You are on page 1of 5

Clinical Nutrition (1999) 18(6): 379-383

© 1999 Harcourt Publishers Ltd

SPECIAL ARTICLE

The role of the nutritional support dietitian in Europe


J. P. HOWARD*, C. F. JONKERS-SCHUITEMA t, U. KYLE*
*Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK, tAcademic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, CH6pital Cantonal,
Geneva Switzerland (Correspondence to: JPH, Head of Nutrition and Dietetic Services, Bristol Royal Infirmary,
Bristol BS2 8HW, UK)

Abstract--The European Community n o w supports the potential for professionals to practice in any of the
member states subject to recognized local standards of education and practice being achieved. However,
there is no agreed role for the nutritional support dietitian. This leads to an inconsistent and, sometimes,
fragmented approach to the nutritional management of patients throughout Europe. There is a need to
develop a common dietetic approach to nutritional support in order to raise awareness and rationalize
standards. This will help to optimize care to individual patients by fostering good practice, developing
effective communication and encouraging research.
Background: The role of the clinical dietitian varies widely throughout Europe - it tends to be more
highly developed in some countries than in others, which is a cause for concern among dietitians in
ESPEN. This appears to be caused by several factors including education, clinical awareness of the
benefits of dietetic support and access to adequate financial resources. The intention of this paper is to
focus on the key aspects of the role of the dietitian working in nutritional support. The educational
requirements of such a dietitian are outlined and these could be used as a preliminary guide for
institutions responsible for delivering undergraduate dietetic programmes. The overall intention is to
identify minimum educational standards for practice in this field throughout Europe. However, these
should be viewed as a baseline from which to proceed. They should also be perceived as a quality
standard for facilitating professional development, sharing clinical practice and enhancing patient
outcomes. This paper does not address issues of resource allocation.
Recommendations: a) There should be agreement about the key functions of the dietitian working in
nutritional support; b) There should be a common standard at first degree level for all dietitians; c) There
should be an identified programme of post-graduate study (both clinical and academic) leading to
specialization in nutritional support; d) There should be an innovative approach to providing clinical
support for emerging specialists; e) ESPEN should investigate the potential for developing an accredited
and integrated European dietetic standard in nutritional support. © 1999 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Key words: dietitians' education; dietetic responsibility; practitioners to assess the nutritional status of patients,
nutritional support; dietetic role; nutritional support educa- define their nutritional goals and recommend strategies to
tion; multidisciplinary nutritional support achieve and maintain these goals.
Malnutrition has potentially serious clinical sequelae and
is frequently not diagnosed when patients are admitted to
Introduction hospital. Furthermore, it is often unrecognized as the clini-
cal course of treatment progresses (1).
Dietitians attending ESPEN conferences have long ex- Changes in technology, clinical practice and resource
pressed concerns about inconsistencies in the dietetic role allocation have combined to highlight the unique role of the
throughout Europe. This paper is an initial step in redressing dietitian as an essential member of any team offering advice
these inequalities and represents the particular views of about nutrition. Assessing nutritional status must, therefore,
those dietitians attending the 18th ESPEN Congress in be a core component of all clinical practice in order to pre-
Geneva (1996). These views were endorsed by delegates at vent the development of malnutrition and its consequences,
the 19th ESPEN Congress in Amsterdam (1997). and should be performed on all patients considered to be
Clinical nutrition is a fundamental component of general suffering from or at risk of developing nutritional deficien-
clinical care as well as acute and chronic disease manage- cies regardless of where this occurs.
ment. The speciality of clinical nutrition relies on trained For the purposes of this report, nutritional support is
defined as the means of helping patients to meet all their
A pre]iminary report on behalf of the Dietitians' Group of the European nutritional needs both in hospital and in the community. The
Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. provision of food is always the first therapeutic option and
379
380 THE ROLEOF THE NUTRITIONALSUPPORTDIETITIANIN EUROPE

should be the first consideration for all patients (2-7). In clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, patients and their relatives -
addition, nutritional support includes the concept of support- preferably within a nutritional support team setting (10-15).
ing others to help patients meet their nutritional needs (8).
The role of the dietitian working in nutritional support has
Research and audit in nutritional support
several aspects - these include clinical practice, research/audit
and quality assurance as well as management. The dietitian Clinical practice is constantly changing in response to new
will be involved in all of these functions to some extent knowledge and technological development. New knowl-
although some of the management aspects may be under- edge, in turn, is generated by dietitians becoming involved
taken by the head of a dietetic service. in clinical research to demonstrate the benefits of changing
The need to maintain competence to practice is a core practice in identified groups of patients (5, 17-19). Dieti-
requirement of continuing professional development for any tians have a crucial contribution to make to the accumula-
clinical dietitian. Knowledge of advances in nutritional sup- ting wealth of evidence based practice and participation in
port with concurrent skills development are fundamental to such initiatives should be viewed as an important part of the
effective practice and these can be acquired either on a uni- dietitian's clinical role as well as underpinning continuing
or multi-professional basis. professional development (20, 21).
Audit is part of quality assurance and a central component
of clinical governance. This is an imperative, and well-
Functions and responsibilities of the clinical dietitian in conducted projects will highlight good practice and help to
nutritional support identify where sub-optimal practice can be improved (22-25).
Agreed standards for service provision can then be identi-
Scope of practice fied and these will help to ensure safe and effective practice
for particularly vulnerable groups of patients. Projects that
The role of the dietitian has developed dramatically during
are patient-focused and designed to improve clinical effec-
the last 50 years. The original need to prepare modified food
tiveness are, usually, best undertaken on a mulfiprofessional
for patients with specific diseases, e.g. diabetes, renal failure,
basis. Dietetic input and support are intrinsic to success.
has expanded into an advisory/educational role which, in
turn, is increasingly focused on evidence based practice.
Nowadays, dietitians in general are experts in the practi- Management
cal application of nutritional sciences to the treatment of
The nutritional support dietitian is not, usually, a manager.
patients in hospital and in the community (9). A fundamen-
However, strong management support is essential if nutri-
tal aspect of dietetic practice is the singular ability of the
tional intervention is to be successful. This will help to
dietitian to translate complex clinical nutritional concepts
ensure a clear operational framework and will facilitate
into simple everyday language coupled with acceptable
many important working relationships (Table 2).
strategies for implementing nutritional change.
Safe dietetic practice depends on clear identification of
potential risk coupled with a comprehensive limitation
Clinical practice in nutritional support strategy. It also relies upon 'dietitians being trained in cur-
rent aspects o f nutritional support in order that they remain
The dietitian working in nutritional support is responsible
up-to-date, competent and safe to practice'(11). The need
for specific aspects of clinical management (Table 1). These
for continuing training and education is well-documented
attributes do not constitute an exhaustive description of the
(8, 11, 26-28). Finally, the dietetic manager should play a
dietetic role. They are, however, an established starting
key role in rationalizing service provision across all areas o f
point from which to clarify individual dietetic responsibili-
care to ensure consistency and an appropriate response to
ties in line with local practices and resource allocation. The
identified patient needs.
need for the dietitian to maintain current knowledge of
developments in product specifications, changes in techno-
Table 2 The role of the dietetic manager in nutritional support
logy and advances in clinical practice is fundamental (11).
In addition, the dietitian can only be successful if there is • To identify and allocate resources. This includes stafftime and
effective collaboration with many other people including identifying budgets for feeding solutions, delivery systems, etc.
• To develop appropriate formularies, thereby helping to ensure safe
practice, a consistent approach to nutritional support and cost effective
Table 1 Clinical responsibilities of the nutritional support dietitian purchasing of feeding solutions, delivery systems, etc.
• To plan and resource explicit continuing professional development for
• To assess nutritional intake and nutritional status (12, 14, 15) dietetic staff working in nutritional support to ensure that they maintain
• To advise clinical colleagues of actual or potential nutritional up-to-date kowledge and skills in relevant areas of dietetic practice
deficiencies (10-13) • To liaise with other Heads of Departments who have an important role
• To develop nutritional care plans for identifiedpatients (11-14) in the provision of nutritional support including catering managers and
• To participate in the design, implementation and monitoring of treasurers as well as directors of pharmacy and nursing services in order
nutritional support at all stages. This includes transitional feeding as to establish and maintain effective nutrition advisory groups
well as the provision of nutritional support at home (11-14, 16) • To consult with organizations involved in purchasing dietetic services
• To provide appropriate nutritional education for health care (whether this is in the hospital or the community) to ensure that
professionals as well as for patients, their families and carers adequate provision is made for nutritional support services irrespective
(11-14, 16) of where they are delivered
CLINICAL NUTRITION 381

The way in which all these tasks are undertaken can vary Distance mentoring
from the formal and specifically identified role of the clini-
It is often helpful to gain clinical experience in a different
cal nutritional support dietitian to more informal and ad hoc
environment, thus bringing relevant examples of the best
advice offered by many generalist dietitians. This highlights
practice back to the local unit. In some cases it may be more
the need to strive for a minimum standard for dietitians
appropriate to spend time at a centre where there is recog-
working in nutritional support in Europe. The need for a
nized expertise in the area of nutritional support. The mentor
common approach to dietetic education in general has
might be an established nutritional support dietitian but
already been recognized by the European Federation of the
could, equally, be another clinician. The placement could be
Associations of Dietitians (EFAD) and several recommen-
organized as an entity or on an intermittent basis.
dations have been made based on information collected
from the member countries (29, 30). However, these relate
to general organizational arrangements rather than an inte- Local mentoring
grated curriculum proposal. An experienced dietitian or a physician will often be well-
placed to work with and support a dietitian who is develop-
ing their role in nutritional support. Informal discussion and
Proposed qualifications and educational requirements demonstration will help to clarify the clinical decision-
for the nutritional support dietitian making process in the context of the dietetic role. Ideas can
be explored in a 'safe' environment thus protecting the
There should be a common standard at first degree level for emerging specialist. It is also important to test any such
all dietitians. This should include courses in nutrition, diete- learning with a range of different professionals thus en-
tics, physiology, biochemistry and psychology. Knowledge suring an informed approach to the subject.
of clinical medicine, pharmacology, microbiology, ethics In either case individual dietitians can select the modality
and sociology are essential. Additionally, dietitians need to best suited to them but the main objective should be to
develop skills in audit, education, basic research techniques improve their clinical skills in assessing, evaluating, deliver-
and effective communication. These courses should all in- ing and monitoring nutritional support. It will be important
corporate a common and defined approach to the provision to reflect on their unique dietetic attributes and to determine
of nutritional support. how these can best be deployed in a multiprofessional
The dietitian working in specialist areas of nutritional approach to nutritional support.
support, e.g. bums, renal disease and haematology should
have further qualifications, including:
A possible role for ESPEN in establishing a standard
• A minimum of 2 years' full time experience in general
approach to the function of the nutritional support
clinical areas, e.g. general medicine, general surgery,
dietitian
critical care. This should, ideally, include some work on a
rotational basis under the supervision of a senior nutri- First degree level
tional support team dietitian.
• Additional relevant post-registration training obtained by • To suggest/recommend core subjects/topics for inclusion
attending formally accredited educational programmes, in the dietetic curriculum.
by undertaking practice based research or by participating • To identify common guidelines for basic nutritional support
in other, equivalent, continuing educational opportunities, (which is a core component of general dietetic practice).
e.g. ESPEN Advanced Nutrition Course, PEN Group
Clinical Update Course (British Dietetic Association). Table 3 Proposal for a clinical internship in nutrition support

• Supervisors should be member physicians/surgeons/dietitians of ESPEN


who work within a multiprofessional team context
Work-based training and development for the • The internship should be for a period of 6 months (full time) or for an
equivalent period on a part-time basis
nutritional support dietitian • The intern should be expected to develop competence in all aspects of
nutritional assessment and evaluation as well as being able to plan
Many dietetic programmes in Europe have not, hitherto, treatments and monitor patients with a wide range of pathologies in
both an acute and a chronic setting. Familiarity with the provision of
included a practical nutritional support component. There-
nutritional support at home would also be expected
fore, most dietitians have had to enhance their competence • The intern should be expected to attend and pass an appropriate course
by relying on work-based training and continuing educa- with both theoretical and practical components in nutritional support
which would be organized/formally recognized by ESPEN. An
tion programmes. This is when the mentoring process can examination would add significant credibility to this award
prove invaluable as an adjunct to more traditional learning • Certification should be awarded following this process after which the
strategies. dietitian could apply for identified prescribing privileges using agreed
protocols. This should be constructed in such a way that would protect
Mentoring can function in a variety of ways and these can experienced dietitians who are currently undertaking specific clinical
be adapted to suit the particular needs of each individual duties. These duties could include such tasks as passing enteral feeding
(31-34). Mentors can either be assigned to a mentee or, tubes, taking blood samples, assessing swallow and prescribing
parenteral nutrition
preferably, selected by the mentee.
382 THE ROLE OF THE NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT DIETITIAN IN EUROPE

Post-graduate level References


• To identify the basic requirements for a dietitian working 1. McWhirter J P, Pennington C R. Incidence and recognition of
in specialized areas of nutritional support. malnutrition in hospital. BMJ 1994; 308:945-948
• To establish a register of appropriate, formal courses for 2. Allison S P. Hospital food as treatment. Maidenhead: British
Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1999
dietitians wishing to gain accreditation in nutritional sup- 3. Maryon Davis A, Bristow A. Managing nutrition in hospital: a recipe
port. for quality. London: The Nuffield Trust, 1999
• To publicize regular specialist dietetic meetings through- 4. Fenton J, Eves A, Kipps M, O'Donnell C G. Menu changes and their
effects on the nutritional content of menus and nutritional status of
out Europe for dietitians working in nutritional support. elderly hospitalised, mental health patients. J Hum Nutr Diet 1995;
• To identify hospitals/dietitians prepared to offer place- 8:395-409
ments to dietitians wishing to gain experience in nutri- 5. Odlund - Olin A, Osterberg P, H~dell K, Armyr I, Jerstrrm S,
Ljungqvist O. Energy enriched hospital food to improve energy intake
tional support. in elderly patients. JPEN 1996; 20:93-97
6. Traviss K A, Barr S I. Rethinking post operative diets for short-stay
orthopaedic surgery patients. J Am Diet Assoc 1997; 971-974
Future options 7. Gall M J, Grimble G K, Reeve N J, Thomas S J. Effects of providing
fortified meals and between-meal snacks on energy and protein intake
• To formalize the ESPEN education programme, thereby of hospital patients. Clin Nutr 1998; 17:259-264
enabling accreditation. 8. Lennard-Jones J E. A positive approach to nutrition as treatment.
London: Kings Fund Centre, 1992
• To liaise with colleges of nutrition and dietetics and other 9. British Dietetic Association. National professional standards for
academic institutions to develop formally recognized dietitians practising in health care. Birmingham: British Dietetic
advanced courses/qualifications at European level. A Association, 1997
10. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Standards of
combination of distance-learning strategies and formal practice: Nutritional Support Dietitian. Nutr in Clin Pract 1986;
examination should be considered. 1:216-220
• To explore the possibilities of establishing a register of 11. PEN Group of the British Dietetic Association. Dietetic standards for
nutritional support. Birmingham: British Dietetic Association, 1996
institutions/requirements for undertaking higher degrees, 12. Silk D B A. Organisation of nutritional support in hospitals.
e.g. MSc, PhD. Maidenhead: British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition,
1994
• To investigate the practicalities of introducing a clinical
13. Skipper A, Perlmutter S. Function and role of the dietitian on the
'internship' scheme (Table 3). This would involve formal nutritional support team. Nutrition 1992; 8:391-394
supervision by identified member physicians of ESPEN 14. American Dietetic Association. The role of registered dietitians in
within their local multiprofessional nutritional support enteral and parenteral nutrition support - a position paper. JADA
1997; 3:302-304
team. 15. Ireton-Jones C S, Hasse J M. Comprehensive nutritional assessment:
• To identify and formalize the dietetic prescribing privi- the dietitian's contribution to the team effort. Nutrition 1992; 8:75-81
leges associated with the provision of nutritional support. 16. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Standards for
home nutrition support. Nutr in Clin Pract 1999; 14:151-162
Note: These suggestions are intended to be used as guide- 17. Wicks C, Somasundaram I, Bjarnason I et al. Comparison of enteral
feeding and total parenteral nutrition after liver transplantation.
lines rather than as prescriptive definitions. Lancet 1994; 344:837-840
18. PattisonR, Corr J, OgilvieM, FarquharD, SutherlandD,
Davidson H M, Richardson R A. Reliability of a qualitative screening
Conclusion tool versus physical measurements in identifying undernutrition in an
elderly population. J Hum Nutr Diet 1999; 12:133-140
19. Chima C S, Barcock K, Dewitt L A, Maeda M, Teran J C, Mullen K D.
Many dietetic skills are unique and cannot be undertaken by Relationship of nutritional status to length of stay, hospital costs, and
members of other professions. An effective nutritional sup- discharge status of patients hospitalised in the medicine service. J A m
port service relies heavily on dietetic expertise to optimize Diet Assoc 1997; 97:975-978
20. Skipper A. Training for nutrition support dietitians. Nutrition 1996;
patient care. However, standards of practice for dietitians 12:730-732
working in nutritional support vary significantly throughout 21. Taylor M. Evidence based practice: are dietitians willing and able?
Europe. There is a political as well as a clinical imperative J Hum Nutr Diet 1998; 11: 461-472
22. McWhirter J P, Hill K, Richards J, Pennington C R. The use, efficacy
to reconcile these differences. This preliminary report iden- and monitoring of artificial nutritional support in a teaching hospital.
tifies the role of the nutritional support dietitian, which has Scot Med J 1995; 40:179-183
already been realised in some countries in Europe (35). 23. Frost G, Stanford J, Masters K, Taylor T, Ward L, Walters J R F.
A 3 month survey of enteral tube feeding and parenteral feeding - a
ESPEN is in a unique position to encourage a more stan- baseline for improvement. J Hum Nutr Diet 1994; 7:61-68
dardized approach by supporting the recommendations 24. Stanford J, Frost G, Walters J e t al. Changes in enteral feeding - a
which have been made. positive response to clinical audit. Proc Nutr Soc 1995; 54; 2: 104A
25. Peake H J, Stanford J, Frost G. Review of enteral and parenteral
feeding practice between 1994 and 1996: maintaining positive
change. Proc Nutr Soc 1998: 57; 3:118A
Acknowledgements 26. Olree K, Skipper A. The role of nutrition support dietitians as viewed
by chief clinical and nutrition support dietitians: implications for
We would like to thank all the dietitians who have contributed to this training. J A m Diet Assoc 1997; 97: 1255-1260, 1263
document - in particular those who attended the ESPEN Congress in 27. Sizer T. Standards and guidelines for nutritional support of patients in
Geneva and also Mrs Ann Micklewright, former Chairman BDA PEN hospital. Maidenhead: British Association for Parenteral and Enteral
Group, UK and Ms Carole-Anne McAtear, Chairman BDA PEN Group Nutrition, 1996
UK. We would also like to thank Ms Katrin Saner for typing the 28. British Dietetic Association. Malnutrition in hospital - position paper.
manuscript. Birmingham: British Dietetic Association, 1996
CL1NICAL NUTR1TION 383

29. Elliot E T, Mackay I C I. The work of dietitians in Europe. Emmerich: 33. Gates G E, Cutts M. Characteristics of effective preceptors: a
European Federation of the Associations of Dietitians, 1993 review of the allied health literature. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;
30. S~renson M A, Hhdel K. Education programme for dietitians in the 2:225-227
member states of EFAD. Errmlerich: European Federation of the 34. British Dietetic Association. Mentoring in the dietetic profession.
Associations of Dietitians, 1995 Birmingham: British Dietetic Association, 1998
31. Wolf K N, Dunleary C L. Impact of preceptors on student attitudes 35. Howard J P, Jonkers C, Lochs H, Lerebours E, Meier R, Messing B,
towards supervised practice. J Am Diet Assoc 1996; 8:800-802 Soeters P B. Survey to establish the current status of artificial
32. Bunjes M, Canter D. Mentoring: implications for career development. nutritional support in Europe. Clin Nutr 1999; 18:
J Am Diet Assoc 1998; 6:705-707 179-188

Submission date: 16 August 1999 Accepted: 2 September 1999

You might also like