Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JOURNAL
Written By:
SURABAYA
2019
i
ii
ABSTRACT
In the automotive industry, consumer purchase decision is the most important aspect
for company’s life cycle, because it can effect on profitability especially for Honda
CBR 150R. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of purchase decision,
price perception, brand image, and brand association on purchase decision of Honda
CBR 150R in Surabaya. The method of research is data collection by distributing 113
questioner to respondent who met the criteria of the respondent. The data analyze
method in this research is using multiple regression analysis. The result of this
research is the performance and price perception has a negative effect on purchase
decision, but not significantly. The brand image has a positive effect on purchase
decision, but not significantly. In the other hand, brand association has positively
significant on purchase decision. The conclusion of this research is, brand association
is the most considered aspect in the Honda CBR 150R purchase decision.
Keyword: Performance, price perception, brand image, brand association, purchase
decision
INTRODUCTION motorcycle products from two Honda
competitors.
Recently, competition in the 150cc
category of motorcycle industry, Honda Motor factories in Indonesia
especially, in the 150cc sport fairing has sold 38,873 units or become the
category has kept companies busy choice of more than 4,800 motor sport
developing and improving their lovers every month. In 2016, Honda
technologies such as equipment, launched the next generation of the
machinery, and other support boards. CBR 150R which was produced in
The rapid growth and changes in the Indonesia in 2014. The next generation
motorcycle industry in 150cc are of CBR 150R named All New CBR
caused by the growth of the demand 150R whit code K45G, and according
by the consumers. To meet consumer to the Automotive Journalists' Forum
demand for motorcycles, Honda (Forwot) in Liputan 6, the Honda All
presents the CBR 150R has to compete New CBR 150R become the best
with two other Japanese motorcycle of the year through a
manufacturers. They are Yamaha YZF Forwot Motorcycle of the Year (FMY)
R15 and GSX R150 that are event.
iii
result of their consideration towards stage, the customers also assess the
that product. perceived risk associated with online
shopping.
In the case of customers’ process of
considering to purchase a product, Based on the process above, perceived
Kotler, P. & Keller in in Widyastuti risk is proved to have an effect on the
and Muhammad Said (2017), process of the customers’ evaluating
explained in more details. They and choosing behavior. More
described that such process is in fact a importantly, it is argued by Swasta, B.
well-established strategy in in Dharmesta & Irawan, (2008), the
marketing and consumer literature concept of purchase decision is
behavior. In that theory, it explains concerned with the customers’
that when customers make decision to understanding their wants or needs for
purchase, they always involve a certain a certain product. Before deciding to
process. This process includes five buy a certain product, the customers
stages: problem recognition, are evaluating by looking at the
information search, evaluation of existing sources of information about
product options, purchase decisions, the product or service they want to
and post-purchase support. purchase. Thus, they set their decision
to purchase by also identifying
First of all, a purchasing process will different alternatives before they do it,
start by the time the customers have and finally ended by their post-
recognized their problem or need. purchase behavior. Last but not least,
After they have recognized their Drumond in Meyliana, M. (2012)
problem or need, then the next step is asserted that the customer’s purchasing
searching any information related to decision is also the process initially to
their problem or need. In this step, identify all possible alternatives for
they search information (for example solving their problem (purchasing the
information about price and the product) and then evaluating their
product itself). This is the second choice systematically and objectively
process of searching information as based on the information sources
their hard effort until they find it thinking also about the benefits of
completely. After getting the each product of different products.
information they need, the next stage
is decision to purchase that is the third Indicators that can be used to measure
stage. In this third stage, the customer performance refer to research from Md
are trying to evaluate the products and Asha duzzaman, Imranul Hoque and
the options (evaluation process). This Farzana Mahbub (2018), Sri
process, the customers get involved in Widyastuti and Muhammad Said
the effort to examine and compare the (2017) and Umi Muawanah
product attributes. They compare the (2014)anti, Mery Oky Zufi, and
attributes dealing with price, brand, Hendri Sukotjo (2016, as follows:
quality, and etc. in the evaluation
x
H3: Brand image has a significant The sample in this study were all users
effect on purchasing decision of of the All New CBR 105R who have
Honda CBR 150R. just bought in a new condition for a
period of 3 to 6 months, with their own
H4: Brand Association has a intention to purchase, and bought the
significant effect on purchasing CBR 150R with their own money. The
decision of Honda CBR 150R. sample in this study uses non-
xiv
agree with the statement related to interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5. From
CBR 150R performance These data indicate that
respondents strongly agree with the
3. Price Perception brand image statement owned by
In Table 1 can be seen that the Honda CBR 150R.
results of respondents' responses to
the variable Price Perception (PP) 5. Brand Association
on average agree with the In Table 1, it can be seen that the
statement items in the results of respondents' responses to
questionnaire. In Table 1 it can the Brand Association variables on
also be seen that the indicator that average strongly agree with the
gets the highest value is PP 3 with statement items in the
a mean of 3.96 or included in the questionnaire. In Table 1, it can
interval class of 3.4 <× ≤ 4.2, also be seen that the indicator that
While PP 2 is the lowest indicator gets the highest value is BA1 with
with a mean value of 2.81 or a mean of 4.54 or included in the
included in the interval class 2.6 interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5, while
<× ≤3.4. On the average BA2 is the lowest indicator with a
respondent's response to the Price mean value of 4.44 or included in
Perception variable from PP1 to the interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5. From
PP3 shows the results agree with These data indicate that
means value 3.52 which belongs to respondents strongly agree with the
the class interval 3.4 <× ≤ 4.2 statement of the brand association
which shows that on average the owned by Honda CBR 150R.
respondent agreed with the
statement related to Price
Perception of respondents about Classic Assumption Analysis
the price listed Honda to have a
1. Multicollinearity Test
CBR 150R.
This test aims to test whether the
4. Brand Image regression model find a correlation
In Table 1, it can be seen that the between independent variables. A
results of respondents' responses to good regression model should not
the Brand Image variables on occur correlation between independent
average strongly agree with the variables. If the variables are
statement items in the correlated, then this variable is not
questionnaire. In Table 1 it can orthogonal. Orthogonal variables are
also be seen that the indicator that independent variables whose
gets the highest value is BI4 with a correlation value between independent
mean of 4.60 or included in the variables is zero. Multicollinearity can
interval class 4.3 <× ≤ 5, while BI2 also be seen from VIF, if VIF <10,
is the lowest indicator with a mean then the level of colinearity can be
value of 4.47 or included in the
xvi
HA: Residual data are not normally H0: dL < d < 4-dU (no
distributed autocorrelation)
H1: d > 4-dL (there is autocorrelation)
xvii
A 10.197
TABLE 4
E 2.214
THE RESULT OF
AUTOCORELATION TEST
Std. Error of the Estimate Durbin-Watson
Form the Table 5 can be concluded the
1.681 1.528
formula of multiple linear regressions
as follows:
Y= a+ b1X1 + B2X2 + B3X3 + B4X4
According to table 4 the score +e
of Durbin Watson (D) is 1.528. Y= 10.197 + -0.164 X1 + -0.012 X2 +
According to Durbin Watson table 0.112 X3 + 0.590 X4 + e
(a=5%) with 113 samples and three Constanta (a) = 10.197 show that if the
independent variables, the value of independent variables (performance,
dL= 1.5255 and value of dU=1.8676. price perception, brand image, brand
so the value of D is located at dL < d < association) on purchase decision
4-dU or 1.5255 < 1.5258 < 1.8676. the Honda CBR 150R in Surabaya =0, the
conclusion is there is no Purchase Decision Honda CBR 150R
autocorrelation in the variables. in Surabaya is 10.197. Regression
coefficient of performance (X1) =
Statistic Analysis -0.164 show that there is a negative
correlation between performance and
Statistical data in this study multiple purchase decision. it means that
linear regressions and t-test are used to purchasing decisions are increasing
determine the effect of performance, even though the performance is
price perception, brand image, and decreasing. Regression coefficient of
brand associations on purchasing price perception (X2) = -0.012 show
decisions. In multiple linear regression that there is a negative correlation
analysis and t-test is using SPSS 16.0. between price perception and purchase
decision. It means that purchasing
1. Multiple Regression Analysis decisions are increasing even though
the price perception is decreasing.
TABLE 5 Regression coefficient of brand image
HE RESULTS OF MULTIPLE (X3) = 0.112 show that there is a
LINEAR REGRESSION TESTS positive correlation between brand
image and purchase decision. It means
Variables B Value
that purchasing decisions are
Performance -0.164 increasing if the brand image is also
Price Perception -0.012
increase. Regression coefficient of
brand association (X4) = 0.590 show
Brand Image 0.112 that there is a positive correlation
xviii
between brand association and From the results of the multiple linear
purchase decision. It means that regression test contained in the table
purchasing decisions are increasing if above, performance and price
the brand association is also increase. perception have a negative influence
Error (e) = 2.214 show that if the error on Honda CBR150R purchasing
value increases by the unit it will decisions, while brand image and
increase in other variables outside the brand associations have a positive
independent variable in this study by influence on Honda CBR150R
4.909. purchasing decisions. On the other
hand, according to the table above
1. T-Test performance, price perception, and
TABLE 6 brand image do not have a significant
THE RESULTS OF T- influence on Honda CBR150R
TEST purchasing decisions, while brand
No Variables Sig. associations have a significant
1 Performance 0.111 influence on Honda CBR150R
purchasing decisions.
2 Price Perception 0.894
buy a Honda CBR 150R will continue and research conducted by Umi
to increase. Muawanah (2014) anti, Mery Oky
2. Price perception has a negative Zufi, and Hendri Sukotjo (2016)
influence on Honda CBR150R entitled the effect of brand awareness,
purchasing decisions, but it is not brand association, and brand image on
significant. Aqua purchase decision. Both studies
The results of this study contradict the both state that brand image has a
research conducted by Sri Widyastuti significant positive influence on
and Muhammad Said (2017) entitled purchasing decisions. In this study the
the customers’ consideration towards brand image has no significant effect
their decision to purchase Specs Sports on the purchase decision of the Honda
Shoes Product through Brand Image, CBR 150R because respondents do not
Product Design, and Price Perception consider the brand image of the Honda
which states that price perception has a CBR 150R and the companies that
significant positive effect on produce it. Even so the brand image
purchasing decisions. In this study, still has a positive influence on
price perception does not have a purchasing decisions because the value
significant influence on purchasing (b) on X3 has a positive value of
decisions because respondents do not 0.112.
weigh prices too much in deciding to 4. Price brand association has a
buy a Honda CBR 150R. Besides that, significant positive effect on
according to oto.com, CBR 150R itself Honda CBR150R purchasing
has a relatively expensive price decisions.
compared to its competitors. This is The results of this study are in line
also supported by the results of the with research conducted by Umi
value (b) on X2 of the multiple linear Muawanah (2014) anti, Mery Oky
regression equation which shows that Zufi, and Hendri Sukotjo (2016)
although the perception in the sector of entitled the effect of brand awareness,
price perception decreases, the brand association, and brand image on
decision to buy Honda CBR 150R will Aqua purchase decision stating that
continue to increase. brand association has a significant
positive influence on purchasing
3. Brand image price has a positive decisions. The customers will always
influence on Honda CBR150R associate the high-quality product with
purchasing decisions, but is not the value they get when buying it or
significant. the products they possess. This brand
The results of this study contradict the association can significantly affect the
research conducted by Sri Widyastuti customers’ purchasing decision.
and Muhammad Said (2017) entitled Therefore, brand association is an
The customers' consideration towards influential factor for increasing the
their decision to purchase Specs Sports customers’ purchasing decision. In this
Shoes Products through Brand Image, study, brand association has a
Product Design, and Price Perception significant positive effect on
xx