Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Suarez
In every way, this philosophy is very consistent. Students are being taught
to be responsible for their learning and their classrooms so that they can
be responsible for themselves and their environment later in life. The goal
of this concept has been to foster a sense of self-worth while
simultaneously recognizing the importance of all other participants. If my
job as a teacher is to help students succeed, it's only natural that the
environment I establish in the classroom be one that welcomes all
students and prioritizes their safety. It also follows that a curriculum that
considers the diversity of the environment promotes the achievement of all
students in the classroom and beyond. In its focus on my own self-
development, this philosophy integrates practicality. If my theory is
evolving, it stands to reason that it will remain relevant and adaptable to
each given period and place in which it is practiced. Similarly, if I am
always improving my skills through lifelong learning, my methods and
philosophy will be in line with current trends and represent what is best for
students.
Within my philosophy, there are three belief claims that I would like to
defend in further depth. The first step toward a stronger defense of these
beliefs is to demonstrate that they are based on the theories of previous
educational philosophies. The first assumption I want to defend is that
learners are individuals with unique needs and capacities who should be
encouraged to take charge of their own learning, especially as they get
older.
The second notion I'd like to explain in greater detail is that a teacher's
primary function is that of a learning facilitator, generating opportunities for
learning that increase the likelihood of student success. Individuality is
emphasized in the School of Existentialism, which supports this belief. It
asserts that it is the job of the instructor to assist pupils in making their
own decisions and developing into their own individuals (Van Nuland,
2001). It also emphasizes that it is the role of the instructor to provide a
learning environment that allows pupils to express their subjectivity (Van
Nuland, 2001). According to the School of Idealism, it is the teacher's role
to promote learner awareness of ideas and serve as a cultural legacy
transmitter (Van Nuland, 2001). According to the Idealism school, a
teacher should expose children to cultural legacy wisdom so that they can
understand, share, and extend it (Van Nuland, 2001). Finally, the founder
of kindergarten, Freidrich Froebel, may be referenced in favor of this view
because he stressed the necessity of the learner's own self-activity (Van
Nuland, 2001).
The third and last notion I'd like to defend is that the learning environment
is a shared, public space that must be inviting, safe, and accountable to
those who use it. According to the school of Idealism, a pupil is a mind that
must be nourished and protected (Van Nuland, 2001). This backs up the
idea that the classroom should be a safe place to learn. According to
Idealism, the objective of a school is to expose pupils to cultural legacy
wisdom so that they might know, share, and extend it (Van Nuland, 2001).
If the classroom depicted in my personal philosophy is truly inclusive, it will
embrace the many different cultures represented in the classroom.