SWE2003-REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING AND

MANAGEMENT
PROJECT
E SHOPPING

SLOT-G2
SUBMITTED-TO: VALARAMATHI B

SUBMITTED BY:
VELAGA LALITH SRINIVAS-20MIS0010
SRUTHI RAVINDRA-20MIS0438
 REVIEW-2
BRAINSTORMING

PAIRED COMPARISON ANALYSIS:

To make our model effective and well structured, we need to choose

the most appropriate method.
We need to choose between the following options:
1. Making our website more mobile-friendly.
2. Offer free-shipping.
3. Making our site easy to navigate.
4. Giving a live chat option.

Step 1: Make a list of all of the options that you want

 to compare. Assign each option a letter (A, B, C, D, and
so on)
A. = Making our website more mobile friendly
B. = Offer free shipping
C. = Make your site easy to navigate
D. = Give a live chat option

Step 2-Mark your options as both the row and column headings on
the worksheet. This is so you can compare your options with one
another.

A B C D
A
B
C
D

Step 3-Within each of the blank cells, compare the option in the
row with the option in the column. Decide which of the two options
is the most important and write down the letter of the most
important letter in that cell.
A B C D
A B C A
B C D
C C
D

Step 4-
Score the difference in importance between the options, running
from zero (no difference/same importance) to, say, three (major
difference/one much more important than the other.)
A B C D
A A,1 C,3 A,2
B C,2 D,2
C C,1
D

Step 5-Consolidate the results by adding up the values for each of

the options. You may want to convert these values into percentage
of the total score.
FROM THE TABLE WE GET THAT:
TOTAL =11
A=3/11*100=27.27% (2nd Rank)
B=0/11*100=0% (4th Rank)
C=6/11*100=54.5% (1st Rank)
D=2/11*100=18.2% (3rd Rank)

Step 6-
Make a decision as per rank.
FROM THE TABLE WE GET THAT:
TOTAL =11
 A=3/11*100=27.27% (2nd Rank)
B=0/11*100=0% (4th Rank)
C=6/11*100=54.5% (1st Rank)
D=2/11*100=18.2% (3rd Rank)

DECISION MATRIX ANALYSIS:

STEP 1: List the number of options and factors.

FACTORS COST QUALITY RELIABILITY COMPETANCY TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHT

TEAM 1

TEAM 2
TEAM 3

STEP 2: Make a table (row name-option, column name-factor)

FACTORS COST QUALITY RELIABILITY COMPETANCY TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHT

TEAM 1

TEAM 2

TEAM 3

STEP 3: Fill the values in the table

FACTORS COST QUALITY RELIABILITY COMPETANCY TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHT

TEAM 1 4 6 3 2

TEAM 2 2 4 2 1
TEAM 3 3 2 4 3

STEP 4: Assign a weight to each factor

FACTORS COST QUALITY RELIABILITY COMPETANCY TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHT 4 3 4 1

TEAM 1 4 6 3 2

TEAM 2 2 4 2 1

TEAM 3 3 2 4 3

STEP 5: Multiply each column value and factor weight value.

FACTORS COST QUALITY RELIABILITY COMPETANCY TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHT 4 3 4 1

TEAM 1 16 18 12 2
TEAM 2 8 12 8 1

TEAM 3 12 6 16 3

STEP 6: Add all the values in the row (total score column).
FACTORS COST QUALITY RELIABILITY COMPETANCY TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHT 4 3 4 1

TEAM 1 16 18 12 2 48

TEAM 2 8 12 8 1 29

TEAM 3 12 6 16 3 37

STEP 7: Take the maximum value from the total column.

FACTORS COST QUALITY RELIABILITY COMPETANCY TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHT 4 3 4 1
TEAM 1 16 18 12 2 48
TEAM 2 8 12 8 1 29

TEAM 3 12 6 16 3 37

STEP 8: Decision making (which option is having the maximum

value)
FACTORS COST QUALITY RELIABILITY COMPETANCY TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHT 4 3 4 1

TEAM 1 16 18 12 2 48(HIGHEST
SCORE)
TEAM 2 8 12 8 1 29

TEAM 3 12 6 16 3 37
TEAM 1 IS HAVING THE HIGHEST SCORE

AFFINITY DIAGRAM: A tool that gathers large amounts of

language data (ideas, opinions, issues) and organizes them
into groupings based on their natural relationships.
Step 1: Transfer Ideas On to Sticky Notes Write down every
piece of information that you need to organize onto a
separate sticky note. When you are sure that you have
written everything down, stick your notes onto a wall or
table. Don't worry about organizing information at this stage
– you'll do this next.

Step 2: Sort Ideas Into Themes Your next step is to sort all
the ideas into groups. Start small – look for just two ideas
that are similar in some way, and group them together on
the table or wall. Then, look for another two ideas that relate
to one other, and so on. For our case, we have identified the
four themes and they are given below.
>> Prevention
>> Appraisal
>>Internal failure
>>external failure
AFFINITY DIAGRAM