Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tensile behavior contrast of basalt and glass fibers after chemical treatment
Bin Wei b, Hailin Cao a,c,*, Shenhua Song b
a
Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
b
Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology, Xili, Shenzhen 518055, China
c
Shenzhen Aerospace Tech-Innovation Institute, Shenzhen Key, Laboratory of Composite Materials, Shenzhen 518057, China
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Basalt and glass fibers were treated with sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid solutions respectively
Received 12 January 2010 for different periods of time. Both the mass loss ratio and the strength maintenance ratio of the fibers
Accepted 5 April 2010 were examined after the treatment. The morphologies of the fiber surfaces were characterized using
Available online 9 April 2010
scanning electron microscopy and their compositions were analyzed using energy dispersive X-ray spec-
troscopy. For the basalt fibers, the acid resistance was much better than the alkali resistance. Neverthe-
Keywords: less, for the glass fibers, the acid resistance was nearly the same as the alkali resistance. Based on the
B. Fibers and filaments
experimental results, possible corrosion mechanisms are addressed.
E. Corrosion
F. Microstructure
Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0261-3069/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.009
B. Wei et al. / Materials and Design 31 (2010) 4244–4250 4245
Table 1 50
Mechanical property of basalt fibers. basalt fiber
Property Basalt Glass (E-glass) glasa fiber
Tensile strength (MPa) 2600 2500
40
Filament diameter (lm) 13 12
20
2. Experimental procedures
10
Basalt fibers (produced by Shenzhen Academy of Aerospace
Technology, China, one bundle has 2400 fibers) and glass fibers
(Type E, produced by PPG Company, US, one bundle has 4000 fi- 0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
bers) were used. The specific mass of the fibers was 800 tex for ba-
salt fibers with an average diameter of 13 lm and 1200 tex for Treating time/ h
glass fibers with an average diameter of 12 lm. Their compositions Fig. 1. Mass loss ratio-treating time behavior (acid treatment). The error bars
are listed in Table 2. represent the standard deviation for the estimate of the mean mass loss of ten
The two kinds of fiber were treated in NaOH and HCl solutions samples.
with a concentration of 2 mol/l, respectively. Before the treatment,
all the filaments were washed using the acetone in order to clean
the fiber surface. The treating time ranged from 0.5 to 3 h and basalt fibers, while it increases continuously and slowly until the
the experimental solution maintained at boiling point during the maximum treating time (3 h) for the glass fibers. In addition, the
whole process. After treatment, the filaments were immersed in mass loss ratio is much lower for the basalt fibers than that for
distilled water for 24 h, removing the residual chemical softly. the glass fibers (3 times lower). As a result, the basalt fibers are
The mass losses of fibers after the treatment were examined using much more resistant to acid corrosion as compared with the glass
an electronic analytical balance with a precision of 0.001 g. Assum- fibers.
ing the mass of initial state fibers is m0; the mass of treated state The tensile behavior of the two types of fibers after acid treat-
fibers is m1, then mass loss ratio equals to (m0 m1)/m0. Both be- ment is represented in Fig. 2. Apparently, compared with the origi-
fore and after the treatment, the specimens were dried in an oven nal value, the strength drops dramatically for both types of fiber
at 105 °C for 3 h in order to make the metage accurate. until 0.5 h. After that, the strength of the glass fibers falls slowly
Tensile strength of the filaments before and after the treatment with further increasing treating time until the maximum treating
was measured. Since a single fiber was too delicate to handle espe- time (3 h). However, for the basalt fibers, after 0.5 h the strength
cially after treated, the bundle strength was measured. The fiber decreases slowly until 1 h and then increases a little with further
multifilament strength was measured according to GB/T 7690.1- extending treating time.
7690.6-2001 using a multiple mechanical tester manufactured by The surface morphologies of acid-treated and untreated glass fi-
SANS, China. The distance between the two collets of the specimen bers are shown in Fig. 3. Seemingly, there is little change in the sur-
was kept 500 mm and the crosshead speed was 200 mm/min. All face morphology after acid treatment. But it may be seen that there
the samples were maintained under an environment of relative are local amplificatory cracks with a size in a range of a few hun-
humidity 65% and 25 °C for 24 h before the test. Ten specimens dred nanometers on the fiber surfaces (see Fig. 3c, the arrowed
were tested for each condition and the mean value of the data position).
points obtained was taken as the measured result. Fig. 4 shows SEM images and EDS spectra of the basalt fibers be-
The surface morphologies of the basalt and glass fibers before fore and after acid treatment. The surfaces of the basalt fibers are
and after the treatment were characterized using a Hitachi S- seriously damaged after the treatment for 1 h (see Fig. 4b). The
4700 field emission gun scanning electron microscope (FEGSEM) cracks extend along the axial direction, and also extend into the
equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, interiors of the fibers at the same time. After 3 h treatment, the
manufactured by EDAX Inc., US). damaged surfaces are partially healed (see Fig. 4c). Probably the
cracks are filled with some chemical reaction products. This could
account for the increase in the tensile strength test of the basalt fi-
3. Results and discussion bers with further treatment after 1 h. Of course, the tensile
strength loss cannot be totally offset by the healing effect. The
3.1. Hydrochloric acid aqueous solution treatment EDS spectra are presented here to indicate the composition change
of the basalt fiber surface after acid treatment, and the microanal-
Fig. 1 shows the mass loss ratio as a function of treating time for ysis results are shown in Table 3. As seen, the concentrations of the
the two types of fiber. As seen, the mass loss ratio increases sharply elements in the fiber are decreased due to the treatment except Si
before 0.5 h for both types of fiber. After that, it rises slowly until and Ti, and the decrease becomes severer with increasing treating
1 h and keeps stable with further increasing treating time for the time. This phenomenon is totally different from the work of Majb-
Table 2
Chemical compositions of the basalt and glass fibers (wt%).
Composition SiO2 Al2O3 CaO MgO K2O Na2O FexOy TiO2 B2O3
Basalt fiber 48.39 14.7 7.7 4.7 1.6 3.0 15.3 3.8 –
Glass fiber 52.1–53.4 13.5–14.5 18.5–19.5 3.6–4.4 0–1 0–0.6 0–0.5 8.0–9.0
4246 B. Wei et al. / Materials and Design 31 (2010) 4244–4250
100 structure, the silicon dioxide plays a role of the net former and the
basalt fiber alumina plays a dual role of the net former and modifier. This case
glass fiber also applies to the basalt fibers [28]. During the first 1 h treatment,
Strength maintenance ratio/%
80 the constituents of the basalt fiber, such as Ca, Mg, Al, Fe, Na and K,
are dissolved into the solution. It makes the framework damaged,
especially by the framework former elements (Al and Fe). After
60 that, the whole chemical reaction of the basalt fibers with acid
may be over. And then the subsequent 2 h treatment is an absorb-
ing/transferring process that some elements migrate from solution
40 onto the basalt fiber surface including the surface of cracks under
the driving force of chemical gradient. Consequently, the surface
flaws of the basalt fibers are partially healed and the crack tips
20 are passivated. Edith Mäder has proved the fact [29] that the glass
fiber defects (flaws) can be healed by the nanometer-scale rein-
forcement (nanotubes, nanoclays).
0 Fig. 5 shows the SEM images of the basalt fiber cross-sections.
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
As seen, after 1 h treatment a corrosion layer appeared around
Treating time/ h
the basalt fibers, and the corrosion layer became even thicker with
Fig. 2. Strength maintenance ratio-treating time behavior (acid treatment). a thickness of 2–3 lm after 3 h treatment. From Fig. 5 with refer-
ence to Table 3, we could guess SiO2 is dominant in the corrosion
layer. Therefore, there may be another reason concluded that
ritt D. Lund and Yuan-Zheng Yue. They measured the aging behav-
causes the strength increase after 3 h treatment in hydrochloric
ior of basalt fibers under water medium and found water aged fi-
acid solution: that is the formation of like high silica glass fiber
bers show a decrease of the relative amount the elements Na,
organization.
Mg, Al and K compared to Si qualitatively [27]. The concentration
It may be concluded from the above that the strength loss due
of Si is increased substantially with increasing treating time and
to acid corrosion is less for the basalt fibers than for the glass fibers,
becomes about 52.5 wt% after 3 h treatment. The concentration
i.e., the basalt fibers are more resistant to acid corrosion than the
of Ti does not change apparently due probably to its stable chem-
glass fibers.
ical properties. It is interesting to note that the strength of the ba-
salt fiber does not decrease with further increasing treating time
after 1 h treatment. This may be because the content of SiO2 in 3.2. Sodium hydroxide aqueous solution treatment
the fiber surface layer increases with treating time (see Table 3).
The SiO2 may be beneficial to corrosion-resistance and partially The mass loss ratio is represented in Fig. 6 as a function of treat-
offset the damaging effect of the acid solution. In the silicate glass ing time for the two types of fibers in alkali environment. As
b c
Fig. 3. SEM images of glass fibers before and after treatment in HCl solution (a – original fiber; b – after 1 h treatment; c – after 3 h treatment).
B. Wei et al. / Materials and Design 31 (2010) 4244–4250 4247
a
Spectrum1 Spectrum1
b
Spectrum 2
c
Spectrum 3 Spectrum 3
Fig. 4. SEM images and EDS spectra of the basalt fiber surfaces before and after treatment in HCl solution (a – original fiber; b – after 1 h treatment; c – after 3 h treatment).
Table 3 a little until 3 h. Compared with the glass fibers, the mass loss ratio
Surface concentrations of elements in the basalt fibers before and after acid treatment of the basalt fibers are much larger.
(wt%). Tensile strength maintenance ratio of the two types of fibers
Element O Si Na Mg Al K Ca Ti Fe treated by NaOH is presented in Fig. 7. The ratio decreases sharply
Untreated 41.8 26.9 2.6 2.9 8.2 1.3 5.3 2.6 8.4 and almost reaches below 20% after 0.5 h treatment. Then with
1h 38.9 32.9 1.7 2.2 7.7 1.1 4.9 2.5 8.1 increasing treatment time, the tensile strength of the fibers contin-
3h 35.4 52.5 0.2 0.7 3.4 0.4 1.9 2.2 3.3 ues to fall until non-strength. It is also seen from Fig. 7 that the de-
crease rate of the tensile strength for the glass fibers is a little
lower than that for the basalt fibers. This may be because the
framework (mainly composed of Si and Al) in the glass fibers is
shown, the mass loss ratio increases sharply before 2 h for the ba- more compact than that in the basalt fibers. The Ca element is
salt fibers. After that, it keeps stable with further increasing treat- more in the glass fibers than in the basalt fibers and the reaction
ing time. The mass loss rate of the basalt fibers is somewhat larger products (compound containing a plentiful of Ca element) on the
than that presented in the literature (5%) [30,31]. However, for fiber surface could effectively prevent the reaction further develop-
the glass fibers, the mass loss rate becomes slower after 0.5 h ing [32].
and the mass loss ratio reaches a maximum value after treating Fig. 8 shows the surface morphologies of the two types of fibers
for 1 h. Then it keeps stable until 2 h, and subsequently decreases after 3 h treatment in a 2 mol/l NaOH solution. There is a flake
4248 B. Wei et al. / Materials and Design 31 (2010) 4244–4250
Fiber
Matrix
b c
Corrosion layer
Corrosion layer
Fig. 5. SEM images of the basalt fiber cross-sections before and after treatment in HCl solution (a – original fiber; b – after 1 h treatment; c – after 3 h treatment).
8 100
basalt fiber
Strength maintenance ratio/ %
glass fiber
80
6
Mass loss ratio/ %
basalt fiber
glass fiber
60
4
40
2
20
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Treating time/ h
Treating time/ h
Fig. 6. Mass loss ratio-treating time behavior (alkali treatment).
Fig. 7. Strength maintenance ratio-treating time behavior (alkali treatment).
structure present on the fiber surfaces, indicating that some chem- copolymer with nanoclays could obviously increase alkali resis-
ical reactions have occurred during the treatment. Seemingly, both tance of the glass fibers [29].
the basalt and glass fibers appear to have similar deterioration The main component in the glass and basalt fibers is SiO2. Dur-
characteristics and to lose strength and volumetric stability under ing chemical treatment in the alkali solution, the ASiAOA bond
severe alkali conditions. Water and NaOH reagents may penetrate which is the main framework of the fiber will be broken by the hy-
into the net structure of the glass fiber and cause some reactions to droxyl ion:
destroy the original structure. Meanwhile, some constituents in-
½ASiAOASiA þ OH ! ½ASiAOH þ ½ASiO ð1Þ
side the glass fiber could migrate outside and dissolve in the solu-
tion. On the other hand, hydrolytic action may exist on the alkali Hence the strength of the fibers after treatment in alkali solu-
silicate of the fiber [19]. It is also believed that the alkaline metal tion is decreased considerably. Their acid corrosion-resistance is
oxides in the fiber would cause their chemical stability weaker relatively better as compared to alkali corrosion-resistance proba-
when meeting with the alkali molecules. Edith Mäder’s research bly because the ASiAOA structure is inert to the acid except for
group has proved that using nanometer-scale coating based hydrofluoric acid and phosphorous acid.
B. Wei et al. / Materials and Design 31 (2010) 4244–4250 4249
a b
Fig. 8. SEM images of the glass and basalt fiber surfaces after treatment in NaOH solution (a – glass fiber, b – basalt fiber).
[26] Scheffler C, Förster T, Mäder E, Heinrich G, Hempel S, Mechtcherine V. Aging of [30] Wang L, Chen Y, Li ZW. Property of continuous basalt fiber and composites.
alkali-resistant glass and basalt fibers in alkaline solutions: evaluation of the Fiber Reinforced Plast/Compos 2000;6:22–4.
failure stress by Weibull distribution function. J Non-Cryst Solids [31] Shi QH. Overseas development and application of basalt continuous fiber. Fiber
2009;355:2588–95. Glass 2003;4:27–31.
[27] Lund Majbritt D, Yue Yuan-Zheng. Influences of chemical aging on the surface [32] Oka Y, Ricker S, Tomozawa M. J Am Ceram Soc 1979;62:11.
morphology and crystallization behavior of basaltic glass fibers. J Non-Cryst [33] Brik VB. Advanced concept concrete using basalt fiber composite
Solids 2008;354:1115–54. reinforcement. Tech Res Report submitted to NCHRP-IDEA, Project 25; 1999.
[28] Gutnikov SI, Malakho AP, Lazoryak BI, Loginov VS. Influence of alumina on the [34] Brik VB. Performance evaluation of basalt fibers and composite rebars as
properties of continuous basalt fibers. Russ J Inorg Chem 2009;54(2):191–6. concrete reinforcement. Tech Res Report submitted to NCHRP-IDEA, Project
[29] Gao S-L, Mäder E, Plonka R. Nanocomposite coatings for healing surface 45; 1999.
defects of glass fibers and improving interfacial adhesion. Compos Sci Technol
2007;12.