You are on page 1of 28

THE EFFECT OF PERFORMANCE, PRICE PERCEPTION, BRAND IMAGE

AND BRAND ASSOCIATION ON PURCHASING DECISIONS OF HONDA

CBR 150R IN SURABAYA

JOURNAL

Submitted to Qualify the Study Program Requirement


Undergraduate Program of
Management Department

PONTA DEWA SAKTIAWAN


2016210041

Written By:

PONTA DEWA SAKTIAWAN


2016210041

SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU EKONOMI PERBANAS

SURABAYA

2019

i
ii

The Effect of Performance, Price Perception, Brand Image and Bran


Association on Purchasing Decisions of Honda CBR150R in Surabaya

STIE Perbanas Surabaya


E-mail : 2016210041@students.perbanas.ac.id

ABSTRACT

In the automotive industry, consumer purchase decision is the most important aspect
for company’s life cycle, because it can effect on profitability especially for Honda
CBR 150R. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of purchase decision,
price perception, brand image, and brand association on purchase decision of Honda
CBR 150R in Surabaya. The method of research is data collection by distributing 113
questioner to respondent who met the criteria of the respondent. The data analyze
method in this research is using multiple regression analysis. The result of this
research is the performance and price perception has a negative effect on purchase
decision, but not significantly. The brand image has a positive effect on purchase
decision, but not significantly. In the other hand, brand association has positively
significant on purchase decision. The conclusion of this research is, brand association
is the most considered aspect in the Honda CBR 150R purchase decision.
Keyword: Performance, price perception, brand image, brand association, purchase
decision
INTRODUCTION motorcycle products from two Honda
competitors.
Recently, competition in the 150cc
category of motorcycle industry, Honda Motor factories in Indonesia
especially, in the 150cc sport fairing has sold 38,873 units or become the
category has kept companies busy choice of more than 4,800 motor sport
developing and improving their lovers every month. In 2016, Honda
technologies such as equipment, launched the next generation of the
machinery, and other support boards. CBR 150R which was produced in
The rapid growth and changes in the Indonesia in 2014. The next generation
motorcycle industry in 150cc are of CBR 150R named All New CBR
caused by the growth of the demand 150R whit code K45G, and according
by the consumers. To meet consumer to the Automotive Journalists' Forum
demand for motorcycles, Honda (Forwot) in Liputan 6, the Honda All
presents the CBR 150R has to compete New CBR 150R become the best
with two other Japanese motorcycle of the year through a
manufacturers. They are Yamaha YZF Forwot Motorcycle of the Year (FMY)
R15 and GSX R150 that are event.
iii

However in the next competition, The decrease of sale above occurred


according to the data from the because of the problems with the
Indonesian Motorcycle Industry company's inability to meet consumer
Association in TMCBlog.com, in May demand in 150cc sport fairing bike
2017, Yamaha was ahead of its rivals competition which has an impact on
with R15 sales reaching 8,526 units. purchasing decisions. Pratiwi GI
Then, it was followed by the Honda (2015), states that in order to meet the
CBR150R with a distribution of requirements of the above-mentioned
7,241units, and followed the Suzuki consumers, motorcycle companies
GSX-R150 with 3,897 units. In 2017 should pay attention to the different
itself, the Honda CBR 150R again consumption parameters of modern
came under competition pressure from society. purchasing decision is
Yamaha which knocked out the next described as a process of evaluating
generation of YZF R15 which was and selecting the various alternatives
named the All New YZF R15 plus in accordance with certain interests by
Suzuki also entered the market determining a choice that is considered
competition in the 150cc sport fairing the most profitable.
bike class by presenting the GSX
R150. There are several factors to be weighed
in consumer purchase decisions.
According to the data from the According to Ashaduzzaman, M.,
Indonesian Motorcycle Industry Hoque, I., & Mahbub, F. (2018)
Association in TMCBlog.com, in June performance is a factor that can effect
2018, Yamaha was ahead of its rivals bike purchase decision. According to
with R15 sales reaching 4,893 units. Kotler and Keller (2009), states that
Then, it was followed by the Honda the higher the benefits or performance
CBR150R with a distribution of 2,609 of the product that can be offered to
units, and followed the Suzuki GSX- customers, the higher the value the
R150 with 465 units. In 2018 itself, customer thinks. This means that
Honda once again launched the next customers' incentives to make
generation of the CBR 150R from purchasing decisions will be even
previous generation with code K45N higher. In fact, from the specification
In order to fight back again with of Honda CBR 150R, Honda CBR
Yamaha YZF R15 and GSX R150. 150R has the lowest horse power
However, although Honda has updated output from a performance point of
its motorcycle technology, Yamaha view. As a result, CBR 150R becomes
YZF-R15 can still outperform Honda the slowest bike in 150cc. This is
CBR 150R motorcycle sales. This is reinforced from the news in oto.com
the second time Yamaha YZF R15 has which states that Honda equipped the
been able to overtake sales from CBR 150R with a 150 cc DOHC
Honda CBR 150R since Yamaha YZF engine that produce the lowest power
R15 appear in 2014. in it’ class
iv

On the other hand, of the research combination of attitudes, attributes and


above, according to Sri Widyastuti and benefits. The impressions that arise in
Muhammad Said (2017), Price the minds of the consumer are because
Perception is a factor that can effect of various factors such as
purchase decision. According to communication, the marketing of a
oto.com which states that one of the brand, their experience and the
shortcomings of the Honda CBR 150R consumption of the brand by other
is its price is expensive when people. The relationship and
compared with competitors expectation associated with the
product would increase together by
In the same study, according to Sri increasing the number of customer
Widyastuti and Muhammad Said experiences in purchasing a brand or
(2017), brand Image is one of factors by increasing the brand's presence in
that can effect goods purchase the communication strategy of the
decision. Dib, H., & Alnazer, M. companies.
(2013) stated that brand image is a
kind of association in the consumers’ Based on the above research
minds when considering certain background, the formulation of the
brands. This is reinforced from problem in this study can be
research conducted by Choirul Fattah, formulated as follows:
M. O. H. (2016) who stated that the
brand image on the All New Honda 1. Whether the motor performance
CBR 150 R motorbike was built on the has a significant and positive effect
minds of consumers in the Honda on the customers’ purchasing
sotre: the strength of the brand decision towards Honda CBR
association, knowledge and assessment 150R?
of a consumer about the extent of 2. Whether Price Perception has a
consumers can remember the All New significant and positive effect on
Honda CBR 150 R as a motor sport the customers’ purchasing decision
issued by Honda. The strength of this towards Honda CBR 150R?
brand association can be measured by 3. Whether Brand Image has a
the popularity and credibility of the All significant and positive effect on
New Honda CBR 150 R as well as the customers’ purchasing
being comfortable to drive, a famous decisions towards Honda CBR
motorbike sport that has the best 150R?
quality in its class, high resale prices 4. Whether Brand Association has a
significant effect on the customers’
Meanwhile, according to Yanti, M. O. purchasing decisions towards
Z., & Sukotjo, H. (2016), Brand Honda CBR 150R?
Association is one of factors that affect
purchase decision. Therefore,
according to Aaker, D. (1997), Brand
association can be formed through the
v

LITERATURE REVIEW found that there was the most


important criteria for buying a car as
Performance done by the domestic car purchasers.
One of the criteria was the technical
This aspect of performance has been
performance of the car ( Aghdaie, S. F.
very often taken into account by the
A., & Yousefi, E, 2011). Indicators
customers when they start choosing
that can be used to measure
any product. In this case, the product is
performance refer to research from Md
the sport firing motorcycles which
Asha duzzaman, Imranul Hoque and
have their performance above average
Farzana Mahbub (2018), as follows:
in the type of motorcycle. As it was
based on the o Focus Group 1. Engine quality
Discussion (FGD) in the study 2. Millage of engine.
conducted by Md Asha duzzaman, 3. Engine Power.
Imranul Hoque and Farzana Mahbub
(2018), it was found that performance Price Perception
is used as a consideration by mostly
the customers. Puspitasari, I, (2013) As argued by Wei, C. F., Bruce, C. Y.
argued that there are some parameters L., Kou, T. C., & Wu, C. K in
used to analyze the motor engine Widyastuti and Muhammad Said
performance. They are such as torque, (2017), the second important factor is
power, and specific fuel consumption. price. The customers also think that
price is used for consideration when
As stated by Kotler (2010), the factor buying products or services. Therefore,
of performance has a relation to a they think that they will purchase
certain item’s functional aspects. It is products or services with reasonable
also as the main characteristic which prices, meaning to decrease cost but it
should be taken account by the can also increase the network facility.
customers when they buy those items. In the perspective of marketing, price
Another proponents— Fink, R. C., is a monetary unit or other
James, W. L., & Hatten, K. J. (2011), measurement (service and other item).
also found the same evidence. They Money is a means of exchange to have
found that the factor of performance of a possession or having the right to get
certain products is always dependent service or products. Another aspect of
on the customer types. price is that it is flexible. By being
flexible, it means that, money or price
According to Liu, Pang-Lo, and Chih- can be flexibly adapted. Therefore,
Hung Tsai in Ashaduzzaman, M., price is identical to money with its
Hoque, I., & Mahbub, F. (2018) ability to provide the customers with a
showing that manufacturers better like possession of products or services
the management of value process for whenever and wherever they can
developing their new products. This decide to use it for buying that is
condition tends to create a product flexible.
with its better performance. It was
vi

In terms of elements of traditional the company to cover the cost of


marketing combination, the easiest production as well. From the price the
element is also price. In this case, price company can also determine their
can change and adapt to the market sustainability, besides being able to
dynamics. It will be much clearer hen pay for the workers. It is also stated by
price is viewed from the perspective of Sony Harsono (2013), that price is
price competition for example in a considered one of the elements in the
discount war. This can very often marketing mix. He said that price in
happens in the retail industries. As this strategy that is a marketing mix
stated by Dib, H., & Alnazer, M in can provide the companies better
Widyastuti and Muhammad Said income. In more detail, it is stated that
(2017), Consumer assessment is there are still other three elements in
influenced by high-quality, low-price marketing mix. They are products,
and retailer attractiveness. The distribution, and promotion.
customers are attracted by the same
level related to price as they desire and Indicators that can be used to measure
as they are willing to pay for anything performance refer to research from Sri
they want to buy. Thus, it is the Widyastuti and Muhammad Said
customers’ buying intention that (2017), as follows:
means that when they buy any
1. Number of value that consumer
products with higher price they also
exchanges with the benefit.
want high quality. They also perceive
2. Competitive price.
that the high price is related to their
3. Price fit with quality.
perception of high quality product they
buy with it. How they can be attracted Brand Image
is by the advertising program done by
the companies. This is dealt also with The next aspect in determining the
pricing strategy by the company. The customers’ decision to purchase is
companies should be able to increase brand image. This aspect is very often
the customers’ perception towards the viewed by the customers for making
products of high quality with high their decision to buy or purchase the
price (Wu, Y. F., Wu, C. S., Lee, C. J., products or services. According to
& Tsai, L. F in Widyastuti and Aaker in Yanti, M. O. Z., & Sukotjo,
Muhammad Said 2017). H. (2016), Consumers more often buy
products with well-known brands
More than the above nature of price, because they feel more comfortable
the company can also determine with things that are already known, the
selling the product or services. By assumption that famous brands are
determining a certain price with the more reliable, always available and
high quality products the company can easy to find, and have quality that is
get higher profits. Thus, the customers not in doubt, so that more recognized
who pay the products or services brands more often chosen by
produced by the company will enable consumers over unknown brands. A
vii

research conducted by Oladepo, O. I., (2014)anti, Mery Oky Zufi, and


& Abimbola, O. S. (2015), provides Hendri Sukotjo (2016), as follows:
evidence indicating the there is a
significant effect of brand image on 1. Brand Recognition.
the customers’ decision to purchase 2. Well know brand.
(purchase decision). For that reason, 3. Memorable Brand.
this factor has an important role for the 4. Corporate Image.
company to attract the customers in
Brand Association
order they make decision to buy the
company’s products or services. Another factor to be discussed is brand
association. This factor refers to an
As argued by Dib, H., & Alnazer, M.
individual or person’s mind with his
(2013), they defined that brand image
impression as associated with his
indicates the customers’ mind for
memory towards a certain brand. A
association process towards a certain
brand image is – in fact—will created
product’s brand. This process is delat
by several interconnected brand
with associating the customers’
process of association. When there are
memory about the specification of the
more processes of associations, the
brand. It also deals with the traits,
stronger the image of the product or
strengths, as well as the brand’s
service is Durianto, D, (2004). In
weaknesses. In connection with this
relation to this brand association,
brand image, Setya, B. I., & Soni
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2007)
Harsono (2018) stated that the
argued that brand association is the
companies could assist their customers
person’s impressions that rise in his
to attain some information related to
mind with his memoery towards a
the company's products or services.
certain brand. This is caused by many
The company can also help them for
things the individual or a person have
recommendation such as to purchase a
in relation to a certain product or
certain product or services. The
service. This can happens during
company is also able to help their
communication process such as the
customers to distinguish their own
company’s strategy in their marketing.
brand with another products’ brand. In
The company can communicate their
this case, the company has to try to
product brand through marketing
make their customer have a good
strategy. Therefore, this
feeling towards their own products or
communication during the marketing
services. This is created by the
strategy can make the customers
company using the brand image.
experience with the product or service
Indicators that can be used to measure they buy. They experience when they
performance refer to research from Sri buy the products or services—thus
Widyastuti and Muhammad Said consuming the brand as well.
(2017) and Umi Muawanah
As stated by Widjaja in Yanti, M. O.
Z., & Sukotjo, H. (2016) the aspect of
viii

brand association is that it is always that reason, brand association is


associated with the fact that the always both directly and indirectly
products or services consumed by the connected with the customer's memory
customers can express their life styles. of the brand. Las but not least, Aaker
It can also show their social status, in Hasan, A. (2009) also argued that
social class. Even, brand association the factor of brand association
can also indicates the customers’ concerns anything associated with the
professional roles. For example, the person’s memory towards a certain
customers feel that by using the brand. It can even a certain group of
products or services they have customers’ memory related to the
purchased they can apply it and then brand of a certain product or service in
they can be considered as the types of which all the processes occur in the
the people with high brand. This is customer’s mind.
their association with the brand. It can
also represents the store, selling the Indicators that can be used to measure
products with certain customers performance refer to research from
associated with their social class. Umi Muawanah (2014) Yanti, Mery
Oky Zufi, and Hendri Sukotjo (2016),
Another proponent is Hermawan, A. as follows:
(2012). He described that brand
association the factor with the person’s 1. Product Attributes.
memory towards a certain brand. It is 2. Functional Benefits.
the brand association which does not 3. Attitude.
only occur in in the customers’ life but
Purchase Decision
brand association also has a certain
degree of its power. This power or As it has been noted in the prevailing
strength is related to a certain brand. It business and trade nowadays, there are
can be stronger when it is based on lost several products which have been sold
of customers’ experiences of along with other competitors of both
communication. This communication services and goods. For that reason, for
is ofen done during the marketing the customers, they have always their
process. It is also similar to the own option consumers to purchase or
statement by Aaker, D. A. (2013). It is to buy any product. They select by
stated that the process of association of themselves, specifically when the
the brand is very much correlated with product is the goods or services and
the company and the product or these products and services also have
service brand. This experience can be the same competitors of the same
in very long process that is becoming a products and services or even the
long-lasting asset possessed by the substitution products. The customers—
company. This kind of asset with the finally— will make their own decision
customers’ experience reflects the to buy such product. Their final
company’s strategic position of the decision in this case is actually the
company’s product or services. For
ix

result of their consideration towards stage, the customers also assess the
that product. perceived risk associated with online
shopping.
In the case of customers’ process of
considering to purchase a product, Based on the process above, perceived
Kotler, P. & Keller in in Widyastuti risk is proved to have an effect on the
and Muhammad Said (2017), process of the customers’ evaluating
explained in more details. They and choosing behavior. More
described that such process is in fact a importantly, it is argued by Swasta, B.
well-established strategy in in Dharmesta & Irawan, (2008), the
marketing and consumer literature concept of purchase decision is
behavior. In that theory, it explains concerned with the customers’
that when customers make decision to understanding their wants or needs for
purchase, they always involve a certain a certain product. Before deciding to
process. This process includes five buy a certain product, the customers
stages: problem recognition, are evaluating by looking at the
information search, evaluation of existing sources of information about
product options, purchase decisions, the product or service they want to
and post-purchase support. purchase. Thus, they set their decision
to purchase by also identifying
First of all, a purchasing process will different alternatives before they do it,
start by the time the customers have and finally ended by their post-
recognized their problem or need. purchase behavior. Last but not least,
After they have recognized their Drumond in Meyliana, M. (2012)
problem or need, then the next step is asserted that the customer’s purchasing
searching any information related to decision is also the process initially to
their problem or need. In this step, identify all possible alternatives for
they search information (for example solving their problem (purchasing the
information about price and the product) and then evaluating their
product itself). This is the second choice systematically and objectively
process of searching information as based on the information sources
their hard effort until they find it thinking also about the benefits of
completely. After getting the each product of different products.
information they need, the next stage
is decision to purchase that is the third Indicators that can be used to measure
stage. In this third stage, the customer performance refer to research from Md
are trying to evaluate the products and Asha duzzaman, Imranul Hoque and
the options (evaluation process). This Farzana Mahbub (2018), Sri
process, the customers get involved in Widyastuti and Muhammad Said
the effort to examine and compare the (2017) and Umi Muawanah
product attributes. They compare the (2014)anti, Mery Oky Zufi, and
attributes dealing with price, brand, Hendri Sukotjo (2016, as follows:
quality, and etc. in the evaluation
x

1. Problem recognition. process management to develop new


2. Information search. products. This value-process
3. Alternative evaluation. management is also to focus on a
4. Make a purchase decision. better performance of the products the
companies produced.
INTER-VARIABLE
RELATIONSHIPS Based on the evidences described
above, it can be generalized that
Effect of Performance on the performance is an important factor for
Purchase Decision the companies—and especially the
marketers—to focus on their value-
As stated by Kotler (2010),
process management for creating
performance is concerned with the
better performance. For that reason,
functional aspects of a product in
the companies should improve their
which the customers use it as the main
products’ performance, very
characteristic for considering the
specifically the car or motorbikes’
decision to purchase. In relation to this
performance because it can finally
argument, it can be referred to a study
make the customers quickly decide to
by Ashaduzzaman, M., Hoque, I.,
purchase their motorbikes with high
&Mahbub, F. (2018). They provide an
performance (purchasing decision).
evidence they found in their study that
there is a significant and positive effect Effect of Price Perception on
of motorbike’s performance on the Purchase Decision
customers’ decision to purchase in
Bangladesh. Their research showed The proponents of marketing, namely
that the performance’s mean score is Kotller & Amstrong (2008), defined
3.73 and Z-value is 25.36 with p < simply that price is identical to the
0.001. In addition, the roads, culverts, amount of money the customers use
traffic jam, and other infrastructures in for paying whatever goods or services
Bangladesh require the business and they want to buy or purchase. In
the marketers to pay attention much addition, in any literatures, price
the motorbikes’ performance. This perception is related to the customers’
finding was also supported by perception towards e certain amount of
Aghdaie, S. F. A., & Yousefi, E. money used for an exchange of
(2011) They found that the most possessing the benefits of using the
important criteria for purchasing a car products or services. This price
by the customers is also the car’s perception is indeed considered to
technical performance. According to have significant effect on the
Liu, Pang-Lo, and Chih-Hung Tsai in customers’ purchasing decision. For
Ashaduzzaman, M., Hoque, I., & example, an evidence of the study by
Mahbub, F. (2018)also proved that Widyastuti, S., & Said, M. (2017) also
most of the companies also prefer their showed that price perception has a
management focused on the value significant and positive effect on the
xi

customers’ purchasing decision. They Effect of Brand Image on the


found that price perception in their Purchase Decision
finding is 2.127 value of T-test, and
the significance value is 0.039, smaller Besides the products’ performance and
than 0.05. This indicates that price price perception, brand image is also
perception has a significant effect on considered an influential factor for the
the customers’ purchase decision. customers’ purchase decision.
Fajarianto, B., Lubis, N., & Saryadi, S.
This evidence above also shows that (2013) argued that brand image if the
price as a monetary unit or customers’ perception towards a
measurement (service and other item) product or service brand, or the
serving as a means of exchange for customers’ memory reflected in their
possessing or using the right products mind as related to also the brand
or services. Besides that, the product association. They consider brand
or service quality and the customers’ image as a group of belief, idea,
income can affect price perception. A impression, and the customers’
study by Shirai, M. (2014) found that perception towards a certain brand. For
there is a relationship between the example, there is an evidence to
customer’s value and market price support this concept of brand. A study
from a long-lasting product category. by Widyastuti, S., & Said, M. (2017)
It is also supported by another shows that brand image has a
argument claiming that price is based significant effect on the customers’
on the product’s value. In other words, purchasing decision. As statistically
price perception can also be affected analyzed, brand image has 3.190 value
by the product value and therefore, with the t-test, and the significance
price also shows the product’s value. value is 0.003 which is smaller than
0.05.
Based on the arguments with
evidences provided above, it can be Brand image is considered to have a
explained that product with higher significant and positive effect on the
price will be perceived by the customers’ purchasing decision. As
customers to have the same high value described, an image is one of the basic
of the products the customers want to characters in modern marketing
purchase. Therefore, price is also an orientation that attempts to have more
important factor for the companies to attention on building a strong image.
determine for their product with also With the product strong image on the
high performance that is the high customers’ mind, the company can
value. By doing so, the company can motivate their customers to buy their
make the customers make quick products. Generally, customers believe
decision to purchase their products. in the famous brand of a certain
Price is then an important factor for product they have already purchased.
affecting the customers’ decision to Another evidence is also proved by a
purchase (purchase decision). study conducted by Yanti, M. O. Z., &
xii

Sukotjo, H. (2016). They showed a relation to this concept of brand image,


regression coefficient value of the Yanti, M. O. Z., & Sukotjo, H. (2016)
brand image that is 0.433. Therefore, if provided an evidence in their study.
the brand image increases by one unit, They found that brand associations
it can also increase purchasing affect the customers’ purchasing
decisions by 0.433 units, assuming the decision. Using a regression
variable of brand awareness and brand coefficient value, they found the brand
association are constant. association variable with 0.123 value.
Therefore, when the brand association
Based on the concept of brand image increases by one unit, it will also
and the evidences supporting the brand increase the purchasing decision by
image as important factor for the 0.123 units, assuming there is a
customers’ decision to purchase, it can constant brand awareness variable and
be asserted strongly that brand image brand image. In other words, the
is an important indicator for affecting products with high-quality impression
the customers’ purchasing decision, will encourage consumers to buy or
namely their decision to buy a product. purchase it so that they trust on the
In order that the company can increase quality of the product.
their customers’ purchase decision, the
company should have a great effort of Based on the arguments above, it can
building their product image. Brand also be asserted that brand association
image has a significant effect on the is an important indicator for the
customers’ purchasing decision. companies to pay attention in order
they can improve or build their product
Effect of Brand Association on brand. The customers will always
Purchase Decision associate the high-quality product with
the value they get when buying it or
When referring to the proponent,
the products they possess. This brand
namely Aaker in Hasan, A. (2009)
association can significantly affect the
brand association is anything
customers’ purchasing decision.
connected with a brand in the
Therefore, brand association is an
customers’ memory or a group of
influential factor for increasing the
people with their mind associated with
customers’ purchasing decision.
having a brand in their mind. This is
conceptually related to the customers’ By considering the four factors
memory related to a certain band. (performance, price perception, brand
According to Aeker in Yanti, M. O. Z., image, and brand association), the
& Sukotjo, H. (2016), there are some researcher has conceptualized the
indicators for measuring brand framework of this present research.
association. It consists of such as Having theoretically described the
direct and indirect product attributes, effects of these four factors, based on
product fictional benefit, and both theoretical basis and the previous
evaluation to a product attitude. In studies, the present researcher find it
xiii

important to have the a clear Population, Sample and Sampling


theoretical framework as it is The population, in this study,
presented on Figure 2.4. the researcher mentions all elements or
members in a region that are the target
Research Framework of research or the whole of the object
of research Juliansyah Noor, S. E.
Performance (2016). The population of this study is
H1 (+)
all the Users All New CBR 150R in
Surabaya.
Price
H2 (+)
Perception According to Bungin, B. (2013),
Purchase the sample is a conclusion drawn from
Decision
H3 (+) the population and can be generalized
Brand Image H4 (+) to the entire population. This
conclusion can be made because the
intended sampling is to represent the
Brand entire population.
Association
According to the formula of Van
Voorhis in Sagala, C., Destriani, M.,
Figure 1 Research Framework Putri, U. K., & Kumar, S. (2014), the
number of respondents to be taken in
Research Hypotheses this study to be sampled is more than
equal 82 respondents. In the other
In this study consisted of several hand, this research uses validity and
research hypotheses as the initial reliability test, therefore the total
reference in this study based on number of respondents used is 112
previous theories and research. consisting of 30 respondents for small
samples and 82 for large samples
H1: Performance has a significant
effect on purchasing decision of
Honda CBR 150R.
RESEARCH SUBJECT AND
H2: Price perception has a significant DATA ANALYSIS
effect on purchasing decision of
Honda CBR 150R. Research Subject

H3: Brand image has a significant The sample in this study were all users
effect on purchasing decision of of the All New CBR 105R who have
Honda CBR 150R. just bought in a new condition for a
period of 3 to 6 months, with their own
H4: Brand Association has a intention to purchase, and bought the
significant effect on purchasing CBR 150R with their own money. The
decision of Honda CBR 150R. sample in this study uses non-
xiv

probability (non-probability sampling


method/ non-randomly sampling). The
sampling is not based on technical 1. Purchase Decision
opportunities that do not provide the On Table 1, it can be seen that the
same opportunities (opportunities) for results of respondents' responses to
elements or members of the population the average purchase decision
to be chosen as samples Ruslan, R. variable strongly agree with the
(2010) statement items in the
questionnaire. In Table 1, it can
Data Analysis also be seen that the indicator that
gets the highest value is PD4 with
Statistic Descriptive Analysis a mean of 4.78 or included in the
interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5, while
TABLE 1
PD3 is the lowest indicator with a
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTIC
mean value of 4.45 or included in
OUTPUT RESULTS
the interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5. From
Vari N M Desc Vari N M Descripti These data indicate that
able’ ea riptio able’ ea on
s n n s n respondents strongly agree with the
Indi Indi statement of the purchase decision
cator cator
PD 1 1 4. Very PP 3 1 3. Agree
of respondents to buy a Honda
1 53 Agre 1 96 CBR 150R.
3 e 3
PD 2 1 4. Very Mea 1 3. Agree
1 54 Agre n 1 52 2. Performance
3 e (PP) 3
PD 3 1 4. Very BI 1 1 4. Very
On Table 1, it can be seen that the
1 45 Agre 1 51 Agree results of respondents' responses to
3 e 3 the average Performance (P)
PD 4 1 4. Very BI 2 1 4. Very
1 78 Agre 1 47 Agree variable agree with the statement
3 e 3 items on the questionnaire. On
Mea 1 4. Very BI 3 1 4. Very
n 1 57 Agre 1 58 Agree Table 4.14, it can also be seen that
(PD) 3 e 3 the indicator that gets the highest
P1 1 3. Agre BI4 1 4. Very
1 93 e 1 6 Agree value is P1 with a mean of 3.93 or
3 3 is included in the interval class of
P2 1 3. Agre Mea 1 4. Very
1 9 e n 1 54 Agree 3.4 <× ≤ 4.2, While P 3 is the
3 (BI) 3 lowest indicator with a mean value
P3 1 2. Agre BA 1 4. Very
1 89 e 1 1 54 Agree of 2.89 or included in the class
3 3 interval 2.6 <× ≤ 3.4. Overall
Mea 1 3. Agre BA 1 4. Very
n (P) 1 59 e 2 1 44 Agree respondents' responses to the
3 3 variable Performance (P) from P1
PP 1 1 3. Agre BA 1 4. Very
1 8 e 3 1 5 Agree
to P3 showed the results agree with
3 3 the value of means 3.59 included
PP 2 1 2. Agre Mea 1 4. Very
1 81 e n 1 49 Agree
in the class interval 3.4 <× ≤ 4.2
3 (BA 3 which shows that overall the
)
respondent expressed strongly
xv

agree with the statement related to interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5. From
CBR 150R performance These data indicate that
respondents strongly agree with the
3. Price Perception brand image statement owned by
In Table 1 can be seen that the Honda CBR 150R.
results of respondents' responses to
the variable Price Perception (PP) 5. Brand Association
on average agree with the In Table 1, it can be seen that the
statement items in the results of respondents' responses to
questionnaire. In Table 1 it can the Brand Association variables on
also be seen that the indicator that average strongly agree with the
gets the highest value is PP 3 with statement items in the
a mean of 3.96 or included in the questionnaire. In Table 1, it can
interval class of 3.4 <× ≤ 4.2, also be seen that the indicator that
While PP 2 is the lowest indicator gets the highest value is BA1 with
with a mean value of 2.81 or a mean of 4.54 or included in the
included in the interval class 2.6 interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5, while
<× ≤3.4. On the average BA2 is the lowest indicator with a
respondent's response to the Price mean value of 4.44 or included in
Perception variable from PP1 to the interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5. From
PP3 shows the results agree with These data indicate that
means value 3.52 which belongs to respondents strongly agree with the
the class interval 3.4 <× ≤ 4.2 statement of the brand association
which shows that on average the owned by Honda CBR 150R.
respondent agreed with the
statement related to Price
Perception of respondents about Classic Assumption Analysis
the price listed Honda to have a
1. Multicollinearity Test
CBR 150R.
This test aims to test whether the
4. Brand Image regression model find a correlation
In Table 1, it can be seen that the between independent variables. A
results of respondents' responses to good regression model should not
the Brand Image variables on occur correlation between independent
average strongly agree with the variables. If the variables are
statement items in the correlated, then this variable is not
questionnaire. In Table 1 it can orthogonal. Orthogonal variables are
also be seen that the indicator that independent variables whose
gets the highest value is BI4 with a correlation value between independent
mean of 4.60 or included in the variables is zero. Multicollinearity can
interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5, while BI2 also be seen from VIF, if VIF <10,
is the lowest indicator with a mean then the level of colinearity can be
value of 4.47 or included in the
xvi

tolerated. The result of If the significant value > 0.05,


Multicollinearity Test can be seen in it means that H0 is accepted, which
Table 2 can be interpreted as residual data that
is normally distributed Ghozali, I.
TABLE 2 (2013)
THE RESULT OF
MULTICOLLINEARITY TEST TABLE 3
THE RESULT OF NORMALITY
No. Variables Tolerance VIF Value
Value TEST
1 Performance 0.895 1.118
2 Price Perception 0.895 1.119 One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
3 Brand Image 0.888 1.126 Unstandardized
4 Brand Association 0.873 1.146 Residual
N 113
According to Table 2, the VIF Normal Mean 0.0000000
Parameters2
values of performance, price Std. 1.65045320
Deviation
perception, brand image, and brand Most Extreme Absolute 0.119
association variables are less than 10. Differences
Positive 0.051
Its mean there is no correlation Negative -0.119
Kolmogorov-Smirnov 1.260
between independent variables on
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 0.084
regression models.
2. Normality Test According to Table 3 the
significant value is 0.084. It means that
This test aims to test whether in the H0 is accepted and residual data are
regression model, confounding or normally distributed because the
residual variables have a normal significant value > 0.05
distribution. For example, if it is
known that the t test and the F test 3. Autocorrelation Test
assume that the residuals follow the
normal distribution. If the assumption This test is used to test whether the
is violated then the statistical test linear regression model has a
becomes invalid for the small sample correlation between the error of the
size. Another statistical test that can be intruder in period t and the error of the
used to test residual normality is the previous period intruder. a good linear
non-parametric statistical test. regression model is if symptoms do
Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S). K-S test not occur auto correlation. Ways that
is done by making a hypothesis can be used to detect the presence of
autocorrelation symptoms include:
H0: Residual data are normally
distributed Durbin Watson Test (DW Test)

HA: Residual data are not normally H0: dL < d < 4-dU (no
distributed autocorrelation)
H1: d > 4-dL (there is autocorrelation)
xvii

Brand Association 0.590

A 10.197
TABLE 4
E 2.214
THE RESULT OF
AUTOCORELATION TEST
Std. Error of the Estimate Durbin-Watson
Form the Table 5 can be concluded the
1.681 1.528
formula of multiple linear regressions
as follows:
Y= a+ b1X1 + B2X2 + B3X3 + B4X4
According to table 4 the score +e
of Durbin Watson (D) is 1.528. Y= 10.197 + -0.164 X1 + -0.012 X2 +
According to Durbin Watson table 0.112 X3 + 0.590 X4 + e
(a=5%) with 113 samples and three Constanta (a) = 10.197 show that if the
independent variables, the value of independent variables (performance,
dL= 1.5255 and value of dU=1.8676. price perception, brand image, brand
so the value of D is located at dL < d < association) on purchase decision
4-dU or 1.5255 < 1.5258 < 1.8676. the Honda CBR 150R in Surabaya =0, the
conclusion is there is no Purchase Decision Honda CBR 150R
autocorrelation in the variables. in Surabaya is 10.197. Regression
coefficient of performance (X1) =
Statistic Analysis -0.164 show that there is a negative
correlation between performance and
Statistical data in this study multiple purchase decision. it means that
linear regressions and t-test are used to purchasing decisions are increasing
determine the effect of performance, even though the performance is
price perception, brand image, and decreasing. Regression coefficient of
brand associations on purchasing price perception (X2) = -0.012 show
decisions. In multiple linear regression that there is a negative correlation
analysis and t-test is using SPSS 16.0. between price perception and purchase
decision. It means that purchasing
1. Multiple Regression Analysis decisions are increasing even though
the price perception is decreasing.
TABLE 5 Regression coefficient of brand image
HE RESULTS OF MULTIPLE (X3) = 0.112 show that there is a
LINEAR REGRESSION TESTS positive correlation between brand
image and purchase decision. It means
Variables B Value
that purchasing decisions are
Performance -0.164 increasing if the brand image is also
Price Perception -0.012
increase. Regression coefficient of
brand association (X4) = 0.590 show
Brand Image 0.112 that there is a positive correlation
xviii

between brand association and From the results of the multiple linear
purchase decision. It means that regression test contained in the table
purchasing decisions are increasing if above, performance and price
the brand association is also increase. perception have a negative influence
Error (e) = 2.214 show that if the error on Honda CBR150R purchasing
value increases by the unit it will decisions, while brand image and
increase in other variables outside the brand associations have a positive
independent variable in this study by influence on Honda CBR150R
4.909. purchasing decisions. On the other
hand, according to the table above
1. T-Test performance, price perception, and
TABLE 6 brand image do not have a significant
THE RESULTS OF T- influence on Honda CBR150R
TEST purchasing decisions, while brand
No Variables Sig. associations have a significant
1 Performance 0.111 influence on Honda CBR150R
purchasing decisions.
2 Price Perception 0.894

3 Brand Image 0.243


1. Performance has a negative
4 Brand Association 0.000 influence on purchasing
decisions Honda CBR 150R, but
not significant.
From the results of data analysis using
The results of this study contradict the
SPSS 16.0 in Table 6 shows the t-test
research conducted by
of probability significance. If the
MdAshaduzzaman, Imranul Hoque
significance value <0.05 then H0 is
and Farzana Mahbub (2018) entitled
rejected and H1 is accepted. The
Factors affecting decision to purchase
significance value of performance,
motorbikes, a study done on the
price perception and brand image are
customers in Bangladesh which states
0.111, 0.894, and 0.243 which is
that performance has a significant
greater than 0.05. It shows that H0 is
positive effect on purchasing
accepted and H1 is rejected, so
decisions. In this study, performance
performance, price perception and
did not have a significant influence on
brand image have no significant effect
purchasing decisions because
on purchasing decisions. In the other
respondents did not attach importance
hand, brand association has a
to motor performance in deciding to
significance value of 0,000. This value
buy a Honda CBR 150R. This is also
is smaller than 0.05. This means that
supported by the results of the value
brand associations have a significant
(b) in X1 of the multiple linear
effect on purchasing decisions.
regression equation which shows that
even though the performance sector
Discussion
assessment is declining, the decision to
xix

buy a Honda CBR 150R will continue and research conducted by Umi
to increase. Muawanah (2014) anti, Mery Oky
2. Price perception has a negative Zufi, and Hendri Sukotjo (2016)
influence on Honda CBR150R entitled the effect of brand awareness,
purchasing decisions, but it is not brand association, and brand image on
significant. Aqua purchase decision. Both studies
The results of this study contradict the both state that brand image has a
research conducted by Sri Widyastuti significant positive influence on
and Muhammad Said (2017) entitled purchasing decisions. In this study the
the customers’ consideration towards brand image has no significant effect
their decision to purchase Specs Sports on the purchase decision of the Honda
Shoes Product through Brand Image, CBR 150R because respondents do not
Product Design, and Price Perception consider the brand image of the Honda
which states that price perception has a CBR 150R and the companies that
significant positive effect on produce it. Even so the brand image
purchasing decisions. In this study, still has a positive influence on
price perception does not have a purchasing decisions because the value
significant influence on purchasing (b) on X3 has a positive value of
decisions because respondents do not 0.112.
weigh prices too much in deciding to 4. Price brand association has a
buy a Honda CBR 150R. Besides that, significant positive effect on
according to oto.com, CBR 150R itself Honda CBR150R purchasing
has a relatively expensive price decisions.
compared to its competitors. This is The results of this study are in line
also supported by the results of the with research conducted by Umi
value (b) on X2 of the multiple linear Muawanah (2014) anti, Mery Oky
regression equation which shows that Zufi, and Hendri Sukotjo (2016)
although the perception in the sector of entitled the effect of brand awareness,
price perception decreases, the brand association, and brand image on
decision to buy Honda CBR 150R will Aqua purchase decision stating that
continue to increase. brand association has a significant
positive influence on purchasing
3. Brand image price has a positive decisions. The customers will always
influence on Honda CBR150R associate the high-quality product with
purchasing decisions, but is not the value they get when buying it or
significant. the products they possess. This brand
The results of this study contradict the association can significantly affect the
research conducted by Sri Widyastuti customers’ purchasing decision.
and Muhammad Said (2017) entitled Therefore, brand association is an
The customers' consideration towards influential factor for increasing the
their decision to purchase Specs Sports customers’ purchasing decision. In this
Shoes Products through Brand Image, study, brand association has a
Product Design, and Price Perception significant positive effect on
xx

purchasing decisions because Research Limitation


respondents consider brand attributes
and functional benefits of the Honda Based on this research, a
CRB 150R, as well as awards given by researcher has research limitation
others to the Honda CBR 150R. as below:

Conclusion 1. This research cannot be an


absolute reference for assessing the
On the whole of the results of purchase decision of motorcycle
the analysis that has been done in this products in the 150cc sport bike
study it can be concluded that segment, because it only examines
including: one product in the 150cc sport bike
segment namely the Honda CBR
1. Performance does not have a 150R and there is a probability of
significant positive effect on consumers buying a Honda CBR
purchasing decisions, because 150R competitor having different
consumers are not too concerned behavior
with the performance of the Honda 2. This study cannot be an absolute
CBR 150R when deciding to buy a reference for assessing the
Honda CBR 150R purchase decision of the Honda
2. price perception has no significant CBR 150R, because it only
positive effect on purchasing examines four independent
decisions, because consumers are variables namely performance,
not too concerned with the price price perception, brand image, and
listed by Honda to buy a CBR brand associations that influence
150R when deciding to buy a purchasing decisions.
Honda CBR 150R 3. The research location is only in
3. Brand image has a positive effect Surabaya, so it needs to be
on purchasing decisions but its adjusted to respondents in different
influence is not significant, places
because consumers are not too
concerned with the CBR 150R Recommendation
brand image and the company that
produced it when deciding to buy a Based on result findings, a
Honda CBR 150R researcher has some recommendations
4. Brand association has a positive for shareholder and future research as
and significant influence on below:
purchasing decisions, because
respondents consider brand 1. For researchers and future research
attributes and functional benefits of a. To judge a product, especially a
the Honda CRB 150R, as well as 150cc motor sport, there is much to
awards given by others to the consider. Therefore, further
Honda CBR 150R. research is expected to add
appropriate variables to examine
xxi

the purchase decision of the Honda consumers who decide to buy a


CBR 150R. Honda CBR 150R
b. To assess a product, especially the - Of all the questionnaires
150cc motor sport, there are many distributed to respondents, there
differences in consumer behavior were several respondents who
towards one product and another. suggested that Honda add the CBR
Therefore, further research is 150R feature, as well as make it
expected to examine different easier for consumers to buy Honda
objects with the same independent CBR 150R parts.
variables and locations
2. For Astra Honda Motor Indonesia
From the whole questionnaire REFERENCES
distributed to respondents, there were
Aaker, D. 1997. Manajemen ekuitas
several respondents who gave
smerek. Jakarta: Spektrum.
suggestions for the development of the
Honda CBR 150R, including: Aaker, D. A. 2013. Manajemen
- Although the performance variable pemasaran strategis. Edisi
is not significant in the decision of kedelapan. Salemba Empat.
the Honda CBR 150R, and has a Jakarta.
negative influence, many
respondents want Honda to Aghdaie, S. F. A., & Yousefi, E.
improve the performance of the 2011.The comparative
CBR150R, especially in terms of analysis of affecting factors
power and torque, so that it can on purchasing domestic and
become a motor sport that has imported cars in Iran market-
competitive performance with its using AHP technique.
competitors. besides that, it is also International Journal of
hoped that improvements in Marketing Studies, 3(2), 142.
performance will increase
consumers who decide to buy the Ashaduzzaman, M., Hoque, I., &
Honda CBR 150R Mahbub, F. 2018. Factors
- Although the price perception Influencing Bike Purchase
variable is not significant in the Decisions: A Study of
decision of the Honda CBR 150R, Consumers in Bangladesh.
and has a negative influence, many South Asian Journal of
respondents want Honda to make Management, 25(1).
the CBR150R have a more Bungin, B. (2013). Metodologi
affordable price, so that it can penelitian sosial dan
become a motor sport that has Ekonomi. Jakarta: Kencana
competitive prices with its Prenada Media Group.
competitors. besides that
competitive prices are also
expected to further increase
xxii

Choirul Fattah, M. O. H. (2016). Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. 2013. Partial


Pengaruh citra merek dan Least Square. Konsep, Teknik
desain produk terhadap dan Aplikasi Menggunakan
keputusan pembelian All New Program SmartPLS, 3.0. BP
Honda CBR 150 R (Studi Universitas Diponegoro
Pada Dealer Honda Cemara
Agung Motor Magetan). Hasan, A. 2009. Marketing edisi baru.
Jurnal Pendidikan Tata Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
Niaga (JPTN), 1(1).
Hermawan, A. 2012. Komunikasi
Dib, H., & Alnazer, M. 2013. The pemasaran. Erlangga 2013
impact of sales promotion on
Soni, H. 2013. Pengaruh Harga, Nilai
perceived transaction value
Manfaat, Dan Kualitas
and purchase intentions: the
Terhadap Kepuasan
moderating role of
Pelanggan Handphone
promotional benefit level.
Blackberry Di Surabaya.
International journal of
Journal of Business and
economy
Banking 3 (2).
Durianto, D. 2004. Brand Equity Ten
https://www.oto.com/berita-
Strategi Memimpin Pasar.
motor/lima-kekurangan-
Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
honda-cbr150r-dibanding-
Fajarianto, B., Lubis, N., & Saryadi, S. kompetitor-2118537
2013. Pengaruh Kualitas
https://tmcblog.com/2017/12/15/honda
Pelayanandan Brand Image
-cbr150r-pimpin-distribusi-
Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan
penjualan-sport-fairing-150-
Melalui Kepuasan Pelanggan
cc-di-november-2017/
(studi kasus pada CV.
AHASS Sahabat Sejati Motor https://tmcblog.com/2018/07/11/data-
Tembalang Semarang). aisi-yamaha-r15-tekuk-honda-
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi cbr150r-di-juni-2018/
Bisnis.
Juliansyah Noor, S. E.
Fink, R. C., James, W. L., & Hatten, 2016. Metodologi Penelitian:
K. J. 2011. Pricing, Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi &
purchasing and product Karya Ilmiah. Prenada Media.
performance factors
associated with the relational Kotler, P., 2010. Manajemen
exchanges of different sized Pemasaran, Edisi Ketiga
customers. Journal of Belas, Jilid I dan II ,
Business & Industrial Erlangga., Jakarta
Marketing, 26(1), 34-44.
xxiii

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. dan komunikasi. Rajawali


2007.Manajemen Pemasaran, Pers.
Edisi Kedua Belas, Jilid II,
PT. Macaran Jaya Cemerlang, Sagala, C., Destriani, M., Putri, U. K.,
Jakarta. & Kumar, S. 2014. Influence
of promotional mix and price
Kotler, P. & Keller, 2009.Manajemen on customer buying decision
Pemasaran, Edisi Ketiga toward fast food sector: a
Blea, Jilid I, Erlangga., survey on university students
Jakarta in jabodetabek (Jakarta,
Bogor, Depok, Tangerang,
Meyliana, M. 2012. Pengaruh Bekasi) Indonesia.
Komunitas Virtual Dalam International Journal of
Keputusan Pembelian. Jurnal Scientific and Research
Fakultas Hukum UII. Publications, 4(1), 1-7.
Oladepo, O. I., & Abimbola, O. S. Setya, B. I., & Soni, H. 2018. The
2015. The influence of brand effect of brand image and
image and promotional mix product on customer
on consumer buying decision- satisfaction and willingness to
a study of beverage pay at coffee bean surabaya.
consumers in Lagos State, STIE Perbanas Surabaya
Nigeria. British journal of
marketing studies, 3(4), 97- Shirai, M. 2014. Effects of quality and
109. price appeals on consumers’
internal reference prices and
Pratiwi, G. I. 2015. Perilaku konsumtif quality perceptions. Modern
dan bentuk gaya hidup (Studi Economy, 5(08), 831.
Fenomenologi pada Anggota
Komunitas Motor Bike of Swasta, B. Dharmesta & Irawan, 2008,
Kawasaki Riders Club Manajemen
(BKRC) Chapter Pemasaran. Modern, Liberty,
Malang). JurnalMahasiswaSo Yogyakarta.
siologi, 1(5).
Widyastuti, S., & Said, M. 2017.
Puspitasari, I. 2013. Studi Komparasi Consumer consideration in
Performa Motor Yamaha purchase decision of SPECS
Jupiter MX 2010 Berbahan sports shoes product through
Bakar Biopremium dengan brand image, product design
Pertamax. Jurnal Teknik and price
Mesin, 1(2), 211-220. perception. International
Journal of Supply Chain
Ruslan, R. 2010. Metode penelitian Management, 6(4), 199-207.
relations: public relations
xxiv

Yanti, M. O. Z., & Sukotjo, H.


2016.PengaruhKesadaranMer
ek, AsosiasiMerek, Dan
Brand Image Terhadap
Keputusan Pembelian
Aqua. AQUA, 75, 75-9.
v

You might also like