You are on page 1of 5

AIRBUS INDUSTRIE Getting to Grips with

Flight Operations Support Approach-and-Landing Accidents Reduction

Approach-and-Landing Briefing Note

5.1 – Approach Hazards Awareness - General

Introduction
Factor % of Events
Factors that may contribute to approach-and-
landing accidents include flight over hilly terrain,
reduced visibility, visual illusions, adverse winds, Night time 75 %
contaminated runways and/or limited approach aids.
IMC 59 %
Flight crews should be aware of the compounding
nature of these hazards during approach and Darkness or twilight 53 %
landing.
Non-precision approach or visual 53 %
approach
Statistical data
Precipitation ( rain or snow ) 50 %
Approach-and-landing is the most hazardous phase
of any flight, as illustrated by the following data: Absence of radar service 50 %
• Over the past 40 years, approach-and-landing Adverse wind (high crosswind, 33 %
accidents accounted for 55 % of total hull tail wind or wind shear)
losses.
Absence of GPWS or radio 29 %
This statistic does not show a downward trend.
altimeter
• The flight segment from the outer marker to the
Absence of letdown navaid, 21 %
runway threshold averages only 4 % of flight
approach/runway lighting or VASI
time, but accounts for 45 % of hull losses.
/ PAPI

Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 illustrate the Spatial disorientation or visual 21 %


respective contributions of the factors involved in: illusions

• All approach-and-landing accidents; Runway contamination (standing 18 %


water, slush, snow or ice)
• CFIT events; and,

• Runway excursions and overruns. Table 1


(Source: Flight Safety Foundation – ALAR Task Force) All Approach-and-Landing Events

Approach Hazards Awareness – General


Page 1
AIRBUS INDUSTRIE Getting to Grips with
Flight Operations Support Approach-and-Landing Accidents Reduction

Flight Crew
Factor % of Events
• Fatigue – reduced awareness:
− Long duty time:
Low visibility 71 %
! Long-haul operation; or,
Hilly or mountainous terrain 67 % ! Short-haul or medium-haul / multiple-
legs operation;
Table 2 • Unfamiliar airport; and/or,
CFIT Events • Unfamiliar instrument or visual approach
procedure.

Factor % of Events Expected Approach


• Step-down non-precision approach or circling
Low visibility 73 % approach with no VASI / PAPI;

Adverse wind conditions 67 % • Visual approach in darkness; and/or,


• Anticipated last-minute runway change.
Table 3
Runway Excursions and Overruns Approach Charts
• Absence of a published STAR;
Awareness Program Outline
• Missed-approach possible conflict with takeoff
A company awareness program on approach-and- on intersecting runways; and/or,
landing hazards should review and discuss the • Incorrect or missing information.
following factors that may contribute to approach-
and-landing accidents.
When preparing and briefing an approach, these Airport Information Services
factors may be either: • Inaccurate TAF information;
• Known from the crew (by means of NOTAMs, • Absence of current weather reports;
dispatcher’s briefing, ATIS, etc) and, thus, may
be briefed and accounted for; or, • Absence of VOLMET;
• Unknown and, thus, be discovered as the • Absence of ATIS (or of English version of ATIS
approach-and-landing progresses message); and/or,
• Inaccurate or outdated ATIS information
Aircraft Equipment (absence of regular ATIS update, when
required).
• Use (or absence) of the following safety-
enhancing equipment:
− GPWS; Airport Air Traffic Control Services
− TAWS; • Absence or primary and/or secondary
surveillance radar;
− TCAS;
• Inadequate or ineffective radar vectoring
− Wind shear warning and guidance; and/or, practices;
− Predictive windshear system.

Approach Hazards Awareness – General


Page 2
AIRBUS INDUSTRIE Getting to Grips with
Flight Operations Support Approach-and-Landing Accidents Reduction

• Inadequate or non-standard air traffic control • Unsecured airport (i.e., absence of airport
procedures; perimeter fences, allowing vehicles, persons or
animals to access to runway or maneuvering
• Inadequate air traffic flow management; areas);
• Mixing of IFR and VFR traffics; • No illumination of wind sock or wind “T”;
• Frequent uncontrolled VFR traffics in airport and/or,
vicinity; • Faded painting of runway and/or taxiways
• Frequency congestion / controller overload markings.
caused by high density traffic or by a single
controller operating tower and ground
frequencies; Terrain
• Absence of adequate VHF coverage in known • Trees or man-made obstacles (antennas, ...)
FIR or TMA sectors; penetrating the obstacle clearance level;
• Inadequate coordination between international • Topographical features requiring unusual
and domestic FIRs; procedures and reduced safety margins; and/or,
• Absence of or failure to use landline • Terrain features resulting in GPWS activation
communications between two close airports; during approach.
and/or,
• Absence of English language proficiency in Refer to Briefing Note 5.2 – Terrain Awareness for
ATC communications and/or use of non- expanded information.
standard phraseology.

Visual Illusions
Airport Equipment • Airport environment (black hole, ...);
• Absence of / limited / low intensity approach • Runway environment; and/or,
and runway lighting (or part of it);
• Weather conditions.
• Non-standard runway-edge lights spacing;
• Absence of ILS; Refer to Briefing Note 5.3 – Visual Illusions
Awareness for expanded information.
• ILS unusable beyond a specific point (because
of obstacles) or below a specific altitude
(because of approach over water); Visibility
• ILS without OM; • Darkness, low visibility (rain, fog, mist, haze,
• ILS without VASI/PAPI to support the visual low lighting, smoke).
segment ;
• Offset VOR/DME approach; Wind conditions
• VOR/DME with inoperative DME; • Shifting or gusty wind, crosswind or tail wind;
• VOR incorrect calibration; and/or,

• NDB known as unreliable in adverse weather • Known frequent wind shear on final approach of
conditions; specific runway under adverse weather and / or
wind conditions.
• Non-precision or circling approach with
absence of VASI / PAPI; Refer to Briefing Note 5.4 – Wind Shear
Awareness for expanded information.
• VASI/PAPI being incorrectly calibrated or
inoperative;

Approach Hazards Awareness – General


Page 3
AIRBUS INDUSTRIE Getting to Grips with
Flight Operations Support Approach-and-Landing Accidents Reduction

Runway condition Decision-making and Countermeasures


• Wet, but known as slippery-when-wet;
A company awareness program on approach-and-
landing hazards should stress the following
• Contaminated with standing water, slush, snow elements of effective crew coordination and
or ice; decision-making:
• Heavy rubber deposit in touchdown zone; • Comply with standard operating procedures
(SOPs), published limitations, specific
• Reduced braking action; operational recommendations and flying
techniques;
• Insufficient water drainage or runway surface
condition leaving water puddles after rain; • Adjust and use the approach and go-around
and/or, briefings to heighten the flight crew awareness
of the specific hazards of the approach; and,
• Undulated surface in touchdown zone area.
• Anticipate and be prepared for the worst case
(i.e., “expecting the unexpected” by adopting a
Taxiways “What if ?” attitude);

• Absence of high-speed-exit taxiways; Prepare options to counter approach-and-


landing hazards, for example:
• Absence of parallel taxiway, thus requiring back
track on the active runway; and/or, − Request a precision approach into the wind,
whenever available;
• Non-standard taxiway marking and/or non-
standard signs. − Define next targets and an approach gate
that must be met for the approach to be
continued;
Low temperature operation
− Wait for better conditions (fuel permitting);
• Absence of a defined OAT threshold below or,
which, a temperature correction on published
altitudes is required. − Divert to an airport with better weather
conditions, wind conditions and/or runway
conditions.
Bird Strike Hazard

• Permanent or seasonal bird activity, without


available bird control program and squad.

Approach Hazards Awareness – General


Page 4
AIRBUS INDUSTRIE Getting to Grips with
Flight Operations Support Approach-and-Landing Accidents Reduction

Associated Briefing Notes

Dedicated Briefing Notes provide specific and


expanded information on the following approach
hazards:

• 5.2 - Terrain Awareness,

• 5.3 - Visual Illusions Awareness,

• 5.4 - Windshear Awareness,

• 6.1 - Being Prepared to Go-around,

• 6.3 - Terrain Avoidance (Pullup) Maneuver.

Associated Documents

The following documents published by the Flight


Safety Foundation should be considered also when
developing a company awareness program on
approach-and-landing hazards:

• Approach and Landing Risk Awareness


Tool/Checklist; and,

• Approach and Landing Risk Reduction


Planning Guide.

Approach Hazards Awareness – General


Page 5

You might also like