Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Open Access in
Inter State Transmission System
S S Barpanda,
DGM, GM, NRLDC
Open Access
Presentation Outline
–Overview of Indian Power Market
–Open Access – Other areas
–Provisions of Electricity Act 2003
–Open Access in Inter-state Transmission
•Bilateral
•Collective
–Congestion management in PX
–Connectivity, LTA and MTOA
Indian Power Market – An
Overview
August 2006
Five Regional Grids North synchronized
Two Frequencies
With Central Grid
March 2003
West synchronized NEW Grid
With East & Northeast
Central Grid
MERGING
North OF
East MARKETS
West
Northeast
South
Capacity
Market
Ancillary
Market
Power Exchange
2008
Open Access
2004
Settlement System
2002-03
Grid Code
Feb.’2000
Market Design
Four Pillars of Market Design
ELECTRICITY MARKET
SCHEDULING
CONGESTION ANCILLARY
& IMBALANCES
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
DISPATCH
Control Area
Stability Limit
Time
Total Transfer Capability is the minimum of the
Thermal Limit, Voltage Limit and the Stability Limit
Total & Available Transfer Capability
Intra-day STOA
Day-ahead STOA
Collective (PX) STOA
First Come First Served STOA
Advance Short Term Open Access (STOA) TTC ATC
3 Deterministic Probabilistic
4 Constant under a set of conditions Always varying
5 Time independent Time dependent
6 Non-directional Directional
7 Determined directly by design Estimated indirectly using simulation
models
8 Declared by designer/ manufacturer Declared by the Grid Operator
9 Understood by all Frequently misunderstood
10 Considered unambiguous & sacrosanct Subject to close scrutiny by all
stakeholders
Total Transfer Capability as defined in the
Congestion charge regulations
• “Total Transfer Capability (TTC)” means the
amount of electric power that can be
transferred reliably over the inter-control area
transmission system under a given set of
operating conditions considering the effect of
occurrence of the worst credible contingency.
Open Access
in Inter-State Transmission
• Implemented w.e.f. 6-May-2004
• Revised Regulations w.e.f 1st April 2008
• Further amendment w.e.f. 15th June 2009
• Products –
– Monthly bilateral
• Advance
• First Come First Serve
– Day ahead bilateral
– Collective Transactions through Power Exchange
– Intra day bilateral
DO P-1
Adv
Application FCFS
for M2
Adv
Application for
M3,
Approvals for
M2
Adv
Application for
M4, Day Ahead /
Approvals for PX LEGEND:
M3
D OP : Day of Operation
D L : Last day of M1
Approvals for
M4
New Open Access Regulations w.e.f.
01-April-2008
5500
Approved Energy (MUs)--->
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
JULY'04
JAN'06
JAN'07
JAN'08
JULY'08
MARCH
MARCH
MARCH
JULY
JULY
JULY
MAY ' 04
NOV'04
JAN '05
MAY'05
NOV'05
MAY'06
NOV'06
MAY'07
NOV'07
MARCH'08
MAY,08
SEP'08
Nov'08
Jan'09
Mrch'09
May'09
July'09
Sep'09
Nov'09
Jan'10
Mar'10
May'10
July'10
SEP
SEP
SEP
SEP
Open Access-TOTAL TRANSACTIONS ( 2004-10)
2000
1800
1600
NO. OF TRANSACTIONS
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
JULY' …
SEP
SEP
SEP
SEP
MAY'04
MAY'05
MAY'06
MAY'07
SEP'08
MAY'09
Mar'10
SEPT
JAN
JAN
MAR
MAR
MAR
MAR
NOV'04
JAN'05
NOV'05
NOV'06
NOV'07
JAN'08
MAY,08
Nov'08
JAN'09
MAR'09
Nov'09
Jan'10
May'10
July'10
JULY
JULY
JULY
JULY
JULY
3500
ENERGY APPROVED(MU) - (Nodal RLDC-NRLDC)
3000
2010 - 11
2500 2009-10
Energy (MUs)---------->
2000
2007-08
2006-07
1500 2008-09
1000 2005-06
500
Month -------->
SOUTHERN REGION ENERGY APPROVED(MU)-Bilateral
1600
1400 2010
Approved Energy(MUs)------>
1200
2009
1000
2008
800
2007
600
2006
400
200
20000
40 40
Volume of trade (BUs) No. of transactions
18128
35 31
Number of Transactions ---->
30 15000
30
Energy (BUs) ----->
25 23 24 11781
9560 10000
20 17
15
5933
10 5000
3938
5
778
0 0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09* 2009-10*
100 CESC
700
ICPL
DSCLS
600
MW(Total)
80 TPRA
MW
TPRA
500
KEB
60 MPTCL
400
MPTCL
MPTCL
40 300
MPTCL
SIKIM
200
TNEB
20
100 JPL
JPL
0 0 JPL
1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81 89 NGLND
Time Blocks TOTAL
Quantum : 20 MW
NETWORK INVOLVED
Co-ordination for Scheduling,
DSP/ASP Settlement & System Operation by
CPP(2*60 MW) Seller
DVC SLDC-DVC
Seam
Changes ER ISTS ERLDC
WR ISTS WRLDC
CSEB SLDC-Chattisgarh
Buyer
BSP
Transmission & System Operation Charges
BSP DSP
2.466 Rs/kwh 2.33 Rs/kwh
CSEB DVC
TSC+SOC=0.034 Rs TSC +SOC =0.034 Rs
2.432Rs/kwh 2.364Rs/kwh
WR ISTS ER ISTS
TSC+SOC=0.034 Rs TSC+SOC= 0.034 Rs
2.398Rs/kwh
Transmission Losses
BSP DSP
17.03MW 20MW
CSEB DVC
3.93% Loss 2.82% Loss
17.73MW 19.44MW
WR ISTS ER ISTS
5.5% Loss 3.5% Loss
18.76MW
Scheduling of Collective
Transactions Through Power
Exchange
General
• NODAL Agency (at Regional Level) - NLDC
• All buyers within a State shall be clubbed together and all
sellers within a State shall be clubbed together
– Each group considered as a single entity for the purpose of
scheduling and operating charges at Regional Level
– SLDC shall count each point of drawal / injection separately for
the purpose of Scheduling and operating charges
• Information Exchange
– Dedicated Communication Channel between NLDC and PX,
NLDC and RLDCs
• PX to ensure
– Necessary infrastructure for information exchange with
NLDC/RLDCs/SLDCs
• PX to indemnify all SLDCs/RLDCs/NLDC at all times
Eligibility Conditions
• Entities scheduled by RLDCs
– Deemed Regional Entity
– Entities whose metering and energy accounting done by
RLDCs/RPCs
– New Entities
• To Satisfy conditions
– as laid down in CERC Order 58/2008 dated
07.05.2008
• Obtain Prior Approval from RLDCs/RPCs
• Entities scheduled by SLDCs
– SLDCs to assess TTC/ATC for their State system
– Prior Consent from respective SLDCs
– Standing Clearance / NOC
– As per format in detailed procedure
Information Exchange
Power Exchange SLDCs
Request for Scheduling
Provisional Solution
Information
exchanged over Final Trade Results for
leased line between State Utilities & Intra State
NLDC and PX Entities to be sent by PX
directly to SLDCs
NLDC
RLDCs/SLDCs to
incorporate
NLDC to Collective
Market confirm Transactions in
Participants to acceptance. the Daily
place their Bid PX to send files Schedule
NLDC to check to SLDCs for
for congestion. scheduling
PX to send
In case of
provisional
congestion shall
unconstrained
intimate PX PX to send Scheduling
solution to
regarding to the Request to NLDC based
NLDC and flow
period for on margin specified by
on TS as
congestion and NLDC/SLDCs
informed by
available
NLDC
margins
SUBMISSION/PROCESSING OF
APPLICATION
• Application for scheduling : Format-PX-II
– Summary of Collective Transaction
– Declarations
• Scheduling Request : Format- PX-III
– Each Region
– IR corridor
– At Regional entity Periphery
– Other Bid Area, Sub-Bid Area – if required.
TREATMENT OF LOSSES
FOR COLLECTIVE TRANSACTION
• Both Buyers and Sellers to absorb losses
– Buyer
• draw less than Contracted Power
(Contracted Power – losses)
– Seller
• inject more than Contracted Power
(Contracted Power + Losses)
Scenarios:
1. 4S
WR ER+ 2. 3S + 1D
NER
3. 2S + 2D
4. 1S + 3D
5. 4D
SR
FLOWGATES
• Day ahead PX
• Contingency transaction
• Real time
Reasons for congestion in India
• Fuel / resources related constraints
– Long haulage of power
• Physical network limitations
– Fast growing network, transition, mismatch
• Inadequate compliance to reliability standards
– Inadequacy in Safety net
• Market Design/Interplay and behavior of
players
Causes of congestion
• Inadequate transmission – including outages
E2 East ORISSA
A1 North-East TRIP, MEGH, MANI,
MIZO
• Multiple Prices
– Collective Transactions:
• Two prices – one for each exchange
– Two Grids – two UI Prices
– In case of congestion, market split
• Area prices
• Multiple exchanges
Congestion Management in
Multi Exchange Scenario
Multiple Power Exchange
Operation
• First Power Exchange : 27th June 2008
– Indian Energy Exchange
• Promoters – Financial Technologies (India) Ltd., MCX, PTC.
• Methods:
– Priority Based Rules
• Lowest MCP
• Highest MCV
• Highest MCP X MCV
• Maximization of Social Welfare, consumer surplus, etc.
• May not lead to an overall economy
Congestion Management in Multi
Exchanges Scenario (2)
• Explicit Auctioning amongst Exchanges
– Inter-dependencies in the Indian scenario
– Difficult to implement
– Simple to implement
– Sub-optimal method
– Further complications
• Arising out of inter-dependencies in the Indian scenario
Implementation in India
• Worldwide, one Power Exchange dealing with
physical delivery in one market
Case Study
• No congestion till onset of severe winter
• Occasional congestion after 12th Dec 08
– Foggy conditions in Talcher area
• Case of 12th Dec 2008
– Period of Congestion: 0500 – 0600 Hrs
– Congested Corridor: Total import to SR
– TTC to SR reduced from 4000 MW to 3600 MW
– Total provisional requisition: 1430 MW
– Total trades cleared: 1091 MW
– Market split into NEW Grid and SR Grid
– MCP [IEX website]:
• NEW Grid: Rs. 4.80 per kWh
• SR Grid: Rs. 6.00 per kWh
– Cost of Transmission discovered
• Rs. 1.20 per kWh
Transparency - Information Sharing
• Information dissemination through websites
• Available Transfer Capability (ATC) -3 months
ahead
• Past & Current Transactions
• Injection & Drawal Schedules
• Un-requisitioned Surplus
• Frequency Trend
• Urgent market information – unit tripping, load
crash, contingencies
• 52 week ISTS pooled losses
• Procedures for capacity reservation
• Balancing Mechanism
• Consent by STU/SLDC
– Telemetry
– Metering
– Scheduling
• Functional Autonomy of SLDC
• PPAs
Challenges ahead…….
• Designing Market that complements Reliability
• Focus on Reliability of physical system
• Adequacy, Security, Dependability
• System Operation – A facilitator for an Efficient Electricity
Market
– Empowering SLDCs
• Market Mechanism System
– Deployment of technology
– Automation, Information exchange
• Rapid growth
– Harmonization
– Jurisdiction
• Capacity building
– Inclusive, sustainable, broad based
– Human Resource
• Ancillary, Capacity, Derivatives …
Expectations
• Focus on reliability of the physical system
Exchanges
OTC Markets
Market
Maturity
Spot/
Auction Mkt
Individual
B&S
Time
Issues ………….
• Transmission Pricing
• Transmission Losses
• New Actors in the market
– Aggregators
– Professional Members
– Changing Role of Traders
• Energy to Capacity
• Capacity Market
– Issues
– Right time
Larger the footprint……… Larger the complexities involved.
Thank you