Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Because absorption costing includes fixed overhead costs in the cost of its
products, it is unfavorable when compared to variable costing when management
is making internal incremental pricing decisions. This is because variable costing
will only include the extra costs of producing the next incremental unit of a
product.
Fast Fact
Absorption costing results in a higher net income compared to variable costing.
Example of Absorption Costing
Assume ABC Company makes widgets. In the month of January, they make
10,000 widgets, of which 8,000 are sold in January and 2,000 are still in
inventory at month-end. Each widget uses $5 of labor and materials directly
attributable to the item. In addition, there is $20,000 of fixed overhead costs each
month associated with the production facility. Under the absorption costing
method, the company will assign an additional $2 to each widget for fixed
overhead costs ($20,000 total / 10,000 widgets produced in the month).
The absorption cost per unit is $7 ($5 labor and materials + $2 fixed overhead
costs). Since 8,000 widgets were sold, the total cost of goods sold is $56,000 ($7
total cost per unit * 8,000 widgets sold). The ending inventory will include
$14,000 worth of widgets ($7 total cost per unit * 2,000 widgets still in ending
inventory).