Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JURY ASSIGNMENT
SUBMITTED BY :-
GURNOOR KAUR
BFT/18/620
DFT-VI
LABOUR COSTING & INCENTIVE PLANS.
Labour cost or total labour cost is the total expenditure borne by employers for employing
staff.
Total labour cost consists of:
average monthly labour cost: total labour cost per month divided by the corresponding
number of employees (including apprentices), expressed as full-time equivalents;
average hourly labour cost: total labour cost divided by the corresponding number of
hours worked;
structure of labour cost: wages and salaries, employers’ social security contributions
and other labour costs, expressed as a percentage of total labour cost.
Beside this annual labour cost data collection, Eurostat also publishes the detailed results of the
four-yearly Labour cost survey (LCS) and the series of the quarterly labour cost index (LCI).
The Eurostat definition closely follows the international one laid down by the International
Conference of Labour Statisticians (Geneva, 1966) in its resolution on the statistics of labour
cost.
The labour cost includes both direct and indirect costs.
Indirect costs:
o employers’ actual social contributions (i.e. statutory, collectively agreed,
contractual and voluntary social security contributions);
o employers’ imputed social contributions (mostly guaranteed pay in the
event of sickness or short-time working, plus severance pay and
compensation instead of notice);
o vocational training costs;
o recruitment costs and work clothes given by the employer;
o taxes paid by the employer (based on their wages and salaries bill or on
the numbers they employ)
o minus subsidies received by the employer (intended to refund part or all of
the cost of direct pay).
Incentive plans are plans for low level employees who are at the bottom of the
organization’s hierarchy, which mostly includes staffs and first line supervisors. For
example, a software programmer might receive a performance bonus for creating a
low cost application which helps the organization in cost optimization.
The middle management incentive plan includes the work group managers. For
example, IT manager would get a performance bonus for completing all the work
projects in time and within the budget allocated to him.
This article has been researched & authored by the Business Concepts Team. It has
been reviewed & published by the MBA Skool Team. The content on MBA Skool has
been created for educational & academic purpose only.
Browse the definition and meaning of more similar terms. The Management
Dictionary covers over 2000 business concepts from 6 categories.
Purchasing inventory or raw materials isn’t always so simple. Not only do you
need to find a manufacturer that sells the right supplies at the right price but
also one that allows you to order an optimal amount of units.
However, your ideal unit count or reorder quantity may not match your
manufacturer’s MOQ, which is one of the joys of running an ecommerce
business.
Of course, the suppliers you work with may change over time, as will your
production runs. Your first 20,000 units may look very different from the
inventory of your 1 millionth unit — not just in terms of the physical product
itself but your cash flow, profitability, and financial health.
In this article, we’ll give an overview of minimum order quantity, take a look at
some vital factors to consider when calculating MOQ requirements, and
provide tips on how to make the most of MOQs.
What is minimum order quantity (MOQ)?
A minimum order quantity is the fewest number of units required to be
purchased at one time. In ecommerce, it’s most often used by a manufacturer
or supplier in the context of a production run, though a merchant can put
MOQs in place for different types of orders.
A couple examples:
1. Determine demand
As a merchant purchasing inventory, demand forecasting takes product type,
competition, seasonality, and other factors into account in estimating how
many units you will sell. This data can help inform your next purchase
order. Inventory forecasting goes hand in hand, to match supply with demand
in this equation.
You may find the minimum order quantity wanted from the manufacturer isn’t
far off from what you’ll sell through. You’ll also want to account for your total
timeline to get the inventory ready to ship, including lead times, freight transit
times, warehouse receiving with your third-party logistics service
provider (3PL) , and other potential delays, as you may realize you need to
order inventory sooner than anticipated.
For wholesale relationships, consider what the lowest per-unit dollar amount
you’re willing to charge in exchange for a higher order value. It can’t be so low
that your profit margins are next to nothing, but volume discounts are
expected if you’re not just paying for smaller quantities at a higher price.
Your inventory holding cost is the true cost of storing all of your products and
something you must consider before investing too heavily in inventory.
If your partners or customers have been willing to buy 200-unit orders in the
past, you could set 200 units per orders as your minimum order quantity, or
even go down to 150.
No matter where you are, here are some tips on how to work with MOQs.
Similarly, you can test this strategy for your direct-to-consumer orders by
requiring a minimum amount of products to be sold (e.g., 3 bottles of a
beverage each priced at $10 to ensure your order value is at least $30) to
cover customer acquisition costs and the cost of goods sold.
You can also try this with a free shipping minimum spend threshold, where
you require customers to spend a certain amount of money to qualify for free
shipping.
Keeping your SKU count simple and minimal helps with inventory forecasting.
The difference between 20 and 40 SKUs can be hard enough to manage, let
alone managing up to 400 SKUs. It’s easy to overestimate the use of new
colors and slight variations in products. A lot of the time for ecommerce store
experiences, having more than three options is too much to think about.
“Don’t go crazy with your SKU count. Focus on keeping a catalog small while
still being able to increase lifetime value and new sales. For a lot of brands, 3
SKUs make up 50% of sales. You probably don’t need hundreds of products
that aren’t driving revenue.”
If the minimum order quantity amount is too high and you haven’t proven out
your business model or product-market fit yet, it’s best to look elsewhere.
Otherwise, you’ll have spent too much money that you may not be able to
recover, while also paying for warehousing.
See if a manufacturer will let you ‘mix and match’ or order several
different products to hit an MOQ, rather than only identical units.
Ask the manufacturer if they have leftover products from other
customers who have canceled orders and thus, don’t require them to
produce anything from scratch.
Focus on relationships
It’s possible to start with good terms from a manufacturer, but it becomes
even easier over time especially when you build a good relationship with them.
You sell your manufacturer your vision and get them bought in.
Your ecommerce business keeps growing.
Your manufacturer is happy as they keep making money alongside your
growth.
You pay them on time and order more from them.
Over time, they may offer better terms and be more flexible with you.
“Manufacturers want you to succeed. The last thing they want is for you to go
out of business. If you’re not going through inventory or selling it, they have no
motivation to help you. Sell the vision of your company, let them see the
potential, your creative marketing, and how you’re differentiated. If they believe
in your brand, they are not just your supplier, but a partner.”
“ShipBob’s analytics tool is really cool. It helps us a lot with planning inventory
reorders, seeing when SKUs are going to run out, and we can even set up email
notifications so that we’re alerted when a SKU has less than a certain quantity
left. There is a lot of value in their technology.”
Conclusion
One of the biggest barriers to starting a business is the capital required to get
up and running. A minimum order quantity may prevent some businesses
from working with a manufacturer altogether, but an MOQ can often be better
in the long run for some brands rather than buying a smaller batch of
inventory at a higher per-unit cost (when you factor in the higher average cost
over time as well as freight costs to account for the higher frequency of
reorders).
The best minimum order quantity will vary across businesses, and
determining the right benchmark requires a lot of research, thoughtful sales
planning, and luck. Finding an MOQ that works for you can help you scale your
business while keeping it profitable.
INVENTORY COSTING. LIFO , FIFO
Inventory costing is the process of assigning value to inventory, and thus to
the cost of goods sold. Though all inventory costing involves assigning a
value to goods sold, there are a number of common costing methods,
including:
First In First Out (FIFO)
Last In Last Out (LIFO)
Average Cost/weighted average
Which inventory costing method a particular business chooses to use will
be based on the specifics of the operation itself, as well as the nature of the
inventory. Below, we discuss each of these costing strategies in more
detail.
COSTING METHODS
Activity-based costing system is “a technique of cost attribution to cost units on the basis of
benefits received from indirect activities e.g. ordering, setting up, assuring quality” (CIMA, in
Rajasekaran and Lalitha, 2011, p.272). In simple terms, in activity-based costing system
overheads are assigned to specific activities with individual cost centres and cost activities
clearly identified.
The current costing system of Manac plc, absorption costing system can be explained as “a
costing system wherein fixed manufacturing overhead is allocated to (or absorbed by) products
being manufactured” (Accounting Coach, 2013, online). The main differences between the two
costing systems relate to the role of overheads in accounting system, the types of cost drivers,
and the allocations of costs.
Advantages of Activity-Based
Costing System for Manac plc
There is a set of advantages to be obtained by Manac plc from replacing its current absorption
costing system with activity-based costing system. First of all, by introducing activity-based
costing system Manac plc management would be able to eliminate a range of activities that do
not add value, consequently reducing the cost of product.
Introduction of activity-based costing also provides Manac plc financial management the
possibility of tracing the costs overheads with an increased level of accuracy and reliability. The
value of this advantage can be explained in a way that the management would be able to explore
the possibilities of reducing overhead costs to increase the levels of profit margins. Furthermore,
by adopting activity-based costing system Manac plc financial management would be able to
monitor the total life-cycles of all costs and identify and utilise the possibilities of their reduction.
Activity-based costing system can also provide an effective linkage between Manac plc corporate
strategy and decision making at an operational level. In other words, Manac plc managers would
be able to analyse cost-life cycle and make decisions regarding the cost overheads focusing on
strategic direction of the company.
It worth to be noted that activity-based costing system is associated with a high level of
integration with Six Sigma, Total Quality Management and a wide range of other programs of
continuous improvement. This advantage alone represents a weighty argument in support of
introduction of activity-based costing system by Manac plc, due to the fact that the
implementation of continuous improvement programs has become a necessary survival condition
in the modern marketplace.
Disadvantages of Activity-Based
Costing System for Manac plc
It is important that Manac plc fully understand a range of disadvantages associated with the
introduction of activity-based costing system. The major disadvantage relates to difficulties and
high costs associated with identification and cost estimations associated with activity pools of
Manac plc business practices.
Moreover, activity-based costing system involves more cost calculations compared to Manac plc
current absorption costing system. This requires additional amount of clerical work and other
related expenses such as using one of the most important types of resources – time.
In activity-based costing system mistakes may occur in the process cost identification in general,
and finding appropriate cost pools in particular with negative implications on the level of accuracy
of results. Furthermore, scholars warn that “activity-based costing data can easily be
misinterpreted and must be used with care when used in making decisions” (Garrison, 2009,
p.338).
Manac plc is going to be the most vulnerable to these disadvantages during the initial period after
the introduction of activity-based costing system due to the lack of previous experience in cost
identification per activity and interpretation of relevant data.
Adaptability can be specified as another potential disadvantage associated with the introduction
of activity-based costing system. To be more specific, the extension of product line and
introduction of new technology is going to require adjustments in accounting procedures within
activity-based costing system, and a wide range of difficulties may arise in the initial period of
adaptation.
The negative implications of this particular disadvantage is further increased taking into account
the fact that new product development and technological innovation has become a frequent
necessity in consumer electrical goods sector that Manac plc operates in.
Conclusions and
Recommendation
To summarise, as it has been discussed above, the introduction of activity-based costing by
Manac plc is associated with a set of both, advantages, as well as, disadvantages. Nevertheless,
a set of significant advantages to be obtained by adoption of activity-based costing such as
eliminating a range of activities that do not add value and possibility of tracing the costs
overheads with an increased level of accuracy and reliability oughtweight the disadvantages.
Therefore, Manac plc management is recommended to replace its current absorption costing
system with activity-based costing system.
At the same time it is critically important for Manac plc management to adopt a proactive
approach in terms of addressing the disadvantages of activity-based costing system once the
system is introduced. This can be achieved through providing training and development for
finance and accounts departments employees to engage in cost identification and data
interpretation in an appropriate manner.
The standard cost of a component is based on the expected purchasing volume under
a specific contract with a supplier.
The standard cost of labor is based on a time and motion study, adjusted for down
time.
The standard cost to operate a machine is based on expected capacity levels, utility
costs, and scheduled maintenance charges.
A standard cost variance can be unusable if the standard baseline is not valid. For example, a
purchasing manager may negotiate a high standard cost for a key component, which is easy
to match. Or, an engineering team assumes too high a production volume when calculating
direct labor costs, so that the actual labor cost is much higher than the standard cost. Thus, it
is essential to understand how standard costs are derived before relying upon the variances
that are calculated from them.
There are many types of standard cost variances, including the following: