MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 
BOA CONTRACT NO. 1111495 
TASK ORDER NO. 8 

White’s Ferry Operation Alternatives Study 
 

Background:  
The  White’s  Ferry  ceased  operations  in  December  2020  in  the  wake  of  a  long‐running  legal  dispute 
between former owner White's Ferry Inc. and Rockland Farm, which owns the ferry's Virginia landing site. 
Early this year, the ferry infrastructure has since been acquired by JK Moving Services CEO Chuck Kuhn. 
Negotiations between Mr. Kuhn and Rockland Farm's owners had not been successful.  

Scope of Services:  
Loudoun County Virginia and Montgomery County Maryland are issuing jointly a Request for Proposals 
(RFP) for consultant teams (AECOM and Stantec) to evaluate the feasibility of operating a Potomac River 
ferry  service  (Project)  between  Loudoun  and  Montgomery  Counties  near  the  current  location  of  the 
White’s Ferry. The study needs to be under contract within 30 days and completed within 90 days of start. 
 
Table 1. Proposed Budget by Task  
 

Labor
TASK DESCRIPTION Labor Cost
Hours

TASK 1 Introduction and Project Management 12 $2,606.23

TASK 2 Understanding of Legal Matters 42 $5,959.84
TASK 3 Transportation Issues and Operations 262 $46,044.84
TASK 4 Alternatives to Consider 109 $20,331.73
TASK 5 Economic Development 14 $2,443.30
TASK 6 Technology Assessment - Deferred 0 $0.00
TASK 7 Fiscal Analysis of all alternatives 12 $2,412.36
TASK 8 Summary Report 54 $9,838.92
TASK 9 Project Coordination and Meetings 92 $19,662.20
Disbursement A - Purchase of StreetLight Location Based Data for O-D matrix $0.00
Disbursement B - local travel to site to examine concrete ramps and road $500.00
Total 597 $109,799.42  
 
Stantec will provide following services: 

1. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT 
Review the draft Statement and provide input.  
 We will review the outline and draft statement created by AECOM to ensure that the transportation 
issues as represented, and the parameters of the study are within the scope of the following work 
program. 

2. UNDERSTANDING OF LEGAL MATTERS 
 Stantec will investigate applicable environmental regulations and permitting requirements for MD 
side and review AECOM’s work on VA side. 
 Stantec will identify regulations and potential permitting requirements including: USACE Section 
404/401;  MDE  Wetlands/Waterways;  USCG;  Montgomery  County  Forest  Conservation;  NPS 
special use permits. 
 Stantec input in MD side, review VA side of AECOM’s work. 
 Stantec will review AECOM permitting assessment and provide comment.  
Summary and illustrative map of surrounding property owners, including rights of way and National 
Park Service, to and from existing location and clarification of exact boundaries of existing ownership 
and responsibility. 
Stantec  will  utilize  existing  property  information  from  MD  Real  Property  data  to  identify  ROW, 
property boundaries and floodplain limits.  A high‐level review of FEMA models shows that this section 
of the Potomac River does not have mapping already undertaken so a review of historical information 
and mapping of flood marks on buildings may have to be considered to achieve a 100‐year flood zone 
for the vessel removal. 

3. TRANSPORTATION ISSUES & OPERATIONS 
a. Review of existing (and for proposed landing) sites needed to connect with a local road network 
system. 
iii.  Review of historical data of ferry ridership. 
This item is no longer valid based on the lack of historical data on ridership or vehicles.  Ridership 
will be estimated based on the use of Location Based Data in 3c 
 
b. Ferry  Traffic  projections:  (Define  Future  Year  Scenario  2030  &  2040  Using  only  Existing  Model 
Data) 
iii. Daily vs. Capacity 
1. Potential volume increases with  a marketing plan. (provide  a range  estimate  based on 
varying factors such as campaign size, potential partnerships, etc.) 
2. Identify potential partnerships between future ferry options and nearby attractions. 
Based on the lack of passenger and vehicle information, these estimates will be derived using the 
location based data in 3c.  The location based data will be used as a basis to examine surrounding 
businesses  and  patterns  of  movement  (including  information  from  3‐3)  to  determine  whether 
there  is  potential  to  increase  ridership  through  either  additional  service  or  through  strategic 
partnerships with agrotourism sites. 
c. Review of available historical data of ferry ridership, including consideration of passenger counts, 
fare  options  and  trends  in  fare  type  selection,  types  of  vehicles  accommodated,  any  available 
information on non‐auto mode share, seasonal/time of day/day of week trends, and trip purposes. 

Page | 2  
 
 Based on the lack of passenger and vehicle data or accurate daily revenue information (A recent 
interview with the former operator noted that they did not collect passenger or vehicle counts 
and  that  daily  revenues  could  include  monthly  or  booklet  of  ticket  purchases  on  the  day  of 
purchase rather than when they were redeemed, therefore daily revenue is cannot be used as a 
proxy for ridership) we will need to purchase location based data to provide some understanding 
of person movements to the ferry.  This is will be provided by Streetlight (At a cost) and be used 
analyze  data  from  2018  and  2019  to  look  at  the  Origin‐Destination  patterns  of  users  to 
supplement the review and provide input into the economic development analysis. 
 
We will utilize a 10‐zone Advanced Analytics Streetlight Data package to understand variation in 
seasonal demand for the Terminals, based on monthly averages for each month in 2018 and 2019, 
for both a typical weekday and a weekend day.  This comparison will allow us to evaluate the 
impacts  of  COVID.    We  will  also  explore  the  routes  vehicles  are  taking  to  and  from  the  Ferry 
terminals, as well as their home and work locations.   
d. Operations Planning Assessment 
i. Schedule & Hours of Service 
ii. Staffing 
iii. Fare Analyses – Projections & Farebox Recovery 
iv. Estimated Annual Maintenance Costs 
As  noted  in  the  data  analysis,  the  information  provided  by  the  former  operator  will  be 
reviewed to understand the financial and operational components of the service including 
staffing throughout the year, revenue, and expenditures that can help define the options to 
be outlined in section 4. 
v. Parking  considerations  in  surrounding  areas  and  congestion/coordination  considerations  in 
MD‐side park and related park access. 
Stantec will define the current parking 
areas, parking demand and limitations. 
Options to expand or use existing ROW 
for  additional  storage  if  required  will 
be documented.   (example is Gabriola 
Island  Ferry  Terminal  for  service  to 
Nanaimo BC.  Small onsite parking lot 
but roadway is used to extend parking 
for  ferry  back  along  Taylor  Rd.    two‐
way traffic still happens in the ROW. 
vi. Resiliency Planning  
1. Flood & Ice Detour Planning 
2. Remove Ferry from water options. 
3. Operational History 
Flood  elevations  will  be  assessed  through  research  and  summary  of  available  FEMA  flood 
study data. We will summarize frequency of risks that may be associated with flood and ice 
events  using  available  USGS  river  gage  and  weather  records.  An  assessment  of  potential 
storage locations will be conducted, comparing to the available flood risk data or to the high‐

Page | 3  
 
 level assessment of what that level might be based on existing data (as noted earlier from an 
initial search) 
e.  Vessel sizing 
i.  Options to achieve same or improved provision of service consistent with defined purpose. 
ii.      Accommodation of existing and future demand 
The potential ridership will help provide parameters for ferry vessels that could be considered 
if there is a rationale to replace the existing vessel.  Along with the review by AECOM in section 
6, we will review information from ferry reviews in New Zealand, and ferry services by two 
provincial agencies in British Columbia to help create a matrix of vessel sizes and propulsion 
types.   The length of cable and  the  turn angle from shore may need to be reviewed in the 
context of a new landing site and the impact that may have on the infrastructure, the vessel 
and the potential for additional or different demand. 
iii.  Road  and  vessel  conditions  impact  on  the  type  of  vehicles  that  can  access  using  ferry  (i.e.,   
charter buses for economic development, agritourism, wine tours, etc.) 
Stantec will review aerial photographs and GIS information to determine roadway constraints 
for different types of vehicles accessing the landings on both the Virginia and Maryland sides. 
iv.  Meeting  river  conditions,  (depth,  currents,  shoreline  conditions),  depending  on  locations  of 
landings. 
Stantec will utilize existing available information to assess the river conditions and provide a 
summary of concerns.  Depth of river and shoreline examination are likely beyond the scope 
of resources and timeframe but should be considered in more detail in terms of the Loudoun 
County movement of a landing ramp and terminal as well as the depth of the river that may 
create restrictions of future vessel types due to draught of the vessels.  We will review other 
ferry operations at a high level to assess whether there are docks layouts for smaller vessels 
that can adapt to changing river levels. 
v. Bike Ped Accommodations 
Stantec will review the existing active mode connections to the ferry ramps with input from 
AECOM  on  the  Loudoun  County  side  as  well  as  review  the  areas  within  the  vessel  to 
accommodate walk‐ons and bike parking as part of the technology review.   
vi. Condition assessment of the ferry, landing ramps, etc. 
Stantec  will  review  GIS  information  to  determine  the  existing  profile  of  the  ramps  and  will 
perform a site visit to assess the condition of existing pavement and width of the existing ramps.  
This will also include an understanding of the total site area, how recreational boaters use the 
Maryland site and what the new site in Virginia may require to meet different vehicle types. 
 
    Deliverable: 
 
 Technical Memo Summarizing Transportation Issues 
We  will  prepare  a  tech  memo  summarizing  the  transportation  issues  around  the  Ferry 
Terminal operations.  This will include assessments of where travelers are starting and ending 
their  trips  (home/work  locations),  operating  constraints,  including  roadway  geometric 
limitations, high level conditions assessment of the river, and opportunities to accommodate 
bikes and pedestrians. 
 

Page | 4  
 
  Sample Operations Plan 
A sample operations plan will be developed.  This will include recommendations for vehicle 
queueing,  loading,  access  points  to  the  Terminals,  signage  and  wayfinding,  staffing  during 
peak  and  off‐peak  periods,  service  frequency,  and,  if  applicable,  traffic  management 
strategies for ingress and egress 

4. ALTERNATIVES TO BE CONSIDERED 
a. Potential alternative to be considered: 
ii. Re‐opening the ferry operation by the private sector, with assistance from the public sector, 
through an operating agreement/concessionaire. 
iii. Establishing a publicly operated ferry operation at the existing landing locations 
1. Scenarios by Ownership 
a. Montgomery 
b. Loudoun 
c. Maryland 
d. Virginia 
There  are  a  number  of  permutations  to  each  scenario  that  will  be  shown  in  a  matrix  of 
responsibilities  for  the  various  activities  that  will  occur  during  operations.    This  includes 
everything from public information through operations and infrastructure to maintenance of 
the waterborne and landside assets. 
 
vi. Risk Analysis 
1. Include consideration of timing of each option to put in place, risks of ongoing instability 
of operation, etc. 
b. Consideration of each alternative should include: 
i. Identify Permitting Requirements for each alternative. 
Based  on  the  matrix  developed  in  the  previous  task,  we  will  assess  permitting 
issues/requirements for the alternatives including any waterborne requirements for staffing 
and  operating  a  vessel  that  may  not  be  grandfathered  into  the  operation  now  that  it  has 
ceased functioning.  It appears that the current vessel is permitted by the Coast Guard only 
so a high level review may be required for changes to the land side operations and whether 
any county based permitting would be triggered. 
ii. Legal issues 
We  will  develop  a  matrix  of  legal/permitting  issues  that  may  be  applicable  to  the  various 
alternatives. 
iii. Identify land ownership. 
We will create a GIS based map showing land ownership and parcel limits based on existing 
available information. 
iv. Landing site improvements. 
Stantec will provide high level input into the landing sites on both sides of the river including 
sketch  level  diagrams  of  what  may  be  possible  on  the  Loudoun  County  side  with  the 
movement of the terminal adjacent to public lands or roadways, any changes in operational 

Page | 5  
 
 strategies (such as prepayment at a pay point and queued parking or changes in the cable 
angle to accommodate a new landing point). 
vi. Schedule to start operations, and startup cost estimates including: 
Our team will develop a rough timeline or schedule that starts with startup dates and moves 
backwards to highlight the key functions that must occur and the approximate timeline for 
that function. 
As much as is possible with the available information, we will provide a high‐level estimate of 
costs associated with the tasks noted above. 
vii. Vessel replacement and life cycle costs 
As input into the Technology Assessment, we will utilize our knowledge and research from 
New Zealand, Virginia and Maryland DOT’s and British Columbia to provide information on 
possible vessel sizing and costing. 
Deliverable ‐ Technical Memo Summarizing Alternatives with Opportunities & Constraints 
We will create a technical memo that summarizes the elements of the SWOT analysis. 

5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BENEFITS & OPPORTUNITIES 
Stantec  shall  review  AECOM  deliverables  and  provide  recommendations  for  additional 
descriptions/data/approaches to ensure economic development opportunities adequately identified 
for both Loudoun and Montgomery Counties.  Stantec shall meet with Montgomery County Economic 
Development Corporation to identify tourism partnership opportunities in Maryland. 

6. TECHNOLOGY ASESSMENT 
Task Deferred. 

7. FISCAL ANALYSIS OF ALL ALTERNATIVES 
Based on the startup costs and known issues, we will provide input into Task 7 

8. SUMMARY REPORT 
Stantec’s team will provide supporting text from the lead tasks as well as any graphics or tables that 
may help support the final summary report. 
 
   

Page | 6  
 
 MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BOA CONTRACT NO. 1111495
Task Order No. 8

April 30, 2021

White’s Ferry Operation Alternatives Study
Price Proposal

Price Summary

DIRECT LABOR SUMMARY

Classification Hours Rate Direct Labor

Principal 14 $ 297.28 $ 4,161.92

Senior Manager 63 $ 280.83 $ 17,692.29
Project Manager 94 $ 197.81 $ 18,594.14
Senior Engineer 26 $ 180.38 $ 4,689.88
Project Engineer 119 $ 170.64 $ 20,306.16
Transportation Planner 138 $ 172.33 $ 23,781.54
Environmental Scientist 101 $ 141.77 $ 14,318.77
Right-of-way Specialist 10 $ 142.32 $ 1,423.20
Traffic Engineer 32 $ 135.36 $ 4,331.52

Subtotal - Direct Labor 597 $ 109,299.42

DIRECT EXPENSES SUMMARY

Travel $ 500.00

Printing and Postage $ -

Miscellaneous Other costs $ -

Subtotal - Direct Expenses $ 500.00

Estimated Total Price $ 109,799.42

 
   

Page | 7  
 
  

Page | 8  
 
 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
MINORITY, FEMALE, DISABLED PERSON SUBCONTRACTOR
PERFORMANCE PLAN

Contractor’s
Name: Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Address:
6110 Frost Place
City:
Laurel State: Maryland Zip: 20707
Phone Number:
301-982-2800 Fax Number: Email: Simon.simon@stantec.com
CONTRACT NUMBER/PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Contract No. 1111495 Task Order #8 - Whites Ferry Study

A. Individual assigned by Contractor to ensure Contractor's compliance with MFD Subcontractor Performance Plan:

Name:
Bimal Patel, PE
Title:
Principal
Address:
6110 Frost Place
City:
Laurel State: Maryland Zip: 20707
Phone Number: 240-372-6220 Fax Number: Email: bimal.patel@stantec.com

B. This Plan covers the life of the contract from contract execution through the final contract expiration date.

C. The percentage of total contract dollars, including modifications and renewals, to be paid to all certified minority owned
business subcontractors, is 9.57 % of the total dollars awarded to Contractor.

D. Each of the following certified minority owned businesses will be paid the percentage of total contract dollars indicated
below as a subcontractor under the contract.

I hereby certify that the business(s) listed below are certified by one of the following: Maryland Department of Transportation
(MDOT); Federal SBA (8A); MD/DC Minority Supplier Development Council (MSDC); Women’s Business Enterprise
National Council (WBENC); or City of Baltimore.
A Certification Letter must be attached.
For assistance, call 240-777-9912.

1. Certified by: Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Minority Business Enterprise

Subcontractor Name: Mercado Consultants, Inc.

Title:
Address: 17830 New Hampshire Ave, Suite 200

City: Ashton State: Zip:

Phone Number: 301-260-0090 Fax Number: 301-260-0018 Email: Canderson@mercadoeng.com
CONTACT PERSON:

Circle MFD Type:

AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN AMERICAN DISABLED PERSON
FEMALE HISPANIC AMERICAN NATIVE AMERICAN

The percentage of total contract dollars to be paid to this subcontractor: 4.25 %

This subcontractor will provide the following goods and/or services: Field Survey, Mapping, ROW Plats, Engineeing
Design Support
PMMD-65 Rev. 04/19
 2. Certified by: Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Minority Business Enterprise
Subcontractor Name: Edwards Utility Mapping Corporation
Title:
Address: 11 Marsh Run Road
City:
Fredericksburg State: Zip:
Phone Number:
540-737-5141 Fax Number: 540-737-5141 Email: Dewards@EUMCORP.COM
CONTACT PERSON:
Circle MFD Type:

AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN AMERICAN DISABLED PERSON

FEMALE HISPANIC AMERICAN NATIVE AMERICAN

The percentage of total contract dollars to be paid to this subcontractor: 0.93 %

This subcontractor will provide the following goods and/or services: Utility Designation & Mapping, Test holes

3. Certified by: Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Minority Business Enterprise

Subcontractor Name: DMY Engineering Consultants, Inc.
Title:
Address: 217 Perry Parkway, #12
City: State: Zip:
Phone Number: 301-768-4168 Fax Number: 301-768-4169 Email: pzhang@dmyec.com
CONTACT PERSON: Paul Zhang, PE
Circle MFD Type:

AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN AMERICAN DISABLED PERSON

FEMALE HISPANIC AMERICAN NATIVE AMERICAN

The percentage of total contract dollars to be paid to this subcontractor: 3.33 %

This subcontractor will provide the following goods and/or services: Geotechnical Engineering Services

4. Certified By: Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Minority Business Enterprise

Subcontractor Name: Precision Systems, Inc.

Title:
Address: 2713 Newlands Street, N.W.

City: Washington State: DC Zip: 20015

Phone Number: 202-686-8225 Fax Number: 202-686-8227 Email: psi@dcpsi.com
CONTACT PERSON: Mike Y. Houh
Circle MFD Type:
PMMD-65 Rev. 04/19
AFRICAN AMERICAN ASIAN AMERICAN DISABLED PERSON
FEMALE HISPANIC AMERICAN NATIVE AMERICAN

The percentage of total contract dollars to be paid to this subcontractor: 1.06 %

This subcontractor will provide the following goods and/or services: Traffic Engineering Services, Signal Design,
Street Lighting

E. The following language will be inserted in each subcontract with a certified minority owned business listed in D above,
regarding the use of binding arbitration with a neutral arbitrator to resolve disputes with the minority owned business
subcontractor; the language must describe how the costs of dispute resolution will be apportioned:
DISPUTE RESOLUTION: If requested in writing by either the Subconsultant or Stantec, the Subconsultant and Stantec shall attempt to
resolve any dispute between them arising out of or in connection with this Agreement by entering into structured non-binding negotiations
with the assistance of a mediator on a “without prejudice” basis. The mediator shall be appointed by agreement of the parties. The Parties
agree that any actions under this Agreement will be brought in the appropriate court in the jurisdiction of the Governing Law, or elsewhere
by mutual agreement. Nothing herein however prevents Stantec from any exercising statutory lien rights or remedies in accordance with
legislation where the project site is located. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subconsultant may be joined in a proceeding relating to
Subconsultant's Services in any court of competent jurisdiction, when initiated by Client or a third party. The prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover their reasonable legal fees and other costs related to the dispute. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subconsultant may be
joined in a proceeding relating to Subconsultant’s Services in any court of competent jurisdiction or in any arbitral proceeding, when
initiated by Client or a third shall be able to recover their reasonable legal fees and other costs related to the dispute.

F. Provide a statement below, or on a separate sheet, that summarizes maximum good faith efforts achieved, and/or the intent to
increase minority participation throughout the life of the contract or the basis for a full waiver request.
Due to the scope and demanding schedule of the Whites Ferry Study project we couldn't accomodate any subconsultants on this task
however Santec is fully committed to meet overall MFD participation goal of the Contract No. 1111495. A summary/report showing
awarded task assignments including planned and actual MFD Performance details is attached for your information.

A full waiver request must be justified and attached.

Full Waiver Approved: Partial Waiver Approved:

Date: Date:
MFD Program Officer MFD Program Officer

Full Waiver Approved: Partial Waiver Approved:

Date: Date:
Avinash Shetty Avinash Shetty
Director Director
Office of Procurement Office of Procurement

The Contractor submits this MFD Subcontractor Performance Plan (Plan Modification No. 8 ) in accordance with
the Minority Owned Business Addendum to General Conditions of Contract between County and Contractor.

CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE

USE ONE:
1. TYPE CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

Signature

Typed Name

Date

PMMD-65 Rev. 04/19

 2. TYPE CORPORATE CONTRACTOR’S NAME: Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

Signature
Simon Simon, PE
Typed Name

5/14/2021
Date

I hereby affirm that the above named person is a corporate officer or a designee empowered to sign contractual agreements for
the corporation.

Signature

Michael A. Retton, PE
Typed Name

Senior Principal
Title

5/14/2021
Date

APPROVED:

Avinash Shetty, Director, Office of Procurement Date

Section 7.3.3.4(a) of the Procurement Regulations requires:

The Contractor must notify the Director, Office of Procurement of any proposed change to the Subcontractor Performance Plan.

PMMD-65 Rev. 04/19

 Montgomery County Department of Transportation
Contract No. 1111495

MINORITY, FEMALE, DISABLED (MFD) SUBCONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE PLAN

MFD Participation
MDOT Certification
No. MFD Firm Name MFD Type Planned Billed/Paid to Date Engineering Services
No.
$$ % of Contract $$ % of Contract
1 Mercado Consultants, Inc Hispanic American 90-081 443,925.66 4.25% 62,947.10 9.21% Surveying, Structure Design Support
2 Edwards Utility Mapping Corp. African American 09-642 96,902.10 0.93% 13,104.40 1.92% Utility Designation
3 DMY Engineering Consultants, Inc Asian American Pacific 14-473 347,314.98 3.33% 13,496.36 1.98% Geotechnical Engineering
4 Toole Design Group, LLC Female 04-022 Transit Planning/Engineering, Civil Engineering
5 Straughan Environmental, Inc Female 97-190 Noise Analysis
6 Precision System, Inc. Asian American Pacific 97-195 110,988.47 1.06% Traffic Engineering / Street Lighting

Total MFD Participation 999,131.21 9.57% 89,547.86 13.11%

Total Contract Amount 10,442,935.78
Total Billed to Date 683,277.45

MFD SUBCONTRATOR PERFORMANCE BY TASK:

Task MFD SUBCONSULTANT Notes
Task Order Contract MFD Percent
Order Task Description Mercado Consultants, Edwards Utility DMY Engineering Toole Design Group, Straughan
Amount Precision System, Inc. of Task Order
No. Inc Mapping Corp. Consultants, Inc LLC Environmental, Inc
Planned Amount 270,566.71
1 MD 355 BRT Review
Billed/Paid to Date 233,570.58
Planned Amount 338,427.96 82,324.30 24.33%
2 Brighton Dam Road Bridge Repairs
Billed/Paid to Date 0.00
Cameron St. to Planning Pl. Bikeway Planned Amount 11,584.77
3
Improvements Billed/Paid to Date 10,846.07
White Flint Metro Station Access Planned Amount 638,453.53 33,356.36 30,169.80 26,280.92 14.07%
4
Improvements Billed/Paid to Date 250,698.73 33,592.50 13,104.40 13,496.36 24.01%
MD 355 BRT Ongoing Program Planned Amount 99,974.02
5
Management Billed/Paid to Date 30,347.96
MD355 BRT Program Management Planned Amount 7,995,314.98 258,815.84 321,034.06 7.25%
6
and Prelim. Design Billed/Paid to Date 157,814.11 29,354.60
Fenton Street Bikeway - From Gist Ave Planned Amount 978,814.39 69,429.16 66,732.30 110,988.47 25.25%
7
to Cameron St. Billed/Paid to Date
Planned Amount 109,799.42 Cost Proposal Submitted,
8 Whites Ferry Study Report
Billed/Paid to Date 5/14/2021

Total Planned Amount 10,442,935.78 443,925.66 96,902.10 347,314.98 110,988.47 9.57%

Total Billed/Paid to Date 683,277.45 62,947.10 13,104.40 13,496.36 13.11%