E.

Rationale for Recommendations

i. Feasibility Analysis Matrix

Feasibility % Plan A Plan B Plan C

Criteria Wt WebHR Effortless HR MS Access

Operational 30% Features can help There are enough Solves the HR
Feasibility the company to features to solve problems experience
Functionality. A solve the problem the problem of by the company
description of and gives monitoring the completely.
to what degree additional employees
the benefits to the HR punctuality, but
candidate department of the only minimal for
would benefit company. the project
the monitoring, and
organization only few additional
and how well benefits.
the
system would
work.

95% 80% 100%

Technical 30% The software is The software is The system is not yet
Feasibility already available already available available.Higher
Technology. and is fully and is fully software and hardware
An assessment functional. functional. Minimal requirement. Having
of the maturity, Minimal risk of risk of outdated risk of outdated system
availability (or outdated system. system. Requires in coming years.
ability to Requires minimal minimal hardware Requires technical
acquire), and hardware and and software talents in handling the
desirability of software support. support. system.
the computer
technology
needed to
support
this candidate.

95% 95% 70%

Economic 30%
Feasibility

Cost to 23, 516.80 Pesos 23, 516.80 Pesos 127 ,000 Pesos
develop (Per
year):

Payback period 0.19 years or 2.28 0.19 years or 2.28 0.45 years or 5.4 months
(discounted): months months

Net present
value: 1,383,490.36 1,383,490.36 827,491.42

Detailed
calculations:

100% 100% 80%

Schedule 10% 12 Days 12 Days 27 Days

Feasibility
An assessment
of how long the
solution will
take to design
and
implement.

100% 100% 90%

RANKING 97% 92.5% 84%