Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Desai- Liaqat Plan • Equal number of persons nominated by the No settlement btw Congress and ML
(Bhulabhai Congress and the League in the central
Desai+Liaqat Ali legislature.
Khan) • 20% reserved seats for minorities.
June 1945 Wavell Plan • With the exception of the governor-general and • ML wanted all Muslim members to be League
(Shimla Conference) the commander-in-chief, all members of the nominees and claimed some kind of veto in the
executive council were to be Indians. council with decisions opposed to Muslims
• Caste Hindus and Muslims to have equal needing a two-thirds majority for approval.
representation.
• reconstructed council was to function as an • Congress objected to reducing it to purely caste
interim government within the framework of the Hindu Party
1935 Act
(i.e. not responsible to the Central Assembly).
• The governor-general was to exercise his veto on
the advice of ministers.
• Representatives of different parties were to
submit a joint list to the viceroy for nominations
to the executive council. If a joint list was not
possible, then separate lists were to be
submitted.
• Possibilities were to be kept open for
negotiations on a new constitution once the war
was finally won.
Prelims Page 1
Feb,1946 Cabinet Mission • Rejection of the demand for a full-fledged Congress:
(Pethick Lawrence, Pakistan • Provinces should not have to wait till the first
Secretary of State • Grouping of existing provincial assemblies into general elections to come out of a group. They
for three sections: should have the option of not joining a group
India; Section-A: Madras, Bombay, Central Provinces, in the first place.
Stafford Cripps, United Provinces, Bihar and Orissa (Hindu- (Congress had the Congress-ruled provinces of
President of the majority provinces) NWFP and Assam in mind which had been included
Board of Trade; and Section-B: Punjab, North-West Frontier Province in groups B and C respectively.)
A.V. Alexander, First and Sindh (Muslim-majority provinces) • Compulsory grouping contradicts the oft-
Lord of Admiralty) Section-C: Bengal and Assam (Muslim-majority repeated insistence on provincial autonomy
provinces). • Absence of provision for elected members
• Three-tier executive and legislature at provincial, from the princely states in the constituent
section and union levels. assembly (they could only be nominated by
• A constituent assembly was to be elected by the princes) was not acceptable.
provincial assemblies by proportional
representation (voting in three groups—General, League:
Muslims, Sikhs) Grouping should be compulsory with sections B and
• A common centre would control defence, C developing into solid entities with a view to future
communication and external affairs. A federal secession into Pakistan.
structure was envisaged for India. The League had thought that the Congress would
• Communal questions in the central legislature reject the plan, thus prompting the government to
were to be decided by a simple majority of both invite the League to form the interim government.
communities present and voting.
• Provinces were to have full autonomy and
residual powers. The Muslim League on June 6 and the Congress on
• Princely states were no longer to be under June 24,1946 accepted the long-term plan put
paramountcy of the British government. They forward by the Cabinet Mission.
would be free to enter into an arrangement with
successor governments or the British
government.
• After the first general elections, a province was July 29, 1946: The League withdrew its acceptance
to be free to come out of a group and after 10 of the long-term plan and gave a call for “direct
years, a province was to be free to call for a action” from August 16 to achieve
reconsideration of the group or the union Pakistan.
constitution.
• Meanwhile, an interim government was to be
formed from the constituent assembly.
Prelims Page 2