How to prepare a claim for an extension of time

Construction contracts generally allow the construction period to be extended when there is a delay that is not
the contractor's fault. This is described as an extension of time (EOT).

When it becomes reasonably apparent that there is, or that there is likely to be, a delay that could merit
an extension of time, the contractor gives written notice to the contract administrator identifying the relevant
event that has caused the delay, requesting the extension of time, presenting the reasons, and referencing
the contract clause that allows the request. This letter is then assessed by the contract administrator (perhaps
with input from the consultant team) before approval or rejection. If it is approved, the letter is given a written
answer, and a change order is issued.

Sometimes, contracts may require the submission of requests within a specific time, otherwise, they can be
rejected.

For more information, see Extension of time - approval letter example.

Proving delay and/or disruption can be a complicated and time-consuming process, and the quality of

the information provided and the records available are often the key to successful claims. The claim should
adequately establish both causation and liability, as well as the extent of the
damages/disruption experienced by the contractor as a direct result of the delay.
 To be able to do this effectively, the contractor should produce an accurate baseline
programme before work begins, for progress to be monitored. The programme should show the
planned productivity rates for the different work activities and appropriate benchmarks. As construction
projects are naturally dynamic and subject to change, the programme should be continually updated and
revised to reflect the current project conditions. This can enable the contractor to determine what effect
a delay is likely to have on their ability to complete activities, making it easier to prepare their claim.

All events and issues which either cause, appear to cause, or have the potential to cause delay should be
recorded by the contractor, including:

All events and issues which either cause, appear to cause, or have the potential to cause delay should be
recorded by the contractor, including:

 When the event occurred.

 Why it occurred.
 The tasks that it effected and the reasons why.
 The resources that it required.
 A list of the affected activities from the schedule.
 Any other activities that were carried out, either on- or off-site, as a result.
 Sketches, photographs and plans.
 Details of actions taken by the contractor to avoid or minimise delays.
 Alternative solutions and/or a proposed recovery plan.
 Communications between the construction team relating to possible delays.

It is important that this is done at the time, as recording the causes of details of a delay retrospectively is often
very difficult and time-consuming.

All costs which are associated with delay events should also be

recorded wherever possible. Demonstrating a causal link
between an event and subsequently incurred costs will make it
more likely the claim will be approved.
The submitted claim should be concise, accurate and as clear as possible. It should explain the delay
event and the sequence of events surrounding it, all of which should be cross-referenced to records, i.e.
the programme. Retrospective delay analysis should be avoided if possible and used with caution if
necessary.

Claim requests should also consider the following:

 Working days are different from calendar days.

 The reissuing of insurances and other bonds to cover extended periods.
 Summer days tend to be longer and more productive than winter days.
 Whether the extension of time being requested will be sufficient to cover all delays.
 The nature of the proposed changes and their ramifications.
 Once an extension of time has been approved, no additional time will be granted for the same item.
 Only one claim is necessary for a continuing delay.
 Contents
[hide]

 1 Delay analysis methods

 2 What the contractor is entitled to claim

 3 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki

 4 References

Delay analysis methods

It is essential to analyse and present the exact impact due to the delay events. Delay analysis methods are
used to analyse and present these impacts. The most popular delay analysis methods are:

 Impacted as-planned.
 Collapsed as-built.
 As-planned vs as-built.
 Time slice windows analysis.
 Time impact analysis.
 Longest path analysis.

What the contractor is entitled to claim

The contractor is entitled to claim the following essential costs:

 Site office costs.
 Site overheads.
 Head office overheads.
 Finance and insurance-related costs.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki

 Acceleration of construction works.

 Change order.
 Common refusals of extensions of time.
 Compensation event.
 Contract administrator.
 Contract claims.
 Delay damages.
 Extension of time.
 Extension of time - approval letter example.
 Practical completion.
 Project programme.
 Time certainty.
 Time Risk Allowance TRA.
 Variations.

References

 Quantity Surveyor. (2019). Quick Guide to extension of time claims (EOT Claims) · Quantity Surveyor.

[online] Available at: https://quantitysurveyor.blog/2019/10/26/quick-guide-to-extension-of-time-claims-eot-
claims/ [Accessed 29 Oct. 2019].