝟏𝟐
S max. = = 464.4mm
𝟐 𝒙 𝟎.𝟎𝟏𝟐𝟗
𝛂 𝐱 𝐓𝟏+𝐓𝟐 𝟏𝟎−𝟓 𝐱 𝟐𝟎+𝟐𝟎
(Max. crack width) W max = 𝐒 max. = 𝟒𝟔𝟒. 𝟒 𝟐
𝟐
W max = 0.093mm < 0.1mm …………………………….ok.
Provide12mm bars at 150mm centers, area = 1292mm2
Weight of slab + water: W swt = 0.3m x24KN/m3 + 9.81KN/m3 x 1.5m = 21.92 KN/m2
Weight of wall: W wl = 1.8m x 0.2m x 24 KN/m3 = 8.64KN/m
𝑲
Lever arm: 𝒁 = 𝒅 𝟎. 𝟓 + 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓 − 𝟎.𝟗 = 239.26mm
𝐌𝐮 𝟖𝟎𝐱𝟏𝟎𝟔
A st(min) = 𝟎.𝟖𝟕𝒁𝒇𝒚 = 𝟎.𝟖𝟕𝒙 𝟐𝟑𝟗.𝟑𝒙 𝟐𝟓𝟎 = 1537.3mm2
2
This requires 16mm bar at 125mm centers, area = 1610mm
Figure 5-4: position of calculated crack width (where a cr the distance to the surface of the nearest reinforcing bar)
𝒔𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝟐 𝟐
a cr = 𝟐
+ 𝑪𝒄 𝒎𝒊𝒏 - ф/2
𝟏𝟐𝟓 𝟐 𝟐
a cr = 𝟐
+ 𝟒𝟎 - 16/2 = 74.2mm
Є 2 = 0.44 x 10-3
Є m = (1.057 – 0.44) x 10-3
Є m = 0.617 x 10-3
and the max. Crack width:
𝟑a 𝐜𝐫 𝒙 Є 𝐦 𝟑x 74.2 𝒙 𝟎.𝟔𝟏𝟕 𝐱 𝟏𝟎−𝟑
W max = 𝐚 𝐜𝐫−𝐂𝐜𝐦𝐢𝐧 = 𝟕𝟒.𝟐−𝟒𝟎
𝟏+𝟐 𝟏+𝟐
𝒉−𝒙 𝟑𝟎𝟎−𝟖𝟓
This just exceeds the allowable limit and since continuous construction is required in the direction of
the span, the spacing should be reduced to 115mm centers in both faces.
2
Provide16mm bars at 115mm centers, area = 3500mm .
Ф12mm Cc 150mm
Ф16mm Cc 115mm
𝑺𝒅 𝑻𝟏 = 𝜶𝜷𝜸
𝜶 = 𝜶𝟎 𝑰 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓 ∗ 𝟏 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
𝑻𝟏 = 𝑪𝟏 𝑯𝟑/𝟒 = 𝟏. 𝟐𝟐𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝟏.𝟐𝑺
𝜷= 𝟐 = 𝟏. 𝟎𝟒𝟕 ≤ 𝟐. 𝟓
𝑻𝟏 𝟑
𝛄 = 𝜸𝟎 × 𝒌𝑫 × 𝒌𝒓 × 𝒌𝒘 = 𝟎. 𝟐 ≤ 𝟎. 𝟕
𝑺𝒅 𝑻𝟏 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓 ∗ 𝟏. 𝟎𝟒𝟕 ∗ 𝟎. 𝟐 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟎𝟒𝟕
𝒇𝒃 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟎𝟒𝟕 ∗ 𝑾
Table 6-1: Story shear from earth quack and building mass from ETABS
Since the building is of somehow different height and width, we used the maximum height and width.
e = min 2h = 14.76m
b = 27.12m e = 14.76m e/5 = 2.952m and d > e
𝒅 𝟑𝟎.𝟕
𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒉 = 𝟕.𝟑𝟖 = 𝟒. 𝟏𝟔 > 4 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑙𝒍 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒔 > 𝟏𝟎𝒎𝟐 ==> 𝑪𝒑𝒆 = 𝑪𝒑𝒆(𝟏𝟎)
Table 6-2: The net wind pressure of the top wall for the NW direction
𝒅 𝟑𝟎.𝟕
𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆 = = 𝟒. 𝟏𝟔 > 4 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠 > 𝟏𝟎𝒎𝟐 ==> 𝑪𝒑𝒆 = 𝑪𝒑𝒆(𝟏𝟎)
𝒉 𝟕.𝟑𝟖
Table 6-3: The net wind pressure of the bottom wall for the NW direction
e = min 2h = 7.6m
b = 30.7m e = 7.6m e/5 = 1.52m and d > e
𝒅 𝟐𝟕.𝟏𝟐
𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒉 = 𝟑.𝟖
= 𝟕. 𝟏𝟒 > 4 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠 > 𝟏𝟎𝒎𝟐 ==> 𝑪𝒑𝒆 = 𝑪𝒑𝒆(𝟏𝟎)
Table 6-4: The net wind pressure of the top wall for the SE direction
ii) For the bottom part: Z = 30.7m
Z > Z min
𝟕𝑲𝒕
𝑪𝒓(𝒛) = 𝑲𝒕 ∗ 𝐥𝐧 𝒁
𝒁𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟐𝟏𝟖 𝑪𝒆(𝒛) = 𝑪𝟐𝒓(𝒛) ∗ 𝑪𝟐𝒕 𝒛 𝟏 + = 𝟐. 𝟎𝟓𝟔
𝑪𝒕 𝒛 𝑪𝒓(𝒛)
e = min 2h = 61.4m
b = 30.7m e = 30.7m e/5 = 6.14m and d < e
𝒅 𝟐𝟕.𝟏𝟐
𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒉 = 𝟑𝟎.𝟕
= 𝟎. 𝟖𝟖 ≈ 𝟏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒔 > 𝟏𝟎𝒎𝟐 ==> 𝑪𝒑𝒆 = 𝑪𝒑𝒆(𝟏𝟎)
Table 6-5: The net wind pressure of the bottom wall for the SE direction
Since for the Top Part: W net (D) = +0.3905KN/m2 and for the Bottom Part: W net (D) = +0.6081KN/m2
W net (E) = -0.3905KN/m2 W net (E) = -0.5145KN/m2
which are of the SE direction b =30.7m
(Here only the Roof floor will lay on the Top part)
Table 6-6: The net Lateral load on the building from wind action
Along Axis - A
153.8
𝑑≥ = 391.64mm
11.33𝑥300𝑥0.295
D=391.64+25+16/2=424.64
Take D=450mm i.e. d = 417mm>391.64………………….OK
o Support A
Msd=110.5KNm
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝜇𝑠𝑑 = = 0.187 > 0.295 … … … … … … … … 𝑂𝐾
𝑓𝑐𝑑𝑥𝑏𝑥 𝑑 2
Kz=0.887
𝑀𝑠𝑑 𝐴𝑠1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 1145.19mm2 #= 𝑎𝑏
=7
Provide 7𝝓14 bars
o Span AB
Msd = 90.37KNm
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓𝑐𝑑𝑥𝑏𝑥 𝑑 2 = 0.153 > 0.295 … … … … … … … … 𝑂𝐾
Kz=0.913
𝑀𝑠𝑑 𝐴𝑠1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 909.89 #= 𝑎𝑏
=6
Provide 6 𝝓14bars
o Support B
Msd=153.8KNm
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓𝑐𝑑𝑥𝑏𝑥 𝑑 2 = 0.260 > 0.295 … … … … … … … … 𝑂𝐾
Kz= 0.962
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 1469.67𝑚𝑚2 #= 𝐴𝑠1
𝑎𝑏
=10
Provide 10𝝓14bars
o Span BC
Msd=29.14KNm
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓𝑐𝑑𝑥𝑏𝑥 𝑑 2 = 0.049 > 0.295 … … … … … … … … 𝑂𝐾
Kz=0.961
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 278.74mm2 # = 𝐴𝑠1
𝑎𝑏
=2
Kz=0.9285
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 709.66𝑚𝑚2 # = 𝐴𝑠1
𝑎𝑏
=5
Kz=0.95
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 428.38 𝑚𝑚2 # = 𝐴𝑠1
𝑎𝑏
=3
Msd= 71.39KNm
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓𝑐𝑑𝑥𝑏𝑥 𝑑 2 = 0.121 > 0.295 … … … … … … … … 𝑂𝐾
Kz=0.9285
𝑀𝑠𝑑 𝐴𝑠1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 709.66𝑚𝑚2 #= 𝑎𝑏
=5
o Span DE
Msd= 28.22KNm
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝜇𝑠𝑑 𝑓𝑐𝑑𝑥𝑏𝑥 𝑑 2 = 0.048 > 0.295 … … … … … … … … 𝑂𝐾
Kz=0.961
𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 269.94𝑚𝑚2 # = 𝐴𝑠1
𝑎𝑏
=2
Kz=0.947
𝑀𝑠𝑑 𝐴𝑠1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 463.42𝑚𝑚2 #= 𝑎𝑏
=3
Kz=0.939
𝑀𝑠𝑑 𝐴𝑠1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = = 557.33𝑚𝑚2 #= =4
𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 𝑎𝑏
Kz=0.939
𝑀𝑠𝑑 𝐴𝑠1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = = 818.74𝑚𝑚2 #= =5
𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 𝑎𝑏
Kz=0.979
𝑀𝑠𝑑 𝐴𝑠1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐾𝑧∗𝑑∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 123.28𝑚𝑚2 #= 𝑎𝑏
=2
Shear Reinforcement
Maximum spacing
𝐴𝑣∗𝑓𝑦𝑘 76.97∗300
0.4𝑏
= 0.4∗300
= 192.5𝑚𝑚
𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤ 0.5𝑑 = 0.5 ∗ 450 = 225𝑚𝑚 S max = 190mm
300𝑚𝑚
- For Vsd1=116.48KN
Vs1=Vsd1-Vc =116.18-36.78=79.4KN
𝑑∗𝐴𝑣∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 450∗76.97∗260.87
Spacing (S) = = =113.79mm
𝑉𝑠 79.4
- For Vsd2=113.24KN
Vs2=Vsd2-Vc =113.24-36.78=76.46KN
𝑑∗𝐴𝑣∗𝑓𝑦𝑑 450∗76.97∗260.87
Spacing (S) = 𝑉𝑠
= 76.46
= 118.17𝑚𝑚
The second order effect is not taken into account in the following cases,
For Sway frame,
𝟏𝟓
𝝀 < 25 𝝀≤
𝑽𝒅
For Non-sway frames,
𝑴
𝝀 ≤ 𝟓𝟎 − 𝟐𝟓 𝑴𝟏 M1 and M2 as defined previously
𝟐
From the 3D analysis result obtained from ETABS the column having maximum element force is
considered and on our case the column with the properties described below is selected
Material properties
Analysis result
𝛼 +0.4 𝛼 1 +𝛼 2
𝐿𝑒 = 𝛼 𝑚 +0.8 𝐿 ≥ 0.7𝐿 , 𝛼𝑚 = 2
𝑚
𝐼𝐶1 𝐿𝐶1 𝐼𝐶1 𝐿𝐶1 +𝐼𝐶2 𝐿𝐶2
𝛼1 = 𝐼 𝐿𝑏 1 +𝐼𝑏 2 𝐿𝑏 2
𝛼2 = 𝐼𝑏 3 𝐿𝑏 3 +𝐼𝑏 4 𝐿𝑏 4
𝑏1
Design actions
Eccentricities in the X-X direction
0.6𝑒𝑜2 ± 0.4𝑒𝑜1
𝑒𝑒 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥
0.4𝑒𝑜2
𝑒𝑜1 = 𝑀1 𝑁𝑠𝑑 = 352.1𝑚𝑚
𝑒𝑜2 = 𝑀2 𝑁𝑠𝑑 = 639.9𝑚𝑚
𝑒𝑒 = 523𝑚𝑚
𝐿
𝑒𝑎 = 𝑒 300 ≥ 20𝑚𝑚 , 𝑒𝑎 = 20𝑚𝑚
𝑒2 = 0 … … … … … 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑠𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟
𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝑒𝑒 + 𝑒𝑎 + 𝑒2 = 543𝑚𝑚
Eccentricities in the Y-Y direction
0.6𝑒𝑜2 ± 0.4𝑒𝑜1
𝑒𝑒 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥
0.4𝑒𝑜2
𝑒𝑜1 = 𝑀1 𝑁𝑠𝑑 = 551𝑚𝑚
𝑒𝑜2 = 𝑀2 𝑁𝑠𝑑 = 903𝑚𝑚
𝑒𝑒 = 762𝑚𝑚
𝐿
𝑒𝑎 = 𝑒 300 ≥ 20𝑚𝑚 , 𝑒𝑎 = 20𝑚𝑚
𝑒2 = 0 … … … … … 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑠𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟
𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝑒𝑒 + 𝑒𝑎 + 𝑒2 = 96.2𝑚𝑚
Reinforcement calculation
Design Axial load
𝑁𝑠𝑑 = 1494.3𝐾𝑁
𝑁𝑠𝑑
𝜈𝑠𝑑 = = 0.6
𝐴𝑐 ×𝑓𝑐𝑑
Reinforcement
′ 𝑏 ′
= 𝑏 = 0.1
𝜔 = 0.05, 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑏𝑖𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑁𝑂. 18
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.008𝐴𝑐 = 0.002880𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.08𝐴𝑐 = 0.0028800𝑚𝑚2
𝜔𝐴𝑐 𝑓 𝑐𝑑
𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 = = 0.002420𝑚2 < 𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 … … … 𝑠𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑓 𝑦𝑑
Provide 8 ф 20 bars at four sides
Design of the rest of the columns is summarized in the table below
The center to center spacing of the lateral reinforcement shall not exceed:
12 × ∅𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 = 12 × 20 = 240𝑚𝑚
𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑏𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 550𝑚𝑚
300𝑚𝑚
Provide ∅8 C/C 240mm.
The wall is designed as isolated sway element of a frame using the second-order theory of columns.
In the absence of more accurate methods EBCS-2 section 4.4.15.3 recommends the use of
approximate method
For the approximate method, one-fourth of the total reinforcement must either be distributed
along each face of the column or at each corner. The column shall be designed for uniaxial bending
with the following equivalent uniaxial eccentricity of load, 𝑒𝑒𝑞 along the axis parallel to the larger
relative eccentricity:
Where: 𝒆𝒆𝒒 = total eccentricity in the direction of the larger relative eccentricity
K = relative eccentricity ratio
α = is obtained from table 4.1 as a function of the relative normal force,
𝑵𝒔𝒅
𝒗=𝒇 … … … … … … … … 𝑬𝑩𝑪𝑺 − 𝟐, 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟓 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝟒. 𝟒. 𝟏𝟓. 𝟑
𝒄𝒅 ×𝑨𝒄
The following standard lift shaft and car sizes for center opening electrical traction are taken form DAN techno
craft technical specification
From the above specification the traction with the properties listed below are selected
Capacity of lift =480 Kg
No of person to accommodate =6
Shaft width =1700mm
Shaft depth =1700mm
Car width =1200mm
Clear opening =800*2000
Pit depth =1500
Overhead height =3600
𝑺𝒅 𝑻𝟏 = 𝜶𝜷𝜸
𝜶 = 𝜶𝟎 𝑰 = 𝟎. 𝟏 ∗ 𝟏. 𝟐 = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟐
𝑻𝟏 = 𝑪𝟏 𝑯𝟑/𝟒
𝟎.𝟎𝟕𝟓
𝑪𝟏 = ; 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒘𝒂𝒍𝒍
𝑨𝒄
𝑳𝒘𝒊 𝟐 𝑳𝒘𝒊
𝑨𝒄 = 𝑨𝒊 𝟎. 𝟐 + ; ≤ 𝟎. 𝟗
𝑯 𝑯
𝟏.𝟐𝑺
𝜷= 𝟐 ≤ 𝟐. 𝟓
𝑻𝟏 𝟑
𝛄 = 𝜸𝟎 × 𝒌𝑫 × 𝒌𝒓 × 𝒌𝒘 ≤ 𝟎. 𝟕
γ = 0.2
(a) (b)
Figure 9-1: (a) Shear wall – 1, (b) Shear wall - 2
Note: W is the total weight of the shear wall plus 25% of the floor live load, for storage and ware house occupancies.
Elevator car is assumed to be there throughout and always serves, hence it can be considered as storage
occupancies to account the 25% allowance for live load.
The base shear force distributed over the height of the structure at each floor level is given by:
𝒇𝒃 −𝑭𝒕 𝑾𝒊 𝒉𝒊
𝑭𝒊 = 𝒏 𝑾 𝒉
𝒊−𝟎 𝒊 𝒊
𝑾𝒊 𝒉𝒊
𝑭𝒊 = 𝟑𝟑. 𝟒 𝒏 𝑾 𝒉
𝒊−𝟎 𝒊 𝒊
Load calculation
Dead Load:- self wt.: 0.1 x 25 = 2.5KN/m2
Plastering: 0.023 x 20 = 0.46KN/m2
9.6
Self wt. of elevator car:2 𝑥 4 𝑥 2.3
= 𝟐. 𝟎𝟗𝐊𝐍/𝐦𝟐
Total DL = 5.05KN/m2
Live Load: for store/stair case = 5KN/m2
Design Load: P d = 1.3DL + 1.6LL
P d = 14.57 KN/m2
Analysis
α xf = 0.1, α yf = 0.056 (EBCS – moment coefficients for unsupported roof slab)
M xf = α xf *P d *Lx2 = 7.708KNm
M yf = α yf *P d *Lx2 = 4.32KNm
Design
𝑴𝒔𝒅 𝟕.𝟕𝟎𝟖∗𝟏𝟎𝟔
𝝁𝒖𝒔 = 𝒇 𝟐 = 𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟐𝟎𝟎∗𝟕𝟕𝟐 = 𝟎. 𝟓𝟕𝟒 ==> 𝑲𝒛 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟓
𝒄𝒅 𝒃𝒅
𝑴𝒔𝒅 𝟕.𝟕𝟎𝟖∗𝟏𝟎𝟔
𝑨𝒔𝒕 = 𝑲 = 𝟎.𝟒𝟓∗𝟐𝟔𝟎.𝟖𝟕∗𝟕𝟕 = 𝟖𝟓𝟐. 𝟕𝟒𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝒛 𝒇𝒚𝒅 𝒅
Provide 4 ф 16 Cc 230mm
Load transferred to beams
β vx = 0.4788 β vy = 0.33
𝑽𝒙 = 𝜷𝒗𝒙 ∗ 𝑷𝒅 ∗ 𝑳𝒙 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟕𝟗 𝒙 𝟏𝟒. 𝟓𝟕 𝒙 𝟐. 𝟑 = 𝟏𝟔. 𝟎𝟓𝑲𝑵/𝒎
𝑽𝒚 = 𝜷𝒗𝒚 ∗ 𝑷𝒅 ∗ 𝑳𝒚 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟑 𝒙 𝟏𝟒. 𝟓𝟕 𝒙 𝟒 = 𝟏𝟗. 𝟐𝟑𝑲𝑵/𝒎
Total vertical load at the top of the shear wall:
𝑵𝒔𝒅 = 𝑷𝒅 + 𝒘𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒘𝒕. 𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒃𝒐𝒕𝒕𝒐𝒎
Design of wall A
Equivalent eccentricity
e eq = e tot (1 + Kα) = 2081.53 (1 + 0.1106 x 0.7) = 2242.68mm
Design moment
M sd = e eq N sd = 2.243 x 906.92 = 2033.93KNm
𝑴𝒔𝒅 𝟐𝟎𝟑𝟑.𝟗𝟑∗𝟏𝟎𝟔
𝝁=𝒇 = 𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟒𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟐𝟎𝟎∗𝟒𝟎𝟎𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓𝟔
𝒄𝒅 𝑨𝒄 𝒉
Therefore for V = 0.1 and μ = 0.056 ω = 0.01 (from interaction diagram: uniaxial chart 6)
𝝎𝒇𝒄𝒅 𝑨𝒄 𝟎.𝟎𝟏∗𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟒𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟐𝟎𝟎
𝑨𝒔 = 𝒇𝒚
= 𝟐𝟔𝟎.𝟖𝟕
= 𝟑𝟒𝟕. 𝟒𝟓𝒎𝒎𝟐
For vertical reinforcement the code provides the following limiting values
A min =0.004*A c = 3200mm2
A min =0.04*A c = 32000mm2
Take A s = 3200mm2 Use 16 ф16 bars
Shear reinforcement
Section resistance
V rd = 0.25f ctd b ω d = 2152.7KN………ok
Section capacity
V c = 0.25f ctd K 1 K 2 b ω d
f ctd =1.03
K 1 = 1.6 – d ≥ 1 K 1 = 1
K 2 = 1 + 50ρ ≤ 2, ρ = A s/bωd = 0.0042 K 2 = 1.21
V c = 236.8KN……………………………..ok
Here, according to EBCS -2, Sec.7.2.5.3, the area of horizontal reinforcement shall not be less
than one fourth of the vertical reinforcement.
𝑨𝒄 𝟑𝟐𝟎𝟎
𝑨𝒔 = 𝟒
= 𝟒
= 𝟖𝟎𝟎𝒎𝒎𝟐
Spacing ash/As = 3188mm
S= 2t = 400mm assuming ф 10 bar
300mm
Provide ф10 C/c 300mm
𝑵𝒔𝒅 𝟒𝟐𝟒.𝟕𝟓∗𝟏𝟎𝟑
𝑽= = = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟗𝟖 α = 0.698 (from EBCS -2, Tb. 4.1)
𝒇𝒄𝒅 ∗𝑨𝒄 𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟏𝟗𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟐𝟎𝟎
Equivalent eccentricity
e eq = e tot (1 + Kα) = 4309.23 (1 + 0.242 x 0.698) = 5037.13mm
Design moment
M sd = e eq N sd = 2139.52KNm
𝑴𝒔𝒅 𝟐𝟏𝟑𝟗.𝟓∗𝟏𝟎𝟔
𝝁=𝒇 = 𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟏𝟗𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟐𝟎𝟎∗𝟏𝟗𝟎𝟎𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟔𝟐
𝒄𝒅 𝑨𝒄 𝒉
Therefore for V = 0.098 and μ = 0.262 ω = 0.5 (from interaction diagram: uniaxial chart 6)
𝝎𝒇𝒄𝒅 𝑨𝒄 𝟎.𝟓∗𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟏𝟗𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟐𝟎𝟎
𝑨𝒔 = 𝒇𝒚
= 𝟐𝟔𝟎.𝟖𝟕
= 𝟖𝟐𝟓𝟐𝒎𝒎𝟐
For vertical reinforcement the code provides the following limiting values
A min =0.004*A c = 3200mm2
A min =0.04*A c = 32000mm2
Take A s = 8252mm2 Use 26 ф20 bars
Shear reinforcement
Section resistance
V rd = 0.25f ctd b ω d = 1022.5KN………ok
Section capacity
V c = 0.25f ctd K 1 K 2 b ω d
f ctd =1.03
K 1 = 1.6 – d ≥ 1 K 1 = 1
K 2 = 1 + 50ρ ≤ 2, ρ = A s/bωd = 0.023 K 2= 2
V c = 185.92KN……………………………..ok
Here, according to EBCS -2, Sec.7.2.5.3, the area of horizontal reinforcement shall not
be less than one fourth of the vertical reinforcement.
𝑨𝒄 𝟖𝟐𝟓𝟐
𝑨𝒔 = 𝟒
= 𝟒
= 𝟐𝟎𝟔𝟑𝒎𝒎𝟐
Spacing ash/As
S= 2t = 400mm assuming ф 10 bar
300mm
Provide ф10 C/c 300mm
𝒇𝒃 −𝑭𝒕 𝑾𝒊 𝒉𝒊
𝑭𝒊 = 𝒏 𝑾 𝒉
𝒊−𝟎 𝒊 𝒊
𝑾𝒊 𝒉𝒊
𝑭𝒊 = 𝟏𝟗. 𝟔 𝒏 𝑾 𝒉
𝒊−𝟎 𝒊 𝒊
Load calculation
Dead Load: - self wt.: 0.1 x 25 = 2.5KN/m2
Plastering: 0.023 x 20 = 0.46KN/m2
9.6
Self wt. of elevator car:2 𝑥 2.3 𝑥 2.3 = 𝟑. 𝟔𝟑𝐊𝐍/𝐦𝟐
Total DL = 6.59KN/m2
Live Load: for store/stair case = 5KN/m2
Design Load: P d = 1.3DL + 1.6LL
P d = 16.6 KN/m2
Analysis
For L y/L x = 1 α xf = 0.056, α yf = 0.056 (EBCS – moment coefficients for unsupported roof slab)
M xf = α xf *P d *Lx2 = 4.92KNm
M yf = α yf *P d *Lx2 = 4.92KNm
Design
𝑴𝒔𝒅 𝟒.𝟗𝟐∗𝟏𝟎𝟔
𝝁𝒖𝒔 = 𝒇 𝟐 = 𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟐𝟎𝟎∗𝟕𝟕𝟐 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟕 ==> 𝑲𝒛 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟏𝟓
𝒄𝒅 𝒃𝒅
𝑴𝒔𝒅 𝟒.𝟗𝟐∗𝟏𝟎𝟔
𝑨𝒔𝒕 = 𝑲 = 𝟎.𝟑𝟏𝟓∗𝟐𝟔𝟎.𝟖𝟕∗𝟕𝟕 = 𝟕𝟕𝟕. 𝟔𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝒛 𝒇𝒚𝒅 𝒅
Design of wall A
𝑵𝒔𝒅 𝟓𝟎𝟔.𝟐𝟑∗𝟏𝟎𝟑
𝑽= = = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟗𝟕 α = 0.697 (from EBCS -2, Tb. 4.1)
𝒇𝒄𝒅 ∗𝑨𝒄 𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟐𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟐𝟎𝟎
Equivalent eccentricity
e eq = e tot (1 + Kα) = 1564.53 (1 + 0.15 x 0.697) = 1728.1mm
Design moment
M sd = e eq N sd = 1.728 x 506.23 = 874.82KNm
𝑴𝒔𝒅 𝟐𝟎𝟑𝟑.𝟗𝟑∗𝟏𝟎𝟔
𝝁=𝒇 = 𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟒𝟎𝟎𝟎∗𝟐𝟎𝟎∗𝟒𝟎𝟎𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟕𝟑
𝒄𝒅 𝑨𝒄 𝒉
Therefore for V = 0.697 and μ = 0.073 ω = 0.056 (from interaction diagram: uniaxial chart 6)
𝝎𝒇𝒄𝒅 𝑨𝒄 𝟎.𝟎𝟓𝟔∗𝟏𝟏.𝟑𝟑∗𝟐𝟑𝟎𝟎∗𝟐𝟎𝟎
𝑨𝒔𝒕 = 𝒇𝒚𝒅
= 𝟐𝟔𝟎.𝟖𝟕
= 𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟖. 𝟖𝒎𝒎𝟐
For vertical reinforcement the code provides the following limiting values
A min =0.004*A c = 1840mm2
A min =0.04*A c = 18400mm2
Take A s = 1118.8mm2
Provide 6 ф16 bars
Shear reinforcement
Section resistance
V rd = 0.25f ctd b ω d = 1237.8KN………ok
Section capacity
V c = 0.25f ctd K 1 K 2 b ω d
f ctd =1.03
K 1 = 1.6 – d ≥ 1 K 1 = 1
K 2 = 1 + 50ρ ≤ 2, ρ = A s/bωd = 0.003 K 2 = 1.13
V c = 127.2KN……………………………..ok
Here, according to EBCS -2, Sec.7.2.5.3, the area of horizontal reinforcement shall not be
less than one fourth of the vertical reinforcement.
𝑨𝒄 𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟖.𝟖
𝑨𝒔 = = = 𝟐𝟕𝟗. 𝟕𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝟒 𝟒
Soil Type
γ = 19KN/m3 Ф = 28 C=0
Hence from EBCS-7, Table 6.3 we found the presumed design bearing resistance to be 560KPa
And the soil pressure distribution was assumed to be planar.
Material Data
Concrete C-25
Steel S-300
10.1.1. Proportioning
Let a = b
- Eccentricities
𝑴𝒙 𝟐.𝟒𝟗𝟏 𝑴𝒚 𝟕.𝟒𝟖𝟐
. 𝒆𝒙 = 𝑷𝒖𝒏𝒇 = 𝟒𝟑𝟎.𝟎 . = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟓𝟕𝟗𝐦 𝒆𝒚 = 𝑷𝒖𝒏𝒇 = 𝟒𝟑𝟎.𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟕𝟒𝐦
𝑴𝒙 𝟐.𝟒𝟗𝟏 𝑴𝒚 𝟕.𝟒𝟖𝟐
𝒆𝒙 = 𝐏 = 𝟒𝟓𝟒.𝟐𝟔 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟓𝟒𝟖 𝒆𝒚 = 𝐏 = 𝟒𝟓𝟒.𝟐𝟔 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟔𝟓
𝐮𝐧𝐟 𝐮𝐧𝐟
𝟔𝒆 𝟔𝐞 𝐲 𝟔∗𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟓𝟒𝟖 𝟔∗𝟎.𝟎𝟏𝟔𝟓
𝟏± 𝒙 ± 𝟏± ±
𝛔𝐦𝐚𝐱 = 𝒂 𝒃
= 𝟏.𝟏
𝟐
𝟏.𝟏
= 𝟒𝟔𝟏. 𝟓𝐊𝐏𝐚 < 𝛔𝐚𝐥𝐥 = 𝟓𝟔𝟎𝐊𝐏𝐚 … … 𝐨𝐤
𝐚∗𝐛 𝟏.𝟏
Reinforcement calculation:
In the X-direction
A s,min = 0.6*b*d/fyk = 946.0mm2
Msd= q max*((L-a)/2)2/2 = 39.13KN-m
msd = Msd / (fcd*b*d2) = 0.02
K z = 0.98 (From EBCS2 design aid table)
Z = K z*d = 422.02
As = Msd / (Z*fyd) = 355.42mm2 which is less than A s,min
2
Therefore we have As, provided = 946.0mm
Spacing = 1000*(as/ As, provided) = 332.0mm
Material properties
Steel
𝒇𝒚𝒌 = 300𝑀𝑃𝑎 , 𝒇𝒔 = 𝟎. 𝟓𝟐𝒇𝒚𝒌 = 156𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝒇𝒔 156
𝑬𝒔 = 200𝑀𝑃𝑎 , 𝒓= 𝒇𝒄 = 10.625 = 14.68
𝒇𝒄𝒕𝒌
𝒇𝒄𝒕𝒌 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟏𝒇𝒄𝒌 𝟐/𝟑 = 1.5547 , 𝒇𝒄𝒕𝒅 = 𝟏. 𝟓 = 1.0315
𝑬𝒔 𝐧𝐟𝐜
𝑬𝒄 = 25.491𝑀𝑃𝑎, 𝒏= 𝑬𝒄 = 7.85 , 𝐊= 𝐟𝐬 + 𝐧𝐟𝐜 = 0.348
𝑲 𝒙 𝒋 𝒙 𝒇𝒄
𝒋 = 𝟏 − 𝒌 𝟑 = 0.88, 𝑹= 𝟐 = 1.629
Initial assumptions
0.4 ≤ B/H ≤ 0.8
1/12 ≤ b 2 ≤ 1/8
b 3 ≈ B/3
b 3 ≥ 300mm
Df≥ b2
Hence
Ho = 6m b 1 = 0.5m
D f = 2m b 2 = 1m
Z = 1m b 3 = 2m
B = 6m b 4 = 3m
𝑲𝒂 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟓𝟏, 𝑲𝒑 = 𝟓. 𝟑𝟖𝟗
Where:
Wall inclination β =85.9o
Internal friction angle ф =280 = 0.49rad
Wall friction angle δ = 2/3ф = 18.670 = 0.33rad
Surface inclination α = 00
F 2 = 0.5 x 3m x 20.01KPa/m
= 30.02KN/m
Reinforcement Calculation
As min = ρ min b*d avail
= 0.0015 x 1000 x 662
= 993mm2
Main Reinforcement
𝑀𝐴 −𝐴
𝐴𝑠 = 𝑓𝑠 ∗𝑗 ∗𝑑 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑖𝑙
= 504.63𝑚𝑚2 As used =993mm2
𝑎 𝑠 ∗𝑏
Spacing: 𝑆= 𝐴𝑠
= 202.4𝑚𝑚
B) At section B-B
F 1 = 6m x 3.52KPa/m
= 21.12KN/m
F 2 = 0.5 x 6m x 40.01KPa/m
= 120.03KN/m
M B-B = 3 F 1 + 2F 2 V A-A = F 1 + F 2
= 303.42KN/m = 141.15KN/m
Main Reinforcement
𝑴𝑩−𝑩
𝑨𝒔 = 𝒇𝒔 ∗𝒋∗𝒅𝒂𝒗𝒂𝒊𝒍
= 𝟐𝟒𝟒𝟐. 𝟐𝟒𝒎𝒎𝟐 As used =2442.24mm2
𝑎 𝑠 ∗𝑏
Spacing: 𝑆= 𝐴𝑠
= 289.4𝑚𝑚
C) At front face
Minimum Reinforcement should be provided both in the vertical and horizontal direction.
Use ø16mm Cc = 80mm and As min = 1357.5mm2
𝑎 𝑠 ∗𝑏
Spacing: 𝑆= 𝐴𝑠
= 148𝑚𝑚
10.2.1.2Design of Heel
𝒒𝒄 𝟑𝒎
= 𝟔𝒎 ==> 𝒒𝒄 = 𝟐𝟗. 𝟑𝟓𝑲𝑵
𝟓𝟖.𝟕
A) At section C-C
B) At front face
Minimum Reinforcement should be provided both in the vertical and horizontal direction.
Use ø16mm Cc = 80mm and As min = 1365mm2/m
𝑎 𝑠 ∗𝑏
Spacing: 𝑆= 𝐴𝑠
= 147.2𝑚𝑚
A) At section D-D
F1 = 0.5 x 2m x (q1 – q2) = 71.93KN F2 = 2m x q2 = 88.05KN
M D-D = 4/3mx F1 + 1mx F2 = 135.05KNm V D-D = F1 + F1 = 111.07KN
Check the depth for flexure
D provided =1000mm,
ø = 20mm, d available = D pro – ø/2 – Cc = 910mm
Cc = 80mm
𝑴
𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒒 ≥ = 𝟐𝟖𝟕. 𝟗𝟑𝒎𝒎 D req = d req + ø/2 + Cc = 377.93mm
𝑹𝒃
Reinforcement Calculation
As min = ρ min b*d avail
= 0.0015 x 1000 x 910
= 1365mm2/m
Main Reinforcement
𝑀𝑐−𝑐
𝐴𝑠 = 𝑓𝑠 ∗𝑗 ∗𝑑 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑖𝑙
= 1081.05𝑚𝑚2 As used =1365mm2
𝑎 𝑠 ∗𝑏
Spacing: 𝑆= 𝐴𝑠
= 230.04𝑚𝑚
B) At front face
Minimum Reinforcement should be provided both in the vertical and horizontal direction.
Use ø16mm Cc = 80mm and As min = 1365mm2/m
𝑎 𝑠 ∗𝑏
Spacing: 𝑆= 𝐴𝑠
= 147.2𝑚𝑚
REFERENCE
EBCS-1
EBCS-2
EBCS-3
EBCS-7
EBCS-8
Reinforced Concrete Design, 4th Edition, W.H. Mosley and J.H. Bungey
Handbook of structural steel work, 3rd Edition, jointly published by the British constructional steel work
association Ltd. And steel construction institute.
A. Reinforcement Details
Continued ………