Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Teaching Writing
©2019 by University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). Instructional Approaches for Teaching Reading ,Writing, and Vocabulary PPT,
sponsored by the U.S. Department of State, with funding provided by the U.S. government, and administered by FHI 360. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, except where noted. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Is Writing a Product or Process? (It’s Both!)
Product Process
• considers audience and purpose
• emphasis more on structures: • teacher feedback and peer
grammar, sentence structure, feedback is essential for
spelling, punctuation, and developing product
vocabulary • content, organization, and
• content less important than mechanics are significant
mechanics • writing stages allow for learner
interaction with teacher and
peers
• Journaling
• Write ideas, thoughts, and questions in a
journal
• Freewriting
• Write freely what comes to mind without
caring about spelling
• Brainstorming
• Think about the topic and list ideas
• Mapping (see image) or diagraming “Mapping Diagram” by Excelsior College Online Writing Lab is licensed under CC BY 4.0
• Listing
• Make a list to develop ideas
• Outlining
• Create an outline to organize ideas
• Asking defining questions
• Ask defining questions to narrow a
topic
• Noting Pros & Cons “Untitled” by geralt is licensed under a Pixabay License. It is free to use and share.
Topic
• The reader easily understands the topic and the
main points of each paragraph and sentence.
Relate
• The reader can easily follow the discussion and how
each idea relates to another.
Important
• The reader can tell what ideas are most
important. “Untitled” by TeroVesalainen is licensed under a Pixabay License. It is free to
use and share.
Precise
• The reader understands the exact meaning
of the writers ideas.
This is a program of the U.S. Department of State administered
by FHI 360 and delivered by University of Maryland Baltimore
County
Editing
Editing = checking for errors or mistakes
1. Write!
2. Receive constructive feedback.
3. Review and revise their own writing.
“Untitled” by Alexas_Fotos is licensed under a Pixabay License. It is free to use and share.
“Untitled” by susannp4 is licensed under a Pixabay License. It is free to use and
share.
• Disadvantages:
• Advantages:
• Knowing the rules does not mean a
• Students know the rules of
student can produce the language
the language accurately or convey an intended
• Explicit grammar teaching meaning accurately
is time saving • Teacher-centered approach
• Students view language as a set of rules
This is a program of the U.S. Department of State
administered by FHI 360 and delivered by University of
Maryland Baltimore County
Lecture Summary
• Help learners develop pre-writing ideas, organization and content for
expressing their ideas in writing.
• Offer during-writing opportunities for response to students’ writing through
self checklists, peer review, and formative feedback.
• Finally, teaching learners how to edit and revise are all essential ingredients
of process writing for the final publishable product!
• Provide grammar instruction that focuses on accurate form (word category,
word families, cognates, and collocations), semantic features (connotative
meanings), and use (appropriate register), in ways that helps them discover
the form for themselves
This is a program of the U.S. Department of State
administered by FHI 360 and delivered by University of
Maryland Baltimore County
References
• Anderson, N. (2003). Reading. In Nunan, D. (Ed.) Prac5cal English Language Teaching. 2nd ed. (pp. 67-
86), New York: McGraw Hill
• Daniels, H. (1994) Literature Circles-Voice and choice in the student centered classroom.
• Farrell, T. (2006). Succeeding with English language learners. Corwin Press.
• Grabe, W. & Stoller, F. L. (2001). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the ESL/EFL teacher. In
Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Heinle.
• Raimes, A. (2002). Ten steps in planning a writing course and training teachers of writing. In Richards,
J.C & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.) Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge
• Seow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. In Richards, J.C & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.)
Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge.
• Ur. P. (1991). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Zimmerman, C. (2013). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary for Second Language Learners. In Celce-
Murcia, M. 2nd. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Heinle.
This is a program of the U.S. Department of State
administered by FHI 360 and delivered by University of
Maryland Baltimore County