Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2006chapman IL-18 CIMT CUDAS Atherosc
2006chapman IL-18 CIMT CUDAS Atherosc
net/publication/7334628
CITATIONS READS
30 18
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Joe Hung on 30 October 2019.
Received 29 June 2005; received in revised form 20 December 2005; accepted 22 December 2005
Available online 24 January 2006
Abstract
Interleukin (IL)-18 is a novel proinflammatory cytokine that plays a central role in innate and acquired immunity, making it a likely
inflammatory candidate in atherosclerosis. We investigated whether circulating IL-18 levels were associated with subclinical atherosclerosis
in a community population. Carotid intimal medial thickness (IMT) and carotid plaques were assessed in a cross-sectional study of 1111
randomly selected community subjects, aged 27–77 years. Baseline levels of IL-18, IL-6, high sensitive CRP (hsCRP), fibrinogen and white
cell counts were measured along with conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Men had higher mean IL-18 levels than women (P < 0.0001).
Spearman rank correlations (rs ) showed that IL-18 was weakly correlated with all inflammatory markers in the whole population (rs between
0.11 and 0.23, all P < 0.001). IL-18 was also correlated with conventional risk factors including waist–hip ratio, BMI, blood pressure,
triglycerides, HDL (inversely) and pack-years smoking (rs between 0.18 and 0.39, all P < 0.001) but not with LDL-cholesterol. Independent
predictors of IL-18 concentrations were waist–hip ratio, HDL, IL-6, hsCRP and hypertension. There was a positive univariate association
of IL-18 levels with carotid IMT (P < 0.001) and plaque prevalence (P < 0.001) but no residual association after adjustment for conventional
risk factors (both P > 0.05). In a cross-sectional community population, IL-18 levels were related to traditional risk factors and inflammatory
markers but were not independently associated with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis.
© 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
0021-9150/$ – see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.12.026
C.M.L. Chapman et al. / Atherosclerosis 189 (2006) 414–419 415
better independent predictor of subclinical carotid atheroscle- to record a history of smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia,
rosis than hsCRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and total white cell count diabetes, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke
in a community population [7]. More research is therefore or a family history of premature-onset MI or stroke by age
required to identify the important inflammatory mediators 55 years in first degree relatives. Anthropomorphic measure-
involved in atherogenesis. ments and the lower of two resting blood pressures were
IL-18 is novel proinflammatory cytokine that appears to recorded. Written informed consent was obtained from all
play a central role in innate and acquired immunity, making study participants. The study protocol was approved by the
it a likely inflammatory candidate in the atherosclerotic pro- Institutional Ethics Committee of the University of Western
cess [8,9]. IL-18 acts directly as a proinflammatory cytokine Australia.
by inducing IL-1, IL-8, adhesion molecules, granulocyte-
macrophage colony stimulating factor and tumor necrosis 2.2. Biochemical analysis
factor-␣ [10]. IL-18 also promotes (Th1) T lymphocyte differ-
entiation, and stimulates the production of interferon (IFN)-␥ A fasting blood sample was obtained from each subject.
by T cells, natural killer cells and macrophages [11]. IFN-␥ Serum IL-18 was measured by a commercially available
promotes plaque development and instability by stimulating ELISA method (MBL Co. Ltd.) as previously described
the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, [15,21]. The within run coefficients of variation were 5.4%
and MHC II complex on macrophages and vascular cells as at a mean value of 400 g/L (28 samples); between run coef-
well as inhibiting collagen synthesis by smooth muscle cells. ficients of variation were 8.2% at 298 g/L (9 samples) and
Increased expression of IL-18 has been reported in human 7.8% at 496 g/L (9 samples). Serum IL-6 was measured
atherosclerotic plaques and related to plaque destabilization using an ELISA (Quantikine HS, R&D Systems) with an
[12]. The introduction of the endogenous inhibitor of IL-18, assay range of 0.38–10 ng/L. Serum hsCRP was measured by
the IL-18 binding protein, has been shown to slow the pro- a microparticle turbidity assay (Hitachi 917, Roche) with a
gression of atherosclerotic plaques and produce a more stable range of 0.1–21.0 mg/L. Plasma fibrinogen was measured by
lesion phenotype in the apoE knockout mice [13]. the Clauss method. Monocyte and white cell counts (WCC)
Epidemiological studies have also suggested that IL-18 were obtained using standard techniques. Total cholesterol,
levels can predict cardiovascular death in patients with stable HDL cholesterol (HDL) and triglyceride levels were deter-
and unstable angina [14] as well as future coronary events mined enzymatically with an Hitachi 747 autoanalyzer.
in apparently healthy men [15]. These findings suggest that
IL-18 aggravates existing cardiovascular disease. Whether 2.3. Carotid ultrasound
levels of IL-18 also associate with early atherosclerosis in
asymptomatic subjects is yet to be investigated. Bilateral carotid B-mode ultrasound was performed
High-resolution B-mode carotid ultrasonography has been by two trained sonographers using a 7.5-MHz annular
used for non-invasive detection of subclinical atheroscle- phased-array transducer on an Interspec (Apogee) CX 200
rosis in large community-based cohorts [7,16,17]. Carotid ultrasound machine as previously described [17]. The IMT
intima–medial wall thickness (IMT) and plaque measured in was defined as the distance between the characteristic echoes
this way have been shown to correlate with standard cardio- from the lumen–intima and media–adventitia interfaces on
vascular risk factors, atherosclerosis in other vascular beds the far wall of the distal common carotid artery measured
and incident myocardial infarction and strokes [18,19]. In over a 1 cm segment length. A thorough search of the
the present study, we evaluated the independent relation- distal common carotid, carotid bulb, and internal and
ship between the inflammatory marker IL-18 and subclinical external carotid arteries was also made to determine the
atherosclerosis as assessed by B-mode ultrasound in a cross- presence of focal plaque. Plaque was defined as a clearly
sectional, community-based sample of mostly asymptomatic identified area of focal increased thickness (≥1 mm) of
subjects from Western Australia. the intima–media layer. Three end-diastolic images were
analysed from the right and left distal common arteries at a
site free of any discrete plaque and measurements averaged
2. Experimental procedures to give the mean IMT. Repeat measurements of randomly
selected scans revealed no significant variation in the IMT
2.1. Subjects measurements.
The selection criteria and study design of the community- 2.4. Statistical analysis
based Carotid Ultrasound Disease Assessment Study
(CUDAS) have been detailed previously [17,20]. In brief, Outcome variables of the association analyses were
this was a random electoral roll sample of 1111 subjects (558 carotid IMT and the presence of carotid plaque. The prin-
men and 553 women) aged 27–77 years from Perth, Western cipal explanatory variable was the inflammatory marker IL-
Australia. Subjects who had previous carotid artery surgery 18. Body mass index (BMI), triglycerides, HDL, carotid
were excluded. A self-administered questionnaire was used IMT, IL-18, IL-6, hsCRP, monocyte count and WCC were
416 C.M.L. Chapman et al. / Atherosclerosis 189 (2006) 414–419
Table 1
Characteristics of the CUDAS study population
Variable Females (n = 550) Males (n = 557) P value
Age 53.2 ± 12.7 53.4 ± 12.7 ns
BMIa 25.1 (24.7, 25.4) 26.5 (26.2, 26.8) <0.0001
Waist–hip ratioa 0.77 (0.76, 0.77) 0.90 (0.90, 0.90) <0.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 127.1 ± 20.1 129.5 ± 16.8 0.03
HDLa (mmol/L) 1.46 (1.43, 1.49) 1.13 (1.11, 1.15) <0.0001
LDL (mmol/L) 3.56 ± 0.90 3.70 ± 0.87 0.009
Triglyceridesa (mmol/L) 1.01 (0.96, 1.05) 1.28 (1.23, 1.34) <0.0001
Mean IMTa (mm) 0.68 (0.67, 0.69) 0.72 (0.70, 0.73) <0.0001
Interleukin-18a (g/L) 266.1 (257.0, 275.5) 340.4 (329.1, 352.0) <0.0001
hsCRPa (mg/L) 1.84 (1.67, 2.02) 1.68 (1.54, 1.84) ns
Interleukin-6a (g/L) 3.68 (3.55, 3.82) 3.61 (3.47, 3.76) ns
Fibrinogen (g/L) 2.79 ± 0.68 2.70 ± 0.63 0.03
Monocyte counta (×109 L−1 ) 0.45 (0.44, 0.46) 0.53 (0.52, 0.55) <0.0001
Values are mean ± S.D. ns: non-significant.
a Geometric mean (±95% CI) for skewed variables.
Table 2
Spearman rank correlations of interleukin-18 and other inflammatory variables against standard cardiovascular risk factors and carotid IMT in the whole
population
IL-18 hsCRP IL-6 Fibrinogen Monocytes WCC
hsCRP 0.23† – – – – –
IL-6 0.21† 0.49† – – – –
Fibrinogen 0.11† 0.50† 0.40† – – –
Monocytes 0.15† 0.14† 0.20† 0.08* – –
WCC 0.15† 0.27† 0.27† 0.19† 0.55† –
Age 0.12† 0.20† 0.34† 0.34† 0.06* 0.04
Systolic BP 0.18† 0.23† 0.27† 0.25† 0.08* 0.07*
Waist–hip ratio 0.39† 0.19† 0.14† 0.07* 0.28† 0.14†
BMI 0.26† 0.39† 0.26† 0.21† 0.13† 0.13†
LDL 0.07* 0.10* 0.07 0.14† 0.02 −0.02
HDL −0.31† −0.15† −0.10* −0.09* −0.18† −0.17†
Triglycerides 0.26† 0.25† 0.20† 0.15† 0.18† 0.26†
Smoking (pack-years) 0.19† 0.16† 0.17† 0.07* 0.24† 0.23†
IMT 0.17† 0.21† 0.30† 0.26† 0.12† 0.09*
* P < 0.05.
† P < 0.001.
C.M.L. Chapman et al. / Atherosclerosis 189 (2006) 414–419 417
Table 3
Age adjusted mean levels of inflammatory markers for categorical risk factors
IL-18 (g/L) hsCRP (mg/L) IL-6 (g/L) Fibrinogen (g/L) Monocytes (×109 L−1 )
Hypertension
No 291.8 (283.4, 300.4) 1.65 (1.53, 1.78) 3.54 (3.44, 3.65) 2.73 (2.69, 2.78) 0.48 (0.47, 0.49)
Yes 327.7 (311.4, 344.8) 2.18 (1.91, 2.49) 4.00 (3.79, 4.22) 2.77 (2.70, 2.85) 0.51 (0.49, 0.53)
P value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns 0.02
Smoking
Never 283.2 (273.4, 292.9) 1.57 (1.44, 1.72) 3.52 (3.39, 3.65) 2.76 (2.70, 2.81) 0.46 (0.45, 0.47)
Ever 319.3 (308.3, 330.6) 1.99 (1.81, 2.17) 3.80 (3.66, 3.94) 2.73 (2.68, 2.79) 0.52 (0.51, 0.53)
P value <0.0001 <0.0001 0.003 ns <0.0001
Obesity
BMI <30 292.4 (284.3, 300.4) 1.57 (1.47, 1.68) 3.52 (3.42, 3.61) 2.71 (2.67, 2.75) 0.49 (0.48, 0.49)
BMI ≥30 342.7 (322.8, 363.9) 3.13 (2.68, 3.64) 4.41 (4.14, 4.69) 2.91 (2.82, 3.00) 0.51 (0.49, 0.53)
P value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.04
Plaque
No 296.5 (287.7, 305.8) 1.76 (1.63, 1.90) 3.60 (3.48, 3.71) 2.75 (2.70, 2.79) 0.48 (0.47, 0.49)
Yes 311.1 (295.0, 328.3) 1.79 (1.56, 2.07) 3.82 (3.61, 4.05) 2.74 (2.66, 2.83) 0.53 (0.51, 0.55)
P value ns ns 0.08 ns <0.0001
History of MI and/or stroke
No 299.5 (291. 8, 307.7) 1.73 (1.61, 1.84) 3.61 (3.51, 3.71) 2.74 (2.70, 2.78) 0.49 (0.48, 0.50)
Yes 309.5 (283.2, 338.3) 2.36 (1.86, 2.99) 4.27 (3.87, 4.69) 2.81 (2.67, 2.95) 0.54 (0.51, 0.58)
P value ns 0.01 0.001 ns 0.003
Data are geometric means ±95% confidence intervals adjusted for age. ns: non-significant; MI: myocardial infarction.
LDL-cholesterol (Table 2). IL-18 had a weak positive associ- tors of IL-18 levels in the whole population. These variables
ation with age (rs = 0.12, P < 0.001) and mean IMT (rs = 0.17, explained ≈20% of the variance in levels of IL-18.
P < 0.001). Similar trend associations were seen in males and Multivariate regression analysis showed that mean carotid
females (data not shown). IMT (adjusted for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, waist–hip
As with other inflammatory markers, age-adjusted IL-18 ratio, LDL, smoking and family history of premature MI)
levels were higher in subjects with hypertension, or who were did not associate with increasing tertiles of IL-18 (Table 4,
current/ex-smokers or were obese (Table 3, all P < 0.0001). P > 0.05). There was also no significant association when
IL-18 levels were also higher in subjects with carotid plaques IL-18 was entered into the model as a continuous variable
compared to those without, 322.1 (306.3, 338.8) and 292.7 (P > 0.05). In a stepwise analysis IL-18 was significantly
(284.3, 301.2) g/L, respectively (P = 0.001). However, once associated with carotid IMT when adjusted for age and sex
adjusted for age no significant difference was observed (P = 0.04), but on addition of systolic blood pressure signifi-
(Table 3). Subjects who had a personal history of myocardial cance was no longer reached.
infarction or stroke did not have significantly higher IL-18 Multivariate modelling (adjusted for age, LDL, smoking,
levels than those without disease (Table 3). However other and history of hypertension, stroke or MI) indicated that the
inflammatory markers were significantly raised in subjects odds of having a carotid plaque did not differ between tertiles
with vascular disease (Table 3). of IL-18 (Table 4, P > 0.05). There was also no linear associ-
Multivariate analysis showed that waist–hip ratio ation of IL-18 with carotid plaque (P > 0.05). No interaction
(β = 0.265, P < 0.0001), HDL (β = −0.146, P < 0.0001), effects on IMT or presence carotid plaque were observed
hsCRP (β = 0.105, P = 0.002), IL-6 (β = 0.082, P = 0.01) and between IL-18, standard cardiovascular risk factors or other
hypertension (β = 0.073, P = 0.01) were independent predic- inflammatory markers.
Table 4
Multivariate analysis of interleukin-18 with carotid atherosclerosis
Interleukin-18 Adjusted mean P valueb Subjects with carotid Odds ratio (95% CI) P valuec
(g/L) IMT (mm)a plaque, n (%) for carotid plaque
Tertiles
1 ≤250.06 0.70 (0.69, 0.71) Reference 84 (24.3) Reference
2 250.07–356.66 0.70 (0.69, 0.71) >0.05 91 (26.4) 0.94 (0.62, 1.44) >0.05
3 ≥356.67 0.70 (0.69, 0.71) >0.05 103 (29.9) 0.87 (0.57, 1.32) >0.05
a Data is adjusted geometric means and 95% confidence intervals.
b Multivariate linear regression analysis of carotid IMT adjusted for age, sex, systolic BP, waist–hip ratio, LDL, smoking (pack-years) and family history of
MI.
c Logistic regression analysis for carotid plaque adjusted for age, LDL, smoking (pack-years) and history of hypertension, stroke and MI.
418 C.M.L. Chapman et al. / Atherosclerosis 189 (2006) 414–419
References [16] Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, et al. Association of coronary
heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major
[1] Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.
1999;340:115–26. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:483–94.
[2] Hansson GK, Libby P, Schonbeck U, Yan Z-Q. Innate and adap- [17] McQuillan BM, Beilby JP, Nidorf M, Thompson PL, Hung J. Hyper-
tive immunity in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Circ Res homocysteinemia but not the C677T mutation of methylenetetrahy-
2002;91:281–91. drofolate reductase is an independent risk determinant of carotid wall
[3] Danesh J, Collins R, Appleby P, Peto R. Association of fibrinogen, thickening. The Perth Carotid Ultrasound Disease Assessment Study
C-reactive protein, albumin, or leukocyte count with coronary heart dis- (CUDAS). Circulation 1999;99:2383–8.
ease: meta-analyses of prospective studies. JAMA 1998;279:1477–82. [18] Grobbee DE, Bots ML. Carotid artery intima–media thickness
[4] Ridker PM. Clinical application of C-reactive protein for cardio- as an indicator of generalized atherosclerosis. J Intern Med
vascular disease detection and prevention. Circulation 2003;107: 1994;236:567–73.
363–9. [19] O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Carotid-artery intima and
[5] Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM, et al. C-reactive protein and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in
other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary older patients. N Engl J Med 1999;340:14–22.
heart disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1387–97. [20] Beilby JP, Hunt CCJ, Palmer LJ, et al. Apolipoprotein E gene poly-
[6] Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, et al. Markers of inflammation morphisms are associated with carotid plaque formation but not with
and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health intima–media wall thickening: results from the Perth Carotid Ultra-
practice: a Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Centers for sound Disease Assessment Study (CUDAS). Stroke 2003;34:869–
Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. 74.
Circulation 2003;107:499–511. [21] Hung J, McQuillan BM, Chapman CML, Thompson PL, Beilby JP. Ele-
[7] Chapman CML, Beilby JP, McQuillan BM, Thompson PL, Hung J. vated interleukin-18 levels are associated with the metabolic syndrome
Monocyte count, but not C-reactive protein or interleukin-6, is an independent of obesity and insulin resistance. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
independent risk marker for subclinical carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke Biol 2005;25:1268–73.
2004;35:1619–24. [22] Whitman SC, Ravisankar P, Daugherty A. Interleukin-18 enhances
[8] Gracie JA, Robertson SE, McInnes IB. Interleukin-18. J Leukoc Biol atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E(−/−) mice through release of
2003;73:213–24. interferon-gamma. Circ Res 2002;90:E34–8.
[9] Szmitko PE, Wang C-H, Weisel RD, et al. New markers of inflammation [23] Elhage R, Jawien J, Rudling M, et al. Reduced atherosclerosis in
and endothelial cell activation. Part I. Circulation 2003;108:1917–23. interleukin-18 deficient apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Cardiovasc
[10] Okamura H, Tsuji H, Kashiwamura S, Yoshimoto T, Nakanishi K. Res 2003;59:234–40.
Interleukin-18: a novel cytokine that augments both acquired and innate [24] de Nooijer R, von der Thusen JH, Verkleij CJN, et al. Overexpression
immunity. Adv Immunol 1998;70:281–312. of IL-18 decreases intimal collagen content and promotes a vulnera-
[11] Okamura H, Tsutsi H, Komatsu T, et al. Cloning of a new cytokine that ble plaque phenotype in apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice. Arterioscler
induces IFN-gamma production by T-cells. Nature 1995;378:88–91. Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:2313–9.
[12] Mallat Z, Corbaz A, Scoazec A, et al. Expression of interleukin-18 in [25] Yamagami H, Kitagawa K, Hoshi T, et al. Associations of serum IL-18
human atherosclerotic plaques and relation to plaque instability. Circu- levels with carotid intima–media thickness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
lation 2001;104:1598–603. Biol 2005;25:1458–62.
[13] Mallat Z, Corbaz A, Scoazec A, et al. Interleukin-18/interleukin-18 [26] Yamaoka-Tojo M, Tojo T, Masuda T, et al. C-reactive protein-induced
binding protein signaling modulates atherosclerotic lesion development production of interleukin-18 in human endothelial cells: a mechanism
and stability. Circ Res 2001;89:E41–5. of orchestrating cytokine cascade in acute coronary syndrome. Heart
[14] Blankenberg S, Tiret L, Bickel C, et al. Interleukin-18 is a strong pre- Vessels 2003;18:183–7.
dictor of cardiovascular death in stable and unstable angina. Circulation [27] Esposito K, Pontillo A, Ciotola M, et al. Weight loss reduces
2002;106:24–30. interleukin-18 levels in obese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
[15] Blankenberg S, Luc G, Ducimetiere P, et al. Interleukin-18 and the 2002;87:3864–6.
risk of coronary heart disease in European men: the Prospective Epi- [28] Wadham C, Albanese N, Roberts J, et al. High-density lipoproteins
demiological Study of Myocardial Infarction (PRIME). Circulation neutralize C-reactive protein proinflammatory activity. Circulation
2003;108:2453–9. 2004;109:2116–22.