Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT
energy.
SOLUTION
negative side, renewable energy can make large tracts of land unusable for competing uses,
disrupt marine life, bird life and flora/fauna, and produce visual and noise pollution.
Alternative energy sources, especially in terms of reducing air pollution. Tables 1 shows the
likely life-cycle emissions from major renewable energy technologies and conventional
decommissioning).
The results are purely indicative, but they demonstrate the variations and relative differences
in fuel inputs. When compared to fossil fuel plants, the life-cycle emissions from renewable
energy use are minimal. The studies that the figures are based on did not look into nuclear
power.
1
Nuclear power generation has a significant environmental impact, but it generates no sulphur
dioxide (SO2) or nitrogen oxides (NOx) and emits very little carbon dioxide (CO2). Its
emissions of these gases over their entire lifespan are within the ranges shown for non-
Table 1.0: Life cycle air emissions from conventional electricity generation in the
United Kingdom.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Renewable energy has a slew of other potential negative consequences for the environment.
On the downside, renewable energy can render enormous swaths of land unfit for other uses,
disturb marine life, bird life, and flora and wildlife, and cause visual and aural pollution.
However, these possible environmental repercussions are typically site-specific, and there are
a variety of techniques to mitigate the effects, which are typically minor and reversible.
Renewable energy has environmental benefits in addition to lowering greenhouse gas and
2
other air pollution. Hydroelectric schemes, for example, can increase water supply while also
created is replanted, and the carbon emitted is recycled into the next generation of growing
plants. The efficiency with which bioenergy can be generated and used will determine the
extent to which it can replace net CO2 emissions. Although bioenergy facilities emit less SO2
than coal or oil plants, they may create more particulate matter.
These emissions are manageable, but they raise the cost of electricity generation. The
environmental and social impacts of large-scale hydropower vary by location and are a
source of heated debate. Large-scale initiatives have the potential to disrupt local ecosystems,
decrease biological diversity, and alter water quality. They may also have a negative impact
on the local economy by displacing residents. For these reasons, a number of projects in
developing nations have been halted or cut back, and securing big project loans from
international lending agencies and banks has become increasingly difficult. These negative
consequences may be regulated and reduced to some extent, but they may have an impact on
1. Visual effects
Wind turbines must be in exposed areas and are therefore highly visible. They are
considered unsightly by some people, and concerns have increased with the larger size of
3
2. Noise
Wind turbines produce aerodynamic noise, from air passing over the blades and mechanical
noise from the moving parts of the turbine, especially the gearbox. Better designs have
reduced noise, and research continues. Wind farms developed far from highly populated
3. Electromagnetic Interference
systems. Appropriate siting (avoiding military zones or airports) can minimise this impact.
Birds get killed when they collide with the rotating blades of a turbine. Migratory species
are at higher risk than resident species. Siting the turbines away from migratory routes
The release of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide and methane, which
energy sources. Different forms of non-renewable energy fuels produce varying amounts of
greenhouse gases. Coal, for example, is regarded as the worst carbon dioxide emitter.
EFFECTS
4
1) GREEN HOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Different types of non-renewable sources emit different types of greenhouse gases. Coal for
example is the worst emitter of carbon dioxide. Indeed, natural gas emits a lot less carbon
percent fewer heat-trapping gases compared to gasoline when used to power a vehicle.
However, that does not mean that natural gas can help mitigate climate change, as drilling
and extracting natural gas from wells results in the leakage of methane, which is a much
more potent greenhouse gas – it is 34 times stronger than CO2 in terms of its potential for
trapping heat.
Climate change and greenhouse gas emissions are intertwined problems. It's not only about
the immediate effects of rising temperatures and altering weather patterns, such as the
changing conditions and jeopardizing biodiversity and the vital ecosystem services that we
rely on.
2) AIR POLLUTION
Coal-fired power plants is a source of mercury emissions. When mercury is emitted into
the air, it deposits on the ground or in water. This way it can accumulate in organisms of
species that inhabit the area (such as fish), passing through the food chain.
This has profound effects on our biodiversity but also creates real risks for people, as
studies have found that exposure to mercury can lead to neurological and neuro-behavioural
Other air pollutants emitted due to fossil fuel combustion include sulphur dioxide, nitrogen
5
3) ACID RAIN AND WATER POLLUTION
Dangerous pollutants that are emitted into the air can take a part in the water cycle. This is
the case of acid rain which forms when sulphur and other chemicals are introduced into the
atmosphere from industrial processes. Chemicals suspended in the air then turn the rain
mildly acidic.
Acid rain is corrosive to machinery and disrupts local ecosystems. In terms of the
environment, acid rain changes the acidity of lakes and streams which can be very harmful
to fish and other aquatic organisms; it is also damaging to trees thereby weakening forest
ecosystems.
Another aspect of water pollution due to the use of fossil fuels such as coal, or nuclear
Water is required for the operation and cooling of both fossil fuel and nuclear power
facilities. Water is used for a variety of purposes, including supporting local ecological
services and agriculture. When the plants return that water to the environment, its
Heated water that is returned into the ecosystem has lower amounts of dissolved oxygen,
which might stress local fauna by raising fish heart rates or lowering fertility.
There is much data demonstrating the impact of surface mining in both the short and long
term. Huge amounts of extra rock or dirt, for example, are dumped in other regions, such as
6
When it comes to mined land, in the long run, these locations have poor soil quality and, in
certain cases, the chemicals utilized damage the lands as well as any adjacent water
sources.
Because of the radioactive nature of the ore being mined, the example of nuclear energy is
particularly pertinent here, since both the extraction of uranium and waste disposal generate
some highly important challenges for which no long-term solution has been discovered.
unanticipated and unintentional impacts. Oil spills have a devastating impact on adjacent
Biologists were worried that a species of algae, vital to hundreds of species of animals,
would be wiped off due to the oil released in the Gulf of Mexico. Similarly devastating
effects on both nature and humans were seen as a result of the nuclear disaster in
Chernobyl. These were accidents which came about due to negligence, technology failure,
But the point to make is that by continuing to use non-renewable energy we acknowledge
that such disasters are acceptable and even preferable to switching to low carbon and