Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DAHILOG - Statistics Activity 4
DAHILOG - Statistics Activity 4
Dahilog
Course: MS GENERAL SCIENCE EDUCATION
Adviser: Raul Orongan PhD.
INDEPENDENT T-TEST
Group 1 (with ) 37 39 42 27 33 34 41 28 26 34
26 35 27 36
Group 2 (without) 17 20 18 22 23 19 21 12 30 23
20 19 26 24 25 27
5% Level of Significance
Data Aalysis:
Group Statistics
GROUP N MEAN STD. STD.
DEVIATION ERROR
MEAN
SCORE 1 14 33.2143 5.59091 1.49423
2 16 21.6250 4.36463 1.09116
Lower Upper
Since the p value is less than our desired significance threshold (P<0.05), we
reject the null hypothesis which means that there is significant difference of
achievement test score between group1 and group2.
2. Two methods were used to study the latent heat of ice fusion. Both method
A ( an electrical method) and method B (a method of mixtures) were
conducted with the specimens cooled to – 0.72 ○ C. The data in the
following table present the change in total heat from – 0. 72 ○ C to water at
0○ C in calories per gram of mass.
Method A 73.97 72.84 71.82 72.84 77.83 73.03 77.04 79.17 73.05 71.03
Method B 68.12 61.94 63.98 64.96 63.96 65.03 66.95 68.96 64.02 61.54
DV- heat
IV – Methods A&B
5% Level of Significance
Group Statistics
METHOD N MEAN STD. STD.
DEVIATION ERROR
MEAN
HEAT 1 10 74.2620 2.74999 .86962
2 10 64.9460 2.44062 .77179
HEA Equal .381 .545 8.012 18 .000 9.31600 1.16271 6.87323 11.75877
T variances
assumed
Equal 8.012 17.75 .000 9.31600 1.16271 6.87076 11.76124
variances 0
not
assumed
Since the p value is less than our desired significance threshold (P<0.05), we
reject the null hypothesis which means that there is significant difference of latent
heat of the two methods A and B.
3. The following experiment was run to determine whether or not different flavors
of ice cream melt at different speeds. Two flavors (A and B) of ice cream
were stored in the same freezer in similar sized containers. For each
observation, one teaspoonful of ice cream was taken from the freezer,
transferred to a plate, and the melting time at room temperature was
observed to the nearest second. Nine observations were taken on each
flavor. Do melting time differ of the two flavors? Test at 0.05 level. These are
shown in the following table below:
DV- Time
IV – Flavors A&B
5% Level of Significance
Data Aalysis:
Group Statistics
FLAVOR N MEAN STD. STD.
DEVIATION ERROR
MEAN
TIME 1 9 949.4444 315.14565 105.04855
2 920.1111 105.34283 35.11428
9
Since the p value is greater than our desired significance threshold (P>0.05),
we accept the null hypothesis which means that there is no significant difference of
melting time between the two different flavors of ice cream.
4. Trace metals in drinking water affect the flavor and an unusually high
concentration can pose a health hazard. Ten pairs of data were taken
measuring zinc concentration in bottom water and surface water. Does
the data suggest that the true average concentration in the bottom water
exceeds that of surface water?
Location
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zinc .730 .266 .567 .531 .707 .716 .651 .589 .769 .723
concentration
in bottom
water
Zinc .415 .238 .390 .410 .305 .309 .332 .523 .411 .312
concentration
in surface
water
DV- Location
IV – Zinc concentration: bottom water & surface water.
5% Level of Significance
Data Aalysis:
Group Statistics
ZINC_CONCENTRATIO N MEAN STD. STD.
N DEVIATION ERROR
MEAN
LOCATIO 1 10 .6249 .14886 .04707
N
2 10 .3645 .08096 .02560
Lower Upper
Since the p value is less than our desired significance threshold (P<0.05), we
reject the null hypothesis which means that there is a difference between zinc
concentration in bottom water and surface water. In other words, data suggested is
true that average concentration in the bottom water exceeds than of surface water.
PART II:
USE YOUR 180 GENERATED RANDOM SAMPLES IN PS1, PERFORM THE
SUGGESTED STEPS IN HYPOTHEIS TEST:
Group Statistics
GENDER N MEAN STD. STD.
DEVIATION ERROR
MEAN
MOTIVE 1 90 4.3299 .47543 .05012
2 4.2404 .57198 .06029
90
SCORE 1 90 56.7111 14.09538 1.48578
2 90 57.9111 14.62923 1.54206
Lower Upper
MOTIV Equal 3.64 . 1.14 178 .255 .08944 .07840 -.0652 .24416
E variance 8 058 1 7
s
assume
d
Equal 1.14 172.24 .256 .08944 .07840 -.0653 .24419
variance 1 5 0
s not
assume
d
SCOR Equal .369 . -.56 178 .576 -1.20000 2.14138 - 3.0257
E variance 544 0 5.4257 5
s 5
assume
d
Equal -.56 177.75 .576 -1.20000 2.14138 - 3.0257
variance 0 5 5.4257 9
s not 9
assume
d
6. INTERPRETATION / IMPLICATION / CONCLUSION
Since the p value is greater than our desired significance threshold (P>0.05),
we accept the null hypothesis which means that there is no significant difference
between motive and score when group by gender.