You are on page 1of 14

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/355062155

MOSAR: Demonstration of Modular Spacecraft Assembly and Reconfiguration

Conference Paper · October 2021

CITATIONS READS
0 18

10 authors, including:

Pierre Letier Mathieu Deremetz


Space Applications Services Space Applications Services
40 PUBLICATIONS   397 CITATIONS    27 PUBLICATIONS   60 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Gerhard Grunwald Juan Sánchez García Casarrubios


German Aerospace Center (DLR) University of Alcalá
54 PUBLICATIONS   589 CITATIONS    39 PUBLICATIONS   130 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Adap2E View project

ESA Exoskeletons View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Mathieu Deremetz on 01 November 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


MOSAR: Demonstration of Modular Spacecraft Assembly and Reconfiguration

Pierre Letiera*, Mathieu Deremetza, Gerhard Grunwaldb, Jose Miguel Sanchez Martinezc, Matthew
Rowlingsd, Pablo Lopez Negroe, Daniele Filippettof, Juan Sanchez Garcia Casarrubiosg, Xiu-Tian Yanh, Pierre
Dissaux
a
Space Applications Services NV/SA, Leuvensesteenweg 325, 1932 Sint-Stevens-Woluwe (Brussels Area), Belgium,
firstname.lastname@spaceapplications.com
b
Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Gerhard.Grunwald@dlr.de
c
GMV Aerospace & Defence SAU, Spain, Spain, jomsanchez@gmv.com
d
Thales Alenia Space, United Kingdom, matthew.rowlings@thalesaleniaspace.com
e
Thales Alenia Space France, pablo.lopez-negro@thalesaleniaspace.com
f
Sitael Spa, Italy, daniele.lippetto@sitael.com
g
MAG SOAR, Spain, jsanchez@magsoar.com
h
University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom, x.yan@strath.ac.uk
Ellidiss, France, pierre.dissaux@ellidiss.com
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The concept of modular and reconfigurable spacecraft is a possible game-changer solution to answer the future
challenges of the space industry and exploration, that includes, space sustainability, economical profitability, system
reliability and large structure on-orbit assemblies. This concept will be enabled by and is strongly associated with the
development of autonomous robotic solutions, re-usable components and standardization of designs. This will lead to
the emergence of more affordable and reliable components, also opening new possibilities for future space missions,
such as life-time extension or missions reconfigurations.
The main objective of the EC project MOSAR, part of the EU Strategic Research Cluster in Space Robotics, is to
elaborate and refine the concept of modular and reconfigurable spacecraft in the context of on-orbit servicing and
assembly. This is achieved by the development of a ground demonstrator of on-orbit modular satellite
reconfiguration, and by the analysis and elicitation of recommendations for the exploitation and maturation of the
associated technologies.
The MOSAR demonstrator aims at illustrating the servicing mission of a modular client satellite, from the initial
mission design to the assembly and reconfiguration operations. Several technologies have been developed and
integrated in this demonstrator that include, re-usable spacecraft modules, a walking robotic manipulator arm,
HOTDOCK standard mating connectors, and a Functional engineering simulation environment.
In addition, the demonstrator relies on the upgrade of robotics software and hardware building blocks
components developed previously in the same research cluster, for autonomous planning or module data
management. Different scenarios, illustrating modular spacecraft concepts have been demonstrated, as assembly and
reconfiguration of the client satellite, automatic data and power network reconfiguration, thermal management
between modules, software reconfiguration and external visual detection.
The purpose of this paper is to present the outcomes of the MOSAR project, focusing on the results of the
demonstration scenarios and the perspective of technologies exploitation and maturation.

Keywords: Space robotics, On-orbit Servicing, Modular Spacecraft, Relocatable Manipulator, Standard
Interconnects, Thermal Management,

Acronyms/Abbreviations Cluster (SRC), Service Spacecraft (SVC), Technology


Readiness Level (TRL), Walking Manipulator (WM)
Client Satellite (CLT), Data Function Nodes (DFN),
Degrees of Freedom (DOF), Functional Engineering
Simulator (FES), Instrument Control Unit (ICU),
Monitoring and Control Center (MCC), On-Board
Computer (OBC), Operational Grants (OG), Remote
Memory Access Protocol (RMAP), Spacecraft Modules
(SM), Standard Interconnector (SI), Strategic Research

Page 1 of 13
1. Introduction demonstration are summarized, before the conclusion
with a focus on the impact of MOSAR for further
A major trend in space is the emergence of on-orbit
activities.
servicing, maintenance, refueling and lifetime extension
capabilities [1], which have been demonstrated by
companies in North America, as for example with the
recent re-fueling operation performed by Northrop
Grumman’s MEV-1 servicer [2]. A further trend is the
huge investments made by NASA to promote the
commercialization of low Earth orbit space assets,
which will continue with the development of
commercial space stations and platforms. The interest
for space sustainability is also growing very fast, with
the main focus on the removal of the space debris and
satellite end-of-life management, as illustrated by the
ESA Clean Space initiative [3] and the mission
CLearSpace-1, planned for 2025 [4], targeting the first
debris removal from orbit.
Offering cost effective, performant, reliable, scalable Fig.1. Artist view of the MOSAR concept
and flexible solutions will be essential to make the
European space industry spearheading strategic 2. Project Overview
segments of the commercial space. The development of 2.1 MOSAR Mission Overview
novel, European technologies that would allow
standardizing satellites components, facilitating their The technologies developed in MOSAR aim to
assembly, reducing time between customer’s orders and support the development of fully modular and on-orbit
commissioning in space, repairing and upgrading reconfigurable spacecraft. This ambitious objective is
components directly in orbit instead of replacing derived into a demonstrative mission concept that
entirely a failed or damaged satellite, would provide allows the deployment of MOSAR technologies in the
extremely valuable competitive edges to establish near/middle future. A general introductive video is
European leadership in a number of key commercial provided in [5]. Fig 1. shows an artistic view,
space segments. illustrating the MOSAR concept, as described below.
MOSAR is a space sustainability oriented research The proposed demonstrative mission concept and
project of the European Commission proposing a new spacecraft design are represented in Fig. 2. The baseline
paradigm for the on-orbit assembly, operations and scenario is the one of a Servicer Spacecraft (SVC)
servicing of spacecraft. With a consortium of nine transporting a cargo of Spacecraft Modules (SM) and a
industrial and academic partners, MOSAR shall dedicated Walking Manipulator (WM). This last enables
elaborate and refine the concept of Modular Spacecraft, a number of operations with the transfer of SM from
identify and recommend standards and design the and to the Client Spacecraft (CLT), with the purpose of
ground and space infrastructure elements that will adding, replacing or enhancing client platform or
enable its realization and sustain its progressive payload functionalities.
deployment and economical exploitation. MOSAR is
part of the European Space Robotic Technologies
Strategic Research Cluster (SRC), aiming at enabling
major advances in strategic key points of Space
Robotics Technologies, in order to improve the
European competitiveness in space robotics
technologies [6].
The project has been recently finalized with the
performance of the final demonstration. This paper
provides a general overview of the activities and
highlights key results. The first section introduces the
general concept proposed by MOSAR and describes the
principal objectives of the activity. Then, the main Fig.2. Spacecraft design MOSAR-like mission (client
technologies developed and matured during the project and servicer)
are described. Following that, the results of the different

Page 2 of 13
This mission concept aims at making use of operations (e.g. detected failed module), the MCC can
MOSAR technologies to introduce enhanced update the execution plan. The MCC finally includes
functionalities on space missions, mainly on two topics: visualisation front-end to support the design,
verification and monitoring activities during sequence
 Standardization of design thanks to modularity execution.
approach: a common design of the product line
allows multiple configurations to meet different 2.2 MOSAR Project Objectives
mission objectives thanks to the standardized
The first main objective of MOSAR is to develop
interfaces that could be used to plug additional
and mature key technologies and product ecosystem that
payloads and service modules. In this way, the
will support in the future the deployment and operations
customization needed to meet specific mission
of modular spacecraft:
objectives does not need a redesign of the main
elements of the spacecraft.  Extension and integration of the ESROCOS, ERGO,
INFUSE, I3DS and HOTDOCK common building
 The spacecraft, equipped with multiple standard blocks, the outcomes from the previous Operational
interfaces and some modules, performs its original Grants (OG), belonging to the same European
missions for some years with the option of Research Cluster. The aim is to encourage
introducing new elements or reconfiguring the reusability, and initiate the standardization in the
mission by replacing or adding new modules European space robotic endeavour.
brought by a servicer satellite equipped with a
robotic manipulator.  Development of a repositionable robotic
manipulation (aka. Walking Manipulator, WM)
The client satellite is built around a standardized system allowing the manipulation and relocation of
common platform, with all the required main the Spacecraft Modules
functionalities. The platform is designed to cover an  Development of a modular Spacecraft Modules
envelope of payloads and functions. It can be initially ecosystem, consisting of
specialized, on-ground, with a primary payload and
services modules. Both the platform and the payload o Standardized functional modules;
are equipped with standard interfaces enabling the o Suitable power and data buses technologies
connection of the standard modules, for initial allowing flexible and hot-reconfiguration;
configuration on-ground or for addition or replacement o Functional Engineering Simulation (FES)
of units during on-orbit mission. environment offering assistance for the design
Spacecraft Modules are individual structures of modular satellites, for the verification of
associated with a specific function of the spacecraft, that obtained designs (multi-physics simulation),
once assembled, will ensure the spacecraft operations. and for the motion planning and rehearsal of
They can cover system or payload functions. The SM assembly / reconfiguration operations.
are equipped with SI, enabling Modules to Modules and The second main objective of MOSAR is to develop
Modules to spacecraft connections. Each SI provides a sound technology ground demonstrator of on-orbit
mechanical, data, power and thermal transfer modular satellite reconfiguration relying on robotic
capabilities, allowing a full configuration of the CLT capabilities, exploiting the technologies described above,
functions. That includes mechanical structural integrity, in order to illustrate the operative mission described in
data transmission, power routing and thermal the previous section.
management along the elements.
2.3 From Mission to Demonstration
The autonomous transfer and configuration of the
MOSAR demonstrator aims at reproducing the main
SM follow an execution plan prepared and validated
functionalities needed for on-orbit module assembly and
off-line, in the Monitoring and Control Centre (MCC),
reconfiguration of spacecraft, as described in the
on the ground segment. The MCC includes a satellite
mission section above. Fig. 3 illustrates the concept for
design, modelling and validation tool, specifically
the spatial mission, involving a client and a servicer
targeting modular satellites applications. It also allows
satellite, already docked. From this concept, a physical
the automatic planning of the assembly or
ground demonstrator has been integrated, including
reconfiguration sequence that can be verified with a
representative components for the servicer and client
multi-physics simulator (FES). All these elements are
spacecraft buses, several functional modules, some of
working iteratively together to prepare a valid execution
them being already installed on the client, and other
plan that is finally uploaded to the spacecraft for
ones brought by the servicer, and the walking
execution. Based on the monitoring and feedback
manipulator. The MOSAR ground demonstrator has
information received from the spacecraft during the
been built in order to provide the most realistic vision

Page 3 of 13
compared to the proposed space design approach. It had inspection of spacecraft configuration and detection
however to take into account practical constraints, of anomalies.
mainly imposed by the presence of the gravity, reducing
In parallel to this integration, two other setups have
the capability to perform modular operations with big
been developed for the demonstration of the thermal
assets. The nominal module size in the demonstrator has
module management and the external visual detection
been selected in accordance to the 1U size unit, in order
system. They will be described in the corresponding
to limit the modules weight to the lifting capabilities of
section, about the demonstration results.
the Walking Manipulator. The operational concept is
however fully extendable to other shape, sizes and 3. MOSAR Technologies
structures of elements.
3.1 ESROCOS
The ground demonstrator has been focusing on the
validation of the sequence of operations needed for the The ESROCOS framework provides a set of tools
and reusable runtime components for the development
preparation of the operations with the ground support
of robot control software [7]. The ESROCOS
tools (design, simulation and planning), the operational
framework has been implemented in MOSAR as the
concept of manipulator and spacecraft module
central component for the development of the system
relocation, resources re-allocation and further client
control software. The main application of ESROCOS
satellite operations. It addresses the following topics:
during MOSAR project was to develop a model of all
 Hardware: with the possibility to re-configure the the software instances needed for the described
physical arrangement of the spacecraft and/or scenarios. This model includes all the functions and
providing means to add/replace/upgrade specific interfaces between all the main components needed
functions. which are the Ground, Servicer and Client partitions.
 Software: with the possibility to re-configure During MOSAR project new ESROCOS
components responsibilities and support the re- components have been created and some others have
configuration operations been updated to be used in the final software version
that manages the full system including the MCC, Client
 Data: with the possibility to re-route TM/TC and
and Servicer (Fig. 4). Main extension and update cover
data transmission along the different elements
the PUS Services library and PUS console to support
 Power: with the possibility to re-route and control multi-instance operations, and the SpW driver for the
the power transmission along the elements. management of all sub-systems via RMAP. The aspects
related to software reconfiguration have also been
 Thermal: possibility to manage thermal loads, to
analysed and demonstrated on simple scenarios. The
increase dissipation capabilities or maintain thermal
work on ESROCOS during MOSAR provided the
stability of modules.
opportunity to improve the use and implementation of
 Visual: possibility to support operations through the software, in the context of its re-usability for the
external visual detection system, targeting the next PERASPERA call and other projects.

Fig.3. MOSAR Ground Demonstrator derivate from MOSAR mission concept

Page 4 of 13
InFuse is designed as both a software framework
and an open-source library for rapid development
solutions for sensor data fusion in order to provide a
good and timely understanding of the environment that
a robotic system such as MOSAR can perceive.
InFuse was mostly developed for planetary scenarios
during OG3-InFuse project even it has some functions
for on-orbit serving operations [9]. During MOSAR
research and investigation, a significant number of Data
Function Nodes (DFNs) have been created to extend the
capabilities of InFuse identified for MOSAR application.
These include eight DFNs for a range of operations
covering the stereo image filtering, disparity
enhancement and 3-D model reconstruction for object
detections. They also include all key functional nodes
Fig.4. On-Board software ESROCOS model for three types of anomaly detections identified for
MOSAR project.
3.2 ERGO Furthermore, three matching new DFCPs have also
The ERGO framework provides a set of tools and been developed for surface anomaly detection,
components to develop an autonomy control system for identification of any interface anomalies, and detection
robots [8]. It is easily configurable and tailorable to the of any problems in configuration for modular satellites
specific use case, and contains tools from a high level during the constriction operations.
planning point of view to the low level control of certain 3.4 I3DS - Avionics
systems such as a robotic arm.
The I3DS platform (Integrated 3D sensors) is a
The role of ERGO within the MOSAR system is to generic and modular system answering the needs of
compute a plan for the robotic and software near-future space exploration missions in terms of
reconfiguration in the demonstration scenarios, and exteroceptive and proprioceptive sensors with integrated
manage its execution against the simulator or the real pre-processing and data concentration functions [10].
scenario, with the control of the manipulator and the
HOTDOCK SI. During the MOSAR project, some of The key application of I3DS in MOSAR was to
the tools from ERGO were used without the need of any develop the Instrument Control Unit (ICU) and the
change, while others needed some adaptation / sensor management abilities it provides, to a form that is
extension or configuration. This includes four suitable for a modular spacecraft application. This
components that are the PUS Ground Control Interface includes expanding the devices supported by the ICU to
Reactor, the Mission Planner Reactor, Mission include modular spacecraft components and refining the
decomposition Reactor and the Robotic Arm Motion ICU avionics networking aspects such that space-ready
Planner. The configuration files defining the system technologies are used, whilst developing support of a
(timelines, reactors, PDDL, etc.) also had to be modular avionics network that can cope with dynamic
developed during the project to configure the system to changes to the spacecraft's structure.
the specific requirements. MOSAR implements a Reduced-ICU (R-ICU),
derived from the original I3DS ICU design and based
on the same ZU9EG Ultrascale+ platform from Xilinx.
It has been upgraded with a custom FMC that provides
the required SM interfaces for MOSAR. Validation of
the ICU Ultrascale+ MPSoC in a split real-time/Linux
configuration, this is a more realistic representative
application than demonstrated in I3DS. Validated use
when using only space-compatible interfaces
Fig.5. ERGO planner architecture and virtual collision (SpaceWire, CAN). R-ICU + FMC concept validated to
computation make I3DS ICU tailored to mission requirements (e.g.
3.3 InFuse much more customisation to meet a mission mass,
power, cost budgets).

Page 5 of 13
New features where developed for MOSAR R-ICU Fig.7. Active and Passive HOTDOCK equipped with
that would also be compatible with the I3DS ICU, fluidic interface
including RMAP IP, Modular SW Framework for More than 30 units including active (with actuation
Component Control, SpaceWire Network and Router, mechanism), passive (lighter version allowing data and
RMAP TMTC Handler and SpaceWire Network power transfer) and simple mechanical versions have
Discovery and PnP. been integrated in the MOSAR setup. HOTDOCK
fulfilled the challenging requirements of the project. It
features high guidance capability through its external
from-fit geometry. This allows to operate the system
without visual feedback and relying only on position
and contact forces information. Its full 90 degrees
symmetric design (also for the electrical and fluidic
interfaces) provides independent module orientation
compatibility but also optimize the kinematic
configuration of the manipulator. Its high electrical
power and mechanical load capabilities support the
important constraints on the robot base and the full
power needs during operation.
3.6 Walking Manipulator
The Walking Manipulator [12], depicted in Fig. 8
Fig.6. R-ICU hardware components, integrated in each
and Fig. 9, is the central component and main actor of
Spacecraft Module
the MOSAR’s concept. This 7-DOF robotic system is
3.5 HOTDOCK Standard Interconnects
performing the manipulation of the modules to
HOTDOCK is an innovative standard mating device reconfigure the client spacecraft according to the
for orbital and planetary space applications, supporting, forwarded MCC’s plan. For this purpose, the Walking
in a compact and integrated form factor, mechanical, Manipulator is also capable of relocating itself over the
data, power and fluid transfer (Fig.7) [11]. In MOSAR, spacecraft structure thanks to its end-effectors equipped
it has been used: with HOTDOCK standard interconnects. This allows
the WM to reach further location than its nominal
 As the end-effector of the WM for the manipulation workspace.
of the spacecraft modules and to enable the motion
of the robot along the spacecraft, keeping powering
and data access;

 As interface on the module panels and spacecraft


structure for their interconnection, including
SpaceWire data and electrical power transmission,
through its central POGO pin board

 As key component for the test and validation of


thermal power transfer between two modules,
through the eight fluidic connectors.
Fig.8. CAD overview of the Walking Manipulator
The WM offers a symmetric design to ensure a
uniform kinematics whatever its attachment point, and a
compact form factor to navigate between the spacecraft
modules. It also features a human like arm configuration
with asymmetric joints to increase its dexterity. The
overall length of the arm is 1.6 meters for a weight of
32kg. The WM provides up to 10kg payload lifting
capabilities at 1g in its entire workspace and is able to
lift itself in any configurations.
This robot embeds its own avionics: a robot control
unit, servo control units, communication interfaces and

Page 6 of 13
power and data buses. The WM can also be used to the on-ground demonstration in laboratory foreseen in
transfer power and data along its structure, through the MOSAR. Seven modules have then be produced and
HOTDOCK end-effectors. This allows to control equipped with HOTDOCK and payload to validate the
operations of an attached module during the assembly concept in the MOSAR demonstrator.
scenarios. The robotic joints are equipped with positon
and torque sensors to enable either position or
impedance control modes. Additional details on the
integration and specific validation of the WM are
described in [13].

Fig.10. 2U Spacecraft Module (space version design)


and 1U laboratory prototype (Battery module)
Proposed SM payloads covered a range of functions
including OBC, battery, camera payloads and thermal
management. Due to the high interest for space
applications, this last topic has been more deeply
investigated through the implementation of two
dedicated thermal modules, equipped with the new
thermal interface in HOTDOCK, with the purpose to
demonstrate close-loop operations of heat transfer. The
proposed design of the thermal modules offers the
advantages of symmetry, reliability, connection error-
free and zero leakage operations.

Fig.9. Walking Manipulator in the MOSAR ground


demonstrator
3.7 Modular and Repositionable Satellite Components
Within MOSAR project, the objective was to
demonstrate the capability of exploiting a modular
design in which each module is responsible of a
different system function taking the modularity
approach further with respect to the current satellites
design concepts. The Modular and Repositionable
Satellite Components were designed in order to provide
the mechanical framework able to host both the Fig.11. Thermal interface of HOTDOCK and integrated
HOTDOCK SI, and the specific subsystems units or thermal module demonstrator
payload, corresponding to the function required in the
3.8 Power and Data Buses Technologies
application. The result of the design consisted in the
standard structural frame of the modules (SMs) which SpaceWire networking was chosen for the MOSAR
includes the common elements of the primary structure, avionics due to its TRL9 status for flight use and its
such as the modules panels and the mechanical interface simplicity of networking (i.e. SpaceWire path and
to connect the HOTDOCK to the modules. logical addressing). Due to the dynamic nature of a
modular spacecraft's avionics network and the use of
With the target of standardization, scalability (for
potentially less reliable connections (intermediated SI
adaptation to different spacecraft classes), flexibility
compared to standard cable), between SMs, a dynamic
(catalogue of internal options), and based on a deep
networking capability is important for modular
analysis of MOSAR typical missions, the modules have
spacecraft. A Plug-and-Play TMTC set was developed
been first designed considering the space environment
based on the SPaceWire PnP draft standard. This allows
conditions, starting from the 1U module and then
the OBC to identify a SM, what connections are active
expanded to different shapes and sizes (up to 8U). The
and what components the SM supports. A discovery
design was then adapted to the specific environment of
algorithm was also developed for the OBC that can read

Page 7 of 13
the PnP TMTC and build a map of the SMs that are scenario as well as the properties of all relevant
connected and how they are connected together. A components.
routing algorithm is then be applied and uploaded to
The key element of this tool is a collection of script-
each SM's SpW router using the relevant SpW PnP TCs.
based data structures, which describe the components
Finally, a software SpW router was developed to
HOTDOCK, SM, WM, and SVC-CLT platform in a
support the possible change of location of the nodes.
unified manner in terms of mechanical, electrical,
Remote Memory Access Protocol (RMAP) was thermal and data link properties as well as system
selected for the communication between ESROCOS and assembly aspects. These data structures are used as
R-ICU / WM OBC. The aim of the RMAP protocol is to database for parametrization of the simulator model and
standardize the way in which SpaceWire units are the planner components.
configured and to provide a flexible low-level
The tool also provides capabilities of visualization
mechanism for the transfer of data between two
and validation of the configuration (e.g. wrong module /
SpaceWire nodes.
SI assembly, WM configuration) and steady state
The MOSAR power bus strategy has been developed operations of the satellite (e.g. thermal balance), through
around the centralized Power Distribution Unit (cPDU), the implementation of a special version of the FES (see
located in each SM, the CLT and SVC, and controlled after). This offers an early and quick feedback to the
by the local R-ICU through CAN bus. This component, mission team, before starting the full detailed simulation
not anticipated at the beginning of the project and with the ERGO planner.
specifically developed in MOSAR, has two main
purposes:
 Distribute the MOSAR 48V main bus between the
connected HOTDOCK power interfaces (e.g. on
different faces of SM), with the capability to
control the power transmission through a power
switch (up to 5 lines).
 Provides the required DC power for the internal
components of a module or spacecraft bus (SVC
and CLT), through DC/DC conversion from the
48V bus.
Fig.13. Design tool graphical interface in
This strategy has proven to be viable for re- MATLAB/Simulink
configurable spacecraft, while providing a high level of
modularity and flexibility for the configuration of the The second tool is the Functional Engineering Simulator
modules and their operations. (FES). Based on the Modelica/Dymola technology and
existing libraries. It can simulate with high fidelity the
MOSAR scenarios and operations. It works, together
with the Design Tool, the ERGO Planner and WM
controller, to analyse scenarios and generating
execution plans before going on the real hardware.
For the modular configuration of the satellite in
MOSAR new ways had to be found to implement them
in today’s simulation tools, since normally, they don’t
allow structural variable systems (the number of states
Fig.12. cPDU board for local SM power management must remain constant). The development of the so-
3.9 Functional Engineering Simulation Environment called tensor bodies within the MOSAR project helped
to overcome this problem. This new innovative
In order to support the preparation of the technique will also be useful in other similar projects
autonomous spacecraft reconfiguration operations, two where modular elements are part of a system.
software tools have been developed, as part of the
MOSAR ecosystem.
The Spacecraft Design Tool provides a solution, to
the mission control team, to set up a scenario for
MOSAR, by specifying the initial and final state of a

Page 8 of 13
Fig.14. Simulator development in Modelica

4. MOSAR Demonstration
Fig.15. Ground segment plan computation
The final demonstration of MOSAR illustrated
successfully the following scenarios, representative of Full video of the sequence of operations are
the preparation and operations of modular spacecraft: available in [14] and [15].
1. Assembly and re-configuration of modular Following achievements of the demonstrator can be
spacecraft highlighted:
2. Thermal transfer between two modules, through
 Very good performance of the WM, with smooth
their Standard Interconnectors
operations, and design fully compliant with the
3. Automatic data and power re-configuration and
requirements on kinematics, symmetry and
recovery
mechanical loads
4. Software re-configuration
5. Visual detection of module configuration and  High level of repeatability of the operations
anomalies
 Control operation of the WM in position and
4.1 Assembly and Reconfiguration impedance mode, allowing the full reconfiguration
without the need of visual based control
The purpose of this scenario was to demonstrate the
assembly and reconfiguration of several SMs between  Demonstration of several type of connections,
the SVC and the CLT spacecraft buses, including both highlighting the capability to create different shapes
the placement of SMs on the CLT itself and on other like 2U and 4U (interconnected by HOTDOCK).
SMs.
 The good performance of the HOTDOCK SI, with
Regarding the general MOSAR concept, this single, double and triple (diagonal) approach and
scenario is representative of the initial assembly of the simultaneous connection, as well support of the
client satellite with modules brought by the servicer high loads imposed on the WM base
spacecraft, and the replacement of a failed unit on the
CLT.  Advanced robot walking on top and side of the
modules
The scenario was divided in two main set of
operations, first on the Ground Segment for the 4.2 Thermal Management
preparation and simulation of the plan (Fig.15) and Two thermal test setup demonstrators have been
secondly with the Space Segment and the actions on the integrated in MOSAR (Fig.17)). The purpose of the first
real hardware (Fig.16). setup was to characterise the functions and
The walking manipulator gets its power and performances of the HOTDOCK SI fluidic interface. It
commands through the HOTDOCK connectors located allowed to determine the possibility to achieve a thermal
on its end-effectors. It follows a reconfiguration plan flow transfer up to 2500W. The thermal circuitry has
that has been computed and simulated before the also been designed to ensure non-leakage operations,
operations, based on the initial and final expected especially during the phases of connection and
module configuration. At each step, the servicer on- disconnection of HOTDOCK. During the final project
board computer reconfigures the power and space wire integration, the thermal circuitry has been integrated in
data network, such that it can reach the robot or the two representative SM. The thermal transfer between
modules. The manipulator itself is capable to transmit the two modules and the non-leakage strategies have
these signals to the connected module, for instance to been again demonstrated.
operate the HOTDOCK on the other face of the module.

Page 9 of 13
Fig.16. Space Segment Operations Sequence

4.3 Data and Power Reconfiguration and Recovery main bus of the Client satellite. The battery module is
then able to automatically detect the absence of power
Data and power recovery and routing
from the nominal bus. It can then initiate successive
reconfiguration have been validated on the assembled
adaptation of the power network, such that the battery is
Client satellite setup, with a 2x2 SM configuration, as
able to power again all the other modules. This is
obtained at the end of the scenario 1 assembly (Fig.18).
achieved by a reconfiguration of the cPDU board
For the data network, the purpose was to validate the output. As function of the selected spacecraft
ability of the SpaceWire network to automatically detect architecture, the detection and reconfiguration
and adapt to faulty interfaces. The fault-mitigation operations can be either performed by the cPDU or the
aspect was tested by disabling the HOTDOCK attached R-ICU.
SpaceWire connection between two SM, leading to the
impossibility to communicate with other modules (cut
in the path). The developed algorithms have then the
possibility to detect the absence of communication and
initiate a network discovery to find another path to the
lost modules. Once done, the network is automatically
reconfigured and the nominal operations of the satellite
can be recovered.
The possibility of reconfiguration of the power network
has been validated by a scenario of power failure of the

Page 10 of 13
Communication Model) that was added to Cheddar
during the MOSAR project appeared to be less
pessimistic and confirmed the schedulability of the
system.

Fig. 17. Top: Thermal standalone test setup, Bottom:


SM integrated thermal test setup

Fig.19. TASTE Concurrency View simulation with


timing analysis
4.5 Visual Detection
Although the MOSAR system is fully autonomous,
it is very important for future applications in the outer
space environment to support the operations to be full
autonomous for unplanned events through visual
inspection. Based on the previous project Infuse,
external visual detection algorithms have been further
developed in MOSAR and demonstrated. The setup was
Fig.18. Spacecraft Module setup for data and power based on stereo cameras RGB-D to capture stereo
reconfiguration and recovery images for module recognition and detection. It allows
for example to automatically validate the spacecraft
4.4 Software Reconfiguration configuration as well detect defects or missing elements
that would have an impact on the further autonomous
The objective of the software reconfiguration was to operations.
demonstrate the ability of the TASTE/AADL approach
to ease software development for reconfigurable
spacecraft, and anticipate possible scheduling issues at
design time for software running in different operational
modes corresponding to spacecraft hardware
configurations.
With this demonstration, several timing analysis
techniques were applied to an AADL model
representing the MOSAR Client satellite software
architecture and its deployment onto processor boards
communicating via a SpaceWire network.
Timing analysis with the Marzhin simulator showed
the behavior of the software during a change of the Fig.20. Visual system setup and detection of module
satellite configuration but did not detect any scheduling configuration
issue even when all the payloads were active. On the
contrary, Worst Case timing analysis with Cheddar 5. MOSAR Impact
could only provide results in a steady configuration but Through all the MOSAR activity many space
found possible task deadline misses. Finally, a finer relevant technologies have been further developed,
model of the spacewire network (SCM: Spacewire

Page 11 of 13
matured and demonstrated in an integrated system. On a configuration, is a wonderful vitrine to promote the
short term (next 2-3years), this will have a direct topic of on-orbit servicing and further spacecraft
positive impact on the on-going and new space robotic modularity to the industry. It shows, at some level, the
projects, through their re-use or adaption, both in the feasibility of this proposition as well as the good
institutional (e.g. ESA, next OGs) and industrial context. performances of the components. This should enhance
We also expect the upcoming IOD call of the Space the collaboration with MOSAR partners and possibly
Robotics Technologies SRC (likely in 2021) to be the the innovation around these topics, with the final goal to
opportunity to increase the TRL level and to of a flight enable new business cases not yet envisaged today.
demonstration for MOSAR technologies, as mean to Moreover, the general operational concept of MOSAR
pave the way toward concrete exploitation. is not limited to modular spacecraft. The autonomous
operations and the robotic technologies are also very
Several of the MOSAR technologies target a
valuable for other space mission scenarios, like structure
standardization of their design. This is mainly including
assemblies.
the SRC building blocks, HOTDOCK and the spacecraft
modules. The expected benefits of the standardization of Most of the MOSAR technologies have a possible
these technologies are the cost effectiveness of their synergy with terrestrial applications. We can highlight
implementation, the reduction of development, the robotic manipulator, which has been fully operated
production and integration time, the setup of common in 1g conditions. It is offering a fully integrated solution
robotics technological framework… The standardization (with embedded controller) and very high performance
is also one of the main requirement for the performance in terms of lifting to weight ratio, opening a lot of
and cost effectiveness of future modular systems. We possibilities.
can highlight, already that several technologies, like
6. Conclusion and Perspectives
ESROCOS, ERGO, HOTDOCK, were used in different
SRC projects of the second call, creating the foundation The MOSAR project succeeded in demonstrating, in
of such standardization, at least on the European level. laboratory conditions, the concept of assembly and
It is expected that this will continue through the next reconfigurable spacecraft, as well highlighting typical
calls, although this will also require to join the industrial operations around modular satellite architecture as
sphere in order to ensure the sustainability of these power, data, thermal and software management. On top
standardizations. of that, vision based detection is a new promising
feature of MOSAR to support future autonomous
The implementation of MOSAR technologies like
system.
the ERGO, the simulator, HOTDOCK SI, the walking
manipulator will definitively favour the development of Beside the achievement of the integrated system, we
autonomous space systems that can have an important can also highlight that MOSAR enabled the
influence for future space missions and creating new development of several highly relevant technologies for
opportunities for space industry. Autonomous solution future European Space activities and related industries.
will also favour the development of servicing missions This is including the further development of all the SRC
that will improve space mission sustainability and cost building blocks (ESROCOS, ERGO, INFUSE, I3DS),
effectiveness. HOTDOCK, the Walking Manipulator, the Design and
Simulation tools (FES), the Spacecraft Modules and the
On a longer term, MOSAR is proposing a
Thermal Management system.
fundamental shift of paradigm in the design and
operation of spacecraft. This will not be applicable to all Several of these technologies are already applied in
space missions and this is of course not something that on-going projects. PERIOD and EROSS + are direct
will be possible do on a short term, due to the current follow-up projects targeting the definition of the In-orbit
approach of the space missions and the different demonstration of assembly and servicing operations.
technological and costs constraints. There is however Also other European and ESA initiatives will directly
clearly an increase of interest for the On-Orbit servicing benefit from the output of MOSAR, as MIRROR
topic, which is the first step towards the final solution dedicated to the assembly of large telescope structure
promoted by MOSAR. The exploitation review and [16].
analysis has highlighted the most relevant missions as
well as the possible development and exploitation Acknowledgements
roadmap to facilitate this transition. This provides a MOSAR was funded by the European Commission
basis on what MOSAR partners or other institutions and Horizon 2020 programme under grant number 821966.
companies can develop their next activities.
The successful performance of the final MOSAR
demonstrator, with the full satellite assembly and re-

Page 12 of 13
References [15] MOSAR Demonstration (Part 2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F4kJZAv09w
[1] JP. Davis, JP. Mayberry, JP. Penn. On-orbit
Servicing: Inspection, Repair, Refuel, Upgrade, and [16] M. Deremetz et al. Concept of Operations and
Assembly of Satellites in Space, 2019. Preliminary Flight Model Design of a Modular Multi-
Arm Robot using Standard Interconnects for On-Orbit
[2] SPACE NEWS: Northrop Grumman’s MEV-1 Large Assembly, 72nd Intenational Astraunotical
servicer docks with Intelsat satellite, Caleb Henry, 2020, Congress (iAC), Dubai, 2021
https://spacenews.com/northrop-grummans-mev-1-
servicer-docks-with-intelsat-satellite/

[3] ESA Website:


http://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Clean_Space

[4] ESA Website:


https://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Clean_Space/ESA_
commissions_world_s_first_space_debris_removal

[5] MOSAR. A Modular and reconfigurable Future for


Space Missions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwqKEzwAVn8
[6] PERASPERA website: https://www.h2020-
peraspera.eu/
[7] ESROCOS project website: https://www.h2020-
esrocos.eu/
[8] ERGO project website: https://www.h2020-ergo.eu/
[9] InFuse project website: https://www.h2020-
infuse.eu/
[10] I3DS GitHub: https://github.com/I3DS
[11] P. Letier, T. Siedel, M. Deremetz, E. Pavlovski, B.
Lietaer, K. Nottensteiner, M.A. Roa, J.S. Garcia-
Casarrubios, J.L.C. Romero, J. Gancet. HOTDOCK:
Design and Validation of a New Generation of Standard
Robotic Interface for On-Orbit Servicing. 71th
International Astronautical Congress (IAC), The
CyberSpace Edition, 2020.
[12] M. Deremetz, P. Letier, G. Grunwald, M. A. Roa,
B. Brunner, B. Lietaer, M. Ilzkovitz. MOSAR-WM: A
relocatable robotic arm demonstrator for future on-orbit
applications. In 71th International Astronautical
Congress (IAC), The CyberSpace Edition, 2020.
[13] M. Deremetz, P. Letier, G. Grunwald, M. A. Roa,
B. Brunner, A. Ferran Cifuentes, M. Szydelko, J.
Gancet and M. Ilzkovitz, MOSAR-WM: Integration and
Tests Results of a Relocatable Robotic Arm
Demonstrator for Future On-orbit Servicing Missions,
72nd Intenational Astraunotical Congress (IAC), Dubai,
2021.
[14] Final Demonstration of MOSAR Project
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqwKEPRXEYU

Page 13 of 13

View publication stats

You might also like