Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN No:-2456-2165
From the opinions of the experts above, it can be IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
concluded that the dominant factors that affect performance
are ability and motivation (Kasmir, 2015: 195). Thus According to Sugiyono (2013: 70) path analysis is part
additional project success is usually expressed in terms of of a regression model that can be used to analyze causal
meeting three main objectives namely: timely completion, relationships between one variable and another. Path
completion within budget and completion at the desired analysis is used by using correlation, regression and path so
quality level or technical specifications (Tukel and Rom, that it can be known to arrive at the intervening variable.
2001). ; Xiao and Proverbs, 2003: 400)
The results of testing the independent variables of
RESEARCH HYPOTHESES remuneration and organizational culture on employee
H1 : Remuneration affects performance performance through motivation, are shown in Table 1 as
H2 : Organizational Culture Affects Performance follows:
Regression models that can be written in the results in the organizational culture variable with a coefficient of 0.016,
form of standard form regression equations are: and followed by the motivation variable with a coefficient of
Z = 1,625+ 0,464X1 + 0,-016X2 + 0,584 Y 0.584. The positive coefficient indicates the effect of the
relationship between the independent variable and the
The regression equation can be explained as follows: dependent variable is in the direction of In other words, if
the independent variable increases, the dependent variable
Regression coefficient X1 (Remuneration), X2 also increases.
(Organizational Culture) Y (Motivation) obtained a positive
coefficient sign. Based on the above equation, it can be seen The results of testing the independent variables of
that the most independent variable is the remuneration remuneration and organizational culture on employee
variable with a coefficient of 0.464, then followed by the performance are shown in Table 2 as follows:
Regression models that can be written in the results in 2. H2: The Influence of Organizational Culture (X2) on
the form of standard form regression equations are: Performance
Z = 1,517+ 0,-187X1 + 0,-014X2 + 1,115 Y Ho : There is an influence of Organizational Culture
on Employee Performance Ha : There is no influence of
The regression equation can be explained as follows: Organizational Culture on Employee Performance Based on
table 1. It was found that the tcount value of the remuneration
Regression coefficient X1 (Remuneration), X2 variable (X1) is -1.007 while the ttable is 1.667 and the
(Organizational Culture) Y (Employee Performance) significance value is 0.317, which is smaller than 0.05.
obtained a positive coefficient sign. Based on the above Therefore, tcount > ttable, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted,
equation, it can be seen that the most independent variable is which means that Organizational Culture has no effect on
the remuneration variable with a coefficient of 0,-187 Employee Performance at Creative Polymedia. This result is
followed by the organizational culture variable with a not in accordance with the findings studied by Wahyuni
coefficient of 0.014, and followed by the employee (2015) concluding that there is a positive influence of
performance variable with a coefficient of 1.115. The Organizational Culture on Performance. In this case,
positive coefficient indicates the effect of the relationship employees hope that there are improvements that need to be
between the independent variable and the dependent considered through aspects of work quality, job risk factors
variable. In other words, if the independent variable so that they can motivate employees to improve more
increases, then the dependent variable also increases. optimal performance.
The results of the path analysis show how far the 3. H3 : Effect of Remuneration (X1) on Motivation
influence of one independent variable individually in Ho: There is no effect of Remuneration on Motivation
explaining the variation of the dependent variable. Based on Ha: There is an effect of Remuneration on Motivation Based
Table 1. it can be seen that each independent variable has a on table 1. it is obtained that the tcount value of the
significant level of less than 0.05. This means that each Remuneration variable (X1 ) is 8.862 while the ttable is 1.667
independent variable has a significant effect on the and the significance value is 0.000 less than 0.05. Therefore,
dependent variable. The following describes the calculation tcount > ttable, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means
results of each variable: that remuneration has an effect on motivation in Creative
Polymedia. These results are in accordance with the findings
1. H1 : Effect of Remuneration (X1) on Employee studied by Palagia et al (2012) who use remuneration,
Performance motivation, and job satisfaction as independent variables,
Ho: There is no effect of remuneration on employee while employee performance as the dependent variable. The
performance Ha: there is an effect of remuneration on results of the study indicate that if remuneration, motivation,
motivation. Based on table 2. it is obtained that the t count and job satisfaction are increased, it will increase the
value of the remuneration variable (X1) is -1.847, while the performance of employees at the agency.
ttable is 1.667 and the significance value is 0.069 which is
smaller than 0.05. Therefore, tcount > ttable, Ho is rejected and 4. H4 : The Influence of Organizational Culture (X2)
Ha is accepted, which means that remuneration has an effect on Motivation
on employee performance at Creative Polymedia. This Ho: There is an influence of Organizational Culture on
means that employees who provide a good perception of the Motivation Ha: There is no influence of Organizational
remuneration given so far will increase their performance. Culture on Motivation. Based on table 1. it is found that the
This is supported by research by Sitinjak et al (2016) which t-count value of the Organizational Culture variable (X2 ) is -
concludes that there is a significant effect of remuneration 1.007 while the t-table is 1.667 and the significance value is
on performance. This proves that remuneration according to 0.516 which is smaller than 0.05. Therefore, tcount > ttable, Ho
grade can improve employee performance. when employees is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means that
get more workloads and get appreciation for their work will Organizational Culture has no effect on Motivation in
make employees feel appreciated for their hard work. Creative Polymedia. This is not in line with the research of
Istiqomah, Suharnomo, Mirwan Surya Perdhana (2017)
which shows that organizational culture has a positive and
significant effect on motivation.