Previous research has shown that meaning-focused instruction and form-focused instruction are effective teaching approaches individually for developing second language skills. However, no studies have combined the two approaches. This study examines the effects of integrating meaning-focused and form-focused instruction on speaking, writing, and grammar skills of 480 high school ESL students in the Philippines. The students were divided into four groups receiving different instructional approaches. Results showed students who received both meaning-focused and form-focused instruction outperformed those receiving only one approach or standard instruction. Combining the two approaches was concluded to be an effective way to improve language skills.
Previous research has shown that meaning-focused instruction and form-focused instruction are effective teaching approaches individually for developing second language skills. However, no studies have combined the two approaches. This study examines the effects of integrating meaning-focused and form-focused instruction on speaking, writing, and grammar skills of 480 high school ESL students in the Philippines. The students were divided into four groups receiving different instructional approaches. Results showed students who received both meaning-focused and form-focused instruction outperformed those receiving only one approach or standard instruction. Combining the two approaches was concluded to be an effective way to improve language skills.
Previous research has shown that meaning-focused instruction and form-focused instruction are effective teaching approaches individually for developing second language skills. However, no studies have combined the two approaches. This study examines the effects of integrating meaning-focused and form-focused instruction on speaking, writing, and grammar skills of 480 high school ESL students in the Philippines. The students were divided into four groups receiving different instructional approaches. Results showed students who received both meaning-focused and form-focused instruction outperformed those receiving only one approach or standard instruction. Combining the two approaches was concluded to be an effective way to improve language skills.
Previous studies revealed that meaning-focused instruction (MFI) and form-focused
instruction (FFI) are two of the most effective approaches in developing the overall languages skills of second language learners, separately. However, no experimental studies have been conducted to prove their effectiveness when integrated. This study, therefore, aims to fill in this gap by investing the effects of combining MFI and FFI in developing the speaking, writing, and grammar skills of selected secondary ESL students in public high schools in the Philippines. The participants involved in this study are 480 third year high school students. These students were divided into four groups; Group A (n=120) received both the MFI and FFI, Group B (n=120) received MMI only. Group C (n=120) received FFI only, and Group D (n=120) received the Standard English programme for secondary ESL students. Findings revealed that students from Group A, B, and C significantly improved in their speaking. Writing, and grammar skills but not Group D. Based on ANOVA, findings further showed that students from Group A have outperformed students from Group B, C, D. From these findings, it is concluded that combining MFI and FFI is an effective way in significantly improving the language skills of students. Future directions and implications for teaching are discussed.