Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
SOIL
ANALYSIS
2
Title : Soil sampling technique
Procedure
Result
3
The sample for the soil like sand, loam and clay will get with the soil when press into
the soil
Discussion
The metal cylinder and piston are ensure in the vertically with the soil when press
into soil
Conclusion
For the effective technique to get the soil structure in natural, used the digger.
4
Title : determination of the tenture of the soil
Apparatus : 500 cm3 measuring cylinder, 100 cm3 soil sample and 300 cm water.
Procedure :
1) The soil sample is added into the measuring cylinder and with water
2) The content shake vigorously
3) Leave the mixture for 48 hour to allows mixture settle out according to density and
surface area of particles.
4) Then the volume of various traction of soil sample are measured.
5
Matter Soil sample (g)
Weight of soil sample 100
Weight of small stone 24
Weight of loam 40
Weight of clay 14
Weight of water 132
Weight of humus 100
Weight of soil sand 12
We assume that 1 cm3 equal 1g from the table percentage of the small stone, loam,
clay, humus and sand can be calculated by using this formula.
__________________ x 100
__________________ x 100
= 24
___ X 100
100
= 24%
6
2) % of loam component = weight of loam
___________________ x 100
Weight of soil sample
= 40
___ X 100
100
= 40%
7
Discussion
The soil sample in a measuring cylinder has for approximately 48 hours for the soil
sample partides to settle.
Conclusion
From the experiment, we get the texture of the soil contents small stone 24% , loam 40%, clay 14%,
humus 10%, and sand 12%.
8
Title : Determination of water content of soil
Purpose : To determine the water content of soil
Apparatus : Aluminium foil pie dish
Material : 80 gm soil
Procedure :
1) Firstly empty aluminium toil pie dish was weight. Then the mass is recorded (a)
2) A broken up soil sample is added to the pie dish and weight. The mass is recorded (B)
3) The pie dish containing the soil sample was placed into the oven at 110 °c 24 hours.
4) The sample from the oven is remove and cook in dessiccator
5) When the sample is cold, remove and weight it. The mass is recored.
6) The sample then return into the oven at 110 °c for further 24 hours.
7) Stages 4 and 5 repated until consistent weighing are recorded. Received the mass
(c).
8) The percentage of water can be calculate as follow
9
B–C
_____ x 100
B–A
10
Discussion
Soil sample is heated to eliminate the water to avoid the masss of water counted in
this experiment.
Soil sample is heated until the constant weight is apply. The soil colour is change
from dark to light colour. The soil also become more sand sandy.
Conclusion
The value obtained in the experiment, is the percentage total water present. The
amount will depend upon content include field capacity and available water.
11
Title : Determination of organic matter content
Ttripod
Bunson burner
Asbestos mat
12
Procedure :
1) Using Bunsen flame the available and lid are strongly heated to remove all traces of
moisture. Cool it by placing in the desiccators. Then weight and mass (a) are
recorded.
2) The dried soil sample (from the previous experiment) are added in the desiccators and
weight. Mass (b) are recorded.
3) To burn off all the organic matter the soil sample in the unable that corered with the
lid are red heated for 1 hour. Then cool it for 10 minutes and remove it from
desiccators.
4) When cool the emcible and sample are weigh.
5) Procedure from 1 – 4 are repeated with constant mass is recorded.
6) Percentage of organic content is calculated a follow.
7) Experiment are repeated using soil sample taken from different areas.
13
Result :-
No Matter Area
Field Orshard Beach
1 Crucible + cover (a) 28.3 28.3 28.3
2 Crucible + cover + soil 108.3 108.3 108.3
before heating
3 Soil sample used (b - a) 80.0 80.0 80.0
4 Crucible + cover + soil
after heating (c)
Reading 1 98.0 96.00 100.37
Reading 2 97.37 95.39 99.87
Reading 3 97.37 95.39 99.87
Average 97.58 95.55 100.03
5 Organic metter (b – c)
Reading 1 10.3 12.3 7.43
Reading 2 10.9 12.91 8.43
Reading 3 10.9 12.91 8.43
Average 10.7 12.7 8.0
6 Percentage 13.37% 15.87% 10%
(b – c)
_______ x 100
(b – a)
Discussion :-
1) Soil sample from different areas are used to demosstrafe the variation on organic
content
2) The soil sample is heated repeatly at 11. Then is was cooled in desiceator until
consistent reading were obtamed.
Conclusion :-
The soil sample which contained the most organic matter is arehard with and followed
by field 13.37% and 10% beach respectively 15,87%.
14
Title : Determination of air content of soil.
Apparatus : The can of volume 200 cm, 500 cm beaker, metal seeker
Material : Water
15
Procedure :-
1) Place into the 500 cm3 beaker with empty can open uppermost and fill the beaker
with above the level of the can. The water level in the beaker is wanted.
2) The can containing water is remove and using measuring cylinder the volume of
water is measure. Volume (a) recorded.
3) By using a drill the base of the can is perforate about right small holes.
4) The open of the can is push into the soil which the surface vegetation has been
removed until soil begins to come through the perforation. The can is dry out and
standardrize the soil level with the top of can.
5) The can of soil is placed into the beaker with open end uppermost. Used seeker to
loosen soil and allow air to escape.
6) The level of water in the beaker will be lower than the original level because the water
replaced the air which was present in the soil.
7) Water from a full 100cm measuring cylinder is added into the beaker until the original
level ia restorest. Volume of water added (b) is recorded.
8) The percentage air content of the soil sample can be determine as follows
b
_ X 100
16
9) The experiment is repeated using soil sample from different areas.
Formula =
X 100
17
=b
X 100
Table =
Discussion:
18
Conclusion:
Beach soil is not suitable for vegetation because it has higher air content and this
meant that it could nit trap water because of it tiny and smaller sand structure.
The suitable soil for vegetation is the orchard soil because its closed and small
structure.
Apparatus : Long test tube, test tube rack, spatula, 10cm pipette
Procedure :
19
1) 1 cm of soil and barium sulphat is added in the test tube. Barium sulphat is used to
ensure flocculation of colloidal day.
2) 10 cm of water distilled water and 5 cm of BDH universial indicator solution is
added. Used bung to seal the test tube. Then shake it vigorously and leave it 5
minutes to allow content to settle.
3) The colour of liquid in the test tube is compared with the colours on the BDH
reference colour chart the corresponding pH are read of.
4) Using soil sample from different areas the experiment are repeated.
Result :
Area pH value
Field 6
Orchard 10
Beach 4
Discussion :
pH is one the most useful measurement that can be made on soil. Because it determine
the nutrients contents at the soil and which vegetation is suitable to be plant on it.
Conclusion :
Generally loam soil have many humus and it is an acidic soil because of the percentage
of organic acids.
20
TYPE OF SOIL SAMPLE
Beach soil
21
Orchard soil
Padi field
22
Procedure :
23
Determination Of
Organism
3) The beaker contain 4% formalin solution is putted under the surface of tullgram funnel
so that the smallest organism will fall into the formalin solution.
4) The lamp is switched on and the apparatus is leaved for afew days.
5) After a few days, the beaker contain 4% formalin solution is exquliued. Organism in
the soil is examinated by using hand lens to identified them.
6) Types of organism which are found are then identified their order and common name.
The diagram of the organism are draw.
24
Result :
2 Artropoda-insecta Ants
3 Artropoda-archnida Spider
4 Annelid Earthworm
5 Artropoda-insecta Termite
Discussion :
1) The soil sample is that is used first, place on the net under the lamp which has switched
on. After one or two days, the beakers contain formalin that is placed under the
tullgram tunnel is examined and then identifield.
2) This technique is based on the negative responces organism toward bright light, high
temperature and low moisture.
3)The bright light forces the organism download and then eventually falls into the beaker
containing formalin solution.
Conclusion :
25
This technique can isolated the terresfrial mesofauna live, larva, ants, spider,
earthworm, and fermite.
26
Procedure :
2 Ciliaphora Paramecium
3 Zoomastigina Euglena
4 Chlorapphyta Clamydomonas
27
Discussion :
The light temperature and light intensityat the above water layer compared with the
based in the funnel, cause the aquatic organism to swim downwards and gather the
funnel. When the clip is opened these organism fall into the beaker containing
formaline.
Because the aquatic organism are smaller in size compared to the land organism we
have to examinated them under light microscope for better and clean view.
Conlusion :
DETERMINATION
OF
THE DENSITY
OF PLANT
28
IN A
HABITAT
Guidelines
29
DETERMINATION OF THE DENSITY OF PLANT SPECIES IN A
HABITAT
Purpose : To determine the density of the plant species in habitat by using quadrats
(sampling quadrats)
Procedure :-
30
Result :-
Student’s name :
Habitat : Orchad
Date : 15 APRIL2011
Species of plant
31
Table of data for the measurement of species of plant in the
systematic sampling quadrat
32
No Species of plant in quadrat Total species Percentage of Percentage of
for the frequency. (%) relative frequency
quadrat. (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 2 6 1 7 1 9 10 3.6 14.94
0
2 6 3 2 2 4 5 7 1 10 3.0 12.45
3 1 6 2 3 2 7 4 2 3 3 10 3.3 13.69
4 2 5 3 6 9 10 2.5 10.37
5 2 1 1 2 1 3 10 1.0 4.14
6 3 3 5 10 1.1 4.56
7 5 2 3 6 1 6 7 1 2 4 10 3.7 15.35
8 2 2 4 1 3 5 10 1.7 7.05
9 1 1 4 10 0.6 2.49
10 7 5 2 1 1 4 2 7 8 10 3.6 14.94
Total 24.1 100.00
Table 1.2 total species of plant place in the systematic sampling quadrat.
Formula
______________________ X 100
33
Formula :
___________________________________ X 100
____________________________ X 100
34
No Species of plant in quadrat Total Percentage Percentage of
species of relative
for the frequency. frequency (%)
quadrat. (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 9/25 3.6 15.06
2 3/10 3.0 12.55
3 30/100 3.3 15.81
4 1/4 2.5 10.41
5 7/100 0.7 2.93
6 11/100 1.1 4.60
7 37/100 3.7 15.48
8 17/100 1.7 7.11
9 3/100 0.6 2.51
10 37/100 3.7 15.48
Total 24.1 100.00
Formula
35
MAPING AREA EXPERIMENT OF RANDOM QUADRATS
Guideline
36
b) Random sampling quadrats.
Result
Habitat : Orchard
Quadrat size : 1M X 1M
37
Table of data for the measurement of each species of plant in the random sampling.
Formula :
38
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
0
1 8 7 2 10 1.7 9.49
2 2 6 4 3 1 2 5 10 2.3 18.24
3 5 6 1 10 1.2 6.70
4 2 3 1 3 4 4 3 9 10 2.9 16.20
5 3 2 5 6 10 1.5 8.38
6 4 3 1 2 2 1 10 1.3 7.26
7 7 3 10 1.0 5.59
8 5 4 2 2 10 1.3 7.26
9 2 3 4 1 1 1 3 2 6 7 10 3.0 9.49
10 2 5 1 2 4 3 10 1.7 9.49
Total 17.9 100.00
Table 2.2 : total species plant place in the random sampling quadrat
Formula :
39
2 46/50 18.4 21.20
3 22/50 8.2 9.45
4 129/50 6.4 7.58
5 33/50 3.3 3.58
6 193/50 7.1 3.80
7 1/50 0.2 8.18
8 9/50 1.8 0.24
9 179/50 35.8 41.24
10 13/40 3.3 3.80
Total 86.8 100.00
Table 2.3 total of datafor the measurement of each species cover in quadrat
Formula
____________________________________
__________________ x 100
40
Guideline
41
Purpose : To determine frequency coverage percentage and density of plant
Procedure :
1) One base line along the border of the are under investigation is determine.
2) One series of point along the base line is chosen either randomly is
systematically.
3) The plant that touch and cross under transects line are record.
4) Place 10 – 20 line randomly in the area to provide enough sample to
investigate.
Formula:
___________________________________________ X 100
_________________________________ X 100
_______________________________ X 100
Result :-
42
Student’s name :
Habitat : Orchard
Table of data for the measurement of each species of plant in the sampling
technique using linhe transects
43
No Individual in distance of each intervals
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 9 4 3
2 18 3 10 2 8 2 12 10 2 6
3 3 2 8 2
4 1
5 16 6
6 2 1
7 5 2
8 1
9 5
10 3
44
1 16 1530 1.05 145 11.03
Total 1530
1530 9.5 145 100
Table 3.2 percentage of cover and relative cover in other species of palnt in the
transect.
45
1 3 15.30 19 180 10.55
100.00
Table 3.3 Frequency and relative frequency in other species of plant in the
transect.
46
Family : Aracea
47
Family : Graminae
48
Family : Gliecheniarea
49
Family : Lompositae
50
Family : Graminae
51