You are on page 1of 6

T h e Nutrient Content of High and

Low Quality Fresh Eggs. I. Total


Solids, Total Nitrogen, 1(—)
and Tryptophane
L. W. CHARKEY, ELIZABETH DYAR AND H. S. WILGUS, JR.
Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station, Colorado A. and M. College, Fort Collins, Colorado

(Received for publication June 21, 1947)

T HE apparent difference in quality


of the albumen of freshly laid eggs is
state of the mucin. They were unable to
establish in these terms a satisfactory
yet not adequately explained. Cole (1938) explanation for variation in egg quality
reported that this difference in quality is and concluded that "something other than
related to the size of the goblet cells of the the factors studied has a great influence
magnum of the oviduct. Conrad and Scott in determining the apparent quality of
(1942), however, were unable to confirm a freshly laid egg."
this finding; they pointed out that their Thus a more general study of the
observations were statistically non-signifi- chemical composition of eggs appeared to
cant although based on a larger number of be justified. The present report is a com-
birds (24 and 26, whereas Cole had used parison of the total solids, total nitrogen
only seven in each group). and 1(—) tryptophane in the separated
It appears likely that the ability of a fractions of eggs of high and low albumen
hen or pullet to lay eggs of a given albu- quality.
men quality is an inherent characteristic. EXPERIMENTAL
In any case a promising approach to the
In order that a continuing supply of
problem of egg quality would seem to be
fresh eggs of both high and low quality
a study of the egg itself, aimed at the
would be available for analysis, two
determination of chemical or physico-
groups of hens were selected from the
chemical differences existing between
Colorado A &M College Poultry Hus-
eggs of high and low albumen quality.
bandry Department flock of New Hamp-
It has been generally accepted that the shire hens. The selections were based on
albumen quality of eggs is related to the the albumen quality of eggs produced, as
content and/or condition of mucin in the determined by appearance, egg dimen-
egg white (Sharp, 1937; Conrad and Scott, sional measurements, and odor. The hens
1939, 1942; Balls and Hoover, 1940). were leg banded, and all eggs were col-
Accordingly Conrad and Scott (1942) lected by trapnest so their source was
studied the relationships between albu- known. Once the characteristics of the
men quality and mucin content, and some individual hens had been determined, the
factors which might affect the colloidal identity of the two groups was maintained
only on the record of data. All birds were
Scientific Journal Series Paper 247, Colorado
Agricultural Experiment Station. afforded the same diet and treatment by
626
NUTRIENT CONTENT OF FRESH EGGS 627

being housed and managed as a single samples during drying. Since the methpd
group. used is a modification of the standard
The eggs were collected shortly after A.O.A.C. procedure (1940) with condi-
being laid and were held at 10° C. until tions more preceisly defined, it is given
examined the following day. Each egg here in detail:
was then subjected to several measure- The weighed samples, in dishes with the lids off-
ments to determine quality, although it set, resting on the edges of the dishes, were placed
could be roughly assessed in advance by in a vacuum desiccator which in turn was placed in
referring to the group to which the hen a drying oven at 70°C.The desiccator was connected
through openings in the sides of the oven to an
belonged. Eggs from the two groups were aspirator and by a second tube to a Milligan wash
removed from the refrigerator, allowed to bottle containing concentrated sulfuric acid. Be-
come to room temperature, weighed, tween the desiccator and wash bottle a side tube was
opened on a flat, level glass surface, and provided so that rapid air flow could be provided at
immediately measured and observed for only slightly reduced pressure at the start of the
drying period.
odor or abnormalities.
As rapidly as could be done without danger of
Eggs were classified as high, medium, loss of sample by boiling over, the airflowand pres-
or low albumen quality according to the sure were gradually reduced by constriction of the
height of the firm albumen. Eggs whose inlet tube. This in practice required about two hours.
firm albumen measured more than 8.5 The air flow was reduced finally to a few cubic
centimeters per minute, all of which was made to
mm. in height were called high quality. pass through the sulfuric acid in the wash bottle by
Those whose firm albumen measured less complete closure of the side tube. This reduced the
than 6.5 mm. in height were classified as pressure within the desiccator to 30-35 mm. Hg.
low quality. The ones with firm whites These conditions were maintained for 20 hours 4:1
falling between these limits were medium hour, after which the samples were allowed to cool
in another desiccator and were weighed.
and were not used in these experiments.
All eggs were divided into the three main
Total Nitrogen Determination
fractions—yolk, firm albumen, and com-
bined inner and outer fluid albumen. The The dry residues from the total solids
chalaziferous membrane was discarded. determination were transferred (not quan-
In order to have direct comparisons be- titatively) to tared ashless filter papers,
tween high and low quality, the frac- re-weighed, folded into the papers and
tions from an egg of high quality secured by loops of pure copper wire.
and one of low quality were sampled Total nitrogen was determined directly
simultaneously and assayed simulta- on these samples by the standard
neously (except for total nitrogen deter- A.O.A.C. macro Kjeldahl procedure
minations) throughout the period of the (1940).
study.
Determination of l(—)tryptophane
1(—) tryptophane was determined by
Total Solids Determination
the method of Woolley and Sebrell (1945)
Because of the consistency of fresh egg using Lactobacillus arabinosus as the test
substance, the removal of moisture with- organism. Samples were prepared for
out gross decomposition or loss of sample assay by a modification of the pepsin-
presents a practical problem which is trypsin procedure of the above authors,
best solved by using reduced pressure in as follows:
an apparatus permitting observation of Flasks containing weighed aliquots of
628 L. W. CHARKEY, ELIZABETH DYAR, AND H. S. WILGTJS, J R .

the fresh egg fractions for microbiological Following digestion with pepsin, 0.3
assay were immersed in boiling water gram of dipotassium phosphate and 0.3
(95°C.) until coagulation was complete, gram of sodium acetate trihydrate were
as judged by solidification and the ap- added and the pH was adjusted to 4.6
pearance of opaqueness. This required with sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric
about 60 seconds. Longer heating results acid. Twenty mg. of takadiastase were
in further changes in which a translucent, added as an aqueous suspension contain-
very tough collodion-like material is ing five mg. per ml. After the addition of a
formed. This condition is undesirable since few ml. of toluene, each flask was shaken
it hampers subsequent maceration of gently and incubated at 40°C. for 24
samples. This heating and coagulation hours. The takadiastase digestion was
procedure was included as a means of included in the procedure because it was

TABLE 1.—Content of total solids, total nitrogen, and l{—)tryptophane in


high and low quality egg fractions

Fluid albumen Firm albumen Yolks


high q. low q. high q. low q. high q. low q.

Total solids—percent 13.32 11.91 12.54 11.83 52.92 52.88


(24) (24) (24) (24) (25) (25)
Total nitrogen—percent
A. Wet basis (calc.) 1.81 1.62 1.71 1.58 2.60 2.60
B. Dry basis 13.62 13.54 13.60 13.35 4.92 4.87
(23) (23) (22) (22) (23) (23)
K~^tryptophane—mg./g.
A. Wet basis 2.06 1.48 1.78 1.59 1.80 1.72
(15) (15) (16) (16) (14) (14)
B. Dry basis (calc.) 15.88 13.11 14.22 13.13 3.40 3.25

minimizing the effect of the antitryptic desired to assay the final preparations
principle of egg white reported by Harte for certain vitamins, as well as for trypto-
(1945) to interfere in both raw and dried phane, and it was believed that proteolyt-
egg white with in vitro enzymatic pro- ic enzymes might fail to cleave certain
teolysis. linkages by which vitamins are bound in
After the addition of 25 ml. of 0.1 N natural materials. The effectiveness of
hydrochloric acid and loosening of the ad- takadiastase as used by Cheldelin el al.
herent coagulum by means of a policeman, (1942) in preparation of samples for vita-
each sample was macerated by means of a min assays is well established.
high speed cutting stirrer, the blades of Following digestion with takadiastase,
which could be passed into the digestion the pH was adjusted by means of sodium
flask, thus avoiding transfer of the con- hydroxide to 8.6. Six mg. of trypsin
tents. Five mg. of pepsin (1:3000) were (1:100) were added as an aqueous suspen-
added as a solution containing one mg. sion containing one mg. per ml. After
per ml. in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid. Each addition of a few ml. of toluene when
flask was shaken gently, stoppered with necessary, each flask was shaken gently
cotton, and incubated at 40°C. for 20 to and incubated at 40°C. for 16 to 20 hours.
24 hours. No toluene is necessary and none After the above serial enzyme treat-
was added, since it appeared to interfere ments, yolk samples were extracted twice
with the action of pepsin. with 25 ml. portions of ether. All samples
NUTRIENT CONTENT or F R E S H EGGS 629

were then adjusted to pH 5.5 and steamed The data were examined statistically
for 15 minutes to drive off ether and tolu- by Student's pairing method (Snedecor,
ene. The steamed samples were filtered 1940) after elimination of all data left
through Celite with suction, and the fil- unmated by loss of samples. Table 2
trates were diluted to convenient volumes states the degree of statistical signifi-
for assay. cance of differences found which are of

TABLE 2.—Summary of statistical comparisons: total solids, total nitrogen and ly—^tryptophane
content of high and low quality egg fractions

Values compared Means sSficance

Total solids—percent
Fluid albumen, high vs. low quality High 13.32 >999:1
Low 11.91

Firm albumen, high vs. low quality High 12.54 >999:1


Low 11.83

Yolk, high vs. low quality High 52.92 Not Sig.


Low 52.88

High quality eggs, fluid vs. firm albumen Fluid 13.32 > 99:1
Firm 12.54

Low quality eggs, fluid vs. firm albumen Fluid 11.91 Not Sig.
Firm 11.83
Total nitrogen— :nt (dry basis)
Fluid albumen, high vs. low quality High 13.62 Not Sig.
Low 13.54

Firm albumen, high vs. low quality High 13.60 >999:1


Low 13.35

Yolk, high vs. low quality High 4.92 Not Sig.


Low 4.87
/(—) tryptophane- f./g. (dry basis)
Fluid albumen, high vs. low quality High 15.88 >999:1
Low 13.11

Firm albumen, high vs. low quality High 14.22 ca. 16:1
Low 13.13

Yolk, high vs. low quality High 3.40 Not Sig.


Low 3.25

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION interest and of possible value in the expla-


Table 1 shows a summary of the find- nation of variation in egg quality. All
ings, containing the average values for statistically significant differences found
each class of sample. Numbers in paren- are listed.
theses indicate the number of individual It is noteworthy that yolks from eggs
measurements represented by each aver- of high albumen quality were not found
age value shown. Since these data may to differ in any respect from yolks of low
be considered from different viewpoints, albumen quality eggs.
they are given on both the wet and the Both the firm and the fluid albumen
dry basis. fractions of high quality eggs contained
630 L. W. CHARKEY, ELIZABETH DYAR, AND H. S. WILGUS, J R .

more solid matter than did their low fluid albumen comparison is beyond ques-
quality counterparts. In high quality tion. The firm albumen comparison gave a
eggs the fluid albumen contained signifi- smaller difference of less certain statistical
cantly more solid matter than did the significance, but again in favor of the high
firm albumen. It is important to note that quality eggs. In the yolks no significant
in low quality eggs no such difference difference was shown.
was observed. The distribution of water in This variation in apparent tryptophane
such eggs was at a level throughout the content is subject to several possible ex-
entire white of the egg. The results re- planations. First it is conceivable that
ported here confirm those of St. John there is variation in the tryptophane con-
(1936), who reported a significantly higher tent of "specific" proteins. A second ex-
moisture content in the firm albumen planation, which appears more likely, is
than in the fluid albumen of selected that variation exists in the ratio between
"non-watery" eggs. In his "watery" amounts of the several proteins present.
(low quality) eggs he found a small differ- Third, the microbiological assay medium
ence in the opposite direction, of doubtful used in the measurement of tryptophane
statistical significance. These data may may have been deficient in some unrecog-
indicate the breakdown, in low albumen nized factor stimulatory to L. arabinosus,
quality eggs, of a water regulating and which is provided in higher amounts
mechanism present in eggs of higher by high quality eggs than by low quality
quality. eggs. Fourth, there may have been some
The distribution of total nitrogen (and free tryptophane present, in larger amounts
presumably of protein) corresponds to in high quality eggs than in low quality
that of total solids, as appears in Table 1. eggs.
This is in conformity with the fact that Confirmation of the finding of variable
the solids content of egg white is very egg content of tryptophane, and the ex-
largely protein. However, in the firm planation of this variation, are the sub-
albumen fraction, whose amount and con- jects of further studies which are in
sistency is the principal criterion of egg progress.
quality, there is more nitrogen contained
in a gram of high quality solids than in a CONCLUSIONS
gram of low quality solids. It seems proba- 1. Yolks from hens' eggs of high al-
ble that the type or composition of the bumen quality do not differ from those of
protein complex varies between high and low quality eggs in content of total solids,
low quality eggs, thus accounting for a total nitrogen, or 1( —) tryptophane.
greater water-holding capacity in low 2. Both the fluid and the firm albumen
quality eggs. The relatively firm, less fractions from high quality eggs have
hydrated solids of high quality eggs ap- greater contents of total solids than do the
pear to be richer in content of nitrogen. corresponding low quality fractions.
Finally an indication has been ob- 3. In high quality eggs the fluid al-
tained that the content of one of the spe- bumen contains more solid matter per
cific protein building units, tryptophane, gram than does the firm albumen. No
is higher in high albumen quality eggs such difference was found in low quality
than in eggs of low quality. The statistical eggs.
significance of the difference found in the 4. The nitrogen content of fresh egg
NUTRIENT CONTENT OF FRESH EGGS 631

white fractions corresponds roughly to the REFERENCES

content of total solids, but there is more Assoc, of Official Agr. Chem., 1940. Methods of
nitrogen per gram of high quality firm Analysis, 5th Edition, p. 26.
Ibid. p. 308.
albumen solids than per gram of low
Balls, A. K. and S. R. Hoover, 1940. Behavior of
quality firm albumen solids. In addition Ovomucin in the Liquefaction of Egg White. Ind.
an indication has been obtained that and Eng. Chem. 32: 594-596.
fluid and firm albumen fractions from Cheldelin, Vernon H., Margaret A. Eppright, Es-
high quality eggs contain higher levels of mond E. Snell and Beverly M. Guirard, 1942.
Enzymatic Liberation of B Vitamins from Plant
l(-)tryptophane than do the corre-
and Animal Tissues. Univ. of Texas Publ. 4237:
sponding fractions from low quality eggs. 15-36.
5. It appears likely that the type or Cole, R. K., 1938. Histological Basis for the Differ-
composition of the protein complex ences in Consistency of Firm Egg Albumen. Anat.
varies between eggs of high and low Rec. 71:349-357.
albumen quality, especially in the firm Conrad, R. M. and H. M. Scott, 1939. Changes in
Ovomucin During Egg Storage. Proc. Seventh
albumen fraction, resulting in a reduced
World Poultry Cong. p. 528.
water holding capacity in high quality , 1942. Differences between High and Low
eggs. The solids from such eggs are higher Quality Fresh Eggs. Poultry Sci. 21: 77-80.
in nitrogen content than are the solids Harte, Robert A., 1945. On the In Vitro Proteolysis
from relatively watery, low quality eggs. of Egg White. Science. 102: 563.
Sharp, Paul F., 1937. Preservation and Storage of
Hens' Eggs. Food Res. 2:477-498.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Snedecor, George W., 1940. Statistical Methods.
Iowa State College Press. Ames, Iowa.
We wish to express our appreciation for St. John, J. L., 1936. What Is a "Watery" Egg?
the large amount of technical assistance Poultry Sci. 15: 79-82.
Woolley, Jerald G. and W. H. Sebrell, 1945. Two
rendered by Mr. Eldon G. Hill during the Microbiological Methods for the Determination
course of this study. of 1(—) tryptophane in Proteins and Other Com-
plex Suhstances. J. Biol. Chem. 157: 141-151.

You might also like