Final Geotech Report - pkg-6

CONTENTS
Sl No. Description Page No.

1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGY 1
3 SCOPE OF WORK 1-3
4 SEISMICITY 4-5
5 SITE EXPLORATION 6-7
6 LABORATORY TESTING 7-13
9 COMPUTATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY 14
10 CONCLUSION WITH RECOMMENDATIONS 15-16
0
1.0 INTRODUCTION:
M/s National Highway Authority of India proposes Detailed Project Report for Development of
Economic corridor, Inter corridor, Feeder routes & Coastal roads to improve the efficiency of freight
movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana (Lot-4/ Package—5), in the state of Rajasthan”. M/s
National Highway Authority has awarded the work of Detail Project Report to M/s Chaitanya Projects
Consultancy Private Limited. This report furnishes the geotechnical details for structures from Ch.
140+000 to 170+000.
2.0 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGY:

This plane is buried under thick cover of Aeolian sand and Alluvium at some places forming small
and large dunes except for a few isolated patches of recent calcareous and sandy sediments
associated with gypsite. This area is more or less flat with fine sand overburden.
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK:

The scope of soil exploration for this project included the following:
3.1 Mobilization of men and equipment to the proposed site, setting up of the equipment and conducting
the field investigations on land and demobilization after field work is completed satisfactorily.
3.2 Making 150mm diameter bore holes in soil at specified locations shall & auger method through
normal soil excluding boulder and rocky strata to the specified depth or refusal, whichever occurs
earlier. Refusal is defined as an SPT value exceeding 100 blows for 30cms or 25 blows for 2.5cms
or less penetration of the split spoon sampler.
3.3 The summery of field work is given below:

S. No. Location (KM) Name Of Structure Depth Of Boring (m)
1 Ch. 141+252 SVUP 15
2 Ch. 142+321 LVUP 20
3 Ch. 143+398 MNBR 20
4 Ch. 144+211 SVUP 15
5 Ch. 145+455 SVUP 15
6 Ch. 147+078 SVUP 15
7 Ch. 148+175 SVUP 15
8 Ch. 149+020 SVUP 15
9 Ch. 150+141 SVUP 15
10 Ch. 153+531 LVUP 20
11 Ch. 154+512 SVUP 15
12 Ch. 155+791 SVUP 15
13 Ch. 157+641 SVUP 15
14 Ch. 159+252 SVUP 15
15 Ch. 159+593 SVUP 15
16 Ch. 160+391 SVUP 15
17 Ch. 161+263 SVUP 15
18 Ch. 162+940 INTERCHANGE 30
19 Ch. 164+390 SVUP 15
20 Ch. 164+748 SVUP 15
1
S. No. Location (KM) Name Of Structure Depth Of Boring (m)
21 Ch. 166+678 SVUP 15
22 Ch. 168+000 LVUP 20
3.4 Conducting standard penetration tests in bore holes in all types of soils during boring activity at
1.50m interval.
3.6 Collecting undisturbed & disturbed soil samples in soil strata at regular interval of 3.0 m started at
3.00m depth or at every change of strata whichever occurs earlier.
3.7 Recording the depth of ground water table on its full stabilization in all the bore holes in case of its
occurrence.
3.8 Summary of Laboratory Testing program is given below; Laboratory testing was planned on selected
disturbed / un-disturbed soil samples / water sample. Applicable tests were conducted depending
upon the soil type and design requirement;
S.No. Test Description Reference
Undisturbed Soil
Disturbed Soil
Samples
Sample
1 Sieve Analysis/ Hydrometer Test IS: 2720 (Part-IV) √ √
2 Natural Moisture Content, Bulk Density & Dry IS: 2720 (Part-II) √
Density
3 Specific Gravity IS: 2720 (Part-III) √ √
4 Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit IS: 2720 (Part-V) √ √
5 Shrinkage Limit (for expansive soil) IS: 2720 (Part-VI) √
6 Direct Shear Test (for Non-cohesive soil) IS: 2720 (Part-XIII) √ √
7 Un-consolidated Undrained Triaxial Shear Test (for IS: 2720 (Part-XI) √
cohesive soil)
8 Unconfined Compressive Strength Test (for IS: 2720 (Part-X) √
cohesive soil)
9 Free swell Index/ Swelling Pressure Test (if IS: 2720 (Part-XL & √ √
swelling is critical) XLI)
10 Consolidation Test (for cohesive soil) IS: 2720 (Part-XV) √
2
4.0 Seismicity
The seismic hazard map of India was updated in 2000 by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The
area under study and its surroundings are seismically active falls in Seismic Zone – III and the
tectonic elements of the area are considered capable of generating an earthquake of moderate to
severe intensity. In seismic design Zone factor, Z of 0.16 is recommended.
Liquefaction
Liquefaction is the sudden loss of shear strength of the loose fine-grained sands due to earthquake-
induced vibration under saturated conditions. Assessment of liquefaction potential of foundation
strata is made by simplified approach proposed by Seed & Idriss (1983 – 1985) from the SPT data
and peak ground acceleration likely to occur at the site. In this method, cyclic shear stress likely to
be induced in the foundation strata by Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) is first evaluated. Next
threshold cyclic shear stress, which is good enough to cause liquefaction, is determined from SPT
data and the empirical relations. Finally, comparison of these two stresses is used in the estimation
of liquefaction susceptibility of the foundation strata.
Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR)

The equivalent average of shear stress τav likely to be induced in the foundation material due to an
earthquake is calculated by using the equation
Τav = 0.65 * γ * h * (amax / g )* rd
τav = equivalent average of shear stress likely to be induced by DBE
γ = Unit weight of foundation material
= depth at which cyclic shear stress is calculated
Amax = maximum surface acceleration
3
rd = Stress reduction factor = 1.0 – 0.00765 * h if h < 9.15 m
= 1.174 – 0.0267 * h if h = 9.15 m to 23m
= 0.744 – 0.008 * h if h = 23.0 m to 30.0m
= 0.50 if h > 30.0m
If the equivalent average of shear stress τ av is normalized with the initial effective overburden
pressure (σo), the term is called seismic demand of soil layer or cyclic stress ratio (CSR).
CSR = 0.65 * (σo / σo’ )* (amax / g )* rd
Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR)

It expresses capacity of soil to resist liquefaction. CRR is determined using correlation between
corrected blow count (N1)60 and CRR for earthquake of magnitude 7.5. (N1)60 is the SPT blow count
corrected to an effective overburden pressure of 100kpa and to hammer energy efficiency of 60%.
The corrected blow count (N1)60 is determined as follows
(N1)60 = Nm CN CE CB CR CS
Where,
Nm = uncorrected SPT blow count
CE = correction factor for hammer energy ratio
CB = Correction factor for borehole dia = 1.05 for 150 mm dia borehole
CR = Correction factor for rod length = 0.75 for 3.0 m to 4.0 m
= 0.85 for 4.0m to 6.0m
= 0.95 for 6.0m to 10.0m
= 1.0 for 10.0m to 30.0m
CS = correction factor for standard sampler = 1.0
Correction factor for effective overburden pressure (C N) is given by the following relation.
CN = Sqrt (Pa / σo’) Where Pa = Atmospheric pressure
The value of SPT blow count for soil with fines content (FC) can be adjusted to the equivalent clean
sand value of (N1)60CS as follows:
(N1)60CS =α + β (N1)60
where α and β can be determined as follows.
α = 0.0 and β = 0.0 for FC <= 5.0%
2
α = exp [(1.76 – (190/FC )] for 5.0% < FC < 35.0%
β = [0.99+ (FC1.5/1000)]
α = 5.0 and β = 1.20 for FC >= 35.0%
CRRM=7.5 is given by the following equation.
2
CRRM=7.5 =1/[34-(N1)60CS] + (N1)60CS/135 + 50/[10*(N1)60CS+50] -1/200
Hence the CRR for a particular earthquake magnitude is determined as
CRR = CRRM=7.5 * MSF * Kσ
The MSF value is 1.30 for earthquake of magnitude 6.5. Kσ is taken as 1.
The factor of safety against liquefaction, FSL, is given as
FSL = CRR/CSR
The value of CSR and CRR are computed at different depth and depth susceptible to liquefaction is
determined. Liquefaction is probable when FSL is less than 1.0.
4
Andrews and Martin (2000) have re-evaluated the liquefaction field case histories from the
database of Seed et al. (1984, 1985), and have transposed the "Modified Chinese Criteria" to U.S.
conventions (with clay sizes defined as those less than about 0.002mm). Their findings are largely
summarized in table below:
1
Liquid Limit <32 Liquid Limit > 32
2
Clay content <10% Susceptible Further studies required
2
Clay content >10% Further studies required Not susceptible
Note: 1. Liquid Limit determined by Casagrande type percussion apparatus.

2. Clay defined as grains finer than 0. 002mm.
5.0 SITE EXPLORATION:

5.1 The required equipment and team were mobilized to the site for carrying out the required field work.
The locations for bore holes and depths adopted were given by the engineer–in –charge. All the
bore holes and tests were carried out in the presence of the representative of site-in-charge. All
locations are exhibited in site plan.
5.2 For boring, Shell & auger and Rotary drilling method was adopted as per IS: 1892-1979. Casings
were used as per requirement to retain the bore holes in position. The bore holes were advanced by
the depth specified by the Engineer-in-charge.
5.3 The standard penetration tests were conducted at 1.5m intervals during the advancement of
boreholes;
For conducting SPT, IS Code: 2131-1981 was followed. After reaching the required depth of test, the
bottom of the bore hole was cleaned properly and spoon is properly and centrally seated in position
in the borehole. Standard split spoon sampler attached to lower end of “A” drill rods was driven in the
bore holes by means of standard hammer of 63.5kg. falling freely from a height of 75 cm The
sampler was driven 45 cm. and the number of blows required for each 15 cm. penetration were
recorded. The number of blows for the first 15 cm. penetration was considered as seating drive. The
number of blows for last 30 cm penetration was designated as SPT ‘N’ value. SPT soil samples
obtained from standard split spoon sampler for all the above standard penetration tests were
collected in polythene bags, sealed, labeled and sent to the laboratory for testing.
CORRELATION FOR CLAY/PLASTIC SILT CORRELATION FOR SAND/NON-PLASTIC SILT

Consistency Penetration Value Relative Density Penetration Value
Very soft 0 to 2 blows Very loose 0 to 4 blows
Soft 3 to 4 blows Loose 5 to 10 blows
Medium stiff 5 to 8 blows Medium 11 to 30 blows
Stiff 9 to 15 blows Dense 31 to 50 blows
Very stiff 16 to 30 blows Very dense Above 50
Hard Above 30
5
Disturbed Soil Sampling in Bore Holes:
In all boreholes, disturbed soil samples were taken at every 1.5 m interval and at significant change
of stratum (or as per specified). Soil from cutting edge of undisturbed samplers and from split spoon
sampler used for standard penetration tests was taken as disturbed samples. These samples were
placed without delay in adequately sealed polythene bags.
5.5 The undisturbed soil samples were collected in good quality thin walled seamless tubes, of min. dia
of 100mm and length of 450mm with area ratio less than 15%. The UDS tubes are gently pushed in
soil by using gently hammering action. After retrieval of UDS tube from the borehole, ends of the
tube with sample were sealed with freshly molten wax of minimum 20mm thick, properly labeled,
marked an arrow showing upward direction and dispatched to laboratory for testing. At site sample
tubes were covered with wet gunny bags.
5.6 On encountering the water table, its depth was recorded every day in each borehole prior to
resumption of day’s work. The observation of depth of water table was continued for next seven
days in the completed bore holes. When it was fully stabilized, the depth was recorded as depth of
water table.
6.0 LABORATORY TESTING:

6.1 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
For this purpose an oven dry pulverized soil sample is sieved through the set of sieves 20mm,
10mm, 4.75mm, 2.0mm, 1.0mm, 600micron, 300micron, 150micron and 75micron. The amounts of
soil retained on each sieve are noted down. The % retained, cumulative % retained and % passing
are computed by these retained weights.
If the % passing 75micron sieve is appreciable, Hydrometer method is used to find the % fraction of
particle sizes from 75micron to 2micron.
6.2 LIQUID LIMIT

For liquid limit casagrande apparatus is used. For this test air dry soil sample passing 425micron is
taken and mixed with distilled water to give a stiff and homogeneous paste and is left for sufficient
time for maturing in an air light container.
6
A portion of the above paste is kept in the cup of Casagrande apparatus, a groove is cut with groove
cutting tool and blows are imported by turning the handle at the rate of 2 revolutions per second. The
number of blows are counted till the continuous contact of the bottom of the groove occurs.
Few quantity of soil from the close portion of the groove after the contact occurs, are taken and its
water content is determined by over drying method.
The liquid limit (WL) is computed by the equation.
Wl=Wn(n/25)e
Where Wn=water content (% corresponding to n blows)
e=0.092 for soils with WL<50
=0.12 for soils with WL>50
6.3 PLASTIC LIMIT

For this test sample is prepared in the same way as for liquid limit test. A ball is formed of sub
sample weighting about 5 gm. This ball is rolled between the fingers of one hand and the glass plate
with pressure sufficient to reduce the mass into a thread of about 3mm in 5 to 10 complete forward
and back movements. When a diameter of 3mm is reached, soil is again remolded into a ball.
The process of rolling and remolding is repeated until the thread starts just crumbing at a diameter of
3mm. The crumbled thread is immediately transferred to an air tight container for determination of its
moisture content by oven drying method.
This water content is termed as plastic limit. (WP)
6.4 PLASTICITY INDEX

The plasticity index Ip is given by
Ip=WL-WP
6.5 WATER CONTENT

For this test the soil sample of known quantity (Wm) is taken in a container. The container with this
soil sample is placed in an oven for drying at 105-110ºc for 16-24 hours. After drying the dry sample
is again weighed to determine the dry weight of sample (Wd)
The moisture content is computed by the following equation:

Wn=(Wm-Wd)/Wd
6.6 DRY DENSITY & BULK DENSITY

For determination of bulk density, a sample of known volume ‘V’ is extracted from the undisturbed
sample. Its bulk weight ‘W’ and moisture content ‘Wn’ is determined by oven drying method.
The bulk density is determined by following equation;
γb=W/V and dry density γd=γb/(1+Wn)
6.7 SPECIFIC GRAVITY

The specific gravity of soil sample is determined by density bottle method. For this test 5-10g (W2)
sample of oven dry, cool soil is taken in 50ml capacity density bottle and its weight is noted down.
The soil is covered with distilled water and left for sufficient period for suitable soaking. The
entrapped air is removed by vacuum. The soil in bottle is filled full with water and its is noted down
as w3. The mass of empty bottle (w1) and bottle with full distilled water also noted (w4).
7
The specific gravity is found by the following equation.
G=w2-w1/[(w2-w1)-(w3-w4)]
6.8 DIRECT SHEAR TEST

For this test shear box test apparatus is used. The prepared specimen from remolded/undisturbed
sample is placed carefully in the box. The plain grid is kept on top of the specimen with its serrations
at right angles to the direction of shear. The upper porous stone is placed on the grid and loading
pad on the stone. The box with specimen is gently placed in the container (water jacket). The
specimen is submerged with water. The container is mounted with the shear box and the specimen
inside, on the shearing machine. The upper part of the box is so adjusted that it touches the proving
ring. The jack is brought forward to bear up against the box container. The proving ring dial gauge is
set to read zero.
The steel ball is placed in the recess of the loading pad. The loading yoke is set in contact with the
steel ball on the loading pad. Vertical displacement dial gauge to read zero in contact with the top of
the yoke. The normal load is applied and any change in thickness of specimen is recorded. Shear
displacement dial gauge is also set to read zero. The locking screw is now removed and two parts of
the shear box are separated by advancing the spacing screws.
The specimen is sheared at constant rate of strain. The readings of the proving ring dial gauge are
noted down every 15 seconds for the first one minute and then every 30 seconds thereafter. The
reading of change in the thickness dial gauge and shear displacement dial gauge are also recorded
at the same time interval. The test is continued until the specimen fails. The specimen is assumed to
fail when the proving ring dial gauge starts receding or at shear displacement of approximately 15%
of the length takes place.
The soil is removed from the box and test is repeated on the identical specimen under increased
normal load.
For consolidated undrained test the specimen is prepared and set in the apparatus as above and
after submergence, the specimen is allowed to consolidate fully under normal loads. The specimen
is then sheared as in undrained test. At the end of the test, the specimen is removed and its final
water content is determined. The test is repeated on other identical specimen in similar way under
increasing normal loads.
For drained test, after completion of consolidation under a particular normal load, specimen is
sheared at a slow rate to allow the pore water inside the specimen drain out. Final water content of
failed specimen is determined. The test is repeated on other identical specimen after consolidation
under increasing normal loads.
6.9 TRIAXIAL SHEAR TEST

For this test Triaxial Shear Test apparatus with pore pressure measurement apparatus is used. The
porous disc or plain disc, depending on the test conditions is placed on the pedestal of the triaxial
cell. The specimen is placed centrally on the disc. A correct size membrane is fitted inside the
stretcher with ends of membrane folded over those of the stretcher. Vacuum is applied to stretch the
membrane to the inside surface of the stretcher is carefully slipped around the specimen kept on the
pedestal. The vacuum on the membrane is released. Its bottom part is rolled down into the pedestal.
8
Depending on the type of test porous or plain disc is placed on the top of the specimen and then
pressure pad is placed. The top part of membrane is rolled on to the pressure pad. Now the
stretcher is removed and ends are sealed with ‘O’ rings. With the properly sealed specimen placed
centrally on the pedestal, the cell is assembled, keeping the loading piston initially clear of the
pressure pad of the specimen. The assembly is placed in the loading frame.
For unconsolidated undrained test, the bottom drainage value (BDV) and top drainage value (TDV)
of cell, is closed and air release valve (ARV) is opened. The cell is filled with water through the cell
water value CWV. ARV is closed when water begins to escape through it. The cell pressure is raised
to the desired value and kept constant till the end of the test.
If initially unsaturated specimen is to be saturated before the test, the specimen is mounted in the
cell with porous disc. The specimen is saturated by back pressure saturation method.
When the cell pressure is applied, the load piston rises upward, the loading machine is operated at
the anticipated rate to bring the load piston slightly above the pressured pad of the specimen and the
load measuring dial gauge on proving ring is set to zero.
The piston is brought just in contact with pressure pad by hand operation of the machine. The axial
compression dial gauge is mounted and set to read zero.
The axial loading is started at constant rate of strain. Simultaneous readings on the load and
compression dial gauges are noted down. The test is continued until a recession of the axial load is
observed.
After failure, the specimen is unloaded by reversing the loading machine, cell pressure is reduced
and cell water is drained out after opening the ARV. The cell is dismantled and the specimen is
taken out rubber membrane is removed and weight of the failed sample and its water content is
determined. The test is repeated on two more identical specimens with increasing cell pressure.
For consolidated undrained test, first the specimen is saturated by back pressure saturation. The
saturated specimen is then consolidated fully under a cell pressure. After consolidation is complete,
the axial load is applied and the test is conducted as for undrained test. The pore pressure
developed during the undrained test portion is measured by the pore pressure measuring system.
After the completion of test, pore pressure apparatus and mercury control system is disconnected,
cell is dismantled and sample is taken outside to determine its weight and final water content. The
test is repeated on three identical specimen using increasing cell pressure for consolidation.
For consolidated drained test, the specimen is first allowed to consolidate under a confining pressure
as in consolidated undrained test. Then sample is failed under drained condition. After consolidation
is complete, the axial load is applied and the test is conducted as for undrained test. The pore
pressure developed during the undrained test portion is measured by the pore pressure apparatus.
After completion of test the pore pressure apparatus. After completion of test the pore pressure
apparatus and mercury control system is disconnected, cell is dismantled and sample is taken
outside to determine its weight and final water content. The test is repeated on three identical
specimen using increasing cell pressure for consolidation.
9
6.10 CONSOLIDATION TEST
For this test a consolidation test apparatus is used. The porous stones are soaked in water and then
wiped away any excess water. One stone is placed in the central seating of the water trough. The
guide rings are attached to both ends of the specimen ring and the specimen is gently placed on the
porous stone inside the trough of consolidation apparatus with a filter paper against each face of the
specimen. Other porous stone is placed on the top of the specimen and then over it the pressure
pad and the steel ball is placed.
Now the consolidation cell is placed in position on the bed of the loading machine. Counter balance
beam is adjusted into a level position. Settlement dial gauge is mounted and initial dial reading is
noted down.
An appropriate initial pressure is applied on the specimen and dial readings are recorded at elapsed
times (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8, 10 and 24 hours).
After the final dial reading under the first applied pressure, the specimen is consolidated further
under successive higher pressures. Readings of settlement dial gauge are noted down for each
increment of pressure as above.
Having completed the consolidation of specimen under the maximum pressure, ensuring that water
in the trough fully surrounds the specimen, applied pressure is reduced to zero and specimen is
allowed to take up water and swell. After 24 hours, final dial gauge reading corresponding to the end
of test is noted down.
The consolidation cell is removed from the loading machine. The specimen is taken out, cleared off
the filter papers, transferred into the container and dried in an oven for determining final water
content and weight of soil solids.
Few pictures showing Laboratory Tests in Progress:
10
11
12
7.0 TYPE & DEPTH OF FOUNDATION:
The subsoil conditions were studied in detail and depending upon the visual examination of field
strata, field and laboratory test results and type of structure proposed at this site, following types of
foundation and depth are considered most feasible and the same have been analyzed:
a. Raft footings of width ≥6.0m cast at 3.00m depth below existing ground surface.
b. Bored cast in-situ pile of diameter 1000 &1200mm and of required length below cut-off level.
8.0 COMPUTATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY:

Shear and settlement failure criteria as per IS: 6403-1981, IS: 8009 (part-1) and IS: 1904-1986
have been considered to compute the safe/allowable bearing capacity of underlying soil strata for
Raft foundations. The safe/ allowable bearing capacity from both criteria is given as follows:
8.1 SHEAR FAILURE CRITERION:

The net safe bearing capacity of sub-soil strata has been computed by considering general shear
failure using the following equation for calculating the net ultimate bearing capacity;
qnu =CNc’scdcic+q(Nq’ –1)sqdqiq+1/2 γBNγ’ sγdγiγx W’
Following soil parameters are selected for calculations:

Inclination factors:
Ic= iq= iγ =1
Shear parameters:
2
Γ in gm/cc, C in Kg/cm , Ф in Degree
Shape factors have been taken as follows:

Sc = Sq = 1+0.2x(B/L) & Sγ = 1-0.4x(B/L) (for Raft footings)
Depth factors:
2
dc= 1 + 0.2x(D/B)x√(NФ) (where NФ=tan (45+Ф/2))
0
dq= dγ =1 + 0.1x(D/B)x√(NФ) (for Ф > 10 )
0
dq= dγ =1.0 (for Ф ≤ 10 )
9.2 SETTLEMENT FAILURE CRITERION:

The settlement of fine grained soil layers comprising of Clayey Silt (ML-CL) & Silty clay with low &
medium plasticity (CL & CI) within the depth of influence was computed using the following
equation:
The settlement of Clayey layers is computed as per equation shown below:
S = ΔH Cc log10 (po + Δp)
1 + eo po
The settlement of cohesion less soil layers below the foundation level and up to the zone of
influence are computed by the chart N value vs settlement given on the page 11 of IS:8009, Part-I.
For Raft footings the zone of influence below the foundation depth is considered as 1.5B to 2.0B,
where B is the width of foundation.
The following total permissible settlements have been considered:

For Raft foundation : 50mm
13
9.3 SAFE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN-SITU R.C.C. PILES:
Keeping in view the heavily loaded structures, Bored cast in-situ R.C.C. piles were analyzed as per
IS: 2911-Part-I/ sec-2-1979. Piles of required lengths with cut-off level at 2.0m below existing ground
surface were considered for analysis. The safe load carrying capacity of 1000 & 1200mm stem dia
piles were computed for compression, uplift & lateral. The load carrying capacity of bored cast in-situ
piles have been calculated using following expression:
Qu = Ap ( ½ γ D Nγ + PD Nq + Nc Cp) + (Asi Ki Pdi tanδi + Asi i Ci)
Where
Ap = Cross sectional area of pile toe.
D = Stem diameter.
Nc, Nq , Nγ = Bearing Capacity factors.
γ = Effective unit weight of soil at pile toe.
PD = Effective overburden pressure at pile toe
Cp = Average cohesion at pile tip.
Asi = Surface area of pile stem for ith layer.
Ki = Coefficient of earth pressure.
Pdi = Effective overburden pressure at centre of the ith layer
δi= Angle of wall friction between soil & pile.
Ci = Average cohesion at centre of the ith layer
αi = Reduction factor
10.0 CONCLUSION WITH RECOMMENDATIONS:

10.1 Depending on the field and laboratory observations of subsoil strata, test results and the type of
structures proposed at site, the types of foundations, depths and net safe bearing capacities
recommended for design purposes are given in the following table. The net SBC/API in the
following table are the lower of the values obtained from shear failure criterion as per IS: 6403 and
settlement failure criterion as per IS 8009, Part-I.
Net SBC
S. No. Location (KM) Name Of Structure Type Of Foundation 2
t/m
1 Ch. 141+252 SVUP Open Foundation 23.1
2 Ch. 142+321 LVUP Open Foundation 22.0
3 Ch. 143+398 MNBR Open Foundation 22.4
14
Net SBC
S. No. Location (KM) Name Of Structure Type Of Foundation 2
t/m
Type of Net SBC

S. No. Location (KM) Type of Structure
Foundation (T)
1 Ch. 162+940 INTERCHANGE Pile Foundation 587.9
10.3 The above values of safe load carrying capacity in compression, uplift & lateral should be confirmed
by conducting initial pile load tests at site.
10.5 The above recommendations are based upon the field data collected from Limited number of bore
holes given and marked on the ground by the client and the laboratory tests carried out on soil
samples collected from these bore holes and other field tests. In case the actual sub-soil conditions
during excavation for various foundations are found different, we are to be referred for further
recommendations before starting of construction work at site.
15
LIST OF ENCLOSURES
1. LAB TEST RESULT

2. GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE
3. SPT CURVE
4. SAMPLE CALCULATION
16
Location Bore Hole no. Sheet no.
1 31
Geotechnical Investigation for SVUP at Ch.141+252km under "Consultancy services for
Type of boring Shell & Augar Bore Size 150mm
preparation of DPR for development of Economic corridor, Inter corridor, Feeder routes &
Coastal roads to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala
Pariyojana (Lot -4/ Package-6), in the state of Rajasthan. Reduced Level Date of Start
07-09-2018
Water Level (m) NoT Met With Depth of boring (m) Date of Completion
15.00 08-09-2018
Compression Index (Cc)

Grain Size Analysis Consistancy Limits Natural Density Shear Parameteres
Free swell Index (%)

Φ (Angle of friction)
Plasticity Index (PI)
Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 56 44 0 N. P.
Brownish Silty sand SM
-1.500 1.5 8 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 29 66 5 23 19 4 1.71 1.55 10.1 TUU 0.58 12 0.076 2.65
-3.000 3.0 14 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 24 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 28 68 4 24 19 5 1.78 1.61 10.8 TUU 0.56 13 2.62
-6.000 6.0 27 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 26 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 27 67 6 1.83 1.62 12.7 TUU 0.61 12 2.63
Brownish Clayey silt ML-CL
-9.000 9.0 30 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 26 66 8 25 19 6 1.87 1.64 13.9 TUU 0.87 12
-12.000 12.0 40 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 44 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 26 74 0 N. P. 1.92 1.66 15.5 TUU 1.04 12
-15.000 15.0 36 SPT-10
*UDS- UDS not recovered/ Slipped * *DST at 95% MDD ***TUU at 95% MDD
1 31
Geotechnical Investigation for LVUP at Ch.142+321km under "Consultancy services for
07-09-2018
Water Level (m) 18.50 Depth of boring (m) Date of Completion
20.00 08-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 55 45 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 7 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 28 68 4 22 20 2 1.72 1.56 10.4 TUU 0.56 11 0.077 2.64
-3.000 3.0 12 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 22 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 27 70 3 26 21 5 1.79 1.62 10.7 TUU 0.54 13 2.66
-6.000 6.0 26 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 29 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 26 68 6 1.82 1.63 11.8 TUU 0.61 12 2.65
-9.000 9.0 30 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 25 67 8 28 20 8 1.89 1.65 14.5 TUU 0.88 11
-12.000 12.0 38 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 42 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 28 72 0 N. P. 1.92 1.66 15.5 TUU 1.04 12
-15.000 15.0 34 SPT-10
-16.500 16.5 46 SPT-11
-17.500 17.5 UDS-6 0 64 36 0 N. P. 1.95 1.69 15.6 TUU 1.02 12
-18.000 18.0 52 SPT-12 Brownish Silty sand SM
-19.500 19.5 56 SPT-13
-20.000 20.0 UDS-7 0 68 32 0 N. P. 1.98 1.70 16.2 DST 0 33 2.63
1 31
Geotechnical Investigation for Minor Bridge at Ch.143+398km under "Consultancy services for
07-09-2018
20.00 08-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 55 45 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 8 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 30 64 6 22 20 2 1.72 1.56 9.9 TUU 0.56 9 0.074 2.66
-3.000 3.0 11 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 24 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 29 67 4 25 22 3 1.76 1.62 10.5 TUU 0.59 12 2.62
-6.000 6.0 26 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 26 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 26 67 7 1.89 1.63 12.5 TUU 0.60 13 2.64
-9.000 9.0 31 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 25 66 9 26 19 7 1.88 1.65 13.9 TUU 0.85 11
-12.000 12.0 40 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 44 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 28 72 0 N. P. 1.94 1.67 14.5 TUU 1.04 15
-15.000 15.0 35 SPT-10
-16.500 16.5 48 SPT-11
-17.500 17.5 UDS-6 0 62 38 0 N. P. 1.90 1.69 15.7 TUU 1.02 13
-19.500 19.5 57 SPT-13
-20.000 20.0 UDS-7 0 67 33 0 N. P. 1.98 1.70 16.2 DST 0 33 2.63
1 31
07-09-2018
15.00 11-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 55 44 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 9 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 28 66 5 23 20 3 1.69 1.54 9.8 TUU 0.56 10 0.072 2.64
-3.000 3.0 14 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 22 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 26 71 4 24 18 6 1.79 1.62 10.6 TUU 0.54 12 2.68
-6.000 6.0 27 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 25 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 24 72 6 1.83 1.63 12 TUU 0.61 11 2.65
-9.000 9.0 29 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 28 65 8 25 19 6 1.87 1.65 13.5 TUU 0.60 12
-12.000 12.0 40 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 45 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 26 72 0 N. P. 1.94 1.68 15.5 TUU 1.04 11
-15.000 15.0 32 SPT-10
1 31
07-09-2018
15.00 09-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 55 45 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 7 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 29 65 6 22 20 2 1.72 1.56 10.2 TUU 0.54 9 0.076 2.66
-3.000 3.0 11 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 24 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 27 70 3 25 21 4 1.79 1.62 10.6 TUU 0.56 11 2.64
-6.000 6.0 26 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 26 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 25 68 7 1.84 1.63 12.6 TUU 0.60 12 2.65
-9.000 9.0 31 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 28 63 9 26 19 7 1.87 1.64 13.9 TUU 0.86 13
-12.000 12.0 40 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 45 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 24 76 0 N. P. 1.96 1.69 15.5 TUU 1.05 15
-15.000 15.0 32 SPT-10
1 31
09-09-2018
15.00 11-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 55 45 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 6 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 30 64 6 25 20 5 1.72 1.56 10.2 TUU 0.52 10 0.074 2.62
-3.000 3.0 12 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 20 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 27 67 6 26 15 11 1.75 1.63 10.9 TUU 0.56 12 2.65
-6.000 6.0 26 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 26 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 26 66 8 1.85 1.64 12.7 TUU 0.62 12 2.66
-9.000 9.0 29 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 25 66 9 28 16 12 1.86 1.66 13.6 TUU 0.87 13
-12.000 12.0 41 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 44 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 29 71 0 N. P. 1.94 1.68 15.5 TUU 1.05 15
-15.000 15.0 36 SPT-10
1 31
09-09-2018
15.00 11-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 54 46 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 9 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 28 66 6 22 20 2 1.67 1.52 10.1 TUU 0.56 10 0.075 2.61
-3.000 3.0 12 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 24 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 26 69 5 26 18 8 1.79 1.62 10.8 TUU 0.54 13 2.64
-6.000 6.0 26 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 28 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 25 68 7 1.84 1.63 12.7 TUU 0.61 12 2.63
-9.000 9.0 28 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 29 61 10 29 22 7 1.87 1.64 13.9 TUU 0.87 15
-12.000 12.0 41 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 44 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 24 76 0 N. P. 1.91 1.66 14.9 TUU 1.04 12
-15.000 15.0 38 SPT-10
1 31
09-09-2018
15.00 11-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 56 44 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 8 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 29 65 6 22 20 2 1.72 1.56 10.2 TUU 0.56 9 0.077 2.64
-3.000 3.0 14 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 24 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 28 69 3 25 21 4 1.79 1.62 10.8 TUU 0.54 12 2.65
-6.000 6.0 27 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 26 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 27 66 7 1.84 1.63 12.6 TUU 0.52 11 2.63
-9.000 9.0 30 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 26 65 9 26 19 7 1.87 1.64 13.8 TUU 0.86 13
-12.000 12.0 40 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 44 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 26 74 0 N. P. 1.95 1.69 15.4 TUU 1.05 15
-15.000 15.0 36 SPT-10
1 31
09-09-2018
15.00 11-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 54 46 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 9 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 28 66 6 22 18 4 1.72 1.56 10.5 TUU 0.56 9 0.078 2.66
-3.000 3.0 12 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 22 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 26 69 5 26 19 7 1.79 1.62 10.8 TUU 0.56 12 2.62
-6.000 6.0 26 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 26 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 28 64 8 1.84 1.63 12.6 TUU 0.62 11 2.64
-9.000 9.0 30 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 24 67 9 28 20 8 1.87 1.64 13.9 TUU 0.84 13
-12.000 12.0 40 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 42 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 22 78 0 N. P. 1.92 1.66 15.9 TUU 1.04 12
-15.000 15.0 68 SPT-10
1 31
Geotechnical Investigation for LVUP at Ch.143+398km under "Consultancy services for
11-09-2018
20.00 12-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 55 45 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 9 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 29 67 4 22 20 2 1.71 1.56 9.8 TUU 56.00 11 0.074 2.65
-3.000 3.0 14 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 22 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 30 65 5 26 22 4 1.81 1.63 10.8 TUU 0.54 13 2.61
-6.000 6.0 26 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 28 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 28 65 7 1.82 1.62 12.6 TUU 0.62 12 2.63
-9.000 9.0 31 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 24 68 8 28 20 8 1.86 1.64 13.5 TUU 0.86 14
-12.000 12.0 41 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 42 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 28 72 0 N. P. 1.91 1.65 15.6 TUU 1.04 12
-15.000 15.0 38 SPT-10
-16.500 16.5 46 SPT-11
-17.500 17.5 UDS-6 0 66 34 0 N. P. 1.92 1.66 15.8 TUU 1.02 15
-19.500 19.5 57 SPT-13
-20.000 20.0 UDS-7 0 67 33 0 N. P. 1.98 1.70 16.2 DST 0 33 2.63
1 31
07-09-2018
15.00 08-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 0 55 45 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 7 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 28 67 5 22 18 4 1.68 1.52 10.2 TUU 0.56 11 0.076 2.65
-3.000 3.0 14 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 22 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 26 68 6 26 20 6 1.79 1.62 10.6 TUU 0.58 13 2.62
-6.000 6.0 27 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 28 SPT-5
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 26 66 8 1.84 1.63 12.6 TUU 0.61 12 2.63
-9.000 9.0 30 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 33 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 24 67 9 24 20 4 1.84 1.62 13.5 TUU 0.84 14
-12.000 12.0 42 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 44 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 0 28 72 0 N. P. 1.92 1.66 15.8 TUU 1.05 12
-15.000 15.0 32 SPT-10
Geotechnical Investigation for SVUP at Ch.155+791km under "Consultancy services for 1 32
12-09-2018
15.00 08-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-0.500 0.5 DS-1 Brownish Silty sand SM 0 52 48 0 N. P.
-1.500 1.5 22 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 26 68 6 29 20 9 1.71 1.56 9.8 TUU 0.56 9 0.068 2.68
-3.000 3.0 24 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 30 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 29 62 9 26 18 8 1.80 1.63 10.6 TUU 0.63 12 2.64
-6.000 6.0 52 SPT-4
-7.500 7.5 51 SPT-5 Brownish Clayey silt ML-CL
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 23 70 7 1.89 1.68 12.6 TUU 1.56 14 2.62
-9.000 9.0 55 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 29 63 8 22 20 2 1.90 1.66 14.6 UCS 1.25 12 2.63
-12.000 12.0 91 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 Brownish Gravelly Clayey 32 12 45 11 30 22 8 1.98 1.71 15.8 UCS 3.62 - 2.66
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
Geotechnical Investigation for SVUP at Ch.157+641km under "Consultancy services for 1 32
11-09-2018
15.00 13-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 24 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 26 67 7 26 19 7 1.72 1.56 10.1 TUU 0.54 10 0.064 2.62
-3.000 3.0 23 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 28 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 28 64 8 26 19 7 1.81 1.62 11.7 TUU 0.62 12 2.64
-6.000 6.0 49 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 28 66 6 1.90 1.64 15.6 TUU 1.25 11 2.65
-9.000 9.0 54 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 79 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 27 67 6 25 19 6 1.90 1.66 14.6 UCS 1.22 13 2.67
-12.000 12.0 90 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 96 SPT-9
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
Geotechnical Investigation for SVUP at Ch.159+252Km under "Consultancy services for 1 32
preparation of DPR for development of Economic corridor, Inter corridor, Feeder routes & Type of boring Shell & Augar Bore Size 150mm
11-09-2018
15.00 13-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 24 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 22 72 6 25 18 7 1.72 1.57 9.6 TUU 56.00 8 0.068 2.64
-3.000 3.0 23 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 28 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 26 65 9 29 20 9 1.79 1.62 10.6 TUU 0.61 12 2.66
-6.000 6.0 48 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 29 65 6 1.85 1.63 13.4 TUU 1.56 11 2.63
-9.000 9.0 52 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 26 67 7 28 18 10 1.92 1.67 15.2 UCS 1.23 14 2.62
-12.000 12.0 88 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
Geotechnical Investigation for SVUP at Ch.159+593Km under "Consultancy services for 1 32
11-09-2018
15.00 13-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 22 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 24 72 4 28 20 8 1.67 1.52 10.1 TUU 0.58 10 0.07 2.62
-3.000 3.0 26 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 28 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 26 66 8 26 19 7 1.81 1.62 11.6 TUU 0.62 9 2.65
-6.000 6.0 48 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 29 64 7 1.85 1.65 12.4 TUU 1.15 11 2.63
-9.000 9.0 52 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 79 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 26 65 9 28 22 6 1.92 1.66 15.6 UCS 1.22 14 2.64.
-12.000 12.0 88 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
1 32
Geotechnical Investigation for SVUP at Ch.160+391Km under "Consultancy services for
13-09-2018
15.00 15-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 24 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 26 68 6 24 18 6 1.72 1.56 10.1 TUU 0.59 8 0.066 2.62
-3.000 3.0 23 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 31 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 28 64 8 28 17 11 1.82 1.63 11.6 TUU 0.63 12 2.64
-6.000 6.0 52 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 29 67 4 1.87 1.65 13.6 TUU 1.16 11 2.66
-9.000 9.0 52 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 24 67 9 26 20 6 1.90 1.66 14.6 UCS 1.24 14 2.63
-12.000 12.0 88 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
1 32
13-09-2018
15.00 15-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 22 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 28 64 8 28 18 10 1.75 1.59 10.1 TUU 0.56 10 0.068 2.65
-3.000 3.0 26 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 30 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 29 62 9 26 20 6 1.82 1.63 11.6 TUU 0.63 12 2.68
-6.000 6.0 48 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 30 62 8 1.86 1.64 13.4 TUU 1.15 13 2.63
-9.000 9.0 52 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 27 63 10 24 21 3 1.91 1.66 14.9 UCS 1.24 15 2.62
-12.000 12.0 88 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
1 32
Geotechnical Investigation for Interchange at Ch.162+940km under "Consultancy services for
13-09-2018
30.00 15-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 25 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 26 67 7 26 19 7 1.74 1.58 10.2 TUU 0.60 12 0.069 2.65
-3.000 3.0 23 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 30 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 28 64 8 28 19 9 1.81 1.62 11.7 TUU 0.62 11 2.64
-6.000 6.0 50 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 28 66 6 1.86 1.64 13.4 TUU 1.15 11 2.63
-9.000 9.0 54 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 0 27 67 6 25 19 6 1.91 1.67 14.6 UCS 1.23 13 2.63
-12.000 12.0 90 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 32 13 45 10 29 20 9 1.97 1.71 15.4 UCS 3.64 - 2.67
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10
-16.500 16.5 >100 SPT-11
-17.500 17.5 UDS-6
-18.000 18.0 >100 SPT-12
-19.500 19.5 >100 SPT-13 29 10 49 12 24 18 6 1.97 1.71 15.4 UCS 3.62 14 2.7
-20.500 20.5 UDS-7
-21.000 21.0 >100 SPT-14
>100 Brownish Gravelly Clayey
-22.500 22.5 SPT-15 GC
silt
-23.500 23.5 *UDS-8
-24.000 24.0 >100 SPT-16
-25.500 25.5 >100 SPT-17
-26.500 26.5 *UDS-9
-27.000 27.0 >100 SPT-18 36 8 45 11 30 20 10 1.97 1.71 15.4 UCS 3.61 14 2.71
-28.500 28.5 >100 SPT-19
-29.500 29.5 *UDS-10
-30.000 30.0 >100 SPT-20
1 32
13-09-2018
15.00 15-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 25 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 26 67 7 26 19 7 1.74 1.58 10.2 TUU 0.60 12 0.069 2.65
-3.000 3.0 23 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 30 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 28 64 8 26 19 7 1.81 1.62 11.7 TUU 0.62 11 2.64
-6.000 6.0 50 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 28 66 6 1.86 1.64 13.4 TUU 1.15 11 2.63
-9.000 9.0 54 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 27 67 6 25 19 6 1.91 1.67 14.6 UCS 1.23 13 2.63
-12.000 12.0 90 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
1 32
14-09-2018
15.00 17-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 24 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 26 66 8 24 20 4 1.72 1.56 10.3 TUU 0.63 12 0.067 2.65
-3.000 3.0 23 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 29 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 30 61 9 26 22 4 1.82 1.63 11.6 TUU 0.62 11 2.69
-6.000 6.0 49 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 29 66 5 1.87 1.65 13.4 TUU 1.25 11 2.63
-9.000 9.0 52 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 26 65 9 28 18 10 1.94 1.69 14.9 UCS 1.26 13 2.64
-12.000 12.0 88 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
1 32
14-09-2018
15.00 17-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 22 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 26 66 8 28 20 8 1.73 1.56 10.9 TUU 0.58 8 0.069 2.66
-3.000 3.0 24 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 30 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 28 63 9 24 21 3 1.81 1.62 11.7 TUU 0.62 10 2.64
-6.000 6.0 48 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 29 65 6 1.92 1.69 13.4 TUU 1.25 12 2.68
-9.000 9.0 52 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 26 65 9 26 18 8 1.88 1.64 14.9 UCS 1.23 15 2.63
-12.000 12.0 88 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
GC
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10 silt
Geotechnical Investigation for LVUP at Ch.168+000km under "Consultancy services for 1 32
14-09-2018
20.00 17-09-2018


Bulk Density (g/cc)

Shrinkage limit (%)
Swelling Pressure
N value Observed
Dry Density (g/cc)
Natural Moisture
Reduced Levels
Soil Description
Representation
Type of sample
specific gravity
Plastic limit (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Type of test
contant (%)
Soil Group
C (Kg/cm2)
Gravel (%)
Depth (m)
Symbolic
Sand (%)
(Kg/cm2)
Clay %
Silt%
-1.500 1.5 25 SPT-1
-2.500 2.5 UDS-1 0 26 68 6 29 19 10 1.75 1.58 10.9 TUU 0.60 12 0.07 2.66
-3.000 3.0 23 SPT-2
-4.500 4.5 30 SPT-3
-5.500 5.5 UDS-2 0 28 64 8 26 19 7 1.81 1.62 11.6 TUU 0.62 11 2.64
-6.000 6.0 50 SPT-4
-8.500 8.5 UDS-3 0 24 67 9 1.86 1.64 13.4 TUU 1.15 11 2.63
-9.000 9.0 55 SPT-6
-10.500 10.5 80 SPT-7
-11.500 11.5 UDS-4 26 65 9 26 19 7 1.94 1.69 14.9 UCS 1.26 14 2.63
-12.000 12.0 96 SPT-8
-13.500 13.5 98 SPT-9
-14.500 14.5 UDS-5 32 13 45 10 29 22 7 1.97 1.71 15.4 UCS 3.66 - 2.67
-15.000 15.0 >100 SPT-10
-16.500 16.5 >100 SPT-11
Brownish Gravelly Clayey
-17.500 17.5 UDS-6 GC
silt
-18.000 18.0 >100 SPT-12
-19.500 19.5 >100 SPT-13 29 11 47 13 22 19 3 2.02 1.74 15.9 UCS 3.68 16 2.7
-20.000 20.0 UDS-7
SVUP AT CH-141+252
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)
Depth Gravel Sand Clay

Symbol Description of soil Silt (%)
(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 56.00 44.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 2.50 0.00 28.00 68.00 4.00

LVUP AT CH-142+321
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 56.00 44.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 29.00 66.00 5.00

Minor Bridge AT CH-142+321
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 55.00 45.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 29.00 67.00 4.00

SVUP AT CH-144+211
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 55.00 45.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 29.00 67.00 4.00

SVUP AT CH-145+455
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 55.00 45.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 27.00 70.00 3.00

SVUP AT CH-147+078
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 55.00 45.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 27.00 67.00 6.00

SVUP AT CH-148+175
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 54.00 46.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 26.00 69.00 5.00

SVUP AT CH-149+020
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 54.00 46.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 26.00 69.00 5.00

SVUP AT CH-150+141
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 54.00 46.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 26.00 69.00 5.00

LVUP AT CH-153+531
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 55.00 45.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 30.00 65.00 5.00

SVUP AT CH-154+512
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 55.00 45.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 26.00 68.00 6.00

SVUP AT CH-155+791
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 52.00 48.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 29.00 62.00 9.00

SVUP AT CH-157+641
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 52.00 48.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 29.00 62.00 9.00

SVUP AT CH-157+641
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 52.00 48.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 29.00 62.00 9.00

SVUP AT CH-159+593
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 52.00 48.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 26.00 66.00 8.00

SVUP AT CH-160+391
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 52.00 48.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 28.00 64.00 8.00

SVUP AT CH-161+263
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 52.00 48.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 28.00 64.00 8.00

SVUP AT CH-161+263
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 52.00 48.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 28.00 64.00 8.00

S AT CH-162+940
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 54.00 46.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 28.00 64.00 8.00

SVUP AT CH-166+678
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 56.00 44.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 28.00 63.00 9.00

SVUP AT CH-168+000
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
100
90
80
70
Percentage passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle size (mm)

(m) (%) (%) (%)
Sandy Silt (SM) 0.50 0.00 54.00 46.00 0.00
▪ Clayey Silt (ML-CL) 5.50 0.00 28.00 64.00 8.00

SVUP AT CH.141+252 KM
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
Geotechnical Investigation for Minor Bridge Ch.13.400km under Bharatmala Pariyojana (Lot -4/ Package-5), in the state
of Rajasthan.
LVUP AT CH.142+321 KM
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
MNBR AT CH.143+398 KM
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SVUP AT CH.159+252KM
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SVUP AT CH.159+252KM
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
INTERCHANGE AT CH.162+940KM
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
SPT 'N' VALUES

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0N-Corrected
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
0
10
12
14
DEPTH IN M
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
BH-1 LEGEND
Symbol
No
Nc
of Rajasthan.
Sample Calculation For SBC of Open Foundation At Chainage 141+252
Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 15.1 m
Index properties of soil:
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
Bulk unit weight of soil, γbulk = 17.10 17.90 kN/m
3
Dry density of soil, γd = 15.60 15.90 kN/m
Specific gravity of soil, Gs = 2.70 2.70
Liquid limit of soil, wL = 26.00 24.00
Void ratio, e0 = 0.70 0.67 -initial void ratio of the sample
Shear strength parameters:

2
Cohesion of soil, c = 60.0 kN/m
Angle of internal friction, φ = 13 °
Bearing capacity factors Nc = 9.93
for General shear Nq = 3.35
failure Nγ = 1.73
Nc' = 7.90
Bearing capacity factors
Nq' = 2.25
for local shear failure
Nγ' = 0.97
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.58
q = 21.87 kN/m2
Mode of failure = Intermediate shear failure [As per Table 3; IS 6403:1981]
Bearing capacity: [As per Cl. 5.1.2; IS 6403 : 1981]

qd = 𝑐𝑁_𝑐 𝑠_𝑐 𝑑_𝑐 𝑖_𝑐+𝑞(𝑁_𝑞−1) 𝑠_𝑞 𝑑_𝑞 𝑖_𝑞+0.5𝐵𝛾𝑁_𝛾 𝑠
-for general shear failure
2/3 𝑐〖𝑁′〗_𝑐 𝑠_𝑐 𝑑_𝑐 𝑖_𝑐+𝑞(〖𝑁′〗_𝑞−1) 𝑠_𝑞 𝑑_𝑞 𝑖_𝑞+0.5𝐵𝛾

qd' =
-for local shear failure
Shape factors for rectangular base: [As per Cl. 5.1.2.1; IS 6403 : 1981]
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788
Depth factors: [As per Cl. 5.1.2.2; IS 6403 : 1981]

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
Water table correction factor: [As per Cl. 5.1.2.4; IS 6403 : 1981]
W' = 1.00
Bearing capacity based on shear:
.'. qd = 881.7 kN/m2 -for general shear failure
.'.qd' = 470.6 kN/m2 -for local shear failure
.'. qd,final = 577.8 kN/m2 -ultimate bearing capacity based upon shear criteria
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 231.1 kN/m2
Settlement of the deposit: [As per IS: 8009 (Part-1)-1976]

Settlement for clay layer, Sc = λSoed -layer resting on cohesionless soil or rock
(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =
Δσ = 231.1 kN/m2 -pressure at the base of foundation, due to

which settlement is to be computed
Layer-1
2
p0 = 115.15 kN/m -overburden pressure @ center of layer
z = 5.0 m -depth below foundation level
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
IB = 0.22 -Boussinesq's influence factor
.'. Δp = 50.8 kN/m2
e0 = 0.67 -initial void ratio of the layer
Ht = 5.0 m -height of the individual layers
Cc = 0.119
.'. Soed = 56.61 mm
Correction factors:
λ = 0.85 -for normally consolidated clay
[As per Table-1; IS: 8009(Part-1)- 1976]
1. Effect of depth of foundation: [As per Cl. 9.5.1; IS: 8009 (Part-1)- 1976]
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88
.'. Depth factor = 0.92
2. Effect of rigidity of foundation: [As per Cl. 9.5.2; IS: 8009 (Part-1)- 1976]
.'. Rigidity factor = 0.80
Soed,final = 56.61 mm
Sc,final = 35.4 mm -final settlement of clay layer
.'. SBC of soil, qna = 231.1 kN/m2

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 18.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.39
Nc' = 7.39
Nq' = 2.01
Nγ' = 0.78
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.47
q = 22.17 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.09
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 219.5 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 48.3 kN/m2
Cc = 0.102
.'. Soed = 48.22 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 18.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.56
Nc' = 7.65
Nq' = 2.13
Nγ' = 0.87
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.52
q = 22.17 kN/m2

qd = 𝑐𝑁_𝑐 𝑠_𝑐 𝑑_𝑐 𝑖_𝑐+𝑞(𝑁_𝑞−1) 𝑠_𝑞 𝑑_𝑞 𝑖_𝑞+0.5𝐵𝛾𝑁_𝛾

qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 224.4 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 49.4 kN/m2
Cc = 0.095
.'. Soed = 46.83 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.56
Nc' = 7.65
Nq' = 2.13
Nγ' = 0.87
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.52
q = 21.27 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 217.4 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 47.8 kN/m2
Cc = 0.095
.'. Soed = 45.76 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.73
Nc' = 7.90
Nq' = 2.25
Nγ' = 0.97
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.58
q = 22.17 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 231.4 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 50.9 kN/m2
Cc = 0.099
.'. Soed = 48.98 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.22
Nc' = 7.14
Nq' = 1.88
Nγ' = 0.69
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.42
q = 22.17 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.09
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.00 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 217.0 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 47.7 kN/m2
Cc = 0.097
.'. Soed = 46.66 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.22
Nc' = 7.14
Nq' = 1.88
Nγ' = 0.69
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.42
q = 22.17 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.09
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.00 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 197.9 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 43.5 kN/m2
Cc = 0.097
.'. Soed = 43.15 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.73
Nc' = 7.90
Nq' = 2.25
Nγ' = 0.97
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.58
q = 20.67 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 228.0 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 50.2 kN/m2
Cc = 0.099
.'. Soed = 48.64 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.90
Nc' = 8.16
Nq' = 2.38
Nγ' = 1.06
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.64
q = 22.17 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 241.9 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 53.2 kN/m2
Cc = 0.099
.'. Soed = 50.82 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 18.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.39
Nc' = 7.39
Nq' = 2.01
Nγ' = 0.78
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.47
q = 21.87 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.09
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 215.6 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 47.4 kN/m2
Cc = 0.093
.'. Soed = 43.82 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 18.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.39
Nc' = 7.39
Nq' = 2.01
Nγ' = 0.78
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.47
q = 21.87 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.09
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 215.6 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 47.4 kN/m2
Cc = 0.093
.'. Soed = 43.82 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.73
Nc' = 7.90
Nq' = 2.25
Nγ' = 0.97
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.58
q = 21.87 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 241.6 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 53.2 kN/m2
Cc = 0.096
.'. Soed = 49.44 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.90
Nc' = 8.16
Nq' = 2.38
Nγ' = 1.06
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.64
q = 21.87 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 261.7 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 57.6 kN/m2
Cc = 0.096
.'. Soed = 52.82 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.73
Nc' = 7.90
Nq' = 2.25
Nγ' = 0.97
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.58
q = 21.87 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 238.3 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 52.4 kN/m2
Cc = 0.096
.'. Soed = 48.88 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.73
Nc' = 7.90
Nq' = 2.25
Nγ' = 0.97
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.58
q = 22.17 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 282.2 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 62.1 kN/m2
Cc = 0.103
.'. Soed = 59.86 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.90
Nc' = 8.16
Nq' = 2.38
Nγ' = 1.06
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.64
q = 20.67 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 242.3 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 53.3 kN/m2
Cc = 0.100
.'. Soed = 51.54 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.73
Nc' = 7.90
Nq' = 2.25
Nγ' = 0.97
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.58
q = 22.17 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 277.0 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 60.9 kN/m2
Cc = 0.100
.'. Soed = 57.04 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Verical Pile Capacity Calculation (Static Analysis) As per IS 2911

Diameter of Pile, D = 1200 mm Factor of Safety for Shaft Friction = 2.5
Earth Pressure Coefficient, K = 1.1 Factor of Safety for Base Resistance = 2.5
For Pile in layers of Cohesionless & Cohesive Soil, the ultimate load capacity is the sum of Factor of Safety for Uplift Capcity = 3.0
(i) Base Resistance, Pbu
Pbu = Base Resistance in Cohesionless soil + Base Resistance in Cohesive Soil
P_bu = A_P (0.5γDN_γ "+" P_DN_q+N_CC_P )
(ii) Shaft Friction Resistance, Psu
Psu = Shaft Resistance in Cohesionless soil + Shaft Resistance in Cohesive Soil
P_su = ∑_(i=1)^n▒〖K_iP_DI tan〖
Computation of Base Resistance
Effective Bearing Capacity Factors Base Resistance, Pbu
Depth of Angle of Effective Overburden
Cohesion , CP Safe Load due
layer below Internal Unit Weight, Pressure at
(kN/m2) NC Nq Nϒ CpNC 0.5γDNγ PDNq Pbu (kN) to End Bearing
Pile Cap Friction, ɸ ϒ (kN/m3) base of pile
tip, PD (kN)
2.50 58.86 12.00 17.07 42.67 9.00 4.78 1.79 529.74 18.35 203.98 251.45 100.58
5.50 60.82 11.00 17.76 95.94 9.00 4.34 1.51 547.40 16.04 416.39 1108.16 443.26
8.50 112.82 11.00 18.25 150.68 9.00 4.34 1.51 1015.34 16.49 653.96 1906.57 762.63
11.50 120.66 13.00 18.74 192.47 9.00 5.22 2.08 1085.97 23.36 1004.70 2390.92 956.37
14.50 357.08 13.00 19.33 192.47 9.00 5.22 2.08 3213.76 24.10 1004.70 4798.22 1919.29
17.50 355.12 14.00 19.33 192.47 9.00 5.66 2.36 3196.10 27.41 1089.39 4877.78 1951.11
20.00 355.12 14.00 19.33 192.47 9.00 5.66 2.36 3196.10 27.41 1089.39 4877.78 1951.11
Computation of Shaft Resistance, Total Safe Load (Including End Bearing + Shaft Friction) & Uplift Capacity
Effective Shaft Friction
Depth of Overburden Angle of
2 Uplift Capacity
layer below Pressure at CG of αi Wall Asi (m ) Safe Load due to Shaft Total Safe Load (kN)
𝐊_𝐢𝐏_𝐃𝐈 𝐭𝐚𝐧〖 𝛂_𝐢𝐜_𝐢 Psu (kN) (kN)
Pile Cap Layer, P Di Friction,δ Friction (kN)
2
(kN/m )
2.50 21.34 0.79 27.00 9.42 112.71 439.66 552.36 220.95 321.53 227.07
5.50 69.31 0.77 11.00 11.31 167.60 530.89 1250.86 500.34 943.61 511.44
8.50 123.31 0.41 11.00 11.31 298.20 516.93 2065.99 826.39 1589.02 834.69
11.50 178.79 0.38 13.00 11.31 513.51 517.67 3097.16 1238.86 2195.23 1229.95
14.50 192.47 0.27 27.00 11.31 1220.05 1090.40 5407.62 2163.05 4082.33 2051.64
17.50 192.47 0.27 28.00 11.31 1273.17 1084.41 7765.20 3106.08 5057.19 2889.04
20.00 192.47 0.27 30.00 9.42 1152.05 903.68 9820.92 3928.37 5879.48 3617.23
Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 18.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.56
Nc' = 7.65
Nq' = 2.13
Nγ' = 0.87
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.52
q = 22.77 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 259.3 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 57.0 kN/m2
Cc = 0.099
.'. Soed = 53.34 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.56
Nc' = 7.65
Nq' = 2.13
Nγ' = 0.87
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.52
q = 22.77 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 259.3 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 57.0 kN/m2
Cc = 0.099
.'. Soed = 53.34 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 14.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 3.46
Nc' = 8.81
Nq' = 2.73
Nγ' = 1.37
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.76
q = 21.27 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 304.3 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 66.9 kN/m2
Cc = 0.095
.'. Soed = 60.32 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Details of footing:
GL
Layer-1 1.5 m
3m
7.7 m
Layer-2
10 m
14.5 m
Dw = 18.5 m
Layer-1 Layer-2
3
3

2
failure Nγ = 1.56
Nc' = 7.65
Nq' = 2.13
Nγ' = 0.87
Nφ = tan2(45+φ/2) = 1.52
q = 23.07 kN/m2


qd' =
sc = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sq = 1+ 0.2(B/L) = 1.106
sγ = 1- 0.4(B/L) = 0.788

dc = 1 + 0.2(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.10
dq=dɣ = 1 -for φ < 10°
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1(Df/B) x √NØ = 1.05 -for φ > 10°
W' = 1.00
FOS = 2.5
.'. qs,final = 254.8 kN/m2

(𝐻𝐶_𝑐)/(1+𝑒_0 ) log⁡
((
Soed =

Layer-1
2
B/z = 1.5 m
L/z = 2.9 m
.'. Δp = 56.1 kN/m2
Cc = 0.099
.'. Soed = 52.53 mm
Correction factors:
D/√(LB) = 0.28
LB/√D = 91.16184
L/B = 1.88

Final Geotech Report - pkg-6

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Geotech Report - pkg-6

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONTENTS

Sl No. Description Page No.

2.0 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGY:

3.0 SCOPE OF WORK:

3.3 The summery of field work is given below:

S.No. Test Description Reference

Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR)

Cyclic Resistance Ratio (CRR)

Note: 1. Liquid Limit determined by Casagrande type percussion apparatus.

5.0 SITE EXPLORATION:

CORRELATION FOR CLAY/PLASTIC SILT CORRELATION FOR SAND/NON-PLASTIC SILT

6.0 LABORATORY TESTING:

6.2 LIQUID LIMIT

6.3 PLASTIC LIMIT

6.4 PLASTICITY INDEX

6.5 WATER CONTENT

The moisture content is computed by the following equation:

6.6 DRY DENSITY & BULK DENSITY

6.7 SPECIFIC GRAVITY

6.8 DIRECT SHEAR TEST

6.9 TRIAXIAL SHEAR TEST

Few pictures showing Laboratory Tests in Progress:

8.0 COMPUTATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY:

8.1 SHEAR FAILURE CRITERION:

Following soil parameters are selected for calculations:

Shape factors have been taken as follows:

9.2 SETTLEMENT FAILURE CRITERION:

The following total permissible settlements have been considered:

10.0 CONCLUSION WITH RECOMMENDATIONS:

Type of Net SBC

1. LAB TEST RESULT

Compression Index (Cc)

Free swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Dry Density (g/cc)

Compression Index (Cc)

Free swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Dry Density (g/cc)

Compression Index (Cc)

Free swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Dry Density (g/cc)

Compression Index (Cc)

Free swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Dry Density (g/cc)

Compression Index (Cc)

Free swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Dry Density (g/cc)

Compression Index (Cc)

Free swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Dry Density (g/cc)

Compression Index (Cc)

Free swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Dry Density (g/cc)

Compression Index (Cc)

Free swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (g/cc)

Dry Density (g/cc)