Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives:
to understand Land Use Planning Laws and National Land Use Act
URBAN SPRAWL
Urban sprawl is basically another word for urbanization. It refers to the migration
of a population from populated towns and cities to low density residential
development over more and more rural land. The end result is the spreading of a
city and its suburbs over more and more rural land. In other words, urban sprawl
is defined as low density residential and commercial development on
undeveloped land. Most of the time, people will move from these areas to try to
find better areas to live. This has been the way of the world since the beginning.
The lands of urban sprawl which are defined as lands that have lost their rural
characteristics and yet cannot be defined as urban include specific
uncertainties results in various problems such as unplanned urban growth and
use of non-agricultural purpose. Therefore, urban sprawl can be defined as a
hinterland between rural and urban areas. While Gordon and Richardson (1997)
define urban sprawl as leapfrog development1, DiLorenzo (2000) defines it as
growth with cancer or virus. In the confusion in definition of urban sprawl, Wilson
et al. (2003) and Galster et al. (2001) state that describing would be more
suitable rather than defining. (The Journal of International Social Research
Zuhal KARAKAYACI)
Causes of Urban Sprawl
Urban sprawl can be caused by a variety of different things. These causes will
mainly include:
Lower Land Rates: Lower cost land and houses in the outer suburbs
of the cities, because the centers of urban development have really
made people want to stop settling in these areas and want to venture
further out.
Lower House Tax Rates: Cities will usually have high property taxes,
and you can usually avoid these taxes by living in the outer suburbs
because the taxes are usually lower than they would be in other
situations.
Now, we will take a look at the effects of urban sprawl, now that we have taken a
closer look at the causes of it. Some of the effects include:
As you can see, urban sprawl is something that will continue to occur as long as
we live here on earth. It isn’t something that is going to change, but over time the
more rural areas are going to become more populated because of development
and change. This can be considered a good thing at times, but others view it as
a bad thing. You also have to consider the fact that it will actually play a part in
having to cut down more trees and tear up the environment, and in this aspect it
is not a good thing.
"As the urban sprawl of rapid urbanization expands outwards and upwards, it
provides ready opportunities for hazards such as floods, storms and earthquakes
to wreak havoc," Wahlström said. "Urban floods will represent the lion's share of
total flood impact because of infrastructure, institutions and processes that are
not yet up to the task ahead."
This report from CNN says that 60 people have died, 3,100 homes have been
damaged, and more than 2.4 million people in 144 municipalities have been
impacted by the heavy rains falling over the past five days. The UN says that
millions of slum dwellers were among those in metro Manila forced to evacuate
their homes, though no clear numbers are available.
Floodplains and vulnerable lands are commonly used as informal settlements. It's
unclear how many slum dwellers currently live in metro Manila, but this 2003
report from UN-Habitat estimated the population at 2.5 million. That's about 20
percent of the metro area's roughly 12 million people – a figure that has more
than doubled[PDF] since 1980. According to the UN report, most of these slum
dwellers live along rivers, near garbage dumps and railroad tracks, under bridges
and next to industrial sites. "Although there are relatively large slum
communities," the report notes, "the settlement pattern of the Metro Manila urban
poor is generally dispersed, located wherever there is space and opportunity."
LAND MANAGEMENT
Land use has generally been considered a local environmental issue, but
it is becoming a force of global importance. Worldwide changes to forests,
farmlands, waterways, and air are being driven by the need to provide food, fiber,
water, and shelter to more than six billion people. Global croplands, pastures,
plantations, and urban areas have expanded in recent decades, accompanied by
large increases in energy, water, and fertilizer consumption, along with
considerable losses of biodiversity. Such changes in land use have enabled
humans to appropriate an increasing share of the planet's resources, but they
also potentially undermine the capacity of ecosystems to sustain food production,
maintain freshwater and forest resources, regulate climate and air quality, and
ameliorate infectious diseases. We face the challenge of managing trade-offs
between immediate human needs and maintaining the capacity of the biosphere
to provide goods and services in the long term..
Both the Executive and Legislative Departments of the Philippines have been
pushing for the passage of the proposed National Land Use Act for many years.
Passing it would mean keeping the country’s lands from further misuse and
degradation.
It seems as if the passing of the NLAU requires more than the urging from a chief
executive. The proposed bill has been going around in the Philippine Senate for
years. Former President Benigno Aquino III also called for its enactment. This
was back in February 1, 2013, when he certified the matter as urgent. It was
previously known as Senate Bill No. 3091 in the 15th Congress and was awaiting
its Third Reading in the Senate. Prior to this, however, the NLAU has had
numerous appearances in the previous Philippine Congresses, possibly going
back two decades.
Only time will tell when it will eventually become law. For now, it seems
legislators need all the support they can get to help their Filipino countrymen
benefit from its passage.
Why it is necessary
The unchecked use of land makes the Philippines even more susceptible to
natural disasters. It is a tropical country that has been historically prone to harsh
weather conditions and calamities. The 2016 World Risk Index report even
ranked it 3rd among 171 countries most vulnerable to natural hazards. It has
since improved its ranking for 2018 by coming in 69th over 173 countries. The
main aspects analyzed in the study are exposure, susceptibility, coping capacity,
and adaptive capacity.
When speaking of exposure, the study looks into the degree of threat
that earthquakes, cyclones or typhoons, floods, droughts, and sea level rise have
on the population. Balancing these dangers out are some competencies in public
infrastructure (susceptibility), government and disaster preparedness (coping
capacity), and ecosystem protection (adaptive capacity).