Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CANDLESTICKS
$.afmmH
"Take all necessa y precautions"
futures or calls. If prices move up, the higher price needed to purchase
the cash commodity would be offset, at least partially, by the gains in the
futures or options positions.
In many instances, the underlying cash position may not be fully
hedged at one price. The hedger may intend to scale into the hedge
position. Thus, the question a hedger must frequently address is what
percent of his exposure should be hedged. Candlestick techniques can
help answer this question. By exploring the following examples, it
should offer insight into how candlesticks can be used to furnish clues
as to when to adjust the hedged portion of the cash position.
Candlestick techniques can also be used for those who are 100%
hedged. For instance, let's say that you are a corn farmer and the corn
market is trending against your cash position (corn prices are falling).
This should mean, as a short hedger, your futures hedge position is
profitable. If a strongly bullish candlestick reversal formation appears,
and you believe prices will rally, you might want to ease back on the
hedge. In some instances, early lifting of a profitable hedge may improve
cash flow. However, no hedge should be viewed as a strategy to gener-
ate profits.
As shown in Exhibit 19.1, an explosive rally unfolded in 1988 as
prices nearly doubled from $6 to $11. In mid-1988, near the peak of the
rally, the candlesticks gave a reversal signal a la the bearish engulfing
pattern. This would have not been seen as a Western top reversal forma-
tion using traditional Western techniques. A top reversal formation
would have required a new high for the move and then a close under the
prior week's close. The black candlestick session of the engulfing pattern
did not create a new high. Thus, while not a Western top reversal pat-
tern, it was a reversal formation with candlesticks. This bearish engulf-
ing pattern, for a soybean farmer, could have been used as a warning to
either initiate short hedge positions or, if not already fully hedged, to
raise the percentage hedged.
In 1989, another bearish engulfing pattern warned of a top (this also
was not seen as a top reversal pattern using Western technicals). Short
hedgers could have placed hedge positions here. The window a few
weeks later was another bearish candlestick signal which would have
told short hedgers to add to their short hedge position (if not already
100% hedged). October's bullish piercing pattern could have been used
as a signal to ease back on short-hedge positions. For those looking at a
long hedge, the piercing pattern could be used as a signal to initiate such
a hedge.
As illustrated in Exhibit 19.2, a confluence of bullish candlestick sig-
nals emerged the last week in September and the first week in October
in 1988. The most obvious was the bullish engulfing pattern. These two
weeks also created a tweezers bottom. Additionally, the white candle-
stick was a bullish belt hold which closed at its high. It also engulfed the
prior five candlesticks. For long hedgers, these would have been signs to
start, or add to, their hedges.
In early 1989, the harami cross (an important reversal signal), could
have been used by long hedgers to scale back on hedges. Also, the fact
that this harami cross was formed by a long white candlestick and a doji
would indicate that the market was in trouble. As discussed in Chapter
8, a doji after a long white real body is often a sign of a top.
Exhibit 19.3 explores how a long crude oil hedger could use a candle-
stick signal to get an early signal of a bottom reversal and then use West-
ern technical tools to confirm. a bottom and add to the long hedge. The
first tentative bottom reversal clue came with a hammer on July 5 . Since
this hammer session gapped under the prior lows, it should have not
been taken as a bullish sign unless it was confirmed by other bullish
indicators during the next few sessions. The next clue was the bullish
engulfing pattern which provided bullish confirmation to the hammer.
This engulfing pattern was also an extra important bottom reversal sig-
nal. This is because the white candlestick on July 9 engulfed not one but
two black real bodies. At this point, crude oil end users (that is, long
278 The Rule of Multiple Technical Techniques
I Engulfing
............ Pattern and ............................... !...................
I i I
Jul Oct Jan ~ p r Jul Oct
1989
EXHIBIT 19.2. Cocoa-Weekly
(Candlesticks with Hedging) Source: Commodity Trend Service"
......................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
.........................:. 1900
..
\ '
-................. 1800
.. Bullish .
7/24/90 Engulfing
o= Pattern
H=
:L=
C=
+400
+200
+O
-200
. ;May . iJun . iJul .
rn (23 130 17 114 121 128 14 111 118 125 12 19 116 123
On June 13, I recommended a short at $6.27. The stop was above the
neckline at $6.35. The target was $5.90 (this was based on a support area
earlier in the year). The short position looked good for the rest of the
week as the market tumbled. Then on June 18, the market shouted it
was time to cover shorts. The clues were:
The tall white candlestick on June 18 engulfed the prior black real
body. These two candlesticks formed a bullish engulfing line.
The opening on June 18 made a new low for the move by punching
under the early June lows. However, prices bounced right back above
this early June low. This created a spring in which the lows were bro-
ken and not held. Based on this spring, I had targeted a retest of the
upper end of the trading range at $6.30.
The candlestick on the June 18 was a strong bullish belt-hold line.
The new price lows were not validated by lower stochastic levels. This
was a positive divergence and it demonstrated that the bears were
losing control.
How I Have Used Candlesticks 283
. A = -200
4 .. Y ..
/ ..
' Resistance' : '
................... .
...... .
................Zone 9000
.. ..
.. ..
Hararni
- 6/26/90 . .. ..
. O= 8825
-H= 8825 .. ..
. L = 8615
.C= 8650 ..........Apr May .........................................Jun ................................
..................................... ., 8500
rn 126 12 19 116 123 130 17 114 121 128 14 Ill 118 125
-
7/213:45 . Hammer :
1677 .
.-0=
H= 1678 .
-L= 1663 .
C= 1672 .
I 6/18 1 6/25 7/ 2
This level became resistance. Once the market backed down from near
$.92 on the brief rally, I knew the bears were still in charge. The move
on June 20 opened a window. This implied another leg lower. On June
21, when the market failed to move above the window's resistance area,
I recommended a short at $.go15 with a stop above the June 20 high of
$.9175. The objective was for $.8675 (this was based on support earlier
in the year). The market then backed off.
At the time of the chart shown in Exhibit 20.3, crude oil was in a bear
market. So I was looking to short on rallies. A rally started on June 21
with the hammer (note how I did not use this bullish hammer as a time
to buy. Why? Because the major trend was down). Then, a few days
after the hammer, back-to-back bearish engulfing patterns emerged. At
that time, I suggested a short sale. There was a small window opened
between June 15 and June 18. In the belief that this window would be
resistance, I put a stop slightly above it at $17.65. The target was a retest
near the hammer lows. A late rally on June 25 quickly backed off from the
resistance area made by the bearish engulfing pattern and the window.
Exhibit 20.4 shows that on June 4 a hammer and a successful hold-
How I Have Used Candlesticks 285
2700
and Spring f
2600
.. . . .
, H= 2810
L= 2776
' C= 2806 'Rpr 'May 'Jun
rn 119 126 12 I? 116 123 130 17 114 121 129 14 - -
ing, on a close, of the late April, mid-May lows of $2.65. It was also a
bullish spring since prices made new lows for the move but these new
lows failed to hold.
Although this was a bullish hammer I needed confirmation the next
day before I could recommend to buy since the market was holding the
$2.65 support so tenuously. The day after this hammer the market
proved itself by opening higher. I recommended a buy at $2.68 with a
stop under the support line shown at $2.64. The target was for a test of
the downward sloping resistance line at $2.79. The strong session after
the hammer day made this into a morning star pattern.
Although the trade in Exhibit 20.5 was not profitable, it is a good
example of how candlesticks can help to provide good trade location.
The price action on Friday, March 2 gave some buy signals. First, it was
a hammer line. Next, this hammer's small real body was inside the prior
tall real body creating a harami. This harami meant that the prior minor
downtrend was over. Finally, the hammer session's lows took out sup-
port from early February, yet these new lows could not hold. In other
words, the bears tried to break the market and they could not. It was
time to step in and buy.
286 The Rule of Multiple Technical Techniques