Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/275945914
Cultural tourism
CITATIONS READS
44 5,663
1 author:
Milena Ivanovic
University of Johannesburg
15 PUBLICATIONS 125 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
book: Ivanovic, M. 2008. Cultural Tourism, Cape Town: Juta Academic View project
The revealing case of Cultural Creatives as transmodern tourists in Soweto, South Africa View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Milena Ivanovic on 23 November 2015.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system,
without permission in writing from the publisher.
The authors and the publisher have made every effort to obtain permission for and to acknowledge the use of
copyright material. Should any infringement of copyright have occurred, please contact the publisher, and every
effort will be made to rectify omissions or errors in the event of a reprint or new edition.
Foreword xv
Introduction xvii
Why develop cultural tourism in South Africa? xvii
The historical context of South African cultural and tourism development xix
Cultural tourism as a socio-economic tool of community empowerment xx
The approach to cultural tourism development used xxi
The main sources of information xxii
Who should use this book? xxiv
Glossary xxvi
Introduction 6
1.1 Introduction 9
1.2 What is culture? 10
1.2.1 How do we learn about culture? 11
1.2.2 Social control – a means of maintaining a group’s
culture 11
2.1 Introduction 28
2.2 The ‘old’ phenomenon of culture 29
2.2.1 Humanism and the Renaissance – setting the stage
for the Grand Tour 30
2.2.2 The ‘Classical’ Grand Tour 32
2.2.3 The ‘Romantic’ Grand Tour 33
2.3 The ‘new’ phenomenon of culture 34
2.4 The consequences of broadening the basis of culture 35
2.4.1 ‘High’ culture 35
2.4.2 ‘Low’ culture 36
2.4.3 Mass culture and cultural industries 37
2.5 ‘Low’ and ‘high’ cultural integration 38
2.5.1 The postmodern perspective on culture 39
2.5.2 Implications of ‘low’ and ‘high’ cultural integration for
3.1 Introduction 45
3.2 The face of globalisation 49
3.2.1 Globalisation and developing countries 51
3.2.2 Ten consequences of globalisation 52
3.3 Tourism as an export strategy 54
3.3.1 Tourism and world trade 55
3.3.2 Tourism and the least developed countries (LDCs) 57
3.4 The world’s leading destinations and tourism earners 66
3.5 Future growth in international tourism 69
3.6 Tourism in South Africa – the new ‘gold’ 71
3.7 Summary 72 v
Questions for self-assessment 73
contents
Task 73
4.1 Introduction 74
4.2 Approaches to defining cultural tourism 75
4.2.1 Defining cultural tourism: The ‘sites-and-monuments’
or technical approach 76
4.2.2 Defining cultural tourism: The ‘conceptual activity’ or
process-based approach 76
4.2.3 UNWTO definitions of cultural tourism 76
4.2.4 The ATLAS and ICOMOS definitions of cultural tourism 77
4.3 The scope of cultural tourism 79
4.4 Melanie Smith’s main forms of cultural tourism 80
4.4.1 Heritage tourism 81
4.4.2 Arts tourism 83
5.1 Introduction 96
5.2 The market and tourism development approaches to tourism
development 97
5.3 Cultural tourism processes (the tourism development approach) 100
vi
5.4 The basic structure of cultural tourism (the market approach) 102
5.5 Summary 103
Questions for self-assessment 103
Task 104
Introduction 106
contents
6.7.3 SAHRA’s fundamental principles of heritage
conservation in South Africa 127
6.8 Purpose-built (contrived) cultural attractions – theme parks 129
6.8.1 Disney theme parks 129
6.8.2 The Africa Theme Park Resort (ATPR) 131
6.9 Primary attractions and the image of cultural destinations 132
6.10 Secondary attractions and a destination’s cultural menu 132
6.11 The relative importance of socio-economic elements influencing
the cultural attractiveness of a tourist region 133
6.11.1 Cultural landscapes 133
6.11.2 Intangible (living) heritage 134
6.12 The Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible
Heritage of Humanity 135
6.13 Living human treasures 136
6.14 Summary 136
contents
8.4.1 ICOMOS and heritage interpretation 187
8.4.2 Freeman Tilden (1883-1980) – the father of
heritage interpretation 192
8.4.3 Sources of bias in heritage interpretation 194
8.4.4 The role of interpretation in contemporary cultural
heritage tourism 195
8.5 The presentation of cultural heritage 195
8.5.1 Digital museums and the use of intelligent information in
the presentation of exhibits 198
8.5.2 Innovative concepts for interactive multimedia presentation
of cultural heritage sites 200
8.5.3 The presentation of intangible heritage 201
8.6 Summary 203
Questions for self-assessment 204
Task 204
Introduction 206
contents
Task 262
Index 334
xiii
contents
Throughout the history of our species, culture has been an integral part of our human
evolvement, inseparable from our existence and development. From our remotest times
as cave dwellers to our recent space explorations which have provided our civilisation
with breathtaking photographs of the inhospitable landscapes of the Red Planet, every
civilisation in our history has had a powerful, articulate need to leave its imprint on our
planet. The Pyramids of Gizeh, the Taj Mahal, the Acropolis, the Great Wall of China and
the Colosseum represent but a few phenomenal cultural messages, messages intent
on securing immortality for the civilisations they represent and leaving behind indelible
marks of intellectual and technological achievement. For humankind, the desire to
explore the solar system, to unravel some of its innumerable mysteries and to leave a
human footprint on Mars remains irrepressible.
Some day in the distant future, a curious group of tourists will take a trip to the Red Planet
and be shown the exact place where the first human being stepped from the spacecraft
and left a footprint on the Martian surface. From the perspective of the development
of cultural tourism, there is no doubt that even in the distant future the authenticity
of that footprint will be examined for the purpose of informing, educating, enhancing
understanding, conveying a message and satisfying the curiosity of tourists. These
tourists will be keen to buy souvenirs – some red Martian dust perhaps – attractively
and suitably packaged. They will venture on sightseeing tours and follow the routes of
the first human explorers and settlers. This will certainly be an extraordinary cultural
experience for any human gazing at our own beautiful Blue Planet from the depths of
space. A tour guide will explain the technological and intellectual achievements of our
present Earth-era, our way of life, customs, beliefs and traditions – and the group of
tourists asking questions about the footprint are our cultural tourists of the future!
There is no doubt that tourism travel will be a constant aspect of human life for
centuries to come. The desire to understand, learn and experience things in reality is
A challenging responsibility awaits the developers of cultural tourism as they are the ultimate keepers
of our past, making it accessible to all who seek information and an authentic experience. How
well we preserve the elements of our culture today will ultimately determine the attractiveness and
uniqueness of some future cultural tourism products. So our present responsibility is to conserve and
preserve our cultural heritage so as to ensure a meaningful interpretation, and to protect our cultural
resources through community-based tourism development. But, most importantly, we need to use
cultural attractions in a responsible and sustainable manner so that future generations will be able to
enjoy them in the same way we do today. Seen from this perspective, it becomes clear that in order to
fulfil this important role, the cultural tourism developer has to understand the interconnectedness and
interdependence of tourism and culture and have an in-depth knowledge of the basic characteristics
and principles that govern both fields. Only well-trained people will be able to serve as guardians of
culturaltourism
our cultural heritage, as entrepreneurs and as successful tourism developers capable of securing and
maintaining the sensitive balance between the protection and use of culture in tourism.
This book is intended to equip the student with the necessary knowledge to carry out successfully and
responsibly all the tasks relating to cultural tourism development.
xvi
I should like to acknowledge the valuable suggestions and assistance given to me by Dr Pranill
Ramchander during the writing of this book.
Milena Ivanovic
January 2008
South African Tourism (SAT) has identified the development of cultural tourism as
one of the country’s key growth areas. Unfortunately, the potential for cultural tourism
growth does not correspond to the actual use of cultural resources in South Africa
as part of the tourism product mix. A surprising outcome of the South African
Tourism Competitiveness Study published in 2004 is a perception held by the tourism
industry that our cultural tourism products lack authenticity and sophistication. Even
more worrying is a discovery that, in general, tourists lack empathy with cultural tourism
products, which further implies that such products taken out of their original cultural
setting become unrecognisable as authentic expressions of the original traditional
cultures. With this in mind, the possibility of developing community-based cultural
tourism must be realised as a matter of urgency.
Although the tourism industry’s negative perception of the quality of the South African
cultural tourism product is worrying, international tourists, on the other hand, have
rated cultural tourism as the key component of a meaningful South African tourism
experience. Even more surprisingly, cultural products are given the highest ratings
by domestic tourists, the market segment that has so far been almost completely
ignored in South Africa. Unfortunately it is becoming standard practice among cultural
destinations in South Africa to consider the needs of international tourists only and not
those of domestic tourists.
We can present a few valid arguments why South Africa should in the future prioritise
cultural tourism development.
First, cultural tourism is the fastest growing type of tourism in the world. It is estimated
that 17–35% of all travel in the world is culturally motivated (UNWTO and Greg
Secondly, culture is the only resource capable of interconnecting the characteristics of the
physical assets of a place with the living culture. In essence, culture is responsible for ‘place-
making’, that is, creating the authentic atmosphere of the place (‘sense of the place’) which in
turn creates an identity (‘image’) of the place as a tourist destination. The compound
effect of connecting physical resources to culture is the production of a broad variety of
cultural tourism experiences seen as the raison d’être of cultural tourism development. South
Africa’s cultural and heritage resource base is among the most diversified in the world.
culturaltourism
This potential should be more effectively harnessed by creating a wide variety of authentic
tourist experiences.
Thirdly, and most importantly, cultural tourism has been singled out as an effective socio-economic
tool whereby the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (UN MDGs) can be achieved.
xviii Both international and African communities have endorsed this: the United Nations itself; the
United Nations Educational and Scientific Commission (Unesco); the United Nations World
Tourism Organization (UNWTO); the International Monetary Fund (IMF); the Southern African
Development Community (SADC) and the New partnership for Africa’s Development (Nepad).
The most pressing development goals singled out by the international community are poverty
alleviation and job creation, especially in disadvantaged rural communities. The principles of
sustainability and responsible tourism guidelines are at the core of strategies driving tourism
development in South Africa. UNWTO embraced pro-poor tourism growth as the measure of the
effectiveness of tourism development in achieving UN MDGs as it can provide a clear picture of the
realistic economic growth derived from tourism that positively affects the poorest segments of the
continent’s nations.
South Africa should use more of its cultural heritage potential to secure disadvantaged communities
– largely the owners of culture and heritage – so that they become the primary beneficiaries of cultural
tourism development.
Fourthly, cultural tourism is a powerful tool in urban regeneration and rejuvenation of run-down
city centres. Many urban spaces in South Africa are in urgent need of economic regeneration
and urban rejuvenation. Culture and tourism can provide the desired solution by transforming
these areas into cultural tourism hubs following the good example of Cape Town. The ‘Blue IQ’,
the government’s development agency, is doing sterling work in urban rejuvenation in
Gauteng. The same approach could be used in transforming many other South African cities
and towns.
During the apartheid era cultural groups and communities were segregated, unlawfully displaced,
oppressed, their right to freedom of cultural expression censored and their basic human rights
violated. The development of culture therefore evolved in a highly distorted political environment; a
rich variety of cultural expressions did not enjoy any public support, which was a barrier to normal
growth and the evolution of culture. Oppressive political circumstances were also limiting factors to
the development of any meaningful forms of domestic tourism. Tourism was believed to be ‘the white
thing’, a perception that still prevails in South Africa. Furthermore, the apartheid policies placed severe
constraints on the development of the tourism industry. According to the government’s Tourism White
Paper on the development and promotion of tourism in South Africa, published in 1996, the state of
the tourism industry that was handed over to the first democratic government in 1994 was fraught
with problems. These can be summarised as follows:
The isolation of the South African apartheid regime by the international community in protest against
xix
its policies meant that South Africa was cut off from mainstream cultural and tourism developments
which were flourishing all over the world at that time. The severity of the problems inherited from the
introduction
past were further reaffirmed in the White Paper of 1996:
Tourism development in South Africa has largely been a missed opportunity. Had its
history been different, South Africa would probably have been one of the most visited
places in the world.
In the same vein, we should not allow cultural tourism to be labelled ‘the missed opportunity’ in
any future government literature. If this were to happen, then only this time around we would
miss this opportunity for a completely different reason – a lack of awareness, training and
capacity building.
Today, tourism has been declared the priority industry by the South African Government as in
2005 it outperformed gold mining as a revenue generator – traditionally, the country’s number
one export industry – by three billion rand. In 2005 over seven million foreign tourists visited South
Africa, meaning that the volume of national tourism has more than doubled in the ten years since
South Africa’s first democratic elections in 1994 – when only three million foreigners visited the
country.
SAT’s chief research officer, Didi Moyle, has revealed that tourism’s contribution to South Africa’s
gross domestic product was R93,6 billion in 2004, up from R72,5 billion in 2002. The sector
employs 1,2 million people, with 36 000 new jobs having been created in the past two years
alone.
• The Saxon Hotel in Gauteng has been voted best boutique hotel in the world four times.
• Londolozi Private Game Reserve in Mpumalanga is in fourth place.
• Bushman’s Kloof Wilderness Reserve in the Western Cape is in fifth place.
• Mala Mala Game Reserve in Mpumalanga is in seventh place.
• Phinda Private Game Reserve in KwaZulu-Natal is in eighth place.
In the same year, the British Daily Telegraph voted Cape Town as the best foreign city and the
world’s best city in which to eat out. Cape Town was voted second-best destination in the world,
while South Africa itself was voted fifth. South Africa was the only country to feature in the top
five best overall destinations, being placed fifth after Sydney, Cape Town, New York and Dubai.
Undoubtly South Africa is becoming the tourism ‘darling’ of the world. Bearing in mind the high
standing of South Africa in world tourism, it is unfortunate that many of the country’s poorest rural
communities never encounter a single tourist. We cannot blame them for not knowing what tourism
culturaltourism
is or what a tourist looks like. But the question that needs to be asked is: ‘Do we have a reason to be
proud of our high standing in world tourism when we have done so little to share our blessings with
poor communities in the very same country?’ In this regard, cultural tourism presents itself as an ideal
vehicle for community-based tourism development, where people will ‘see’ tourists and ‘see’ the direct
xx economic benefits of tourists’ visits.
Another important argument that supports the development cultural tourism is that tourism
is a geographically specific industry located in only a few tourist areas. Tourism production and
consumption usually occur in a few areas of a country, which are then the main beneficiaries of
tourism development. The fact that cultural heritage tourism is more dependent on community
cultural heritage resources than on expensive infrastructure and accommodation typical of resort
development points to the capacity of cultural tourism to reshape significantly the current skewed
concentration of tourism to only few designated tourism areas and redistribute benefits more fairly
throughout the country. This characteristic gives cultural tourism the power to become the main
tool of socio-economic development through poverty alleviation and job creation among historically
disadvantaged communities in South Africa.
Nepad is a pledge by African leaders, based on a common vision and a firm and shared conviction,
that they have a pressing duty to eradicate poverty and to place their countries, both individually and
collectively, on a path of sustainable growth and development, and at the same time to participate
actively in the world economy and international body politic.
The Nepad programme is founded on the determination of Africans to extricate themselves and their
continent from the scourge of underdevelopment and exclusion in a globalising world. It suggests
objectives of tourism development and corresponding actions that could lead to mobilising the
Closely related to these issues is the proposal made by former president of the World Bank, James
Wolfensohn (2 April 2001), that it is not possible to reverse the processes of globalisation but it is
possible to create opportunities that will first and foremost benefit the poor. ‘I believe we must treat
globalization as an opportunity and poverty as a challenge,’ was his message to developing countries.
Not surprisingly, Unesco, the World Bank, Nepad, SADC, UNWTO and the UN all identified tourism
as the most effective development tool in addressing the burning issues facing developing countries,
especially creating opportunities for economic growth by securing much-needed foreign exchange
derived from tourism, and eradicating poverty through community-based tourism development.
In line with its potential, tourism is further classified by the IMF as the most suitable export strategy for
debt-ridden countries. For various reasons developing countries are obviously losing the battle in the
international trade arena, but with tourism they are able to enter into an export game where there are
no subsidies, trade barriers, tariffs, cheap labour and cheap products. As estimated by the UNWTO
(2003) tourism is one of the top five export categories for as many as 83% of developing countries in
the world and is the main source of foreign exchange for at least 38% of these countries.
Furthermore, tourism is the world’s largest industry as it involves the greatest, most voluminous
flows of people over the surface of the planet, as well as being the largest of the world’s employers.
Every tenth job in the world is, and will be, directly or indirectly created by tourism. The World Travel
and Tourism Council (WTTC) predicts that between 2006 and 2010 some 328 million people will be
employed in the travel and tourism industry, which is a growth of about 60% from 2004 (approximately xxi
200 million people were employed in 2004).
introduction
In the past few years the South African Government has been addressing issues regarding the socio-
economic potential of tourism in achieving sustainable economic growth through poverty alleviation
and job creation. The Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), in its publication
Responsible Tourism Manual for South Africa, has recommended ‘responsible tourism’ as the most
suitable tourism application, with its emphasis on community-based development and the appropriate
and sustainable use of tourism resources as prerequisites for development within a context outlined
by Nepad and the UN.
The approach employed throughout this book reinforces the central place cultural heritage resources
occupy in cultural tourism development. Cultural resources occupy a central position not only in tourism
development but also in marketing as well as being the main catalysts for tourist experiences and the
main motivation for tourism travel in the first place. In the past not much consideration was given
to the protection and conservation of cultural heritage resources as marketing and tourism product
development were seen as the alpha and omega of successful tourism development. But due to the
fact that the government is firmly committed to a responsible approach towards the country’s tourism
development and has embraced various UN, Unesco and International Council on Monuments and
Sites (ICOMOS) charters and declarations as a guideline for protection, conservation, preservation,
presentation and interpretation of national cultural heritage, further sole reliance on marketing and
This resource-based approach is reflected in the structure of the book as well as in the allocation of
the sections:
Cultural tourism resources not only form a basis for cultural tourism product development but also
represent the main sources of tourists’ experiences. There is no doubt that culture and heritage
is the main reason for the existence of cultural tourism. If used and abused by tourism, cultural
tourism development will cause harm rather than good to communities – the custodians of culture
and heritage – and indirectly to the country as a whole. The material presented in this book broadens
the reader’s understanding of culture and tourism and, more importantly, provides appropriate tools
culturaltourism
for transforming tourism resources into cultural products based on the principles of sustainability and
responsible tourism development.
International organisations such as the UN and Unesco set the benchmark for worldwide national
policy formulation on cultural tourism development. Sustainable and responsible tourism
guidelines – the core of the DEAT’s strategies for the country’s tourism development – are all
derived from the examples set by these organisations. The White Paper and the Responsible
Tourism Manual for South Africa incorporate and build further on the best tourism development
practices worldwide, especially where these are applicable to developing countries in which cultural
tourism resources are vulnerable to the irresponsible exposure of indigenous cultures to tourism.
International organisations set the new standards for responsible tourism development worldwide by
embracing Agenda 21 (introduced at the Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio and reaffirmed
The South African Government also relied on the same sources when developing its policies and
strategies for tourism development in the country. Unesco provided the international framework and
set the international benchmark in relation to the preservation, conservation and safeguarding of
the world’s cultural heritage. National governments all over the world are implementing the Unesco
guidelines, programmes, charters and many other documents which serve as the guide to best
practices in the tourism field, especially the protection and management of the World Heritage Sites.
UNWTO provides the framework for the collection and comparability of national tourism statistics, the
volume and value of the world’s tourism, employment figures, the contribution of tourism to the gross
national product (GDP) of each country, regional statistics, future trends and other tourism-related
statistical data.
The sources of information derived from the ATLAS Cultural Tourism Research Project are valuable
in a sense that it was the first and only international project which from 1991 continuously collected
data by means of qualitative and qualitative research methods: measuring and comparing year-to-
year data focusing on the nature of demand, the expectations and experiences of cultural tourists
and the level of popularity of different cultural tourism attractions. Information is collected by more
than 74 institutions in the world, which carried out the surveys in their respective countries. It is the
first comprehensive research ever carried out on the issues relating to world trends and the main xxiii
characteristics of cultural tourism.
introduction
The research findings clearly reinforced the perception of cultural tourism as the fastest growing type
of tourism in the past decade and confirmed its potent ability to bring substantial economic benefits
to the destinations engaged in providing cultural tourism and heritage products.
Information obtained from ICOMOS and the International Council on Museums (ICOM) is valuable
because South Africa, as a member of both organisations, implements the main charters and
documents regarding issues of authenticity of cultural heritage (Nara Document on Authenticity)
and the interpretation of cultural heritage (the Ename Charter on interpretation and the Charleston
declaration).
Some background documents such as the Nepad document, the UN documents from the UN MDGs,
World Bank and many other sources are widely used either as guiding principles or as the source of
data throughout this book.
However, the most important sources of information are the DEAT and its White Paper and Responsible
Tourism Guidelines for South Africa, SAT, the South African Heritage Resource Agency (SAHRA), in
charge of the South African national estate which includes the country’s cultural and natural heritage,
and the National Heritage Council (NHC), to mention but a few.
Finally, information presented in various documents and conference proceedings from major tourism
conferences as well as the research papers published in international journals in the field of tourism
and cultural tourism development – Annals of Tourism Research, Tourism Management, Journal on
The South African daily press was also a major source of information.
The material presented in this book is intended for broad academic as well as non-academic use.
Apart from being a textbook intended for cultural tourism students, it is also a source of references
useful for graduate and post-graduate students.
The predominant focus on the characteristics of the cultural tourism resource base is the approach
followed in the nature and selection of the material presented and in the nature of the texts themselves.
Local tourism developers should be able to use the approaches outlined to attempt community cultural
heritage development and the management of community cultural heritage resources successfully.
The information regarding the selection, evaluation, product development and interpretation and
presentation of cultural heritage will be a valuable tool in local tourism development.
The book is also a source of information for all stakeholders – especially the custodians of national
culturaltourism
cultural heritage – as well as managers of cultural heritage sites and museums. Understanding the
logic driving the transformation of cultural heritage resources into cultural tourism product provides an
insight into the factors driving cultural heritage tourism development and helps us to better understand
the possible role of custodians and managers of national cultural heritage resources in cultural tourism
xxiv development.
The material presented in the book removes the stigma associated with tourism development, which
has been viewed as an inconsiderate, money-driven endeavour having no regard for the sustainability
of either resources or communities. Well-trained cultural tourism developers can ensure that
irreplaceable cultural heritage resources provide benefits for all the stakeholders involved, not only
the tourism industry.
The golden rhinoceros from the Mapungubwe Cultural Landscape World Heritage Site: tangible
evidence of South Africa’s rich and centuries-old cultural heritage
xxv
introduction
glossary
UN United Nations
Unesco United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNEP United Nations Environmental Programme
UN MDG United Nation’s Millennium Development Goal
UNWTO United Nations World Tourism Organization
WTO World Trade Organization
WTTC World Travel and Tourism Council